Gender difference of symptoms of acute coronary syndrome among Chinese patients: a cross-sectional study

Gender Disparities in Patients' Decisions about the Management of Myocardial Infarction in East Chinese Province

Background

Previous studies showed that there are gender disparities in various respects of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including risk factors, symptoms, and outcomes. However, few of them noticed the gender disparities in patients' decision about the management of AMI, which might also be associated with the outcome.

Aims

To identify gender disparities in patients' decisions about the management of myocardial infarction.

Methods

In this cohort study, the critical time points including the time of symptom onset, visiting hospital, diagnosis of AMI, consent to coronary angiography (CAG), beginning of CAG, and balloon dilation were recorded. Medication and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 6 months were also recorded.

Results

Female patients took more time from symptom onset to visiting hospital (P = 0.001), from diagnosis of AMI to consent to CAG (P < 0.05), and from door to needle/balloon than male (P < 0.05). Less female patients accepted CAG (P < 0.05) and coronary intervention/bypass grafting (P < 0.05). Less female patients kept good inherence to antiplatelet therapy (P < 0.05) and statins (P < 0.05) than male, more female preferred traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) than male patient (P < 0.05), and most of them had MACE within 6 months (P < 0.05). Patients' good adherence to antiplatelet therapy and statins and accepting coronary intervention/bypass grafting were associated with a reduced risk of MACE.

Conclusion

Female patients were more reluctant to make decisions about emergency management of AMI and tended to choose conservative treatment. More female patients preferred TCM than evidence-based medicine. Their reluctance about the critical management of AMI and poor adherence to evidence-based medicine were associated with an elevated risk of MACE.

Sex difference in circulating PCSK9 and its clinical implications

Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a proprotein convertase that increases plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by triggering the degradation of LDL receptors (LDLRs). Beyond the regulation of circulating LDL-C, PCSK9 also has direct atherosclerotic effects on the vascular wall and is associated with coronary plaque inflammation. Interestingly, emerging data show that women have higher circulating PCSK9 concentrations than men, suggesting that the potential roles of PCSK9 may have different impacts according to sex. In this review, we summarize the studies concerning sex difference in circulating levels of PCSK9. In addition, we report on the sex differences in the relations of elevated circulating PCSK9 levels to the severity and prognosis of coronary artery disease, the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and neurological damage after cardiac arrest and liver injury, as well as inflammatory biomarkers and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Moreover, sex difference in the clinical efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors application are reviewed. Finally, the underlying mechanisms of sex difference in circulating PCSK9 concentrations and the clinical implications are also discussed.

Sex Differences in Prodromal Symptoms and Individual Responses to Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Although researchers have shown that prodromal symptoms can predict acute coronary events, the ability of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to identify these symptoms in a timely manner is limited.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess prodromal symptoms in Chinese patients with ACS and their responses to symptoms by sex.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 5 teaching hospitals in China and included 806 patients admitted for ACS between June 2013 and February 2014. The McSweeney Acute and Prodromal Myocardial Infarction Symptom Survey (Chinese version) was used to gather data.

RESULTS

Among 806 patients (including 483 women), 688 (85.4%) experienced at least 1 prodromal symptom before ACS onset. Using adjusted logistic regression models, we determined that women were significantly more likely than men to report back pain, between- or under-shoulder blade pain/discomfort, sleep disturbances, anxiousness, or heart racing. The prevalence of generalized chest pain and loss of appetite was higher among men than women. Only 41% of patients attributed their prodromal symptoms to the heart, and women were more likely than men to attribute prodromal symptoms to a heart attack.

CONCLUSIONS

More than two-thirds of patients with ACS reported at least 1 prodromal symptom, with some significant sex differences. Most patients do not attribute their symptoms to an impending ACS event.

Sex Differences in Symptom Presentation in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background Timely recognition of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is important for successful treatment. Previous research has suggested that women with ACS present with different symptoms compared with men. This review assessed the extent of sex differences in symptom presentation in patients with confirmed ACS. Methods and Results A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane up to June 2019. Two reviewers independently screened title-abstracts and full-texts according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI of a symptom being present were calculated using aggregated and cumulative meta-analyses as well as sex-specific pooled prevalences for each symptom. Twenty-seven studies were included. Compared with men, women with ACS had higher odds of presenting with pain between the shoulder blades (OR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.95-2.37), nausea or vomiting (OR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.48-1.82) and shortness of breath (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.21-1.48). Women had lower odds of presenting with chest pain (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.78) and diaphoresis (OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94). Both sexes presented most often with chest pain (pooled prevalences, men 79%; 95% CI, 72-85, pooled prevalences, women 74%; 95% CI, 72-85). Other symptoms also showed substantial overlap in prevalence. The presence of sex differences has been established since the early 2000s. Newer studies did not materially change cumulative findings. Conclusions Women with ACS do have different symptoms at presentation than men with ACS, but there is also considerable overlap. Since these differences have been shown for years, symptoms should no longer be labeled as "atypical" or "typical."