Disparities in Nursing Home Use and Quality Among African American, Hispanic, and White Medicare Residents With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Objective: This article examines differences in nursing home use and quality among Medicare beneficiaries, in both Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service, newly admitted to nursing homes with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Method: Retrospective, national, population-based study of Medicare residents newly admitted to nursing homes with ADRD by race and ethnic group. Our analytic sample included 1,302,099 nursing home residents-268,181 with a diagnosis of ADRD-in 13,532 nursing homes from 2014. Results: We found that a larger share of Hispanic Medicare residents that are admitted to nursing homes have ADRD compared with African American and White beneficiaries. Both Hispanics and African Americans with ADRD received care in segregated nursing homes with fewer resources and lower quality of care compared with White residents. Discussion: These results have implications for targeted efforts to achieve health care equity and quality improvement efforts among nursing homes that serve minority patients.

A Review of Pain Prevalence in Alzheimer's, Vascular, Frontotemporal and Lewy Body Dementias

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have reported on pain in dementia. It has been hypothesized that pain perception differs between dementia subtypes, and therefore, the prevalence of pain differs between dementia subtypes. However, there remains a paucity of evidence on the differences in the prevalence of pain in different dementia subtypes. This review aimed to determine the prevalence of pain for the major dementia subtypes: Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).

SUMMARY

We found 10 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Most of these studies reported on AD; studies reporting the prevalence of pain in people with DLB were scarce, and for FTD, we found no studies. The sample-weighted prevalence of pain could only be calculated for AD, VaD and mixed dementia: AD 45.8% (95% confidence interval, CI: 33.4-58.5%), VaD 56.2% (95% CI: 47.7-64.4%) and mixed dementia 53.9% (95% CI: 37.4-70.1%).

KEY MESSAGES

Studies investigating the prevalence of pain in dementia subtypes were scarce; however, we found a high prevalence of pain in dementia without significant differences between the dementia subtypes. More studies are required to draw firm conclusions on the differences in the prevalence of pain between dementia subtypes.

Dementia special care units: a comparison with standard units regarding residents' profile and care features

BACKGROUND

Unlike other countries, no data about residents and care features in Special Care Units (SCUs) in Spanish nursing homes have been reported to date. The present paper is the first to analyze the characteristics of residents with dementia and the features of provided care in SCUs in comparison to residents with dementia in standard beds, thus not receiving specialized care in nursing homes in Spain.

METHODS

Data on residents with dementia were collected in 11 nursing homes. Residents with diagnosis of dementia and Mini-Mental State Examination scores of less than 27 were randomly selected in each center. Altogether 197 residents were assessed: 102 (52%) placed in SCUs, and 95 (48%) in standard beds. Analyses of the characteristics of residents in SCUs versus standard beds regarding socio-demographic and clinical variables, features of the care provided, and residents' quality of life (QoL) were performed using univariate and multivariate tests (binary logistic regression analysis).

RESULTS

Residents in SCUs did not differ from those in standard beds in socio-demographic variables. Placement of residents in SCUs seemed to be related with the presence of severe cognitive and functional impairment and aggressive behaviors. Being in an SCU conveyed a higher probability of having individual bedroom and bathroom; nevertheless, there were no differences in the care provided in SCUs, considering use of nappies, and feeding and restraint systems. Patients in SCUs showed lower QoL reported by the staff.

CONCLUSIONS

Although residents in SCUs present higher levels of impairment, there are no real differences in the care provided besides a higher probability of having individual rooms. Regulations on required features for SCUs in Spain are necessary to guarantee that care provided to residents is truly special.

The effect of labeling on employee perceptions of residents living on Alzheimer's disease specialized care units

OBJECTIVES

This study examined whether labeling influenced nursing home employees' perceptions of residents and how those perceptions could affect resident-caregiver interactions.

DESIGN

This was a small descriptive study using vignettes and questionnaires.

SETTING

Two nursing homes (one rural, one urban) in New England.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-three nursing home employees including registered nurses, certified nursing assistants, activities staff, and others.

MEASUREMENTS

All participants read a vignette based on the behavior of a fictional resident and rated their perceptions of the behavior, indicated whether and how they would report the event, and made recommendations for possible courses of action. Although vignettes were the same, the resident label varied: Alzheimer's disease specialized care unit (ADSCU) resident or resident of a non-specialized long-term care unit.

RESULTS

Employees who read the vignette for the ADSCU resident rated the resident's behavior as more problematic, inappropriate, and aggressive than the same behavior for non-ADSCU residents.

CONCLUSION

The effect of the label of "ADSCU resident" may have implications for care provided in specialized long-term care environments.

Evaluation of special and traditional dementia care in nursing homes: results from a cross-sectional study in Germany

OBJECTIVE

Two-thirds of all residents in nursing homes in Germany suffer from some type of dementia. We investigated whether or not dementia patients receiving special (segregated or partially segregated) care exhibited a better quality of life than their counterparts residing in traditional nursing homes.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study in 28 special dementia care facilities in the city of Hamburg (admission criterion: mobile dementia patients with behaviour problems) 594 residents were compared to a group of nursing home residents with dementia (n = 573) in 11 randomly selected nursing homes who were receiving traditional integrative care. Primary features such as cognitive and functional impairment, and behaviour problems were assessed by qualified nursing staff.

RESULTS

Controlling for confounding variables, for dementia patients in special care units as compared to a reference group in traditional integrative care, the level of volunteer caregiver involvement was higher and there was more social contact to staff, fewer physical restraints, more involvement in home activities, and more frequent use of psychiatrists. There was no significant difference between the two care settings with regard to overall use of psychotropic drugs, however, residents in special dementia care used antipsychotics significantly less often and antidepressants more often.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences for a number of indicators of the quality of life point in favour of special dementia care. Future evaluation studies ought to examine not only the general efficacy of types of care designed especially for dementia patients but also the efficacy of the respective individual components (i.e. caregiver ratio).

Psychiatric and behavioural symptoms and the use of psychotropic medication in Special Care Units and Regular Units in Norwegian nursing homes

BACKGROUND

In a number of countries Special Care Units (SCUs) have been established to meet the particular needs of patients with dementia. The criteria for SCUs are poorly defined and often not met.

AIM

To assess the frequency distributions of dementia, psychiatric and behavioural symptoms and the use of psychotropic medication in SCUs and Regular Units (RUs) across different regions.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

By means of a structured interview, comprising the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and Lawton's Physical Self-maintenance scale, a representative sample of 1163 nonselected nursing home patients was assessed. In addition, information was collected from the patients' records.

RESULTS

Overall SCU patients were significantly more likely to be younger, to have higher level of functioning, to have dementia, to exhibit clinically significant psychiatric and behavioural symptoms and to receive psychotropic medication. There were significant differences across regions in terms of psychiatric and behavioural symptoms and the use of psychotropic medication. The ratio of accommodation in SCUs to that in RUs varied across the regions.

CONCLUSION

Patients in SCUs and patients in RUs are distinct nursing home populations. Regional differences, which might be due to diverse ratios of SCUs, are evident.