The ratios of aldosterone / plasma renin activity (ARR) versus aldosterone / direct renin concentration (ADRR)

Aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) as a screening tool for primary aldosteronism (PA)

The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is the standard screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA). Because of the poor reproducibility of the ARR, repeat testing is recommended if the result is not compatible with the clinical condition. Various methods to measure renin are used in different hospitals in Taiwan, and the ARR cutoff values also differ among laboratories. The Task Force of Taiwan PA recommend using plasma renin activity (PRA) to calculate ARR instead of direct renin concentration (DRC) unless PRA is unavailable, because PRA is widely used in international guidelines and most studies.

Aldosterone, Renin, and Aldosterone-to-Renin Ratio Variability in Screening for Primary Aldosteronism

CONTEXT

The plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), renin, and aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) are used to screen for primary aldosteronism (PA). Substantial intra-individual variability of PAC and ARR using plasma renin activity in the context of usual antihypertensive therapy has been described, but there is no data on ARR variability calculated using direct renin concentration (DRC).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the intra-individual variability of PAC, DRC, and ARR in the absence of interfering medications in patients with and without PA.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Hypertensive patients referred for investigation of PA, with at least 2 ARR measurements while off interfering medications.

SETTING

Endocrine hypertension service of a tertiary center, from May 2017 to July 2021.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PAC, DRC, and ARR variability was calculated as coefficient of variation (CV) and percent difference (PD).

RESULTS

Analysis of 223 patients (55% female, median age 52 years), including 162 with confirmed PA, demonstrated high variability with a sample CV of 22-25% in the PAC and sample CV of 41% to 42% in the DRC and ARR in both the PA and non-PA groups. The degree of variability was substantially higher than the assays' analytical CV. Sixty-two patients (38%) with PA had at least one ARR below 70 pmol/L:mU/L (2.4 ng/dL:mU/L), a cut-off for first-line screening of PA.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant intra-individual variability in PAC, DRC, and hence ARR occurs in a large proportion of patients being investigated for PA. These findings support the need for at least 2 ARR before PA is excluded or further investigated.

Comparison of the Chemiluminescence Immunoassay LIAISON® with the Radioimmunoassay for Aldosterone and Renin Measurement

Determination of renin plasma levels is useful in the diagnosis of hypertension and in the therapeutic follow-up of hypertensive patients. Plasmatic concentration of renin decreases in patients with hypertension due to a primary hyperaldosteronism, contrary to renovascular hypertension where concentrations of renin and aldosterone are both elevated. Blood samples (serum, EDTA plasma) were analysed using two different chemiluminiscent methods CLIA LIAISON® and radioimmunoassay for aldosterone (IMMUNOTECH Beckman Coulter) and renin (Cisbio Bioassay) measurements were compared. We used both methods to ascertain the correlation between serum vs. EDTA plasma levels of aldosterone (RIA, CLIA) and renin (IRMA, CLIA) and to compare aldosterone to renin ratios for CLIA and for radioimmunoassay: serum aldosterone to plasma renin and plasma aldosterone to plasma renin. We compared serum aldosterone CLIA vs. RIA (rP=0.933, P<0.001) and plasma renin determined using CLIA vs. IRMA (rP=0.965, P=0.062). Furthermore, we used both methods to establish the correlation between the serum vs. plasma levels of aldosterone: RIA (rP=0.980, P<0.001); CLIA (rP=0.994, P=0.353) and serum vs. plasma levels of renin: IRMA (rP=0.948, P<0.001); CLIA (rP=0.921, P=0.011). Aldosterone (serum, plasma) to plasmatic renin ratios for CLIA (rP=0.999, P=0.286) and for radioimmunoassay (rP=0.992, P=0.025). Our data demonstrate that renin and aldosterone concentrations obtained using CLIA correlate with renin and aldosterone concentrations using radioimmunoassay methods. Correlation coefficients of pair results ranged from 0.921 to 0.994. Aldosterone (serum, EDTA plasma) to plasmatic renin ratios are comparable and any of them can be used with no significant differences found.

China nationwide screening and registry of primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients

In the framework of the China Hypertension Control Initiatives, the China Primary Aldosteronism Prospective Study was designed as a nationwide multicenter programme for the screening and registry of primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients. The primary objective was to establish technological platforms, team and expertise for the screening, diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism in cardiology outpatient clinics. From 18 July 2018 to 31 May 2020, 1329 patients from 14 cities had been screened. 348 (26.2%) patients had a plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio of ≥40 (pg/ml)/(pg/ml) and enroled in the registry. 175 (50.3%) patients had confirmatory testing, of whom 163 (93.1%) had a confirmed diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.

Confounders of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio when used as a screening test in hypertensive patients: A critical analysis of the literature

The aldosterone‐to‐renin ratio (ARR) is a common screening test for primary aldosteronism in hypertensives. However, there are many factors which could confound the ARR test result and reduce the accuracy of this test. The present review's objective is to identify these factors and to describe to what extent they affect the ARR. Our analysis revealed that sex, age, posture, and sodium‐intake influence the ARR, whereas assay techniques do not. Race and body mass index have an uncertain effect on the ARR. We conclude that several factors can affect the ARR. Not taking these factors into account could lead to misinterpretation of the ARR.

High Efficiency and Problems of Chemiluminescence Assay-Detected Aldosterone-To-Renin Ratio in Practical Primary Aldosteronism Screening

Primary aldosteronism is a main cause of secondary hypertension which can be effectively treated. The screening test for primary aldosteronism is benefit for minimizing damage to the patient. In the previous retrospective study, we obtained the optimal cutoff value of aldosterone-to-renin ratio detected by chemiluminescence assay, a newly developing method, and prompted its high efficiency in primary aldosteronism screening in upright position. In this study, we want to evaluate its efficiency in practical work. We used this ratio to continuously screen 238 patients, and 58 patients were finally diagnosed with primary aldosteronism. We found it had 86.13% accuracy rate in the upright position compared with the final clinical diagnosis. False negative and positive rates were 13.79% and 13.89%. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 86.21% and 86.11%, which are slightly different from results in our previous study. False negative rate can be improved by combining the aldosterone-to-renin ratio with aldosterone concentration. We also found impaired glucose tolerance may be a reason for high false positive rate. Besides, chemiluminescence assay may be interfered in aldosterone detection. Although it has some shortcomings, chemiluminescence assay-detected aldosterone-to-renin ratio is a highly effective index for screening primary aldosteronism in practice.

New advances in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common form of endocrine hypertension. The diagnostic process of PA includes a screening test, confirmatory test, and subtype classification. In this review, we have summarized the latest advances in the diagnosis of PA with regard to screening and confirmatory tests and provided some recommendations to improve clinical practice.

Feasibility of Screening Primary Aldosteronism by Aldosterone-to-Direct Renin Concentration Ratio Derived from Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Measurement: Diagnostic Accuracy and Cutoff Value

Objectives

Aldosterone-to-plasma renin activity ratio (ARR) derived from traditional radioimmunoassay (RIA) is widely used to detect primary aldosteronism (PA). Recently, aldosterone-to-direct renin concentration ratio (ADRR), which is calculated by direct renin concentration (DRC) measured by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), is proposed to replace ARR as the screening test method for PA. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy and cutoff value of ADRR as screening test for PA.

Methods

450 hypertensive patients with suspected PA referred to hypertension center of our department were enrolled and underwent screening and confirmatory tests of PA. Plasma renin activity (PRA), DRC, and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) were measured by both RIA and CLIA simultaneously during screening and confirmatory test.

Results

386 patients were diagnosed as primary hypertension (PH) and 64 patients as PA. Within-patient correlation between PRA and DRC (r=0.88, P<0.001) and correlation between PAC measured by RIA and CLIA were high (r=0.80, P<0.001). The optimal cutoff value of ADRR was 2.93 (ng/dL)/(mU/L), sensitivity 80.33%, and specificity 92.11%. The optimal cutoff value of ARR was 25.28 (ng/dL)/(ng/mL/h), sensitivity 76.92%, and specificity 93.38%.

Conclusion

The optimal cutoff values of ADRR and ARR for screening PA are defined in this patient cohort with high sensitivity and specificity. Our results are of clinical importance for accelerating the extensive use of ADRR as a screening test for PA in daily practice.

Age-Related Cutoffs of Plasma Aldosterone/Renin Concentration for Primary Aldosteronism Screening

AIM

This retrospective study is aimed at investigating whether aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR) cutoffs calculated by the plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC)/plasma renin concentration (PRC) should be set differently in patients of different ages.

METHODS

521 hypertensive patients were screened for primary aldosteronism (PA) by the PAC/PRC. 174 patients diagnosed with PA and 311 patients with essential hypertension (EH) were included in the final analysis. Subjects were subdivided into four age groups: <40, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥60 years old.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the ARR varied greatly among the different age groups. An ARR of 3.7 (ng/dl)/(μIU/ml) had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80% in patients ≥ 60 years old. With this cutoff, the sensitivities in patients < 40, 40-49, and 50-59 years old were 74%, 82%, and 87%, respectively, and the specificities were 94%, 95%, and 94%, respectively. To achieve a sensitivity higher than 90%, the ARR cutoff needed to be lowered to 2.0 (ng/dl)/(μIU/ml) for patients 40-49 and 50-59 years old, resulting in sensitivities of 90% and 95%, respectively, and specificities of 80% and 84%, respectively. To achieve a sensitivity higher than 90%, the ARR cutoff needed to be lowered to 1.0 (ng/dl)/(μIU/ml) for patients < 40 years old, resulting in a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

An ARR of 3.7 (ng/dl)/(μIU/ml) is optimal for patients ≥ 60 years; for patients 40-59 years, the optimal ARR cutoff is 2.0; for those younger than 40 years, an ARR of 1.0 may be more reasonable.

Novel Approach to Establishing an Aldosterone: Renin Ratio Cutoff for Primary Aldosteronism

Direct renin concentration is replacing plasma renin activity in many laboratories for the investigation of primary aldosteronism, which may have a significant impact on the resulting aldosterone:renin ratios. We sought to develop a population-based approach to establishing an aldosterone:renin ratio cutoff when transitioning between assays. A population-based study was performed in Calgary, Alberta, Canada of 4301 individuals who received testing from January 2012 to November 2015. In 2014, direct renin concentration replaced plasma renin activity in routine testing. We described the prevalence of primary aldosteronism in our population before the change and, using the assumption of disease prevalence stability, determined the corresponding ratio cutoffs after the introduction of the new assay. During the initial portion of the study (using plasma renin activity), 4.9% of those screened were classified as highly probable cases, whereas 10.4% were considered probable and 28.9% possible using locally validated cutoffs. Aldosterone:renin ratio cutoffs were then determined for the direct renin concentration assay. A highly probable case of primary aldosteronism corresponded to a cutoff of >100 pmol L −1 mIU −1 L −1 with hypokalemia. A probable case corresponded to a cutoff of >100 and a possible case to >35 pmol L −1 mIU −1 L −1 . In contrast, cutoffs derived using a conversion factor resulted in significantly higher cutoffs and the potential for missed cases. In conclusion, using large population data, historically consistent aldosterone:renin ratio cutoffs can be established when transitioning between assays. Population-derived cutoffs may be more appropriate for clinical use and less likely to result in false-negative classification than those obtained from conventional direct method comparisons.

Prospective validation of an automated chemiluminescence-based assay of renin and aldosterone for the work-up of arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

The availability of simple and accurate assays of plasma active renin (DRC) and aldosterone concentration (PAC) can improve the detection of secondary forms of arterial hypertension. Thus, we investigated the performance of an automated chemiluminescent assay for DRC and PAC in referred hypertensive patients.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 260 consecutive hypertensive patients referred to an ESH Center for Hypertension. After exclusion of six protocol violations, 254 patients were analyzed: 67.3% had primary hypertension, 17.3% an aldosterone producing adenoma (APA), 11.4% idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA), 2.4% renovascular hypertension (RVH), 0.8% familial hyperaldosteronism type 1 (FH-1), 0.4% apparent mineralocorticoid excess (AME), 0.4% a renin-producing tumor, and 3.9% were adrenalectomized APA patients. Bland-Altman plots and Deming regression were used to analyze results. The diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, AUC of the ROC) of the DRC-based aldosterone-renin ratio (ARRCL) was compared with that of the PRA-based ARR (ARRRIA) using as reference the conclusive diagnosis of APA.

RESULTS

At Bland-Altman plot, the DRC and PAC assay showed no bias as compared to the PRA and PAC assay. A tight relation was found between the DRC and the PRA values (concordance correlation coefficient=0.92, p<0.0001) and the PAC values measured with radioimmunoassay and chemiluminescence (concordance correlation coefficient=0.93, p<0.001). For APA identification the AUC of the ARRCL was higher than that of the ARRRIA [0.974 (95% CI 0.940-0.991) vs. 0.894 (95% CI 0.841-0.933), p=0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

This rapid automated chemiluminescent DRC/PAC assay performed better than validated PRA/PAC radioimmunoassays for the identification of APA in referred hypertensive patients.

Aldosterone/direct renin concentration ratio as a screening test for primary aldosteronism: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The accuracy of aldosterone/direct renin concentration ratio (ADRR) as a screening test in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) varies widely across the studies. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of ADRR.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library published between April 1971-February 2016. Studies focusing on the accuracy of ADRR for PA screening were included. Two authors independently extracted information regarding patient characteristics, antihypertensives status, true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. The random-effects model was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 974 patients were included. The overall sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and diagnostic odds ratio of ADRR were 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.93), 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), 0.985 and 324 respectively, with substantial heterogeneity. Meta-regression showed that antihypertensive status affects the ADRR and may account for the heterogeneity (p=0.03). Subgroup analysis of patients who discontinued the antihypertensives revealed a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the efficacy of ADRR as a screening test for PA. However, as antihypertensive drugs can interfere with the interpretation of ADRR, it is recommended to interrupt therapy or at least replace with analogues that do not significantly affect the ADRR value.

SFE/SFHTA/AFCE Consensus on Primary Aldosteronism, part 2: First diagnostic steps

In patients with suspected primary aldosteronism (PA), the first diagnostic step, screening, must have high sensitivity and negative predictive value. The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is used because it has higher sensitivity and lower variability than other measures (serum potassium, plasma aldosterone, urinary aldosterone). ARR is calculated from the plasma aldosterone (PA) and plasma renin activity (PRA) or direct plasma renin (DR) values. These measurements must be taken under standard conditions: in the morning, more than 2hours after awakening, in sitting position after 5 to 15minutes, with normal dietary salt intake, normal serum potassium level and without antihypertensive drugs significantly interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. To rule out ARR elevation due to very low renin values, ARR screening is applied only if aldosterone is>240pmol/l (90pg/ml); DR values<5mIU/l are assimilated to 5mIU/l and PRA values<0.2ng/ml/h to 0.2ng/ml/h. We propose threshold ARR values depending on the units used and a conversion factor (pg to mIU) for DR. If ARR exceeds threshold, PA should be suspected and exploration continued. If ARR is below threshold or if plasma aldosterone is<240pmol/l (90pg/ml) on two measurements, diagnosis of PA is excluded.