Knowledge of sexually transmitted infections and sources of information amongst men

Narrative review of the barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice

As the cornerstone of Australian primary health care, general practice is a setting well suited for regular chlamydia testing but testing rates remain low. This review examines the barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice. Six databases--Medline, PubMed, Meditext, PsycInfo, Scopus and Web of Science--were used to identify peer-reviewed publications that addressed barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice using the following terms: 'chlamydia test*', 'STI test*' 'general practice', 'primary care', 'family medicine', 'barriers', 'facilitators' and 'enablers' from 1997 until November 2013. Data about the study design and key findings were extracted from the publications. A framework method was used to manage the data and organise publications into three categories -patient, general practitioner, and general practice. Key findings were then classified as a barrier or facilitator. Sixty-nine publications were included, with 41 quantitative studies, 17 qualitative studies, and 11 using mixed methods. Common barriers identified in all three groups included a lack of knowledge, awareness or training, demands on time and workload, and the social context of testing. Facilitators included the normalisation of testing, the use of nurses and other practice staff, education and incentives. Numerous barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice have been identified. While the barriers are well studied, many of the facilitators are not as well researched, and highlight areas for further study.

The need for innovative sexually transmitted infection screening initiatives for young men: evidence from genitourinary medicine clinics across England

The study objectives were to ascertain behavioural, access-related, health-seeking factors and sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevalence in young men (<25 years) attending genitourinary (GU) medicine clinics and compare them with older men (≥25 years) and young women (<25 years). Between October 2004 and March 2005, 4600 new attendees at seven sociodemographically and geographically contrasting GU medicine clinics across England completed questionnaires, which were linked to routine clinical data. Young men waited significantly less time to be seen in clinic compared with older men and young women. They were less likely to report symptoms than older men ( P = 0.021) yet more likely to be diagnosed with chlamydia ( P = 0.001) and gonorrhoea ( P = 0.007). They were also more likely to be diagnosed with an acute STI relative to young women ( P = 0.007). Our data confirm the need to make comprehensive STI screening readily available for young men and to develop effective and innovative screening strategies in different settings.

Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK

Background

Poor awareness and knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis could be a barrier to uptake of screening. This study aimed to determine the level of awareness and knowledge of chlamydia among young people who were being approached in a variety of community settings and offered opportunistic screening.

Methods

Men and women aged 16-24 years were approached in education, health and fitness, and workplace settings and invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire then provide a urine sample for chlamydia testing. Follow-up semi-structured interviews with 24 respondents were carried out after test results were received.

Results

363 questionnaires were completed (43.5% from men). Whilst awareness of chlamydia was high, knowledge decreased as questions became increasingly focussed so that around half of respondents were unaware of the asymptomatic nature of chlamydia infections. Men's knowledge of symptoms was consistently lower than women's, with most men failing to identify unusual discharge as a symptom in men (men 58.3%, female 45.8%, p = 0.019); fewer men knew unusual discharge was a symptom among women (men 65.3% female 21.4%, p < 0.001). The asymptomatic nature of the infection resonated with respondents and was the commonest piece of information they picked up from their participation in the study.

Conclusions

Despite scientific gains in understanding chlamydia infection, public understanding remains limited. Greater efforts are required to translate scientific evidence to the public. An improvement in knowledge may maximise gains from interventions to improve detection.

Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia: a pilot study into male perspectives on provision of Chlamydia screening in a UK university

BACKGROUND

Since 2003, the University of Leeds has been a pilot site for the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP), which offers opportunistic screening to asymptomatic people under the age of 25. Uptake among men is low. The purpose of this study is to explore perceptions and acceptability of the provision of Chlamydia screening in the University of Leeds among 18-25-year-old male students.

METHODS

Using a purposive sample of 15 male students aged between 19 and 24, two focus group sessions were conducted within university grounds.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis of the data revealed that male attitudes about Chlamydia screening were affected by: (1) lack of knowledge about Chlamydia and screening; (2) social embarrassment about Chlamydia; (3) reluctance to seek medical help; (4) perception that Chlamydia was a 'woman's disease' and (5) indifference about health promotion campaigns.

CONCLUSION

To encourage the uptake of opportunistic screening of Chlamydia, men under 25 years should be made aware of their responsibility for their own sexual health. Emphasis can also be placed on the non-invasiveness, ease and privacy of the test.