The slippery slope of flubromazolam: Experiences of a novel psychoactive benzodiazepine as discussed on a Swedish online forum

Designer benzodiazepine dependence and the difficulties of outpatient management; a case report

BACKGROUND

Novel psychoactive substances, such as designer benzodiazepines (DBZD), are a growing public health concern. There are about 30 different DZBDs reported, which can vary widely in their effect and potential for harmful outcomes, ranging from agitation to confusion to coma. Despite the scope of this widespread phenomena, little information on the management of DBZD dependence is available in the literature.

CASE

In this case report, we present a patient with DBZD dependence requesting assistance tapering off the DBZD, clonazolam. He began self-medicating with clonazolam seven years prior for panic attacks to the point he was using 40 drops per day and having significant withdrawal during the day. He was prescribed gabapentin for his underlying anxiety while he tapered his clonazolam dose. Once he achieved a 75% reduction in his use of clonazolam, he had trouble managing withdrawal and anxiety symptoms and could not taper further.

DISCUSSION

We discuss the challenges of treating patients with DBZD use disorder in an outpatient setting. Switching a patient from a DZBD to a prescription benzodiazepine for the purposes of a taper can be dangerous as an outpatient due to the inability to monitor at-home DBZD usage and the resulting risk of overdose. DBZDs can also be highly potent and make it difficult to achieve success using current withdrawal guidelines.

No prescription? No problem: A qualitative study investigating self-medication with novel psychoactive substances (NPS)

BACKGROUND

The proliferation of Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) presents a challenge for global drug policy. The ease of online drug purchase and the emergence of the dark web have created new avenues for the growth of NPS. Despite the global nature of this issue, limited research has examined motivations of use. These include perceived safety or convenience, an interest in novel pharmacology and self-exploration. Recent evidence has suggested individuals may be self-medicating with NPS, however this phenomenon has yet to be thoroughly explored. This study aims to investigate the occurrence of NPS self-medication, identify the specific NPS involved, and understand the motivations behind their use.

METHODS

Discussions surrounding self-medication using NPS were collected between October 2022 and February 2023 via a content analysis of a Reddit community. Ninety-three threads, comprising 182,490 words and 5023 comments, were collected and cleaned. A frequency analysis was conducted to identify the NPS discussed, and data was analysed systematically through the process of iterative categorization (IC).

RESULTS

Our study revealed frequent discussions about the self-medication with several NPS, notably etizolam, clonazolam, diclazepam, flualprazolam, 2-FMA, 4F-MPH, 3-FPM and 3-MeO-PCP. Individuals were mainly self-treating ADHD, anxiety and depression. Motivations for choosing NPS included access, cost, legality and a dissatisfaction with conventional healthcare. Substances were often chosen based on a profile of "Functionality" and outcomes varied. The use of clonazolam was highlighted as particularly problematic.

CONCLUSION

The current study provides insight into the phenomenon of self-medication with NPS within an internet demographic, exploring the motivations behind why individuals choose NPS for a variety of disorders. The easy access to NPS and lack of scientific data pose a significant challenge for drug policy. Future policies should focus on improving healthcare providers knowledge of NPS use, removing barriers to adult ADHD diagnosis and rebuilding trust between individuals and addiction services.

Novel Designer Benzodiazepines: Comprehensive Review of Evolving Clinical and Adverse Effects

As tranquilizers, benzodiazepines have a wide range of clinical uses. Recently, there has been a significant rise in the number of novel psychoactive substances, including designer benzodiazepines. Flubromazolam(8-bromo-6-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-methyl-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]benzodiazeZpine) is a triazolo-analogue of flubromazepam. The most common effects noted by recreational users include heavy hypnosis and sedation, long-lasting amnesia, and rapid development of tolerance. Other effects included anxiolysis, muscle-relaxing effects, euphoria, loss of control, and severe withdrawals. Clonazolam, or 6-(2-chlorophenyl)-1-methyl-8-nitro-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-α]-[1,4]-benzodiazepine, is a triazolo-analog of clonazepam. It is reported to be over twice as potent as alprazolam. Deschloroetizolam (2-Ethyl-9-methyl-4-phenyl-6H-thieno[3,2-f][1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]diazepine) is part of the thienodiazepine drug class, which, like benzodiazepines, stimulates GABA-A receptors. Meclonazepam ((3S)-5-(2-chlorophenyl)-3-methyl-7-nitro-1,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one) is a designer benzodiazepine with additional anti-parasitic effects. Although it has proven to be an efficacious therapy for schistosomiasis, its sedative side effects have prevented it from being marketed as a therapeutic agent. The use of DBZs has been a subject of multiple recent clinical studies, likely related to increasing presence and availability on the internet drug market and lack of regulation. Many studies have aimed to identify the prevalence of DBZs and their effects on those using them. This review discussed these designer benzodiazepines and the dangers and adverse effects that the clinician should know.

Adulteration of low-THC products with synthetic cannabinoids: Results from drug checking services

Since late 2019, low‐delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) preparations adulterated with synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) have been frequently observed in Switzerland. The unawareness of users concerning the presence of SCs and the typically higher potency and toxicity of SCs, when compared with THC, can result in increased health risks. In Switzerland, low‐THC (<1%) cannabis products, except hashish, are legal. These products can act as carrier materials for SCs. In this study, cannabis samples and user self‐reports received through three drug checking services were collected and analysed, to gain deeper insight into this new phenomenon. Samples were collected from January 2020 to July 2021. Liquid chromatography coupled with high‐resolution mass spectrometry was used for the qualitative screening and semi‐quantification of SCs, while gas chromatography with flame ionization detector was applied for the quantification of THC and cannabidiol levels. Reported adverse effects were compared between users who consumed adulterated (SC‐group) and non‐adulterated (THC‐group) products. Of a total 94 samples, 50% contained up to three different SCs. MDMB‐4en‐PINACA was most often detected. All adulterated cannabis flowers contained ≤1% THC. Adulterated hashish also typically presented low THC‐levels (median: 0.8%). The SC‐group was associated with higher numbers of adverse events (p = 0.041). Furthermore, psychologic (p = 0.0007) and cardiologic (p = 0.020) adverse effects were more profound in the SC‐group than in the THC‐group. Drug checking services enabled the timely detection and monitoring of new and potentially dangerous trends. Furthermore, due to user‐reports, additional valuable information was gained on adverse events associated with the consumption of novel SCs.

A case of fatal multidrug intoxication involving flualprazolam: distribution in body fluids and solid tissues

Purpose

Designer benzodiazepines (DBZDs) increasingly emerged on the novel psychoactive substance (NPS) market in the last few years. They are usually sold as readily available alternatives to prescription benzodiazepines (BZDs) or added to counterfeit medicines. BZDs are generally considered relatively safe drugs due to the low risk of serious acute adverse effects in mono-intoxication, though e.g., alprazolam seems to display an elevated risk of respiratory depression. Here we report on a fatal intoxication involving the novel DBZD flualprazolam.

Methods

A complete postmortem examination was performed. General unknown screenings and analysis of drugs of abuse were performed on postmortem samples by immunoassay, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. The standard addition method was employed to quantify flualprazolam in postmortem blood and tissues. Finally, a toxicological significance score (TSS) was assigned.

Results

Flualprazolam was detected in heart serum (25.4 ng/mL) and peripheral blood (21.9 ng/mL) as well as in urine, stomach contents, brain, liver and kidney (65.2–323 ng/g). The cause of death was deemed as central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory depression with agonal aspiration of stomach contents, in the setting of a multiple drug intake. Given the concentration levels of the co-consumed CNS depressants, the contribution of flualprazolam to the death was considered likely (TSS of 3).

Conclusions

Our results support that highly potent DBZDs like flualprazolam carry an elevated risk for unintended toxicity, especially in association with other CNS depressants. A multidisciplinary evaluation of fatalities remains mandatory, especially when pharmacological/toxicological data on intoxicating compounds are lacking. To our knowledge this is the first report of flualprazolam concentrations in solid tissues in human.

Designer Benzodiazepines: A Review of Toxicology and Public Health Risks

The rising use of designer benzodiazepines (DBZD) is a cat-and-mouse game between organized crime and law enforcement. Non-prohibited benzodiazepines are introduced onto the global drug market and scheduled as rapidly as possible by international authorities. In response, DBZD are continuously modified to avoid legal sanctions and drug seizures and generally to increase the abuse potential of the DBZD. This results in an unpredictable fluctuation between the appearance and disappearance of DBZD in the illicit market. Thirty-one DBZD were considered for review after consulting the international early warning database, but only 3-hydroxyphenazepam, adinazolam, clonazolam, etizolam, deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, meclonazepam, phenazepam and pyrazolam had sufficient data to contribute to this scoping review. A total of 49 reports describing 1 drug offense, 2 self-administration studies, 3 outpatient department admissions, 44 emergency department (ED) admissions, 63 driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) and 141 deaths reported between 2008 and 2021 are included in this study. Etizolam, flualprazolam flubromazolam and phenazepam were implicated in the majority of adverse-events, drug offenses and deaths. However, due to a general lack of knowledge of DBZD pharmacokinetics and toxicity, and due to a lack of validated analytical methods, total cases are much likely higher. Between 2019 and April 2020, DBZD were identified in 48% and 83% of postmortem and DUID cases reported to the UNODC, respectively, with flualprazolam, flubromazolam and etizolam as the most frequently detected substances. DBZD toxicology, public health risks and adverse events are reported.

Quantification of Flualprazolam in Blood by LC-MS-MS: A Case Series of Nine Deaths

The emergence of novel designer benzodiazepines continues to be a public health concern. Flualprazolam is one of these drugs. It was initially identified in 2017. User forums suggest it is slightly more potent than alprazolam and has longer-lasting central nervous system depressant effects. Here we report a simple, sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for flualprazolam and report a series of nine cases in which flualprazolam was quantified. As is typical of forensic toxicology in the twenty-first century, all the cases had more than one drug present. None of the deaths could be directly attributed to flualprazolam alone, but all were likely due to a combination of sedative drugs. However, this paper still adds to the data available to allow interpretation of postmortem flualprazolam concentrations.

Overview of the major classes of new psychoactive substances, psychoactive effects, analytical determination and conformational analysis of selected illegal drugs

The misuse of psychoactive substances is attracting a great deal of attention from the general public. An increase use of psychoactive substances is observed among young people who do not have enough awareness of the harmful effects of these substances. Easy access to illicit drugs at low cost and lack of effective means of routine screening for new psychoactive substances (NPS) have contributed to the rapid increase in their use. New research and evidence suggest that drug use can cause a variety of adverse psychological and physiological effects on human health (anxiety, panic, paranoia, psychosis, and seizures). We describe different classes of these NPS drugs with emphasis on the methods used to identify them and the identification of their metabolites in biological specimens. This is the first review that thoroughly gives the literature on both natural and synthetic illegal drugs with old known data and very hot new topics and investigations, which enables the researcher to use it as a starting point in the literature exploration and planning of the own research. For the first time, the conformational analysis was done for selected illegal drugs, giving rise to the search of the biologically active conformations both theoretically and using lab experiments.

Blood Concentrations of Designer Benzodiazepines: Relation to Impairment and Findings in Forensic Cases

The use of designer benzodiazepines appears to be increasing in many countries, but data concerning blood concentrations are scarce, making interpretation of concentrations difficult. The aim of this study was to report blood concentrations of clonazolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam and phenazepam and to investigate the relationship between blood concentrations and impairment. The concentration data are from blood samples collected from living cases (apprehended drivers and other drug offences) and medico-legal autopsies. The blood samples were analysed for the seven designer benzodiazepines mentioned above by ultra high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Positive cases from between 1 June 2016 and 30 September 2019 were included. Blood concentrations and the conclusion from a clinical test of impairment (when available) are reported. The presented seven benzodiazepines were detected in a total of 575 cases, where 554 of these cases concerned apprehended drivers or other criminal offenders. The number of findings and the median (range) concentrations were as follows: clonazolam, n = 22, 0.0041 mg/L (0.0017–0.053 mg/L); diclazepam, n = 334, 0.0096 mg/L (0.0016–0.25 mg/L); etizolam, n = 40, 0.054 mg/L (0.015–0.30 mg/L); flualprazolam, n = 10, 0.0080 mg/L (0.0033–0.056 mg/L); flubromazepam, n = 5, 0.037 mg/L (0.0070–0.70 mg/L); flubromazolam, n = 20, 0.0056 mg/L (0.0004–0.036 mg/L); and phenazepam, n = 138, 0.022 mg/L (0.0018–0.85 mg/L). A designer benzodiazepine was the only drug detected with relevance for impairment in 25 of the 554 living cases. The physician concluded with impairment in 19 of the 25 cases. Most of the concentrations in these cases were relatively similar to or higher than the median reported concentrations. The most frequent other drugs detected were amphetamine, tetrahydrocannabinol, clonazepam and methamphetamine. The presented blood concentrations can be helpful with the interpretation of cases involving one or more of these seven benzodiazepines. The results indicate that concentrations commonly observed in forensic cases are associated with impairment.

New psychoactive substances: a review and updates

New psychoactive substances (NPS) are a heterogeneous group of substances. They are associated with a number of health and social harms on an individual and societal level. NPS toxicity and dependence syndromes are recognised in primary care, emergency departments, psychiatric inpatient and community care settings. One pragmatic classification system is to divide NPS into one of four groups: synthetic stimulants, synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic hallucinogens and synthetic depressants (which include synthetic opioids and benzodiazepines). We review these four classes of NPS, including their chemical structures, mechanism of action, modes of use, intended intoxicant effects, and their associated physical and mental health harms. The current challenges faced by laboratory testing for NPS are also explored, in the context of the diverse range of NPS currently available, rate of production and emergence of new substances, the different formulations, and methods of acquisition and distribution.

Flubromazolam: Detection in five post-mortem cases

Flubromazolam is a potent triazole benzodiazepine with moderately long-lasting central nervous system-depressant effects relative to other benzodiazepines such as commonly prescribed diazepam. Flubromazolam has been studied in the living. However, there are no published reports including measured drug concentrations in post-mortem cases. We report five cases in which flubromazolam was detected in a systematic screen using high-resolution mass spectrometry and then quantified in femoral blood. In none of the five cases was the cause of death directly attributed to flubromazolam toxicity, as there was a variety of both sedative and stimulant drugs also present. However, it is important that the drug concentrations that were measured are made available for future post-mortem forensic interpretation.

Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects

Psychoactive substances with chemical structures or pharmacological profiles that are similar to traditional drugs of abuse continue to emerge on the recreational drug market. Internet vendors may at least temporarily sell these so-called designer drugs without adhering to legal statutes or facing legal consequences. Overall, the mechanism of action and adverse effects of designer drugs are similar to traditional drugs of abuse. Stimulants, such as amphetamines and cathinones, primarily interact with monoamine transporters and mostly induce sympathomimetic adverse effects. Agonism at μ-opioid receptors and γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) or GABAB receptors mediates the pharmacological effects of sedatives, which may induce cardiorespiratory depression. Dissociative designer drugs primarily act as N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists and pose similar health risks as the medically approved dissociative anesthetic ketamine. The cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptor is thought to drive the psychoactive effects of synthetic cannabinoids, which are associated with a less desirable effect profile and more severe adverse effects compared with cannabis. Serotonergic 5-hydroxytryptamine-2A (5-HT2A) receptors mediate alterations of perception and cognition that are induced by serotonergic psychedelics. Because of their novelty, designer drugs may remain undetected by routine drug screening, thus hampering evaluations of adverse effects. Intoxication reports suggest that several designer drugs are used concurrently, posing a high risk for severe adverse effects and even death.

Twenty percent better with 20 micrograms? A qualitative study of psychedelic microdosing self-rapports and discussions on YouTube

BACKGROUND

Psychedelic microdosing is the trending practice of using tiny repeated doses of psychedelic substances to facilitate a range of supposed benefits. With only a few published studies to date, the subject is still under-researched, and more knowledge is warranted. Social media and internet discussion forums have played a vital role in the growing visibility of the microdosing phenomenon, and the present study utilized YouTube contents to improve comprehension of the microdosing practice as well as the social interactions and discussions around microdosing.

METHODS

Microdosing self-disclosure in YouTube videos and their following comments were qualitatively analyzed by inductive thematic analysis. Various software was utilized to enable gathering and sorting relevant data.

RESULTS

Microdosing of psychedelic substances, primarily LSD and psilocybin, was used for therapeutic and enhancement purposes, and predominantly beneficial effects were reported. Many different applications and outcomes were discussed, and therapeutic effects for depression appeared especially noteworthy. Intentions for use were recognized as an influencing factor for the progression and outcomes of microdosing. The function of social interactions was mainly to discuss views on the microdosing phenomenon, strategies for optimal results, minimize risks, and share emotional support.

CONCLUSIONS

Potentially, microdosing could provide some of the same benefits (for certain conditions) as full-dose interventions with less risk of adverse reactions related to the sometimes intense experiences of higher doses. Microdosing may well also mean additional benefits, as well as risks, through the repeated exposure over extended periods.

Flubromazolam overdose: A review of a new designer benzodiazepine and the role of flumazenil

Designer products, a term referring to analogs of known chemical compounds with no established medical use, represent an easily accessible alternative to prescription-only products. During the past decade, designer benzodiazepines have become widely available on the online forums. Although these agents offer individuals an inexpensive and accessible alternative to prescription-only products, they are not without risk. Because of the lack of federally enforced quality standards, these designer products come with an intrinsic risk of unpredictable and potentially toxic adverse effects. This article presents a 36-year-old male with prolonged bradycardia resulting from the use of flubromazolam, a designer benzodiazepine purchased from the Internet. A PubMed search was conducted for flubromazolam, designer benzodiazepine, and flumazenil. This article will summarize the available literature regarding flubromazolam and the role of flumazenil in managing these overdoses.

Occurrence and time course of NPS benzodiazepines in Sweden - results from intoxication cases in the STRIDA project

CONTEXT

In recent years, many unclassified benzodiazepines (BZD) have appeared through online sale as new psychoactive substances (NPS). This study describes bioanalytical and clinical data related to intoxications involving NPS BZD ("designer BZD") in the Swedish STRIDA project.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series of consecutive patients with admitted or suspected intake of NPS presenting to hospitals all over Sweden for emergency treatment in 2012-2016.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Urine samples collected in the STRIDA project were analyzed for 28 NPS BZD, using immunoassay and liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry . Data of patient's age, gender, reported substance exposure, clinical signs, and treatment were obtained from medical and Poisons Information Center (PIC) records.

RESULTS

A total of fifteen different NPS BZD were analytically confirmed in 217 of 1913 (11%) cases involving patients (81% men) aged 15-66 (mean 28) years. The frequency of positive samples increased from 4% in 2012 to 19% in 2015. Etizolam (20 cases) was the first detected NPS BZD (January 2012), and it was followed by metizolam (four cases), estazolam (two), pyrazolam (33), flubromazepam (33), nifoxipam (five), diclazepam (four), meclonazepam (26), bromazepam (one), flubromazolam (92), deschloroetizolam (one), clonazolam (16), 3-hydroxyphenazepam (eight), ketazolam (one), and phenazepam (one). Most cases (89%) also involved other drugs. Use of NPS BZD was rarely (15%) reported during PIC consultation. In 24 patients exposed only to NPS BZD, CNS depression was the most prominent clinical sign, seven were observed in the intensive care unit, and they responded positively to flumazenil treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

An increasing use of NPS BZD in Sweden was detected in acute intoxication cases, sometimes leading to intensive care monitoring and support needs.

Psychoactive substances as a last resort-a qualitative study of self-treatment of migraine and cluster headaches

BACKGROUND

Treatment resistant cluster headache and migraine patients are exploring alternative treatments online. The aim of this study was to improve comprehension regarding the use of non-established or alternative pharmacological treatments used by sufferers of cluster headaches and migraines.

METHODS

A qualitative thematic analysis of the users' own accounts presented in online forum discussions were conducted. The forum boards https://shroomery.org/ , http://bluelight.org , and https://clusterbusters.org/ met the inclusion criteria and were used for the study.

RESULTS

The analysis resulted in six themes: a desperate need for effective treatments; the role of the forum-finding alternative treatments and community support; alternative treatment substances; dosage and regimens; effects and treatment results; and adverse effects. The results provide an insight into why, how, and by which substances and methods sufferers seek relief from cluster headache and migraines.

CONCLUSIONS

These patients are in a desperate and vulnerable situation, and illicit psychoactive substances are often considered a last resort. There appeared to be little or no interest in psychoactive effects per se as these were rather tolerated or avoided by using sub-psychoactive doses. Primarily, psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide, and related psychedelic tryptamines were reportedly effective for both prophylactic and acute treatment of cluster headache and migraines. Treatment results with cannabis were more unpredictable. No severe adverse events were reported, but it was observed how desperation sometimes spurred risky behavior when obtaining and testing various treatment alternatives. The forum discourse mainly revolved around maximizing treatment results and minimizing potential harms.