Advantages of single-stage surgical treatment with salter innominate osteotomy and Pemberton pericapsular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of both hips

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes for the anterior and medial approaches to open reduction in the treatment of bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) affects 1-3% of newborns and 20% of cases are bilateral. The optimal surgical management strategy for patients with bilateral DDH who fail bracing, closed reduction or present too late for these methods to be used is unclear. There are proponents of both medial approach open reduction (MAOR) and anterior approach open reduction (AOR); however, there is little evidence to inform this debate.

METHODS

We will perform a systematic review designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol. We will search the medical and scientific databases including the grey and difficult to locate literature. The Medical Subject Headings "developmental dysplasia of the hip", "congenital dysplasia of the hip", "congenital hip dislocation", "developmental hip dislocation", and their abbreviations, "DDH" and "CDH" will be used, along with the qualifier "bilateral". Reviewers will independently screen records for inclusion and then independently extract data on study design, population characteristics, details of operative intervention and outcomes from the selected records. Data will be synthesised and a meta-analysis performed if possible. If not possible we will analyse data according to Systematic Review without Meta-Analysis guidance. All studies will be assessed for risk of bias. For each outcome measure a summary of findings will be presented in a table with the overall quality of the recommendation assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach.

DISCUSSION

The decision to perform MAOR or AOR in patients with bilateral DDH who have failed conservative management is not well informed by the current literature. High-quality, comparative studies are exceptionally challenging to perform for this patient population and likely to be extremely uncommon. A systematic review provides the best opportunity to deliver the highest possible quality of evidence for bilateral DDH surgical management.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID CRD42022362325).

Modified Pemberton Pelvic Osteotomy Through Inner Ilium Approach for Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Children

INTRODUCTION

Pemberton osteotomy is a widely used operation in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The traditional pelvic osteotomy was through outside of the ilium. However, in this study, we performed the pelvic osteotomy through the inner ilium approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 79 patients diagnosed with DDH with open surgery in our hospital from March 2016 to May 2018. There were 39 patients who underwent outside ilium Pemberton osteotomy (PO) and 40 patients who underwent inner "L shaped" ilium Pemberton osteotomy (ILSO). Acetabular index (AI), center-edge angle of Wiberg (CE angle), Severin grading scoring system, postoperative avascular necrosis (AVN) by Kalamchi and McEwen classification, and McKay grading scoring system were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the PO group and ILSO group on AI (p = 0.476), CE angles (p = 0.225), avascular necrosis (Kalamchi and McEwen, p = 0.854), and hip function (McKay's, p = 0.444) on the final follow-up. There were significant differences in X-ray radiation (p < 0.001), blood loss (p = 0.011) and surgery time (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Inner side ilium is a viable approach for Pemberton osteotomy of DDH in children with less X-ray radiation, and less blood loss and shorter surgery time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00676-7.

No Difference in the Incidence of Complications in Pediatric Patients with Moderate Anemia 30 Days after Pediatric Hip Surgery with and without Blood Transfusion

This study investigated the association between postoperative blood transfusion and the incidence of postoperative complications 30 days after pediatric hip surgery as well as factors significantly associated with 30-day postoperative complications. Patients were divided into two groups: those with postoperative complications and those with no complications. Postoperative hematocrit (Hct) was categorized as <25%, 25–30%, and >30%. Comparison was made between all postoperative complications at the 30-day follow-up that were influenced by anemia in patients who received transfusion and those who did not. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with postoperative complications. The overall 30-day postoperative complication rate for all patients was 17% (24/138). No significant difference between the transfusion and the non-transfusion patients was found. Preoperative hematocrit (Hct) was significantly lower in the complications group (p = 0.030), and both length of stay and 30-day readmission were significantly higher in patients with complications (p = 0.011 and p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed female gender (OR: 3.50, 95% CI: 1.18–10.36; p = 0.026) and length of hospital stay (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08–1.41; p = 0.004) to be factors independently associated with 30-day postoperative complications. However, no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications at 30 days following pediatric hip dysplasia surgery was found between patients who received blood transfusion to maintain a Hct level ≥25% and those not receiving transfusion.

Outcomes and complications of patients undergoing Salter's innominate osteotomies for hip dysplasia: a systematic review of comparative studies

The purpose of this systematic review is to assess outcomes and complications of patients undergoing Salter's innominate osteotomies (SIOs) for the correction of hip dysplasia along with patient and technical factors that can be optimized to improve outcomes after SIO. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from data inception to 9 October 2018. Data were presented descriptively. Twenty-seven studies were identified including 1818 hips (87.1%) treated with SIO (mean age of 2.1 ± 2.5 years and mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 5.0 years). Patients undergoing SIO had a post-operative center-edge angle (CEA) of 31.3° ± 5.3° and an acetabular index (AI) angle of 16.1° ± 5.2°. Patients undergoing SIO with pre-operative traction had significantly lower (P = 0.049) post-operative McKay criteria scores compared to patients without pre-operative traction. Patients undergoing SIO between the ages of 1.5-2 years had significantly better (P < 0.05) post-operative McKay criteria scores compared to patients aged 4-6 years. The complication rate was 9.4% with avascular necrosis (2.5%) being most common. This review found that SIO for developmental dysplasia of the hip produces generally good post-operative clinical outcomes. The CEA and AI can be corrected to normal range after SIO. Patients may have superior outcomes if they have SIO at a younger age, were not treated with pre-operative traction and did not have untreated contralateral hip dysplasia. Outcomes appear to be similar between one-stage bilateral SIO and a two-stage procedure in the setting of bilateral hip dysplasia; however, more multicentered studies are needed to confirm these results.

Biomechanical investigation of pelvic stability in developmental dysplasia of the hip: unilateral salter osteotomy versus one-stage bilateral salter osteotomy

Background

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common disease in infants and children, and the treatment of bilateral DDH remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the stability of one-stage bilateral Salter pelvic osteotomy for bilateral DDH in patients of walking age.

Methods

In total, nine child cadavers aged 2–6 years were included. A universal mechanical testing machine was used for stability test. We performed two different surgical procedures on the specimens: nine child cadavers underwent unilateral Salter pelvic osteotomy, and six child cadavers were randomly selected to undergo Salter pelvic osteotomy again to simulate one-stage bilateral Salter pelvic osteotomy. The stability of the bilateral sacroiliac joints, local stability of the operation area, ultimate load test, and axial stiffness were evaluated.

Results

Both unilateral and bilateral Salter osteotomy could destroy the integrity of the pelvic ring and increase the risk of pelvic instability. In this study, compared with unilateral Salter osteotomy, bilateral Salter osteotomy had similar pelvic stability, and there was no significant difference between unilateral and bilateral Salter osteotomy in sacroiliac joint stability (p > 0.05), local stability (p = 0.763), ultimate load (p = 0.328), and axial stiffness (p = 0.480).

Conclusions

One-stage bilateral Salter pelvic osteotomy as a potential surgical method is viable and stable for children with bilateral DDH.

Comparison of total cost and outcomes between single-stage open reduction and Pemberton periacetabular osteotomy operation and two separate consecutive operations in treatment of bilateral developmental hip dysplasia in children at walking age

Open reduction and Pemberton periacetabular osteotomy (PPO) is one of the most preferred techniques for the treatment of developmental hip dyslaplasia (DDH) after the walking age. Performing the surgery as a one-stage operation or two separate consecutive operations is a controversial issue. In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes, length of hospitalization and total cost between the patients whom had single-stage open reduction and PPO or two consecutive operations due to bilateral DDH in the walking age children. One hundred thirty patients with bilateral DDH had undergone open reduction and PPO for both hips. Seventy-five patients had one-stage open reduction and PPO for both of the hips, whereas 55 patients have two separate consecutive operations. Total time of exposure to anesthetics, blood loss and duration of operation were noted. Hospitalization period and total treatment costs were also noted for each patient. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the preoperative and postoperative AIs (P > 0.05). Comparing the total cost, length of hospitalization, exposure to anesthetics, perioperative blood loss, there was statistically significant difference between the groups (P < 0.005). Single-stage surgery had favorable outcomes. Major benefits of single-stage surgery for treatment of bilateral DDH are the reduced costs, anesthesia duration, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization period. Also it can be presumed that prolonged immobilization can lead to loss of bone strength and resulting in fragility fractures. So single-stage open reduction and PPO for bilateral DDH can be preferred in experienced clinics.

Simultaneous bilateral single-stage combined open reduction and pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip

Children older than 18 months with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) for the first time or who do not respond to closed treatment require open reduction with/without acetabuloplasty. We determined whether open reduction and pelvic acetabuloplasty using the Pemberton or Dega technique for both hips simultaneously was well tolerated and offered better outcomes. A total of 140 hips of 70 patients with bilateral DDH were identified. All patients were diagnosed after they started walking. Patients were treated with bilateral single-stage open reduction with acetabuloplasty using the Pemberton or Dega procedure. All patients were prospectively followed up between 2007 and 2018. Results were considered satisfactory if the acetabular index was <24°. Hemoglobin levels were evaluated in all patients. At the final follow-up, the results were evaluated radiologically and clinically based on the modified Severin's classification and modified McKay criteria, respectively. The mean age at surgery was 20.3 months (range, 16-24). The mean operative time was 228 minutes. The mean postoperative hemoglobin level was 90.5 g/L (range, 61-122; SD, ±13.4). The mean differences between the preoperative and postoperative acetabular index values for both hips were 22.36° (SD, ±6.69°) and 22.64° (SD, ±6.69°) for the right and left hips, respectively. Open reduction with pelvic acetabuloplasty using the Pemberton or Dega technique simultaneously in both hips was well tolerated, cost-effective, had excellent outcomes, and posed no additional risk to patients with DDH younger than 24 months.

Salter osteotomy without open reduction in the Tönnis type II developmental hip dysplasia: A retrospective clinical study

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of children older than 18 months who were treated with Salter osteotomy without open reduction for Tönnis type II hip dysplasia.

METHODS

Thirty-two type II hips of 24 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 43.22 (18-108) months. The mean follow-up period was 50 (24-142) months. Seven patients had left sided, nine had right sided, and eight had bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip. All patients underwent closed reduction and Salter osteotomy. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were assessed by measuring the center-edge (CE) angle of Wiberg, Smith's c/b and h/b ratio, and acetabular index (AI). Patients were evaluated clinically according to McKay's criteria and radiologically according to Severin criteria. The Kalamchi and MacEwen criteria were used in the evaluation of avascular necrosis.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative AI, CE angle, c/b, and h/b ratio were 36.7° (±4.1), 7.2° (±5.9), 0.9 (±0.08), and 0.05 (±0.04), respectively. The mean latest follow-up AI, CE angle, c/b, and h/b ratio were 18.2° (±1.7), 38.8° (±5.4), 0.6 (±0.03), and 0.19 (±0.04), respectively. The comparison of preoperative and postoperative radiological values revealed statistically significant improvement ( p < 0.01). On the latest physical examinations of the patients, 25 (78.1%) hips were rated excellent, and 7 (21.9%) were rated good according to the McKay criteria. The Severin classification determined 25 (78.1%) hips were grade I and 7 (21.9%) hips were grade II. Type I avascular necrosis (AVN) was seen in four (12.5%) hips. Three of these four hips were more superolateral in preoperative radiographs (c/b > 1 and h/b < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Salter osteotomy without open reduction is a good surgery option for Tönnis type II hip dysplasia, in which closed reduction can be performed. However, the risk of AVN should be kept in mind in more superolateral type 2 hips.

Sequential one-stage combined procedure for treating bilateral developmental hip dysplasia after walking age

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of the sequential one-stage combined procedure for treating bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) that was diagnosed after walking age.

Methods

Thirty-five patients (70 hips) with late-presenting bilateral DDH were treated with the sequential one-stage combined procedure. Hips were reclassified according to the operative time and divided into the first and the second operated hips. The outcomes were compared clinically and radiographically between the two sides preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results

The mean interval time between the two procedures was 5.9 months (range: 2–9 months). The first operated hip achieved better results than did the second operated hip. A total of 68.6% (24/35) of the patients in our series had an asymmetric outcome.

Conclusions

The sequential one-stage combined procedure is a challenge, but a reasonable alternative surgery for bilateral DDH in children after walking age. An asymmetric outcome is a special complication of this procedure.

Reliability of the sourcil method of acetabular index measurement in developmental dysplasia of the hip

PURPOSE

The ability to monitor and study developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) requires validated radiographic outcome measures. The sourcil method of acetabular index measurement (AI-S) has not yet been shown to be a reliable measure of acetabular dysplasia in a DDH population, despite its widespread use. The aims of this study were to test the reliability of the AI-S method in a DDH population, and to compare the reliability of the AI-S method with that of the classic lateral edge method (AI-L).

METHODS

From an institutional database, standardized anteroposterior hip radiographs were obtained from a cohort of 35 female patients (70 hips) at two and five years of age who had been treated nonoperatively for DDH. Three observers independently measured the acetabular index using the AI-L and AI-S methods on all 70 hips at two time points, four weeks apart.

RESULTS

The inter-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the AI-L and AI-S methods was between good and excellent at 0.94 (confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 0.96) and 0.91 (CI 0.87 to 0.94), respectively. The ICCs for intra-rater reliability for the AI-L method were excellent at 0.93 (CI 0.90 to 0.95), 0.95 (CI 0.93 to 0.97) and 0.95 (CI 0.94 to 0.97) for raters 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The ICCs for intra-rater reliability for the AI-S method were between good and excellent at 0.91 (CI 0.87 to 0.93), 0.93 (CI 0.90 to 0.95) and 0.90 (CI 0.86 to 0.93) for raters 1, 2 and 3 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both AI-S and AI-L methods are equally reliable radiographic measures of DDH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (diagnostic).

Blood Transfusion Incidence, Risk Factors, and Associated Complications in Surgical Treatment of Hip Dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Perioperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion is a known complication of hip dysplasia (HD) surgery. Here we examine rates of, risk factors for, and postoperative complications associated with transfusion during HD surgery.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric database was queried for patients treated by an orthopaedist from 2012 to 2013. HD cases were categorized by Current Procedural Terminology codes into femoral osteotomies, acetabular osteotomies, combined femoral/acetabular osteotomies, and open reductions. Patients were grouped by comorbidities: neuromuscular (NM) disease (eg, cerebral palsy) group, non-NM with other comorbidity (Other) group, and no known comorbidity (NL) group. Patients were stratified by weight-normalized transfusion volume. Multivariate regression analysis of transfusion association with procedures, demographics, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory values, and 30-day complications was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1184 HD cases were included. Transfusion rates for the NL, Other, and NM groups, respectively, were 44/451 (9.8%), 61/216 (28.2%), and 161/517 (31.1%). Transfusion volumes (mean±SD) for the NL, Other, and NM groups, respectively, were 8.4±5.4, 13.9±8.8, and 15.5±10.0 mL/kg (P<0.001). Combined osteotomies had the highest transfusion rates in the NM and Other groups (35.7% and 45.8%, respectively), whereas acetabular osteotomies had the highest rate in the NL group (15.8%). Open reductions had the lowest transfusion rate (all groups). Longer operations were independently associated with transfusion (all groups, per hour increase, OR>1.5, P<0.001). Independent patient risk factors included preoperative hematocrit <31% (NM group, OR=18.42, P=0.013), female sex (NL group, OR=3.55, P=0.008), developmental delay (NM group, OR=2.37, P=0.004), pulmonary comorbidity (NM group, OR=1.73, P=0.032), and older age (NL group, per year increase: OR=1.29, P<0.001). In all groups, transfusion was associated with longer hospitalization (P<0.001). We observed a volume-dependent increase in overall complication rate within the Other group for transfusion volumes >15 mL/kg (25.0% vs. 5.4% for <15 mL/kg, P=0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several risk factors for transfusion in HD surgery. The incidence of transfusion in HD surgery and its association with adverse outcomes warrants development of appropriate patient management guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-prognostic.

[Acetabuloplasty - The Dega and Pemberton technique]

BACKGROUND

Hip dysplasia is the most common congenital deformity requiring surgical correction osteotomy in order to prevent early onset of secondary hip arthrosis. The shape of the acetabulum can be modified by Dega or Pemberton osteotomy and is indicated for hip dysplasia and luxation with irregularities of the socket for children aged between 2 and 12 when the y‑physis is still open.

METHOD

We will describe indication, contra-indication, preoperative planning as well as details of the Pemberton technique. In addition, we will provide practical advice based on our long-standing experience.

RESULTS

We present long-term results from the literature and also from our department. In addition, we will explain and critically discuss our own experiences and the risks and complications of surgical techniques. Good long-term results are reported for acetabuloplasties and Salter osteotomy which are preferred for surgical treatment of hip dysplasia in early life. Advantages and disadvantages of both surgical techniques will be compared in the discussion section.

CONCLUSION

Dega and Pemberton acetabuloplasty shows good long-term results regarding prevention of a secondary coxarthrosis. However, correct indication is crucial since this surgical technique is more difficult compared to Salter osteotomy but is also associated with a higher correction potential and a lower complication rate.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip in the newborn: A systematic review

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) denotes a wide spectrum of conditions ranging from subtle acetabular dysplasia to irreducible hip dislocations. Clinical diagnostic tests complement ultrasound imaging in allowing diagnosis, classification and monitoring of this condition. Classification systems relate to the alpha and beta angles in addition to the dynamic coverage index (DCI). Screening programmes for DDH show considerable geographic variation; certain risk factors have been identified which necessitate ultrasound assessment of the newborn. The treatment of DDH has undergone significant evolution, but the current gold standard is still the Pavlik harness. Duration of Pavlik harness treatment has been reported to range from 3 to 9.3 mo. The beta angle, DCI and the superior/lateral femoral head displacement can be assessed via ultrasound to estimate the likelihood of success. Success rates of between 7% and 99% have been reported when using the harness to treat DDH. Avascular necrosis remains the most devastating complication of harness usage with a reported rate of between 0% and 28%. Alternative non-surgical treatment methods used for DDH include devices proposed by LeDamany, Frejka, Lorenz and Ortolani. The Rosen splint and Wagner stocking have also been used for DDH treatment. Surgical treatment for DDH comprises open reduction alongside a combination of femoral or pelvic osteotomies. Femoral osteotomies are carried out in cases of excessive anteversion or valgus deformity of the femoral neck. The two principal pelvic osteotomies most commonly performed are the Salter osteotomy and Pemberton acetabuloplasty. Serious surgical complications include epiphyseal damage, sciatic nerve damage and femoral neck fracture.