1
|
Dudley M, Olson RE, Mescouto K, Setchell J. The good pain patient: a critical evaluation of patients' self-presentations in specialist pain clinics. HEALTH SOCIOLOGY REVIEW : THE JOURNAL OF THE HEALTH SECTION OF THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 2024; 33:306-324. [PMID: 38783523 DOI: 10.1080/14461242.2024.2350501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Established research supports collaborative patient-clinician communication as a means of improving pain management and decreasing opioid use by patients with chronic pain. However, much of this scholarship emphasises clinicians' capacities to shape and improve communication; limited research investigates patients' roles in this process. Drawing on 40 ethnographic observations of patient-clinician interactions, clinical spaces and case conferences within one specialist pain clinic in Brisbane, Australia, this paper investigates how and why patients present themselves in particular ways within consultations. Our theoretical lens combines concepts from Goffman on patienthood and stigma with Foucauldian theories of pastoral and disciplinary power. Findings suggest that elements of the clinical environment - namely posters - usher patients towards presenting in what we conceptualise as the 'good pain patient' role. In this role, patients demonstrate that they are moral, responsible, and contributing members of society. Yet, such a role is problematic to opening communication, with the role constraining what is socially acceptable for patients with chronic pain to say, do, or feel. In recognising how clinical contexts facilitate problematic good pain patient presentations, this paper directs attention to the spatial and relational nature of implicit clinical expectations and constrained good pain patient presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Dudley
- School of Social Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Rebecca E Olson
- School of Social Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Karime Mescouto
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Jenny Setchell
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mescouto K, Olson RE, Costa N, Evans K, Dillon M, Walsh K, Jensen N, Hodges PW, Lonergan K, Weier M, Setchell J. Fostering equitable change in health services: Using critical reflexivity to challenge dominant discourses in low back pain care in Australia. J Health Serv Res Policy 2024; 29:12-21. [PMID: 37553877 DOI: 10.1177/13558196231193862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Justice and equity-focused practices in health services play a critical but overlooked role in low back pain (LBP) care. Critical reflexivity - the ability to examine and challenge power relations, and broader social issues embedded in everyday life - can be a useful tool to foster practices that are more socially just. No research has yet explored this approach in back pain health services. This study sought to understand how clinicians construct LBP in relation to broader socio-cultural-political aspects of care and explore if those constructions changed when clinicians engaged with critically reflexive dialogues with researchers. METHODS Using critical discourse analysis methods, this qualitative study explored institutionalised patterns of knowledge in the construction of LBP care. We conducted 22 critically reflexive dialogues with 29 clinicians from two health services in Australia - a private physiotherapy clinic and a public multidisciplinary pain clinic. RESULTS Our analyses suggested that clinicians and services often constructed LBP care at an individual level. This dominant individualistic discourse constrained consideration of justice-oriented practices in the care of people with LBP. Through dialogues, discursive constructions of LBP care expanded to incorporate systems and health service workplace practices. This expansion fostered more equitable clinical and service practices - such as assisting patients to navigate health care systems, considering patients' socioeconomic circumstances when developing treatment plans, encouraging staff discussion of possible systemic changes to enhance justice, and fostering a more inclusive workplace culture. Although such expansions faced challenges, incorporating broader discourses enabled recommendations to address LBP care inequities. CONCLUSIONS Critical reflexivity can be a tool to foster greater social justice within health services. By expanding constructions of LBP care beyond individuals, critical reflexive dialogues can foster discussion and actions towards more equitable workplace cultures, services and systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karime Mescouto
- Postdoctoral Research Fellow, RECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Rebecca E Olson
- Associate Professor, School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nathalia Costa
- Lecturer in Physiotherapy, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adjunct Research Fellow, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Kerrie Evans
- Group Chief Education and Research Officer, Healthia Limited, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Senior Research Fellow, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Miriam Dillon
- PhD Candidate, School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Kelly Walsh
- Senior Physiotherapist, Metro South Health Pain Rehabilitation Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Niamh Jensen
- Clinical Psychologist, Metro South Health Pain Rehabilitation Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Paul W Hodges
- Professor & NHMRC Leadership Fellow, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Megan Weier
- Senior Lecturer, Centre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenny Setchell
- Senior Research Fellow, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mescouto K, Olson RE, Setchell J. Towards an ethical multiplicity in low back pain care: Practising beyond the biopsychosocial model. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2023; 45:522-541. [PMID: 36541421 PMCID: PMC10947319 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The biopsychosocial model is currently considered by most researchers and clinicians to be the best approach to low back pain (LBP) care. The model was popularised in LBP care in response to some clear deficiencies in earlier biomedical approaches and is now widely recommended in clinical guidelines and policy statements. Yet the biopsychosocial approach has also been critiqued for its narrow conceptualisation and application. In this article, we explore how attending to the multidimensionality of LBP in practice goes beyond a biopsychosocial approach. We engaged with 90 ethnographic observations of clinical practices, 22 collaborative dialogues with clinicians, and eight consultatory meetings with people with experience of LBP to consider the sociomaterialities of clinical practices in two settings: a private physiotherapy practice and a public multidisciplinary pain clinic. Drawing on the work of Annemarie Mol and Rosi Braidotti, our analyses suggest that sociomaterial practices, involving human and non-human actors, produced multiple objects of clinical attention and ethical concerns about how to attend to this multiplicity well. We argue that the multiplicity of LBP is attended well by reimagining: (1) clinical settings as 'becoming more-than-sterile environments' where objects, furniture and elements such as tears and laughter help to provide a relational, welcoming and comfortable space to all bodies with LBP; (2) differences through 'becoming minoritarian' where considering power relations allows actions towards connectiveness and belonging; and (3) disciplinary boundaries through 'becoming interdisciplinary within' where actions expand traditional scopes of practice. The flux of these multiple becomings moves clinical practice and conceptualisations beyond the biopsychosocial approach to consider a new ethico-onto-epistemological approach to LBP care. They invite clinical practices that engage with an ethical multiplicity of LBP care, providing a better understanding of how places, objects, emotions, power, bodies and professions are interconnected and come together in everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karime Mescouto
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | | | - Jenny Setchell
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|