Change in clinical crown height in adult patients treated by means of the multi-bracket appliance with extraction of four first premolars

Evaluating the long-term stability of a predefined palatal region for tooth movement analysis

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a three-dimensional (3D) analysis of orthodontic tooth movement (TM) using digital dental models (DMs), focusing on the palatal region of interest (PROI), aiming to evaluate the long-term stability of the PROI, validate the 3D TM analysis with PROI registration, and compare it with conventional lateral cephalometric analyses.

METHODS

Twenty adult patients treated with a multibracket appliance were evaluated at their first visit (T0) and at least 5 years later (T1) using DMs and lateral cephalograms (LCs). The long-term stability of PROI was assessed by calculating the point cloud distances between DM-T0 and DM-T1. TM analysis using DM with PROI registration for the maxillary central incisors was assessed through linear and angular measurements in the sagittal view and subsequently compared with the LCs.

RESULTS

The average point cloud distance of the PROI between DM-T0 and DM-T1 was 0.21 mm (standard deviation, 0.13 mm). TM analysis using DMs demonstrated excellent reproducibility for both linear and angular measurements (intra-rater correlation coefficient, > 0.99). The 95 % limits of agreement between the DM and LC measurements were < 5.14° for angular change, 3.53 mm for horizontal displacement, and 0.98 mm for vertical displacement. No significant differences were observed in the angular and linear measurements when the TM was compared using the DMs and LCs.

CONCLUSIONS

The PROI remained stable for over 5 years, supporting the reproducibility and accuracy of TM assessment using PROI registration in orthodontic clinical practice.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

DM analysis lacks the risks associated with X-ray exposure and can be easily performed in daily clinical practice, indicating its potential for future clinical applications. These findings further support the use of DM with PROI registration for TM analysis in orthodontic clinical practice, emphasizing its long-term stability and reproducibility.

Clinical crown height changes in adult patients after non-extraction, orthodontic treatment: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in clinical crown height (CCH) in adult orthodontic patients treated by fixed appliances to distalise the molars.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series study.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

A total of 30 adults with healthy periodontal tissues who received orthodontic treatment at the Department of Orthodontics, Yokohama, Japan and its related orthodontic clinic were assessed.

METHODS

CCH was measured as the distance from the gingival margin to the crown plane perpendicular to the tooth axis. Treatment changes of CCH of each tooth were examined on the labial/buccal and lingual/palatal side.

RESULTS

In the upper dentition, on the labial/buccal side, the CCH of the lateral incisors, canines, first premolars, first molars and second molars were increased significantly (P < 0.01), with a median value of 0.41 mm, 0.43 mm, 0.28 mm, 0.43 mm and 0.55 mm, respectively. In contrast on the palatal side, the CCH of the central incisors, first molars, and second molars decreased significantly (P < 0.01), with a median value of -0.41 mm, -0.30 mm and -0.20 mm, respectively. In the lower dentition on the labial/buccal side, the CCH of the first premolars, second premolars and first molars were increased significantly, with a median value of 0.39 mm (P < 0.01), 0.43 mm (P < 0.01) and 0.19 mm (P < 0.05), respectively. The second molars exhibited a significant decrease in CCH with a median value of -0.26 mm (P < 0.05). On the lingual side, the CCH of the central incisors, lateral incisors, canines, first premolars, second premolars and first molars were increased significantly (P < 0.01), with a median value of 0.28 mm, 0.22 mm, 0.31 mm, 0.37 mm, 0.26 mm and 0.28 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences were observed in CCH before and after treatment for many teeth, the average change was less than 0.5 mm. The impact on the long-term health of the periodontal tissue is unknown.