Mid-term Results of Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties at a Small-Volume Center

The learning curve of patient-specific unikondylar arthroplasty may be advantageous to off-the-shelf implants: A preliminary study

Introduction

Introducing a new arthroplasty system into clinical routine is challenging and could have an effect on early results. Since UKA are known to have failure mechanisms related to technical factors, reliable results and easy adoption are ideal. The question remains whether there are differences in objective procedure parameters in the early learning curve of different UKA systems.

Methods

two different UKA implants (Biomet Oxford[BO] followed by Conformis iuni[CI]) were introduced consecutively into clinical routine. We retrospectively analyzed the first 20 cases of each implant for one arthroplasty surgeon regarding operating time, correction of the mechanical axis, learning curve parameters, and revision rate of implants for 1.5 years postoperatively.

Results

Operating time (BO:98.3 ± 26.3min, CI:83.85 ± 21.8min (p < 0.078)), and tourniquet time differed in favor of the CI implant (BO:97.5 ± 29.5min; CI:73.5 ± 33.2 min; p < 0.017)). Mechanical alignment was restored in boths (preop:BO:mean 2.9°varus, CI:2.7°varus, postop:BOmean1.3°varus, CI:1°varus), while one BO patient and two CI patients were overcorrected. Operating time decreased from the first five implants to implants 16-20 for CI (95.2 ± 18.5min to 69 ± 21.5min, p < 0.076) and BO (130.6 ± 27.6min to 78 ± 17.3min, p < 0.009). Within 18 months of follow-up, 2 BO and 1 CI implants were revised.

Conclusion

The introduction of an UKA implant was associated with longer surgery in both implants. Procedure time seems to differ between implants, while a learning curve was observed regarding instrumentation. CI implants seem to be reliable and adaptable in a medium-volume practice. The early results of this retrospective single-surgeon study were in favor of the individualized implant. Certainly, further studies encompassing larger cohorts with various implants are needed.

Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Due to the lack of comparative studies, a systematic review was conducted to determine revision rates of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (UKA and TKA), and compare functional outcomes, range of motion and activity scores in patients less than 65 years of age.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane systems since 2000. 27 UKA and 33 TKA studies were identified and included. Annual revision rate (ARR), functional outcomes, and return to activity were assessed for both types of arthroplasty using independent t tests.

RESULTS

Four level I studies, 12 level II, 16 level III, and 29 level IV were included, which reported on outcomes in 2224 UKAs and 4737 TKAs. UKA studies reported 183 revisions, yielding an ARR of 1.00 and extrapolated 10-year survivorship of 90.0%. TKA studies reported 324 TKA revisions, resulting in an ARR of 0.53 and extrapolated 10-year survivorship of 94.7%. Functional outcomes scores following UKA and TKA were equivalent, however, following UKA larger ROM (125° versus 114°, p = 0.004) and higher UCLA scores were observed compared to TKA (6.9 versus 6.0, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

These results show that good-to-excellent outcomes can be achieved following UKA and TKA in patients less than 65 years of age. A higher ARR was noted following UKA compared to TKA. However, improved functional outcomes, ROM and return to activity were found after UKA than TKA in this young population. Comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings and assess factors contributing to failure at the younger patient population. Outcomes of UKA and TKA in patients younger than 65 years are both satisfying, and therefore, both procedures are not contraindicated at younger age. UKA has several important advantages over TKA in this young and frequently more active population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Mid-term results of Oxford phase-3 medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial arthritis in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term results of an Oxford phase-3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial arthritis in Chinese patients.

METHODS

The study included 64 patients who underwent a minimally invasive Oxford phase-3 UKA for medial knee arthritis. The patients were clinically evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up according to the clinical and functional components of the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score and range of motion. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision surgery as the end point.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative clinical KSSs increased from 63.2 to 91.4 post-operatively, and the mean functional KSSs increased from 54.9 to 86.5 post-operatively. In addition, the mean Hospital for Special Surgery scores increased from 59.5 to 86.4. The mean active knee flexion increased from 109.1° preoperatively to 123.6° post-operatively. A total of six patients (six knees) required revision surgery at the time of the maximum 10-year follow-up. Four conversions to total knee arthroplasty were performed because of arthritis progression in the lateral compartment. One revision to total knee arthroplasty was performed for aseptic loosening, and one liner exchange was performed for wear. The cumulative survival rates at the 6- and 8-year follow-ups were 97% and 93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oxford phase-3 UKA was largely applicable for medial arthritis in Chinese patients. However, the Oxford phase-3 medial UKA selection criteria for young Chinese males need further exploration to obtain the best treatment effect.