1
|
Olson RE, Wen EX, Staines Z, Goh F, Marshall HM. Imperatives of health or happiness: Narrative constructions of long-term smoking after undergoing lung screening. Health (London) 2023; 27:1115-1134. [PMID: 35668696 DOI: 10.1177/13634593221099108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco control policies reinforce a health imperative that positions citizens as duty-bound to manage their health by abstaining from or quitting smoking. Limited attention is paid to the repercussions - especially for lung screening - of anti-smoking rhetoric emphasising individual responsibility. Drawing on interviews with 27 long-term smokers involved in an international lung screening trial, this study analysed Australian smokers' narratives of smoking. By attending to stigma and the use of public health rhetoric within personal narratives, we show how narratives underscoring individual responsibility for quitting were layered with conflicting explanations of biological responsibility and normative expectations. Ironically, narratives of individual responsibility potentially undermine smoking cessation. In positioning smokers as responsible for their own healthy choices, such rhetoric also positions smokers as responsible for managing their emotional health, which some did through smoking. Thus, anti-smoking campaigns pit the neoliberal imperative of health against the happiness imperative. These findings have implications for the design and delivery of lung screening campaigns. They also support calls to move beyond health messaging emphasising individual choice, towards acknowledging the moral power of structures and public health campaigns to discipline citizens in unintended ways.
Collapse
|
2
|
Jäger M, Lindhardt MC, Pedersen JR, Dideriksen M, Nyberg M, Bricca A, Bodtger U, Midtgaard J, Skou ST. Putting the pieces together: A qualitative study exploring perspectives on self-management and exercise behavior among people living with multimorbidity, healthcare professionals, relatives, and patient advocates. JOURNAL OF MULTIMORBIDITY AND COMORBIDITY 2022; 12:26335565221100172. [PMID: 35615752 PMCID: PMC9125109 DOI: 10.1177/26335565221100172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Behavior change and exercise are considered critical for successful self-management in people with multimorbidity, however, little is known about people’s needs, experiences, and preferences. Purpose The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the perspectives of people living with multimorbidity, healthcare professionals, relatives, and patient advocates in relation to self-management and exercise behavior. Research design Analysis was carried out by means of a hybrid inductive-deductive approach using Framework Analysis that enabled the subsequent use of the COM-B model in relation to the study of exercise behavior specifically. Study sample We conducted 17 interviews (9 focus groups; 8 key informants) with 48 informants from four groups (22 people living with multimorbidity, 17 healthcare professionals, 5 relatives, and 5 patient advocates). Data analysis Through an inductive Framework analysis, we constructed three themes: Patient education, supporting behavior change, and lack of a “burning platform.” Subsequent deductive application of the COM-B profile (applied solely to data related to exercise behavior) unveiled a variety of barriers to exercise and self-management support (pain, fatigue, breathlessness, lack of motivation, financial issues, accessibility, decreased social support). Results Overall, the four groups shared common understandings while also expressing unique challenges. Conclusions Future interventions and/or policies targeting exercise behavior in people living with multimorbidity should address some of the barriers identified in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madalina Jäger
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.,Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark
| | | | - Julie Rønne Pedersen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Mette Dideriksen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.,Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Mette Nyberg
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Alessio Bricca
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.,Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Uffe Bodtger
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Næstved, Næstved, Denmark.,Institute for Regional Heath Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Julie Midtgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren T Skou
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.,Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nauta J, van Nassau F, Bouma AJ, Krops LA, van der Ploeg HP, Verhagen E, van der Woude LHV, van Keeken HG, Buffart LM, Diercks R, de Groot V, de Jong J, Kampshoff C, Stevens M, van den Akker-Scheek I, van der Leeden M, van Mechelen W, Dekker R. Facilitators and barriers for the implementation of exercise are medicine in routine clinical care in Dutch university medical centres: a mixed methodology study on clinicians' perceptions. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e052920. [PMID: 35292491 PMCID: PMC8928323 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite the many proven advantages of a physically active lifestyle in patient populations, prescription of exercise is currently not widely implemented in routine clinical practice. The aims of this study were twofold: (1) to assess perceptions of clinicians on the current practice of exercise is medicine (E=M) prescription in two Dutch university medical centres and (2) to determine their perceived barriers and facilitators for the implementation of E=M in routine clinical care in Dutch university medical centres. DESIGN A mixed methodologies study, using both online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. SETTING Dutch university medical centres. PARTICIPANTS Clinicians working within the departments of medical oncology, orthopaedics and rehabilitation medicine of two university medical centres. RESULTS Forty-five clinicians (response rate of 51%) completed the questionnaire, and 19 clinicians were interviewed. The results showed that even though clinicians had a positive attitude towards prescribing E=M, only a few reported to regularly prescribe E=M to their patients. The 52 identified facilitators and barriers for implementation of E=M were categorised into four main themes: (1) beliefs toward the implementation of E=M (eg, clinicians knowledge and skills, and social support), (2) factors related to the patient perspective (eg, patient priorities or motivation), (3) factors related to the referral options (eg, knowledge of and trust in local referral options) and (4) practical considerations when implementing E=M (eg, time constraints). CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that even though many clinicians have a positive attitude toward an active lifestyle, many are not prescribing E=M on a regular basis. In order for clinicians to effectively implement E=M, strategies should focus on increasing clinicians E=M referral skills, improving clinicians knowledge of E=M referral options and develop a support system to ensure that E=M is high on the priority list of clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joske Nauta
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Sports and Nutrition, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke van Nassau
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adrie J Bouma
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- School of Sports Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie A Krops
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hidde P van der Ploeg
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evert Verhagen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas H V van der Woude
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Helco G van Keeken
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - L M Buffart
- Department of Physiology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ron Diercks
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent de Groot
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan de Jong
- School of Sports Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Kampshoff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Stevens
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge van den Akker-Scheek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marike van der Leeden
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem van Mechelen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rienk Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|