Review: Thinking around abdominal obesity and cardiovascular risk

Obesity, particularly intra-abdominal (visceral) obesity, is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD), insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, inflammation and thrombosis. A useful indicator for visceral fat is waist circumference, which is associated with all-cause mortality. Pro-inflammatory adipokines play a causal role in the development of pathologies associated with insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and CVD. In addition to established anti-obesity therapies, namely orlistat and sibutramine, a new type of agent that inhibits the cannabinoid receptor (CB1) is advanced in development to reduce appetite and act predominantly against intra-abdominal adiposity.

Type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: do they share common antecedents?

It has been suggested that the association between type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease might result from a shared antecedent — the `common soil' hypothesis. The antecedent could provide a fundamental link between type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis via the metabolic (or insulin resistance) syndrome. The relative contributions of genes, fetal nutrition and environmental factors to this syndrome remain unclear. Although most patients with type 2 diabetes have insulin resistance, it is uncertain whether the insulin resistance-hyperinsulinaemia complex directly promotes atherogenesis, and whether type 2 diabetes and atheroma are connected via a common mediator such as central obesity, vascular endothelial dysfunction, or disordered lipid metabolism. Insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk may be influenced by adipocytokines (e.g. leptin and adiponectin), by excess fatty acids liberated from visceral fat, and inflammatory processes. Disturbances of the neuro-endocrine system, possibly mediated via visceral obesity, are also under investigation. Other putative links between type 2 diabetes and atheroma include polymorphisms in the genes for tumour necrosis factor-α,insulin-like growth factor-1 promoter, and lamin A/C. Trials with certain cardioprotective agents including inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and statins can improve cardiovascular outcomes and protect against the development of type 2 diabetes, lending support to the common soil hypothesis.

Neuroendocrinological and Epigenetic Mechanisms Subserving Autonomic Imbalance and HPA Dysfunction in the Metabolic Syndrome

Impact of environmental stress upon pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been substantiated by epidemiological, psychophysiological, and endocrinological studies. This review discusses recent advances in the understanding of causative roles of nutritional factors, sympathomedullo-adrenal (SMA) and hypothalamic-pituitary adrenocortical (HPA) axes, and adipose tissue chronic low-grade inflammation processes in MetS. Disturbances in the neuroendocrine systems for leptin, melanocortin, and neuropeptide Y (NPY)/agouti-related protein systems have been found resulting directly in MetS-like conditions. The review identifies candidate risk genes from factors shown critical for the functioning of each of these neuroendocrine signaling cascades. In its meta-analytic part, recent studies in epigenetic modification (histone methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination) and posttranscriptional gene regulation by microRNAs are evaluated. Several studies suggest modification mechanisms of early life stress (ELS) and diet-induced obesity (DIO) programming in the hypothalamic regions with populations of POMC-expressing neurons. Epigenetic modifications were found in cortisol (here HSD11B1 expression), melanocortin, leptin, NPY, and adiponectin genes. With respect to adiposity genes, epigenetic modifications were documented for fat mass gene cluster APOA1/C3/A4/A5, and the lipolysis gene LIPE. With regard to inflammatory, immune and subcellular metabolism, PPARG, NKBF1, TNFA, TCF7C2, and those genes expressing cytochrome P450 family enzymes involved in steroidogenesis and in hepatic lipoproteins were documented for epigenetic modifications.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease

Background

The prevalence of obesity has reached epidemic proportions, and in terms of the extent of its negative impact on the health has been compared to those of tobacco and alcohol. One of the first medical consequences of obesity to be recognised was cardiovascular disease (CVD). Obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, predisposes a person to a number of other cardiovascular risk factors, and is an independent predictor of clinical CVD including coronary death, coronary heart disease, heart failure and stroke.

Materials and methods

A Medline search using the following keywords (obesity, cardiovascular disease, body mass index, cardiovascular risk factors, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome) was performed looking for high impact factor English-written references.

Results

Ninety-nine (N=99) relevant articles published in the last 15 years were selected and commented. As detailed throughout the text, current therapies available for weight management can improve or prevent many of these obesity-related risk factors for CVD. However, there is some controversy as to whether weight loss is beneficial for health, and large clinical outcome trials such as the Look-AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) trial or the SCOUT (Sibutramine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial) study are currently ongoing.

Discussion

In the present review, we summarise the effects of obesity as well as the efficacy of weight-loss interventions on cardiovascular risk factors and CVD.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists for management and prevention of vascular disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus

Inflammation is known to have a pathogenic role in atherosclerosis and the genesis of acute coronary syndromes. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma, which is expressed in many constituent cells of atheromatous plaques, inhibits the activation of several proinflammatory genes responsible for atheromatous plaque development and maturation. Agonists of this receptor, such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, are currently available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and several lines of evidence have shown that these drugs have antiatherogenic effects. Insulin resistance is associated with inflammation and has a key role in atherogenesis. The antiatherogenic and insulin sensitizing effects of the thiazolidinediones in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may be associated with this action. However, in recent years there has been growing evidence that the antiatherogenic effects of PPAR-gamma agonists are not confined to patients with diabetes mellitus. PPAR-gamma agonists have been shown to downregulate the expression of endothelial activation markers, reduce circulating platelet activity, improve flow-mediated dilatation and attenuate atheromatous plaque progression in patients without diabetes mellitus. These effects of PPAR-gamma agonists appear to result from both insulin sensitization and a direct modulation of transcriptional activity in the vessel wall. This review summarizes the current understanding of the role of PPAR-gamma agonists in atherogenesis and discusses their potential role in the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in nondiabetic patients.