Examining professionals' and parents' views of using transanal irrigation with children: Understanding their experiences to develop a shared health resource for education and practise

The role of stomas in the initial and long-term management of Hirschsprung disease

AIM

To review the role of stomas in the initial and long-term management of Hirschsprung disease (HD).

METHODS

Patients treated for HD at our institution between January 2004 and August 2021 were identified. Data were collected regarding: demographics, indication/bowel location/type of stomas performed and outcomes, pull-through (PT) procedure, and follow-up duration.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients (78 male) were identified including one early unrelated death. Forty-four of 94 (47%) required a stoma before PT procedure. Of these 44, 38 (86%) had ileostomies and the remaining six (14%) colostomies; one ileostomy remains long-term. The commonest indication for initial stomas was washout failure (41%). Ninety-one patients had undergone primary PT or secondary PT with stoma closure at the time of the study. A further new stoma was required after primary PT or three-stage management in 20/91 (22%). The commonest indications were constipation/soiling (25%) and anastomotic leak (20%). Seven out of 20 (35%) were performed within 30 days of a previous procedure and all were closed; three patients required further long-term stomas. Thirteen (65%) required a stoma >30 days, nine remain long-term. Surgical revision of stomas was required in 14/56 (25%) - prolapse and retraction being the commonest indications. Overall, 56/94 (60%) patients required stomas (pre- and/or post-PT) to manage their condition and 13/94 (14%) have a long-term stoma in place. Mean follow-up was 7.8 years (0.5 - 17.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Stomas remain an integral part of HD management both initially (47%) and long-term (14%); they carry a considerable associated morbidity. Ileostomy is preferred for initial management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The art of introducing clean intermittent catheterization: How families respond and adapt: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Since its inception >50 years ago, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) has become ubiquitous in managing lower urinary tract dysfunction in children. Emphasis has been on its impact on daily life, but little on its implementation and adjustment in families. The aim of the current study was to discover how families learned to implement and manage their child's CIC needs by interviewing caregivers, adolescents, and young adults about their experiences. Interviews were designed to uncover facilitators and barriers to beginning CIC to initiate potential improvements in a multidisciplinary approach.

METHODS

A semi-structured interview guide was developed and piloted initially to 12 families for validation. Between August 2018 and October 2019, 40 families (52 interviews of caregivers and patients >12 years) were then interviewed with open-ended questions interspersed with more specific ones to generate discussion. Transcripts were coded using Dedoose software to create a base list with emergent codes. Inductive and deductive methods were employed to generate themes. Consensus was reached during successive team meetings.

RESULTS

Five major and several subthemes emerged regarding implementation of CIC by caregivers and patients learning CIC for the first time. THEME 1: Parental reaction to CIC: Caregivers described benefits of an adjustment period on learning their child's need for CIC. Prenatal information to caregivers of spina bifida children gave them time to mentally process the need for CIC. THEME 2: Ease of learning CIC: impact of age and gender: caregivers identified advantages of initiating CIC in infancy. Caregivers speculated CIC was physically easier in boys than girls due to meatus location. Developmentally ready children expressed a desire for independence and privacy as they learned to initiate CIC. THEME 3: The impact of additional caregiver support in learning and performing CIC: presence of multiple caregivers optimized learning and implementation of CIC. Having secondary caregivers available provided peace of mind and more flexibility in maintaining reliable CIC care. Patients learning CIC found it helpful to have a parent present at the teaching session. Occasionally, female caregivers reported feelings of anger and frustration when male caregivers were reluctant to be involved in catheterization, irrespective of their child's gender. THEME 4: Satisfaction with healthcare team's approach: The healthcare team's responsiveness to their learning needs affected how they mastered CIC. The healthcare team's teaching and reassurance helped build caregiver confidence. Developmentally appropriate children were able to learn self-catheterization when supported by the healthcare team. Patients learning self-CIC articulated having a supportive healthcare team was helpful with implementation. THEME 5: Effect of CIC on employment status relative to job changes, insurance, and daycare: implementing and performing CIC presented a spectrum of issues related to employment. Educating employers regarding CIC facilitated a caregiver's ability to both remain at work and administer to their child. Caregivers underscored the importance of adequate insurance when considering employment choices. Concerns about daycare availability affected caregivers' work schedules.

CONCLUSIONS

It is anticipated this information will aid healthcare personnel to more effectively teach and initiate CIC in families, and in individuals learning for the first time. The findings should serve as the basis for conducting future patient satisfaction studies, which would determine the effectiveness and reproducibility of these approaches.