Narratives about distributed health literacy during the COVID-19 pandemic

The role of health literacy in the association between social support and self-rated health: a Danish population-based study in 10,787 individuals with a long-term condition

BACKGROUND

Managing a long-term condition requires higher health literacy. Social networks may play a crucial role for self-management. However, the pathway is not entirely understood. This study aimed to examine whether the association between social support and self-rated health is mediated by health literacy among individuals with a long-term condition.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from the "How are you?" 2021 survey in Central Denmark Region. Social support was assessed using a single question, health literacy with two dimensions from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ): 'Understanding health information' and 'Engaging with healthcare providers', and self-rated health with a single question from SF-36. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations, and multiple mediation analyses were performed using the Karlson-Holm-Breen method.

RESULTS

A total of 10,787 individuals with a long-term condition were included in the study, whereas 6% (n = 595) reported a low level of social support. Both health literacy scales mediated the association between social support and self-rated health, particularly the ability to engage with healthcare providers, accounting for 25% of the variance. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, individuals with a low level of social support had significantly higher odds of reporting difficulties in understanding health information (OR 2.53 (95% CI: 1.84-3.48)) and engaging with healthcare providers (OR 3.77 (95% CI: 2.96-4.79)).

CONCLUSIONS

Health literacy, particularly the ability to engage with healthcare providers, was a mediator between social support and self-rated health. Additionally, a low level of social support was associated with higher odds of reporting lower health literacy. These findings suggest that strategies to enhance health literacy, improve health outcomes, and reduce health inequities may benefit from strengthening individuals' social network, particularly focusing on those with limited support.

Swiss residents' information behavior perceptions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal qualitative study

People's information behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic was challenged through vast amounts of information, misinformation, and disinformation. This study sets out to address the research gap of longitudinal, qualitative inquiries about how people's information behavior changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. It aims to assess how residents of German-speaking Switzerland perceived and evaluated information gathering during a global health crisis. As part of the "Solidarity in Times of a Pandemic" (SolPan) Research Commons, 83 semi-structured interviews with residents of German-speaking Switzerland were conducted in April 2020 (T1), October 2020 (T2), and October 2021 (T3). People were asked about their lived experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative data analysis followed a reflexive thematic analysis approach, using Wilson's model of information behavior as a theoretical framework. Participants perceived high-quality journalistic news media, the Swiss national government, scientific experts, and their direct social environment as trustworthy information sources. They were motivated to gather information through the wish of gaining agency and certainty in the context of a major, global health crisis. Intervening variables that hindered information seeking included a perceived lack of agency, habituation effects in the later stages of the pandemic, information overload, inconsistent information, and conspiracy theories. While information needs were generally high in T1, participants expressed a growing extent of information fatigue in T2. In T3, the most prominent themes were conflicting information and differing interpretations, which led to an increased perception of societal polarization, which was perceived as a direct consequence of participants' information behavior. This finding is contextualized through established models of attitude formation: The study indicates how participants formed rather stable attitudes over time and how this led to a growing polarization and societal segmentation as the pandemic progressed. Practical implications regarding how to meet such societal polarization during crises are discussed.