Acute lower GI bleeding for the acute care surgeon: current diagnosis and management

Massive Rectal Hemorrhage From a Stercoral Ulcer

Massive lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding from stercoral ulcers is exceedingly rare. We report a case of a middle-aged man who presented with progressively deteriorating neurologic function with constipation and subsequent massive GI bleeding per rectum. While an uncommon cause of GI bleeding, such patients require rapid resuscitation and timely diagnosis of these ulcers since the usual management of such cases will be futile and harmful due to potentially inappropriate surgical bowel resection.

Laparoscopy in Emergency: Why Not? Advantages of Laparoscopy in Major Emergency: A Review

A laparoscopic approach is suggested with the highest grade of recommendation for acute cholecystitis, perforated gastroduodenal ulcers, acute appendicitis, gynaecological disorders, and non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP). To date, the main qualities of laparoscopy for these acute surgical scenarios are clearly stated: quicker surgery, faster recovery and shorter hospital stay. For the remaining surgical emergencies, as well as for abdominal trauma, the role of laparoscopy is still a matter of debate. Patients might benefit from a laparoscopic approach only if performed by experienced teams and surgeons which guarantee a high standard of care. More precisely, laparoscopy can limit damage to the tissue and could be effective for the reduction of the overall amount of cell debris, which is a result of the intensity with which the immune system reacts to the injury and the following symptomatology. In fact, these fragments act as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). DAMPs, as well as pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), are recognised by both surface and intracellular receptors of the immune cells and activate the cascade which, in critically ill surgical patients, is responsible for a deranged response. This may result in the development of progressive and multiple organ dysfunctions, manifesting with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), coagulopathy, liver dysfunction and renal failure. In conclusion, none of the emergency surgical scenarios preclude laparoscopy, provided that the surgical tactic could ensure sufficient cleaning of the abdomen in addition to resolving the initial tissue damage caused by the “trauma”.

Tranexamic Acid for Lower GI Hemorrhage: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Lower GI hemorrhage is a common source of morbidity and mortality. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic that has been shown to reduce blood loss in a variety of clinical conditions. Information regarding the use of tranexamic acid in treating lower GI hemorrhage is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this trial was to determine the clinical efficacy of tranexamic acid when used for lower GI hemorrhage.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a tertiary referral university hospital in Australia.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients aged >18 years with lower GI hemorrhage requiring hospital admission from November 2011 to January 2014 were screened for trial eligibility (N = 265).

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 100 patients were recruited after exclusions and were randomly assigned 1:1 to either tranexamic acid or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was blood loss as determined by reduction in hemoglobin levels. The secondary outcomes were transfusion rates, transfusion volume, intervention rates for bleeding, length of hospital stay, readmission, and complication rates.

RESULTS

There was no difference between groups with respect to hemoglobin drop (11 g/L of tranexamic acid vs 13 g/L of placebo; p = 0.9445). There was no difference with respect to transfusion rates (14/49 tranexamic acid vs 16/47 placebo; p = 0.661), mean transfusion volume (1.27 vs 1.93 units; p = 0.355), intervention rates (7/49 vs 13/47; p = 0.134), length of hospital stay (4.67 vs 4.74 d; p = 0.934), readmission, or complication rates. No complications occurred as a direct result of tranexamic acid use.

LIMITATIONS

A larger multicenter trial may be required to determine whether there are more subtle advantages with tranexamic acid use in some of the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Tranexamic acid does not appear to decrease blood loss or improve clinical outcomes in patients presenting with lower GI hemorrhage in the context of this trial. see Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A453.

An approach to acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common problem that can be treated via a number of endoscopic, radiological and surgical approaches. Although traditionally managed by the colorectal surgeons, surgery should be considered a last resort given the variety of endoscopic and radiological approaches available. This article provides an overview on the common causes of acute LGIB and the various techniques at our disposal to control it.

Neural network prediction of severe lower intestinal bleeding and the need for surgical intervention

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients with severe acute lower intestinal bleeding (ALIB) may be assessed by complex artificial neural networks (ANNs) or user-friendly regression-based models. Comparisons between these modalities are limited, and predicting the need for surgical intervention remains elusive. We hypothesized that ANNs would outperform the Strate rule to predict severe bleeding and would also predict the need for surgical intervention.

METHODS

We performed a 4-y retrospective analysis of 147 adult patients who underwent endoscopy, angiography, or surgery for ALIB. Baseline characteristics, Strate risk factors, management parameters, and outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were severe bleeding and surgical intervention. ANNs were created in SPSS. Models were compared by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The number of Strate risk factors for each patient correlated significantly with the outcome of severe bleeding (r = 0.29, P < 0.001). However, the Strate model was less accurate than an ANN (AUROC 0.66 [0.57-0.75] versus 0.98 [0.95-1.00], respectively) which incorporated six variables present on admission: hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, outpatient prescription for Aspirin 325 mg daily, Charlson comorbidity index, base deficit ≥5 mEq/L, and international normalized ratio ≥1.5. A similar ANN including hemoglobin nadir and the occurrence of a 20% decrease in hematocrit was effective in predicting the need for surgery (AUROC 0.95 [0.90-1.00]).

CONCLUSIONS

The Strate prediction rule effectively stratified risk for severe ALIB, but was less accurate than an ANN. A separate ANN accurately predicted the need for surgery by combining risk factors for severe bleeding with parameters quantifying blood loss. Optimal prognostication may be achieved by integrating pragmatic regression-based calculators for quick decisions at the bedside and highly accurate ANNs when time and resources permit.

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis and Gastrointestinal Bleeding: What a Surgeon Should Know

This paper presents to the surgical community an unusual and often ignored cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Hemophagocytic syndrome or hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare medical entity characterized by phagocytosis of red blood cells, leucocytes, platelets, and their precursors in the bone marrow by activated macrophages. When intestinal bleeding is present, the management is very challenging with extremely high mortality rates. Early diagnosis and treatment seem to be the most important factors for a successful outcome. We present two cases and review another 18 from the literature.

Recombinant activated factor VIIa to treat refractory lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage in a patient with recently implanted mechanical valve: a case report

BACKGROUND

Bleeding is a common complication after cardiac surgery. However, lower gastrointestinal bleeding is not usually associated with this type of surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 50-year-old man with a history of aortic regurgitation underwent elective mechanical valve replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass. He experienced a complicated intraoperative course involving unexplained cardiac arrest following induction of anesthesia. He also developed two episodes of massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to mucosal ischemia while convalescing in the cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit. After unsuccessful attempts to control the bleeding, exhaustion of blood products, and consideration of the high risk of mortality associated with surgery and the possibility of early- and long-term surgical complications, the decision was made to administer two successive doses of recombinant activated factor VII at 60 mcg/kg. Hemostasis was achieved without adverse systemic or valvular effects.

CONCLUSIONS

A favorable outcome was achieved after administration of recombinant activated factor VII, which controlled the patient's severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding. This outcome suggests the need to raise awareness about the use of this drug in dire circumstances when other conventional measures fail or are unsuitable.

A rectal bleeding algorithm can successfully reduce emergency admissions

AIM

Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common cause of emergency admissions yet rarely requires blood transfusion or radiological/surgical intervention. We aimed to develop a risk assessment tool to identify patients with acute LGIB who can be safely managed in primary care.

METHOD

We retrospectively applied an existing nomogram to 20 admissions to obtain criteria that could predict the need for transfusion. We simplified the algorithm to three criteria and developed an associated care pathway. If haemoglobin was > 13 g/dl, systolic blood pressure > 115 mmHg and the patient was not anticoagulated, admission could be avoided. These criteria were then applied to 57 prospective patients attending during a 16-week period. This was implemented with education of primary and secondary care staff, access to an emergency clinic and provision of patient information.

RESULTS

We applied our algorithm and care pathway to 57 patients with uncomplicated rectal bleeding. Thirty-five per cent (20/57) of potential admissions were avoided. Instead, patients received written information and underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy as outpatients within 6 weeks. One discharged patient was readmitted from endoscopy with severe colitis. There were no other readmissions or complications. Of the 36 patients for whom the algorithm predicted admission was needed, 33% (12/36) were anticoagulated, 94% (34/36) had haemoglobin < 13 g/dl and 42% (15/36) had a systolic blood pressure < 115 mmHg. Only one admission (1.8%) did not fulfil the admission criteria and could have potentially been avoided. Avoidable admissions reduced from 50 to 1.8%.

CONCLUSION

The application of a simple rectal bleeding algorithm can safely prevent unnecessary admissions.

The management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Lower gastrointestinal (LGI) bleeding is generally less severe than upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding with spontaneous cessation of bleeding in 80% of cases and a mortality of 2-4%. However, unlike UGI bleeding, there is no consensual agreement about management. Once the patient has been stabilized, the main objective and greatest difficulty is to identify the location of bleeding in order to provide specific appropriate treatment. While upper endoscopy and colonoscopy remain the essential first-line examinations, the development and availability of angiography have made this an important imaging modality for cases of active bleeding; they allow diagnostic localization of bleeding and guide subsequent therapy, whether therapeutic embolization, interventional colonoscopy or, if other techniques fail or are unavailable, surgery directed at the precise site of bleeding. Furthermore, newly developed endoscopic techniques, particularly video capsule enteroscopy, now allow minimally invasive exploration of the small intestine; if this is positive, it will guide subsequent assisted enteroscopy or surgery. Other small bowel imaging techniques include enteroclysis by CT or magnetic resonance imaging. At the present time, exploratory surgery is no longer a first-line approach. In view of the lesser gravity of LGI bleeding, it is most reasonable to simply stabilize the patient initially for subsequent transfer to a specialized center, if minimally invasive techniques are not available at the local hospital. In all cases, the complexity and diversity of LGI bleeding require a multidisciplinary collaboration involving the gastroenterologist, radiologist, intensivist and surgeon to optimize diagnosis and treatment of the patient.

Current treatment of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage

Massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding is a significant and expensive problem that requires methodical evaluation, management, and treatment. After initial resuscitation, care should be taken to localize the site of bleeding. Once localized, lesions can then be treated with endoscopic or angiographic interventions, reserving surgery for ongoing or recurrent bleeding.

Selective microcoil embolization of arterial gastrointestinal bleeding in the acute situation: outcome, complications, and factors affecting treatment success

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate microcoil embolization in the interventional treatment of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients (29 men, 15 women) with active arterial gastrointestinal bleeding were treated with microcoil embolization. The analysis included technical/clinical success, morbidity, mortality, and intervention-related mortality. Age, sex, underlying malignant disease, number of embolizations, preinterventional and postinterventional hemoglobin levels, blood products administered peri-interventionally, amount of embolization material used, duration of fluoroscopy, and use of contrast medium were evaluated for possible effects on technical and clinical success.

RESULTS

The primary technical success rate of microcoil embolization for acute gastrointestinal bleeding was 88.6% with a clinical success rate of 56.8%. Minor and major complications occurred in 13.6 and 18.2% of patients, respectively. Intervention-associated mortality, due to intestinal ischemia, accounted for 4.6% of the total 18.2% mortality rate. Patients with technically successful embolization had a statistically significant increase in hemoglobin (P<0.01) after the intervention and a decrease in need for packed red blood cells, (P<0.01), fresh frozen plasma (P<0.01), and coagulation products (P<0.01). A smaller postinterventional fresh frozen plasma requirement was associated with a better clinical outcome (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Microcoil embolization of arterial gastrointestinal bleeding in the acute situation has a high-technical success rate. The number of transfusions required before and after the intervention has no significant effect on technical success. Postinterventional fresh frozen plasma demand negatively correlates with clinical success.

[Gastrointestinal bleeding: the role of radiology]

Gastrointestinal bleeding represents a diagnostic challenge both in its acute presentation, which requires the point of bleeding to be located quickly, and in its chronic presentation, which requires repeated examinations to determine its etiology. Although the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding is based on endoscopic examinations, radiological studies like computed tomography (CT) angiography for acute bleeding or CT enterography for chronic bleeding are becoming more and more common in clinical practice, even though they have not yet been included in the clinical guidelines for gastrointestinal bleeding. CT can replace angiography as the diagnostic test of choice in acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding, and CT can complement the endoscopic capsule and scintigraphy in chronic or recurrent bleeding suspected to originate in the small bowel. Angiography is currently used to complement endoscopy for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Surgical management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding

PURPOSE

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is any form of bleeding distal to the Ligament of Treitz. In most cases, acute LGIB is self-limited and resolves spontaneously with conservative management.

METHODS

Only a minority of approximately 10% is admitted to hospital with signs of massive bleeding and shock requiring resuscitation, urgent evaluation and treatment.

RESULTS

Over the past decade, there has been a progressive decrease in upper GI events and a significant increase in lower GI events. Overall, mortality has also decreased, but in-hospital fatality due to upper or lower GI complications have remained constant. The problem is that LGIB can arise from a number of sources and may be a significant cause of hospitalisation and mortality in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

After initial resuscitation, the diagnosis and treatment of LGIB remains a challenge for acute care surgeons, whereby the identification of the source of bleeding is of utmost importance.

Diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal bleeding: comparison of the arterial, the portal, and the combined set using 64-section computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

To compare the respective capabilities of the arterial, the portal, and the combined set in the detection and localization of acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with 64-section computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

A total of 46 patients with acute GI bleeding and who had undergone both 64-section CT and digital subtraction angiography were included in this study. The results of angiography were used as a reference standard. Two radiologists independently reviewed the 3 sets of CT images (arterial set, the unenhanced and arterial-phase images; portal set, the unenhanced and portal venous-phase images; combined set, the unenhanced and arterial-phase and portal venous-phase images). The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

For each observer, the Az values were 0.915 and 0.931 for the arterial set, 0.903 and 0.933 for the portal set, and 0.919 and 0.911 for the combined set, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant among the 3 data sets for each observer (P > 0.05). Both observers correctly detected the bleeding site in 81.3% and 84.4% on the arterial set, in 81.3% and 84.4% on the portal set, and in 84.4% and 84.4% on the combined set, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using 64-section CT, the diagnostic performance was not different among the arterial, the portal, and the combined set for the detection and localization of acute GI bleeding.