Abilities of candesartan and other AT(1) receptor blockers to impair angiotensin II-induced AT(1) receptor activation after wash-out

Unique mode of binding between angiotensin II type 1 receptor and its blockers

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the 5-oxo-1,2,4-oxadiazole moiety of azilsartan (AZL), which represents a small difference in the molecular structures of AZL and candesartan (CAN) [angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁R) blockers], may be responsible for the molecular effects of AZL. METHODS: We examined the binding affinities of AZL and CAN to AT₁R, along with their ability to block receptor activity. A competition binding study, inositol phosphate (IP) production assay and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) assay were performed using wild-type (WT) and mutants AT₁R-transfected cells. RESULTS: The binding affinities of CAN and AZL were reduced by > 5-fold for Y35F, W84F, R167K, K199Q and I288A compared with WT. In addition, AZL showed a > 5-fold reduction in its binding affinity to V108A. CAN and AZL exhibited > 20-fold and > 100-fold reductions in binding affinity to R167K, respectively. The loss of binding affinity of AZL to R167K was greater than that of CAN. CAN-7H exhibited a > 10-fold reduction in binding affinity to R167K compared with CAN. On the other hand, the binding affinity of AZL-7H to R167K was comparable to that of AZL. While 10^-6M CAN and CAN-7H partly blocked Ang II-induced IP production in R167K, 10^-6M AZL and AZL-7H did not. In addition, 10^-6M CAN, but not 10^-6M AZL, partly blocked Ang II-induced ERK activation in R167K. CONCLUSIONS: The interaction between 5-oxo-1,2,4-oxadiazole in AZL and Arg¹⁶⁷ in the AT1R appears to be more important than the interaction between the tetrazole ring in CAN and Arg¹⁶⁷.

Comparative effect of candesartan and amlodipine, and effect of switching from valsartan, losartan, telmisartan and olmesartan to candesartan, on early morning hypertension and heart rate

Early morning hypertension and a high heart rate are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The DOHSAM study was designed to evaluate the effect of candesartan on early morning blood pressure (BP) and heart rate in hypertensives. We used a prospective, randomized, open-label design. Protocol 1: Patients with early morning BP more than 135/85 mmHg who were not on any antihypertensive drug or on candesartan were given amlodipine 2.5 mg/day (amlodipine group, n = 22) or added candesartan 4 mg/day (candesartan group, n = 36). Candesartan or amlodipine was added when BP did not fall lower than 135/85 mmHg. Protocol 2: Early morning hypertensives who were on other angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (n = 50) such as valsartan, losartan, telmisartan and olmesartan were switched to candesartan. Early morning BP significantly decreased in the candesartan group compared with the amlodipine group 9 and 12 months after treatment. Switching other ARBs except for olmesartan to candesartan significantly decreased early morning systolic and diastolic BP 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment. Heart rate in the office significantly decreased by switching to candesartan 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment. In conclusion, candesartan significantly decreased early morning hypertension more than amlodipine or other ARBs except olmesartan in early morning hypertensives.