Long-term treatment outcomes from the perspective of a patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate

The management of patients with orofacial cleft (OFC) often extends from diagnosis or birth well into adulthood and requires many different specialists within multidisciplinary teams (MDT). The aims of treatment are to restore form and function relating to hearing, speech, occlusion and facial aesthetics. People with OFCs that include the lip, alveolus and palate (cleft lip and palate (CLP)) require several different staged and coordinated surgical and non-surgical interventions, and the treatment pathway is associated with a heavy burden of care. Due to the extensive nature of the interaction with these patients, MDT members have opportunities to provide enhanced patient-centred care and support. This case report provides an overview of the current knowledge of the aetiology of OFC and the management of these patients. It provides a unique perspective from one of the coauthors who has a unilateral CLP (UCLP) and reports on his treatment experiences and long-term treatment outcomes. By having a better understanding of the impact of UCLP and treatment provided, MDT members can not only provide improved clinical treatment but also offer improved patient experiences for those with craniofacial anomalies, in particular, an increased awareness of the psychosocial challenges, they endure throughout their treatment pathway and beyond.

The Cleft Nurse Specialist: A Key Building Block in the Cleft Multidisciplinary Team

INTRODUCTION

The cleft nurse specialist (CNS) plays a key role in counselling and supporting parents from the diagnosis onward. The CNS started in 2012 and we aimed to perform a qualitative study to determine the benefits this brought to the cleft community from the parents' perspective.

METHODS

The cleft database was used to locate babies born in 2010/2011 and 2013/2014. Parents were contacted by phone by 2 authors and completed a questionnaire on the care and support they received following the diagnosis, in the early days and around the time of surgery.

RESULTS

Parents of 38 babies completed the survey. In 2010/2011, only 21% had an antenatal diagnosis compared to 47% in 2013/2014.2011/2012: 3 unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), 3 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), 4 CLO, 9 cleft palate only (CPO).2013/2014: 5 UCLP, 7 BCLP, 7 CPO.2011/2012: 68% were counselled by a surgeon, 42% were seen >1 week after birth, with some over a month.2013/2014: 84% were counselled by the CNS, 53% were seen within 48 hours, and 100% within 7 days.Parents in 2013/2014 felt more supported by the cleft team throughout pregnancy and the early days, with home visits being particularly advantageous.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of the CNS to the cleft multidisciplinary team has significantly improved the pathway for parents and is a key link with the wider cleft team. With the improvement in antenatal diagnosis, counselling occurs at an earlier stage and prepares parents for the difficulties commonly experienced in the early days. Key themes included; home visits and direct contact with the CNS.