Randomized Prospective Study of Olecranon Fracture Fixation: Cable Pin System versus Tension Band Wiring

Postoperative rehabilitation exercises with addition of blood flow restriction therapy following olecranon fracture: A case report

BACKGROUND

The addition of blood flow restriction therapy (BFRT) to exercise in patients with olecranon fracture treated surgically has not been described in the literature.

PURPOSE

To describe the effects and safety of BFRT exercises in the postoperative rehabilitation of a patient with olecranon fracture.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 27-year-old male with a surgically treated olecranon fracture completed a 12-week postoperative physical therapy programme. The assessment was performed at the start of rehabilitation, 4 and 12 weeks. The patient had elbow pain, decreased active range of motion (AROM), reduced handgrip strength, and limited physical function. The patient was treated with low-intensity resistance exercises with BFRT. The BFRT was applied with three exercises per stage, at 50% of the limb occlusion pressure and 75 repetitions per exercise. At discharge from physical therapy, improvements were observed in pain intensity (5.9-1.4 cm), AROM of elbow flexion (88°-137°) and extension (-22°--2°), AROM of forearm pronation (18°-68°) and supination (34°-78°), handgrip strength (8 kg-47 kg), physical function (22.9%-89.6%), and disability (72.7%-13.6%). These changes reached the minimal clinically important difference at the time of discharge for all measures, except for extension, pronation, and supination AROM.

CONCLUSION

The addition of BFRT to exercise was effective in improving pain, elbow, and wrist AROM, handgrip strength, function, and disability in a patient with surgically treated olecranon fracture. Despite the inherent limitations of our design, we believe these preliminary findings are compelling to warrant future investigations.

Locked Tension Band Wiring: A Modified Technique for Olecranon Fractures-A Multicenter Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Complications with Conventional Methods

Purpose

Tension band wiring is the standard treatment for olecranon fractures, but it is associated with high rate of implant-related complication. To reduce this high complication rate, we developed a modified technique, locked tension band wiring (LTBW). The aim of this study was to investigate whether LTBW reduces complication and reoperation rates compared to conventional methods (CTBW).

Methods

We identified 213 olecranon fractures treated with tension band wiring: 183 were treated with CTBW, and 30 were treated with LTBW, and patients in each group were selected using propensity score matching. We evaluated operation time, intraoperative bleeding, complication and reoperation rates, the amount of Kirschner's wire (K-wire) back-out, and Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). Complications included nonunion, loss of fracture reduction, implant failure, infection, neurological impairment, heterotopic ossification, and implant irritation. Implant removal included at the patient's request with no symptoms.

Results

We finally investigated 29 patients in both groups. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the LTBW (106.7 ± 17.5 vs. 79.7 ± 21.1 min; p < 0.01). Complication rates were significantly lower in the LTBW than the CTBW group (10.3 vs. 37.9%; p = 0.03). The rate of implant irritation was more frequent in the CTBW, but there was no significant difference (3.4 vs. 20.7%; p = 0.10). Removal rate was significantly lower in the LTBW (41.4 vs. 72.4%; p = 0.03). The mean amount of K-wire backout at last follow-up was significantly less in the LTBW (3.79 ± 0.65 mm vs. 8.97 ± 3.54 mm; p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in mean MEPI at all follow-up periods (77.4 ± 9.0 vs. 71.5 ± 14.0; p = 0.07, 87.4 ± 7.2 vs. 85.2 ± 10.3; p = 0.40, 94.6 ± 5.8 vs. 90.4 ± 9.0; p = 0.06, respectively).

Conclusion

Our modified TBW significantly increased operation time compared to conventional method, but reduced the complication and removal rate and had equivalent functional outcomes in this retrospective study.

Locked Tension Band Wiring for Mayo IIA Olecranon Fractures: Modified Surgical Technique and Retrospective Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness with Locking Plate

Background: Tension band wiring (TBW) has traditionally been used for simple olecranon fractures, but due to its many complications, locking plate (LP) is increasingly being employed. To reduce the complications, we developed a modified technique for olecranon fracture repair, locked TBW (LTBW). The study aimed to compare (1) the frequency of complications and re-operations between LP and LTBW techniques, (2) clinical outcomes and the cost efficacy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 336 patients who underwent surgical treatment for simple and displaced olecranon fractures (Mayo Type ⅡA) in the hospitals of a trauma research group. We excluded open fractures and polytrauma. We investigated complication and re-operation rates as primary outcomes. As secondary outcomes, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the total cost, including surgery, outpatients and re-operation, were examined between the two groups. Results: We identified 34 patients in the LP group and 29 patients in the LTBW group. The mean follow-up period was 14.2 ± 3.9 months. The complication rate in the LTBW group was comparable to that in the LP group (10.3% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.49). Re-operation and removal rates were not significantly different between the groups (6.9% vs. 8.8%; p = 1.000 and 41.4% vs. 58.8%; p = 1.00, respectively). Mean MEPI at 3 months was significantly lower in the LTBW group (69.7 vs. 82.6; p < 0.01), but mean MEPI at 6 and 12 months were not significantly different (90.6 vs. 85.2; p = 0.06, 93.9 vs. 95.2; p = 0.51, respectively). The mean cost/patient of the total cost in the LTBW group were significantly lower than those in the LP group ($5,249 vs. $6,138; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed that LTBW achieved clinical outcomes equivalent to those of LP and was significantly more cost effective than LP in the retrospective cohort. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Olecranon Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Olecranon fractures account for 10% of all elbow fractures and are more likely to result from a low-energy injury. A displaced fracture with a stable ulnohumeral joint (Mayo type 2) is the most common type of injury.

»

The management of an isolated olecranon fracture is based on patient factors (age, functional demand, and if medically fit to undergo surgery) and fracture characteristics including displacement, fragmentation, and elbow stability.

»

Nonoperative management can be successfully used in undisplaced fractures (Mayo type 1) and in displaced fractures (Mayo type 2) in frail patients with lower functional demands.

»

Patients with displaced olecranon fractures with a stable ulnohumeral joint without significant articular surface fragmentation (Mayo type 2A) can be managed with tension band wiring, plate osteosynthesis (PO), intramedullary fixation, or suture repair.

»

PO is advocated for multifragmentary fractures and fractures that are associated with ulnohumeral instability. It is essential to consider the variable anatomy of the proximal ulna during surgery.

Scandinavian Olecranon Research in the Elderly (SCORE): protocol for a non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial comparing operative and conservative treatment of olecranon fractures in the elderly

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of olecranon fractures is growing in the elderly population. The traditional operative approach is giving way among the elderly to conservative treatment, which seems to provide a comparable functional outcome with a lower complication burden. However, there is still a lack of reliable evidence to support this shift.The objective of this trial is to investigate whether conservative treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in patients aged 75 or older yields comparable results to those of operative treatment in terms of pain and daily function.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Scandinavian Olecranon Research in the Elderly (SCORE) is a randomised, controlled, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Eligible patients will be randomised to either conservative or operative treatment. The sample size will be 68 patients and allocation done at a 1:1 ratio (34 patients per group). The randomisation is stratified according to the participating hospital and patient's sex. Both groups will receive the same postoperative physiotherapy and pain management. The primary outcome is Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes are pain and satisfaction measured on visual analogue scales, Patient Reported Elbow Evaluation, range of motion of the elbow and extension strength of the elbow compared with the unaffected arm. Radiographs will be taken at each follow-up. Primary analysis of the results will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol for this clinical trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland and will be submitted for approval to the Regional Ethics Committees in Linköping, Sweden and Copenhagen, Denmark. Every recruiting centre will apply local research approvals. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04401462.

PROTOCOL VERSION

This is the second protocol version dated on 16 April 2020.

Cerclage fixation without K-wires is associated with fewer complications and reoperations compared with tension band wiring in stable displaced olecranon fractures in elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

Tension band wiring of olecranon fractures has high reported rates of complications and reoperations. We aimed to compare classic tension band wiring to cerclage fixation without K-wires in the treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in elderly patients. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included complications and patient reported outcomes. Outcomes following non-operative treatment were also studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged > 69 years presenting with Mayo class 2a and 2b olecranon fractures at our institution from 2004 through 2016 (n = 239) were eligible for study. Fracture type, treatment method, complications and reoperations were assessed from radiographs and hospital files. QuickDASH surveys were collected by mail.

RESULTS

Patients operated with tension band wire technique had more reoperations (p value 0.03): relative risk (RR) 2.2 (CI 1.08-4.3), odds ratio (OR) 2.6 (CI 1.05-6.4), and complications (p value 0.001): RR 2.5 (CI 1.51-4.1), OR 3.7 (CI 1.67-8.2), compared with those operated with cerclage technique. Non-operative treatment yielded similar complication (p value 0.2) and reoperation rates (p value 0.06) as cerclage fixation. The answer rate was insufficient to compare QuickDASH scores between treatments methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients 70 years and older undergoing cerclage fixation for displaced stable olecranon fractures (Mayo class 2), the reoperation and complications rates were less than half of those in patients undergoing TBW fixation. Non-operative treatment yielded similar reoperation and complication rates to cerclage fixation, in selected cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III-retrospective comparative cohort study.

Complications and reoperations related to tension band wiring and plate osteosynthesis of olecranon fractures

BACKGROUND

Olecranon fractures are common and usually treated operatively either by tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF). The aim of this study was to assess early complications and reoperations and their predictive factors related to those operative methods.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients with an operatively treated olecranon fracture between 2007 and 2017 at Turku University hospital was performed. Reoperations, postoperative complications, and potential risk factors for these were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 434 patients (387 TBW and 47 PF) were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of early complications (49% vs. 62%, P = .262) or reoperations (38% vs. 53%, P = .079) between patients treated with TBW and PF. In the TBW group, the intramedullary placement of Kirschner (K)-wires predisposed patients to complications compared to transcortical placement of the K-wires according to multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 1.94, P = .026). Younger age was associated with the frequency of reoperations, the odds decreasing 24% for every 10 years of age (P < .001). Further, patients with high-energy trauma mechanisms were reoperated more often compared to patients with low-energy trauma (OR 2.99, P = .002). Also, excellent postoperative reduction was associated with higher reoperation rate than good or fair reduction (OR 0.48, P = .033).

CONCLUSION

There is a high risk of early complications and reoperations associated to both TBW and PF. Transcortical positioning of K-wires may reduce the rate of complications in TBW.

Treatment of Displaced Olecranon Fractures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The incidence of olecranon fractures is rising. Displaced fractures are usually operated either by tension band wiring or plate fixation. The aim of this review is to evaluate the best current evidence on the management of displaced olecranon fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were systematically gathered in May 2018 from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and PEDro databases. The methodological quality of articles was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's domain-based framework. Prospero database registration number: CRD42018096650.

RESULTS

Of 1518 identified records, finally, 5 were relevant. Four trials were found on tension band wiring: two compared tension band wiring with plate fixation (n = 108), one compared plate fixation with an olecranon memory connector (n = 40), and one trial compared tension band wiring with a modified tension band wiring called Cable Pin System (n = 62). In addition, one trial compared operative and conservative treatment in elderly (n = 19). The risk of bias was considered low in two and high in three of the trials. The follow-up time was 5-36 months, and outcome measures varied from patient-rated and physician-rated measures to radiological outcomes. In the analysis, there was no difference between tension band wiring and plate fixation. The data were insufficient for further quantitative analysis.

CONCLUSION

No differences were found in clinical or patient-rated outcome measures between the two most frequent fixation methods (tension band wiring and plate fixation) of displaced olecranon fractures. Current data are not sufficient to evaluate other treatment methods; however, conservative treatment might serve as an option for selected patients in the elderly population.

Advantages of expulsion-proof pins in the treatment of olecranon fractures with tension band wiring: Comparison with a control group

INTRODUCTION

Tension band wiring is considered the standard treatment for transverse olecranon fractures. Its main complications are pin migration and discomfort caused by the hardware. We have designed and used "expulsion-proof" pins (EPP) that are shaped to prevent migration and reduce discomfort. This study compared the complication rate between our device and Kirschner pins (controls).

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesised that EPP would have lower migration rates and fewer complications than standard Kirschner pins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, multi-operator, observational, study examined data from January 1996 to December 2014. The primary outcome was the occurrence of pin migration. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of one or more additional complications and the hardware removal rate.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 101 patients: 53 (52.4%) with expulsion-proof pins and 48 (47.6%) controls. The mean follow-up was 240.6days in the EPP group and 268.9days in the control group. No cases of migration (0%) were found in the EPP group versus 21 (43.7%) cases in the controls (p<0.05). One or more complications occurred in 18 (33.9%) patients in the EPP group versus 46 (95.8%) controls (p<0.05). There was material discomfort in 13 (24.5%) cases and 1 (1.9%) case of secondary displacement in the EPP group, compared with 38 (79.2%) and 7 (14.6%) cases, respectively, in the controls (p<0.05). The rate of delayed consolidation was statistically identical in the two groups (p=0.103). The hardware was removed in 13 (24.5%) cases in the EPP group compared with 36 (75%) controls (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

EPPs are useful for management of olecranon fractures treated via TBW: the pins do not migrate and can reduce complications, discomfort, secondary displacement, and the hardware removal rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The fragility of findings of randomized controlled trials in shoulder and elbow surgery

BACKGROUND

Considered the gold standard of study designs, randomized controlled trials' (RCTs) results shape clinical practice, effect policy, and influence reimbursement. The fragility index (FI) can be used to quantitate the relative robustness of RCT results, with higher scores indicating more stout results. Unfortunately, most RCTs in surgery have fragile results. The aim of this study was to report on the FI in addition to a qualitative assessment of recent RCTs within the field of shoulder and elbow surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed identifying recently published shoulder/elbow RCTs that included 1:1 allocated parallel study arms, dichotomous primary outcome variables, and statistical significance. The FI was calculated by sequentially modifying outcome groups by exchanging a nonevent in one group to an event until the P value for the outcome comparison, as calculated by the Fisher exact test, was increased above the .05 threshold.

RESULTS

Thirty RCTs were included. The median FI was 4. Sixty percent trials had a FI of 2 or less. Fifty-three percent studies reported that participants were lost to follow-up. In 87.5% of these studies, the losses to follow-up exceeded their respective FIs. Only 53% of studies defined a primary outcome variable and 60% studies performed a prestudy power analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The median FI reported in the recent shoulder/elbow literature is 4; however, a high proportion of included RCTs display significant methodological concerns. The FI is a useful adjunct to analyze RCT results, but careful analysis of trial methods should be employed in each circumstance before drawing conclusions.

Surgical Management for Olecranon Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Olecranon fractures are common upper-extremity fractures amenable to various surgical techniques. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate surgical management strategies for olecranon fractures in adult patients. Two investigators independently screened articles from records obtained from MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases. The authors compared tension-band wiring (TBW) with plate fixation (PF) for the outcomes of complications and hardware removal. Subgroup analyses were conducted comparing randomized controlled trials with observational studies for each outcome. In addition, the authors evaluated novel fixation techniques other than TBW and PF. Twenty-four studies were included in the systematic review and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis of TBW vs PF. Compared with TBW (n=270), patients who underwent PF (n=369) had a significantly lower complication rate (relative risk, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.64; P<.01; I²=16%). Plate fixation (41 of 332) also had less hardware removal compared with TBW (79 of 236; relative risk, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.50; P<.01; I²=0%). Subgroup analyses showed no difference when comparing randomized controlled trials with observational studies for the outcomes of complication rate (P=.45) and hardware removal (P=.54). Qualitative analysis revealed novel methods of olecranon fixation: a modified cable pin system, tension banding through 2 cannulated screws, olecranon memory connector fixation, and cancellous screw TBW. This meta-analysis revealed significantly lower complication and hardware removal rates for PF compared with TBW. Several novel methods of olecranon fixation may represent viable alternatives. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):75-82.].

Excellent results and low complication rate for anatomic polyaxial locking plates in comminuted proximal ulna fractures

BACKGROUND

Comminuted fractures of the proximal ulna remain a great challenge in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of comminuted proximal ulna fractures treated with a new construct type-anatomically preformed polyaxial locking compression plates.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2016, 46 patients with isolated comminuted fractures were treated with a 2.7-/3.5-mm VA-LCP Olecranon Plate (Synthes, Umkirch, Germany). Of these, 44 were available for an assessment after a mean follow-up period of 2.5 years (range, 12-50 months). We evaluated range of motion, time to recovery, revision rate, and indications, as well as functional scores. Radiographs were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 8 Mayo IB, 29 Mayo IIB, and 7 Mayo IIIB fractures. All fractures showed bony union, and only 2 revision surgical procedures were performed because of a new trauma. No other complications occurred. Mean range of motion was 139° (range, 105°-150°), and the mean pain level was less than 1 on a visual analog scale. Regarding elbow function, we found a mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 98; a mean Oxford Elbow Score of 44; and a mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score of 6. Of the plates, 41% were removed after an average time of 16 months, whereby a significant improvement in extension deficit was detected (P < .01). Ninety-five percent of all patients returned to their pretrauma sports level.

CONCLUSION

The 2.7-/3.5-mm VA-LCP Olecranon Plate represents an effective option with excellent fracture reduction, sufficient stability for early postoperative functional rehabilitation, and a minimum of complications.

Definition of infection after fracture fixation: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials to evaluate current practice

INTRODUCTION

One of the most challenging musculoskeletal complications in modern trauma surgery is infection after fracture fixation (IAFF). Although infections are clinically obvious in many cases, a clear definition of the term IAFF is crucial, not only for the evaluation of published research data but also for the establishment of uniform treatment concepts. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the definitions used in the scientific literature to describe infectious complications after internal fixation of fractures. The hypothesis of this study was that the majority of fracture-related literature do not define IAFF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Medline (OvidSP), PubMed publisher and Web-of-Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fracture fixation. Data were collected on the definition of infectious complications after fracture fixation used in each study. Study selection was accomplished through two phases. During the first phase, titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance, and the full texts of relevant articles were obtained. During the second phase, full-text articles were reviewed. All definitions were literally extracted and collected in a database. Then, a classification was designed to rate the quality of the description of IAFF.

RESULTS

A total of 100 RCT's were identified in the search. Of 100 studies, only two (2%) cited a validated definition to describe IAFF. In 28 (28%) RCTs, the authors used a self-designed definition. In the other 70 RCTs, (70%) there was no description of a definition in the Methods section, although all of the articles described infections as an outcome parameter in the Results section.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows that IAFF is not defined in a large majority of the fracture-related literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted with the objective to explore this important issue. The lack of a consensus definition remains a problem in current orthopedic trauma research and treatment and this void should be addressed in the near future.

Management of type IIB and IIIB olecranon fractures. Case series

•

Management of type IIB and IIIB olecranon fractures.

•

Report and evaluate the functional outcome of plate fixation.

•

Oxford elbow score.

•

Rotational range of movement and flexion arc.

Objectives

to report and evaluate the functional outcome of plate fixation in comminuted olecranon fractures (Mayo types IIB and IIIB).

Method

23 consecutive patients with comminuted fractures of the olecranon presenting to our unit Between Feb 2011 and Jan 2015, at a mean follow-up of thirty-six months. Main outcome measurements include radiographic healing, post-operative range of motion, complications, outcome score and patient satisfaction.

Results

Our study included thirteen females and ten males with a mean age of 55(18–97). Fourteen were Mayo type IIB and nine were Mayo type IIIB. Eighteen patients had no complications post-operatively with good outcome with mean oxford score of 45, full rotational ROM and mean flexion arc of 20–130 °. Five patients had range of motion between 40–90 ° with full rotational ROM and mean oxford score of 24. Two patients out of five required metal work removal. No non-unions were noted in our series.

Conclusion

Plate fixation of complex olecranon fracture is an effective, reliable method of treatment with low risk of non-union. Restoration of a functional flexion arc of movement can be expected with application of correct technique.

Societal costs in displaced transverse olecranon fractures: using decision analysis tools to find the most cost-effective strategy between tension band wiring and locked plating

BACKGROUND

Tension band wiring (TBW) and locked plating are common treatment options for Mayo IIA olecranon fractures. Clinical trials have shown excellent functional outcomes with both techniques. Although TBW implants are significantly less expensive than a locked olecranon plate, TBW often requires an additional operation for implant removal. To choose the most cost-effective treatment strategy, surgeons must understand how implant costs and return to the operating room influence the most cost-effective strategy. This cost-effective analysis study explored the optimal treatment strategies by using decision analysis tools.

METHODS

An expected-value decision tree was constructed to estimate costs based on the 2 implant choices. Values for critical variables, such as implant removal rate, were obtained from the literature. A Monte Carlo simulation consisting of 100,000 trials was used to incorporate variability in medical costs and implant removal rates. Sensitivity analysis and strategy tables were used to show how different variables influence the most cost-effective strategy.

RESULTS

TBW was the most cost-effective strategy, with a cost savings of approximately $1300. TBW was also the dominant strategy by being the most cost-effective solution in 63% of the Monte Carlo trials. Sensitivity analysis identified implant costs for plate fixation and surgical costs for implant removal as the most sensitive parameters influencing the cost-effective strategy. Strategy tables showed the most cost-effective solution as 2 parameters vary simultaneously.

CONCLUSION

TBW is the most cost-effective strategy in treating Mayo IIA olecranon fractures despite a higher rate of return to the operating room.

Quality of research and quality of reporting in elbow surgery trials

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are high in the hierarchy of scientific evidence, but possible sources of bias should be identified or even excluded. This systematic review assessed the methodologic quality and the quality of reporting of the RCTs on the treatment of elbow pathology.

METHODS

A systematic review of RCTs was performed on the treatment of elbow pathology. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant trials. Thirty-five of the initial 540 articles being an (pseudo) RCT on invasive treatment of elbow pathology in humans were included. These were scored with the use of an adapted Checklists to Evaluate A Report of a Nonpharmacologic Trial (CLEAR-NPT). To assess quality of reporting, points were administered to the articles based on the results from CLEAR-NPT list. The highest possible score for quality is 26 points.

RESULTS

The average quality score was 18.1 points (range, 10-25 points). The mean scores were 19.5 for trials published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine, 19.8 for those published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, and 20.3 for those published in the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important finding was that the overall quality and the quality of reporting has not improved over the years and that the overall quality of the selected studies and the quality of reporting in these trials is not related to the journal they are published in.

Surgical interventions for treating fractures of the olecranon in adults

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the olecranon (the bony tip of the elbow) account for approximately 1% of all upper extremity fractures. Surgical intervention is often required to restore elbow function. Two key methods of surgery are tension band wire fixation and plate fixation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of different surgical interventions in the treatment of olecranon fractures in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (22 September 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2014, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1946 to September week 2 2014), EMBASE (1980 to 19 September 2014), trial registers, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-RCTs that compared different surgical interventions for the treatment of olecranon fractures in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. The primary outcomes of this review were function, pain and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six small trials involving 244 adults with olecranon fractures. Of these, four were RCTs and two were quasi-RCTs; both of were at high risk of selection bias. All six trials were at high risk of performance bias, reflecting lack of blinding, and four trials were at high risk of detection bias. The quality of the evidence for most outcomes was generally very low because of limitations in study design and implementation, and either imprecision of the results or inadequate outcome measures. Thus, we are very uncertain about the estimates of effect.One trial (41 participants) comparing plate fixation with standard tension band wiring provided very low quality evidence at 16 to 86 weeks' follow-up of a better clinical outcome after plate fixation (good outcome (little pain or loss of elbow motion): 19/22 versus 9/19, risk ratio (RR) 1.82 favouring plate fixation, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 3.01). There was very low quality evidence of less symptomatic prominent metalwork after plate fixation (1/22 versus 8/19; RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.79). The results for other adverse effects (infection and delayed or non-union) were inconclusive. Evidence is pending from a newly (September 2014) completed trial (67 participants) making the same comparison.Four trials compared four different modified techniques of tension band wiring (i.e. additional intramedullary screw fixation, biodegradable pins, Netz pins and cable pin system) versus standard tension band wiring. There was very low quality evidence of little difference at six to 14 months in function assessed by a non-validated scoring tool from the addition of an intramedullary screw. However, there were fewer cases of metalwork prominence in the intramedullary screw group (1/15 versus 8/15; RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.49; one trial; 30 participants). There was very low quality evidence from one trial (25 participants) of little difference in subjectively or objectively assessed good outcome at a mean of 20 months between tension band wiring with biodegradable implants versus metal implants. There were no adverse events, either non-union or sinus or fluid accumulation, reported. All 10 participants in the metalwork group had an extra operation to remove their metalwork at one year. One trial, which did not report on function or pain, provided very low quality evidence of lower rates of metalwork for any reason or for symptoms after Netz pin tension band wiring compared with standard tension band wiring (11/21 with Netz pin versus 17/25 with standard tension band wiring; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.26; 46 participants); this evidence also supports the possibility of higher rates of metalwork removal for Netz pins. Two intra-operative complications occurred in the Netz pin group. The fourth trial, which compared the cable pin system with standard procedure, found low quality evidence that cable pin improved functional outcome at a mean of 21 months (Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range 0 to 100: best outcome: mean difference (MD) 7.89 favouring cable pin, 95% CI 3.14 to 12.64; one trial; 62 participants). It also found low quality evidence of fewer postoperative complications in the cable pin group (1/30 with cable pin system versus 7/32 standard tension band wiring; RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.17), although the evidence did not rule out the converse.One trial provided very low quality evidence of similar patient-reported function using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (0 to 100: worst function) at two or more years after fixation using a novel olecranon memory connector (OMC) compared with locking plate fixation (MD -0.70 favouring OMC, 95% CI -4.20 to 2.80; 40 participants). The only adverse event was a superficial infection in the locking plate group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions on the relative effects of the surgical interventions evaluated by the included trials. Further evidence, including patient-reported data, on the relative effects of plate versus tension band wiring is already pending from one recently completed RCT. Further RCTs, using good quality methods and reporting validated patient-reported measures of function, pain and activities of daily living at set follow-ups, are needed, including checking positive findings such as those relating to the use of an intramedullary screw and the cable pin system. Such trials should also include the systematic assessment of complications, further treatment including routine removal of metalwork and use of resources.

Factors influencing K-wire migration in tension-band wiring of olecranon fractures

BACKGROUND

Tension-band wiring is a popular method of internal fixation for simple olecranon fractures. Although fracture union rates and clinical outcomes are good, up to 80% of patients require removal because of prominent/symptomatic metalwork. The current literature remains unclear as to the best orientation of the longitudinal wires to minimize hardware failure. The aim of this study was to determine the surgically modifiable factors related to spontaneous wire pullout.

METHODS

A retrospective review of hospital theater records over a period of 6 years was performed to identify all olecranon tension-band wire procedures. Preoperative radiographs were used to confirm and classify the fracture. Intraoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed for a number of wire-associated variables: wire length within the ulna, medullary/cortical position, parallelism of wires, proximal wire prominence, wire angle relative to the ulna, distance from the articular surface, fracture gap, and subsequent pullout.

RESULTS

A total of 182 wires were analyzed. The mean age was 52.5 years, and the mean radiographic follow-up period was 7.3 months. Intramedullary wires had a mean pullout of 5.5 mm compared with 2.4 mm for transcortical wires (P < .0001). A multiple regression model noted 7 independent variables affecting wire pullout: age, bent wires, medullary/transcortical wire positioning, proximal prominence, ulnar shaft angle, distance from the articular surface, and articular step.

CONCLUSION

To minimize postoperative pullout of wires, we suggest anatomic reduction and transcortical wire orientation, without bending, in the subchondral bone close to the articular surface.

Long-term outcome of displaced, transverse, noncomminuted olecranon fractures

BACKGROUND

Operative treatment of a displaced, transverse, noncomminuted fracture of the olecranon is associated with good to excellent elbow function in retrospective short-term followup studies. However, to our knowledge, no studies have evaluated objective and subjective outcomes using standardized outcome instruments (ie, DASH and Mayo Elbow Performance Index [MEPI]) to quantify long-term outcome of these specific fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We evaluated (1) factors associated with disability, as measured with the DASH questionnaire; (2) factors associated with ulnohumeral motion; (3) factors associated with pain intensity; and (4) general descriptive findings for posttraumatic arthrosis, MEPI, ulnar neuropathy symptoms, and return to work between 10 and 32 years after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a transverse, noncomminuted fracture of the olecranon.

METHODS

Between 1977 and 1997, we performed ORIFs of transverse, noncomminuted olecranon fractures in 109 patients, of whom 35 had died, 14 had incomplete data in our registry, and 19 were lost to followup or declined participation, leaving 41 patients available for followup at a minimum of 10 years after surgery. During that time, our general indication for performing ORIF was greater than 2 mm displacement. The average age of these patients at the time of injury was 35 years (range, 18-73 years). Patient-reported outcome was quantified using the DASH questionnaire, and physician-based outcome was evaluated using the MEPI. To identify factors associated with disability (DASH), impairment (MEPI), ulnohumeral motion, and pain, we examined demographic and clinical data in bivariate analyses, and subsequently significant factors in multivariate analysis to identify independent predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

The sole factor associated with higher DASH scores in multivariable analysis was age at surgery, explaining 20% of the variability, with younger patients performing better. The mean arc of elbow flexion was 142° (range, 110°-160°), and the variation was associated with arthrosis alone (ie, a greater arc of motion was associated with a lesser grade of arthrosis according to the system of Broberg and Morrey). Pain was uncommon and generally was correlated with adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The good results of operative fixation (tension-band wiring) of a transverse, displaced olecranon fracture are durable with time. Patient-reported outcomes are excellent in the majority of patients. Residual patient-rated disability does not correlate with arthrosis or loss of extension.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.