Efficacy and safety of barnidipine compared with felodipine in the treatment of hypertension in Chinese patients

Replacement of Amlodipine and Lercanidipine by Barnidipine: Tolerability and Effectiveness in a Real-Life Study

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease worldwide. Calcium channel blockers are an effective antihypertensive treatment, but frequently hypertension remains uncontrolled for many patients, partly due to tolerability issues.

AIM

To assess the tolerability and effectiveness of barnidipine in mild to moderate hypertension patients switching treatment from other calcium channel blockers in daily practice.

METHODS

BASIC-HT, a prospective real life study, enrolled 20,479 hypertensive patients initiating barnidipine treatment. The present paper focuses on a subgroup of patients in BASIC-HT for whom the previous treatment with amlodipine or lercanidipine was replaced by barnidipine. Tolerability and effectiveness of barnidipine in these patients were assessed at two visits during a 3-month follow up.

RESULTS

In 1710 mild to moderate hypertension patients switching treatment from amlodipine or lercanidipine to barnidipine monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drug classes, mean blood pressure decreased during 3-month follow-up. The mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 153.15 mmHg [95% CI 152.35-153.95] at baseline to 139.20 mmHg [95% CI 138.58-139.82] at visit 3, after 3 months. The mean diastolic blood pressure decreased from 88.85 mmHg at baseline [95% CI 88.36-89.34], to 81.56 mmHg [95% CI 81.20-81.91] at visit 3. Among these patients, 65.4% replaced their initial calcium channel blocker treatment to barnidipine for tolerability reasons. During the follow-up, the main adverse event reported was edema (4.8%). The nature and frequency of events reported in this subgroup of switcher patients were in line with those reported by the total population in BASIC-HT.

CONCLUSION

This real-life study suggests that replacement of other calcium channel blockers with barnidipine is a valuable therapeutic option, especially when tolerability is an issue.

Antihypertensive effect of barnidipine 10 mg or amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily in treatment-naive patients with essential hypertension: A 24-week, randomized, open-label, pilot study

BACKGROUND

Dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are largely employed for the treatment of hypertension, coronary heart disease, and heart failure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to compare the antihypertensive effect of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists barnidipine and amlodipine.

METHODS

This was a 24-week, randomized, open-label, pilot study. Consecutive treatment-naive patients with grade I or II essential hypertension (office sitting systolic blood pressure [BP] of 140-179 mm Hg and diastolic BP of 90-109 mm Hg) were enrolled. The primary end points were the effect of treatment with either barnidipine 10 mg or amlodipine 5 mg once daily on office and ambulatory BP, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and markers of cardiac damage, serum procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide, and plasma amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations. Patients were assessed at enrollment, and 12 and 24 weeks. During each visit, the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) was also monitored using spontaneous reporting, patient interview, and physical examination, the relationship to study drug being determined by the investigators. Compliance with treatment was assessed at each study visit by counting returned tablets.

RESULTS

Thirty eligible patients (20 men, 10 women; mean [SD] age, 47 [12] years) were included in the study; all patients completed the 24 weeks of study treatment. Twelve weeks after randomization, 6 patients in the amlodipine group had their dose doubled to 10 mg due to inadequate BP control. Mean BP reductions at study end were not significantly different between the barnidipine and amlodipine groups (office BP, -10.3/-9.4 vs -16.6/-9.1 mm Hg; ambulatory BP, 9.4/6.4 vs 8.1/5.1 mm Hg). Reductions in LVMI and markers of cardiac damage were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Significantly more patients in the amlodipine group reported drug-related AEs compared with those in the barnidipine group (9 [60%] vs 2 [13%]; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this small sample of treatment-naive hypertensive patients, the antihypertensive effect of barnidipine 10 mg once daily was not significantly different from that of amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily.

Comparative study of barnidipine and felodipine in Chinese patients with essential hypertension

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of barnidipine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension in Chinese patients. A total of 131 patients were randomized to receive either barnidipine (10 -15 mg) or felodipine (5 - 10 mg) once daily for 4 weeks. Both drugs reduced blood pressure significantly, with > or = 87% of patients obtaining a marked or moderate effect. The mean +/- SD reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 19.2 +/- 13.6 and 14.4 +/- 7.0 mmHg, respectively, for barnidipine treatment, and 20.3 +/- 11.3 and 14.7 +/- 7.7 mmHg, respectively, for felodipine treatment. There were no significant differences between the two drugs in terms of anti-hypertensive effect, heart rate, laboratory test results or incidence of adverse events. More patients taking felodipine experienced palpitations, but this difference was not statistically significant. Barnidipine is as efficacious and safe as felodipine in the treatment of essential hypertension in Chinese patients.

Barnidipine: a new calcium channel blocker for hypertension treatment

Although it is commonly agreed that all antihypertensive medications have similar efficacy, there are important differences related to safety, tolerability, patient adherence, cost effectiveness and effects on the prevention or retardation of associated disease progression. It is desirable for antihypertensives to have a long duration of action so that once-daily dosing is possible. In addition, antihypertensive medication must be able to be administered concomitantly with other drugs likely to be taken by the patients. This is particularly critical in the elderly population. Barnidipine, a novel, long-acting calcium antagonist, has met these challenges of modern pharmacotherapy. Its once-daily dosing, good tolerability and durable antihypertensive effect contribute to excellent patient adherence and make this drug a valuable addition to the antihypertensive formulary.

An open-label, randomized, controlled, 4-week comparative clinical trial of barnidipine hydrochloride, a calcium-channel blocker, and benazepril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in Chinese patients with renal parenchymal hypertension

This study compared barnidipine, a calcium-channel blocker, and benazepril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in 85 Chinese patients with renal parenchymal hypertension (diastolic blood pressure range 95 - 110 mmHg). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg barnidipine or 10 mg benazepril orally daily for 4 weeks. In patients with diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg after 2 weeks of treatment, the dose of barnidipine or benazepril was increased by 5 or 10 mg, respectively. Both the barnidipine-treated group (n = 43) and the benazepril-treated group (n = 42) showed significant mean reductions from baseline in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The decrease in diastolic blood pressure with benazepril was significantly greater than with barnidipine treatment. Sitting heart rate was not changed by either drug. There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups. Barnidipine is similar to benazepril for the treatment of renal parenchymal hypertension.

Emerging drugs in the management of hypertension

Hypertension is a global health problem, affecting developing and developed countries alike. Most patients with hypertension are undiagnosed, and most diagnosed patients are either untreated or inadequately treated. Randomised controlled trial evidence suggests diuretic therapy for hypertension is as effective as newer drugs in reducing cardiovascular events. There is good evidence for the use of specific classes of drugs in hypertensive patients with a variety of associated clinical conditions, but for uncomplicated cases, the current emphasis in hypertension management is on blood pressure lowering rather than drug class. Individual patients vary in their responses to different drug classes, and optimal therapy for the individual is determined by trial and error. Pharmacogenomics may assist in tailoring therapy for individuals in the future. Emerging drugs include newer members of classes already established in clinical practice, for example, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, aldosterone receptor antagonists, calcium antagonists and centrally acting drugs; newer fixed-dose combination therapies; and more novel therapies, for example, endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists, activators of nitric oxide (NO)-sensitive guanylyl cyclase and vasopeptidase inhibitors.

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Barnidipine Hydrochloride in Thai Patients with Hypertension

This open-label, blinded study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of barnidipine at a titrated dose of 10 − 15 mg once daily for 8 weeks in the treatment of essential hypertension in 40 Thai patients. ‘Office’ blood pressure (BP) and 24-h ambulatory BP measurements were recorded. A systolic BP/ diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) reduction of 18.0 ± 13.6/9.1 ± 6.6 mmHg was obtained. The full response rate among patients with systolic and diastolic hypertension was 63% using either SBP or DBP criteria, and 54% using both SBP and DBP criteria. One of the two patients with isolated systolic hypertension had a full response, and the BP in two of the three patients with isolated diastolic hypertension was normalized. The trough-to-peak ratio and smoothness index for SBP/DBP were acceptable (0.76 ± 0.63/0.55 ± 0.26 and 1.2 ± 0.4/1.2 ± 0.3, respectively). In conclusion, once-daily barnidipine monotherapy provides effective 24-h BP control and is generally well tolerated in ambulatory patients.