Patient-Reported Long-Term Outcome is Superior After Treatment with Self-Expanding Metallic Stents in Esophageal Perforations

Current status of surgical treatment of Boerhaave's syndrome

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment is usually required for Boerhaave's syndrome (post-emetic esophageal perforation), and the technique should be chosen based on the local infection status and patient's general condition. This study was performed to examine the current status of surgical treatment of Boerhaave's syndrome in Japan.

METHODS

Ninety-five patients with Boerhaave's syndrome who underwent surgical treatment from January 2010 to December 2015, obtained from a national survey were retrospectively analyzed. The details of each surgical treatment and the type of treatment performed according to the patients' characteristics were examined.

RESULTS

Primary closure was performed in 75 (78.9%) patients, T-tube insertion in 15 (15.8%), and esophagectomy in 5 (5.3%). The length of the postoperative stay was significantly shorter in patients who underwent primary closure (p = 0.0011). Esophagectomy tended to be performed more often in patients with a long perforation and was performed significantly more often in patients with a high C-reactive protein concentration (p = 0.0118). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with leakage of the primary closure site (p < 0.0001). As a result, leakage of the primary closure site was significantly correlated with a long duration from symptom onset to patient presentation (p = 0.042), diagnostic imaging of the intrathoracic perforation (p = 0.013), and abscess formation in the mediastinal cavity (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of an appropriate surgical procedure may contribute to reduced mortality rates in patients with esophageal rupture. With regard to primary closure, it is necessary to understand that leaks are likely to occur in patients with a long duration from symptom onset to presentation or with severe intrathoracic/mediastinal inflammation, and to select an appropriate surgical procedure in consideration of the degree of invasiveness and QOL.