Endovascular treatment of an aortic aneurysm ruptured into the inferior vena cava

Treatment of Aortocaval Fistula Secondary to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Aortocaval fistula (ACF) secondary to an abdominal aortic aneurysm is a rare complication, inadvertently caused by a rupture into the inferior vena cava. Different treatment modalities have been applied toward the repair of such lesions, including open surgical and endovascular repair. The aim of this study was to report on ACF treatment and to analyze its early and mid-term outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search of the English medical literature published between 2000 and 2022 was undertaken, using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL databases as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 guidelines. A study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022329058). Studies reporting on primary ACF outcomes following open surgical or endovascular repair were included. The ROBINS-I tool was applied for risk of bias assessment. Outcomes included technical success, 30-day and mid-term survival, endoleak following endovascular repair, and reintervention rates.

RESULTS

In total, 110 case studies, incorporating 196 patients (mean age; 66.2 years, males 96%) were included. Open surgical repair was applied in 78% (153/196). From the available data, technical success rate for each modality was 99% (152/153) and 100% (43/43), respectively. Open and endovascular repair demonstrated 87.5% (126/144) and 97.6% (42/43) 30-day survival, respectively, while mid-term survival was 86% (74/86) and 95.2% (20/21), respectively (medial follow-up: 14 months [1-54 months]). Endoleaks were reported in 19 endovascular cases (39.5%). Type II endoleak was the most frequent with a rate at 32.5% (14/43). Reintervention rates were 2.5% (4/151) and 35.7% (15/42) for open and endovascular repair, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Only few case studies were published on the treatment of this rare condition, while almost all invasive procedures were performed in males. Management of ACF repair with both open and endovascular approach was associated with excellent technical success rate and acceptable early and mid-term survival outcomes. Reintervention remained an issue for patients who were managed endovascularly.

Novel Utility of Amplatzer Septal Occlusion Device to Treat Persistent Aortocaval Fistula following Ruptured Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (rEVAR)

Aortocaval fistulas following endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are rare. We herein describe repair using an Amplatzer Septal Occluder in a 68-year-old male who presented to the emergency department 6 months after ruptured endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR) with right heart failure. With the assistance of diagnostic angiography and intravascular ultrasound, the patient was found to have a 1.2 cm diameter aortocaval fistula and a type-II endoleak. His aortocaval fistula was successfully closed using an Amplatzer septal occluder device after failure of attempted closure with an Amplatzer plug and coiling of the aneurysm sac. His symptoms of heart failure improved, and he was discharged to an acute rehabilitation unit. Follow-up at 3 months demonstrated continued improvement in heart failure symptoms, and a small persistent type II endoleak. Aortocaval fistulae are a potentially fatal complication of rAAA. We discuss the sequelae and treatment strategies of aortocaval fistulas following rEVAR including the use of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder.

Open Surgery and Endovascular Techniques in Treatment of Acute Abdominal Arteriovenous Fistulas

Acute abdominal arteriovenous fistulas in the setting of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are a life-threatening condition; thus, a prompt diagnosis is required for proper treatment. Open, endovascular, and hybrid repair have been proposed for their management, with pros and cons for each method. In particular, the evolution of endoluminal techniques guarantees an increasing feasibility of these procedures, and a significant reduction in morbidity and mortality rates was usually associated with open surgery. Nevertheless, some concerns still remain regarding the midterm and long-term follow-up. The aim of this article was to review and compare the reported clinical and technical results of conventional open surgery and endoluminal techniques in this scenario and to report the case of an acute aorto-iliac fistula due to a ruptured common iliac artery aneurysm into the iliac vein that was managed by endovascular repair at our institution.

Emergent Endovascular Repair of Challenging Aortocaval Fistula With Hostile Anatomy

Aortocaval fistula (ACF) is a rare complication. Endovascular repair is an option for this fatal condition. However, endoleak and persistent fistula may occur and lead to technical failure. We performed endovascular repair for 3 cases of challenging ACF with hostile anatomy. Patient 1 was an 80-year-old man who complained of abdominal distension and lower limb edema for 15 days. He had renal and cardiac dysfunction. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed an ACF and extreme tortuosity of right iliac artery. The super-stiff guidewire could not pass the right iliac artery. We performed endovascular repair and an occluder was used to block the right external iliac artery. Postoperative CTA showed migration of the occluder, and we ligated the right external iliac artery. The patient survived for 5 years. Patient 2 was a 78-year-old man who complained of an acute abdominal pain for 30 hours. Computed tomography angiography showed great neck angulation (63.3°) and a huge aneurysm (9.9 cm in diameter). A type 1A endoleak occurred and an aortic cuff was deployed at the proximal seal zone. Meanwhile, a type 3 endoleak occurred because of the migration and detachment of the left iliac limb. Another stent-graft was deployed to connect the iliac limb. The patient was followed up for 1 year and remained in a good condition. Patient 3 was a 74-year-old man who experienced severe abdominal pain for 1 day. Computed tomography angiography showed great neck angulation (66°) and a huge aneurysm (10.1 cm in diameter). A type 1A endoleak occurred, and an aortic cuff was deployed at the proximal seal zone. The patient was followed up for 6 months. In conclusion, ACF is a rare but a fatal condition. Acute cases and chronic cases with instable hemodynamics need urgent diagnosis and surgical intervention. Endovascular repair is an efficacious alternative to the traditional open repair.

Treatment Options of Iatrogenic Pelvic Vein Injuries: Conventional Operative Versus Endovascular Approach

Iatrogenic injury to the iliac vein or inferior vena cava (IVC), which may occur during abdominal operations or posterior orthopedic procedures, can have devastating consequences. Operative management is challenging and may be associated with significant morbidity. The authors report herein 3 cases of iatrogenic pelvic vein injuries that were managed with different treatment approaches. Both traditional open surgical therapy and endovascular techniques are described.

Salvage of an Acutely Ruptured Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm during CPR

Purpose:

To report the successful endovascular treatment of a ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Case Report:

A 72-year-old woman with a type B aortic dissection treated conservatively for 8 years was referred for rupture of a 16-cm aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta. During transfer to the operating room, the patient suffered cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated. A few minutes later during CPR, the surgical procedure began with a cutdown of the right femoral artery and insertion of a guidewire and an aortic occlusion balloon, which was inflated at the origin of the left subclavian artery (LSA). Blood pressure was immediately measurable. By only partially deflating the occluding balloon, a thoracic stent-graft was advanced above it and deployed at the origin of the LSA while rapidly deflating and retracting the occluding balloon. Three stent-grafts were required to cover 27 cm of the descending aorta. The patient was partly ventilator dependent for 3 months due to a massive pleural hematoma that was not evacuated. At the 10-month follow-up, the patient is fully recovered without any sign of respiratory dysfunction or any other sequela. CT scans reveal that the massive hematoma is almost completely resolved.

Conclusions:

This case illustrates that optimal collaboration between anesthesiologists, interventional radiologists, and vascular surgeons with appropriate resources can significantly expand the possibilities of emergent treatment in the face of aortic rupture.

Endovascular Therapy of Spontaneous Aortocaval Fistulae Associated with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

We report a case of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) associated with an aortocaval fistula managed with endovascular techniques. The patient had a known AAA, and on the latest computed follow-up tomographic scan, evidence of fistulization between the aorta and the vena cava was suggested, which was later corroborated by standard contrast angiography. His comorbidities precluded an open repair, and this prompted consideration for an endovascular intervention. Successful exclusion of the AAA was performed, with no evidence of endoleaks or persistence of the fistula. The endovascular approach provides an efficacious alternative to traditional methods for repair of an aortocaval fistula, which is especially important in elderly patients with several comorbidities.

Aortocaval Fistula: Is Endovascular Repair the Preferred Solution?

BACKGROUND

To compare outcomes of open and endovascular repair of aortocaval fistulas (ACFs) in the setting of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken on Pubmed from 1999 to 2014 to identify reported cases of both endovascular and open repair of ACF, including the index case, presented here. Primary outcomes for endovascular repair were: complications, presence of endoleak, and death. Primary outcomes for open repair were: complications and death.

RESULTS

Forty articles were reviewed with a total of 67 patients, including the index case. Endovascular approach was used in 26 patients (39%). Endoleaks were present in 50%, whereas similarly 46% of patients had a reported complication. Five deaths (19%) occurred in the endovascular group. Open repair was performed in 41 cases (61%). The rate of complication and the death in open repair were 36% and 12%, respectively (P = 0.327 and P = 0.910, respectively) compared with endovascular. Mean follow-up was 7.7 months for the endovascular group and 8.5 months in the open group.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous demonstrations of high morbidity and mortality with open repair of ACF in the setting of AAA have motivated endovascular approaches. However, endoleaks are a significant problem and were present in 50% of ACF cases. The continued presence of an endoleak in the setting of an ACF may result in persistence of the ACF, unlikely thrombosis of the endoleak, and continued sac enlargement. Endovascular repair presents theoretical benefit, yet is not associated with a reduced rate of complication or death versus open repair in this contemporary review.

Endovascular Treatment of Major Abdominal Arteriovenous Fistulas

Purpose:

To review the different outcomes of the endovascular repair of major abdominal arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs).

Methods:

An online systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all reported cases of endovascular repair of major AVFs, covering 9 major databases as well as relevant journals up to September 2013. Our own case was included. The primary outcome was technical success and mortality, the secondary outcome was the rate of complications and the operators’ recommendations.

Results:

Forty-eight articles were reviewed totaling a number of 54 patients including our own. The most common fistula site was the aortocaval segment. Aortic stent grafts were used in 78% of patients. Technical success was 94%. Intraoperative mortality was 0% with a 90-day mortality of 10%, half of which were not related to the primary pathology. Of the successful procedures, 12% of patients had major complications. One died before reintervention. All others had uneventful recoveries; 21% had minor complications treated conservatively. The majority of authors were in favor of this treatment modality.

Open repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm and aortocaval fistula using retrograde balloon occlusion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to describe a novel endovascular technique used to minimize blood loss during the open repair of an aortocaval fistula (ACF) in the context of an inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

CASE REPORT

We describe a patient who presented to our hospital with a symptomatic infrarenal AAA which was discovered intraoperatively to contain a large ACF. The patient underwent successful transperitoneal open repair of the AAA with balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava to obtain distal control of the vessel.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrograde balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava can be used to control hemorrhage during the open repair of an ACF, especially in the challenging setting of an inflammatory AAA.

Endovascular exclusion of a large spontaneous aortocaval fistula in a patient with a ruptured aortic aneurysm

A primary aortocaval fistula (ACF) is present in less than 1% of all abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The case of a 62-year-old patient with a ruptured AAA and ACF was reported. A stent-graft was implanted into the abdominal aorta. An inferior vena cava filter was inserted to prevent pulmonary embolism. The patient made a smooth recovery. The follow-up computed tomographic scan three months later did not reveal any evidence of endoleaks or that the fistula was still present. Hemodynamic changes with regard to transient acute liver impairment were discovered (renal and liver parameters were presented). Endovascular exclusion appears to be an effective option in the treatment of an aortocaval fistula in comparison to conventional open repair.

Percutaneous treatment of a aorto-caval fistula in a old high risk patient

Background

To remark the feasibility of endovascular treatment of an aorto-caval fistula in a old high risk patient with “hostile” abdomen for previous surgeries.

Methods

In September 2009 a 81-years-old patient was admitted in emergency at our department because of abdominal pain and massive oedema of the lower extremities associated to dyspnoea (New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III). A CT scan showed an aorto-caval fistula involving the abdominal aorta below the renal arteries. This abnormal communication was likely due to the previous abdominal surgeries, was complicated by occlusion of the inferior vena cava at the diaphragm and was responsible for the massive oedema of the lower extremities. Because of unstable conditions and hostile abdomen the patient was considered unfit for conventional surgery and an endovascular approach was planned. After unsuccessful attempt by positioning of an Amplatzer vascular ring into the fistula, a Medtronic covered stent-grafts were implanted from the renal arteries to the both common iliac arteries. The patient had an impressive improvement characterized by a 18 Kg weight loss and a complete restoration of the functional capacity (from NYHA class III to NYHA class I) associated to a complete resolution of the lower extremities oedema as confirmed at the a month-CT-scan.

Conclusion

Endovascular surgery of aorto-caval fistula represents a good option in alternative to conventional surgery mostly in old high risk patient.

Emergency endovascular repair of aortocaval fistula--a single center experience

PURPOSE

To review the outcomes of patients undergoing emergency endovascular repair of aortocaval fistula (ACF) secondary to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

CASE REPORT

Four consecutive patients who underwent emergency endovascular repair of ACF associated with AAA in a tertiary institution between 2002 and 2009. Of the 4 patients, 3 had initially been misdiagnosed and managed for several days by other specialists for their symptoms prior to diagnosis of their ACF. Three patients died in the early postoperative period. The fourth patient made a satisfactory postoperative recovery but subsequently required further endovascular surgery to treat a persistent type 1 endoleak.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience illustrates the importance of early diagnosis and management of ACF. Even in experienced hands, the management of spontaneous ACF associated with AAA is challenging. Endovascular surgery may still have a role in improving outcomes in these patients.

Endovascular stent-graft repair of major abdominal arteriovenous fistula: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of endovascular stent-graft repair of major abdominal arteriovenous fistulas.

METHODS

The English literature was systematically searched using the MEDLINE electronic database up to January 2009. All reports on endovascular stent-graft repair of major abdominal arteriovenous fistula were considered. Our experience of abdominal arteriovenous fistula was involved in the data analysis. The primary outcome measures were technical success and perioperative, 30-day, and overall mortality.

RESULTS

Data for the final analysis were extracted from 21 papers reporting on 22 patients and from the medical records of a patient treated at our institution. The most common causal associations of these fistulae were the presence of an aortoiliac aneurysm and previous endovascular aneurysm repair, accounting for 56% and 13% of all associations, respectively. The technical success rate was 96% (22/23). No perioperative or 30-day mortality was noticed during a mean follow-up of 9 months. The most common procedure-related complication was type II endoleak, which was found in 22% (5/23) of the patients. This event was either self limiting or required minimal percutaneous intervention.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular stent-graft repair of major abdominal arteriovenous fistula is a safe and effective treatment option, with good short- and midterm results. However, no long-term data exist, and larger series are required to draw solid conclusions regarding the outcomes of this method.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in detection and follow-up of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with aorto-caval fistula and endovascular treatment

An aorto-caval fistula is a rare complication of a symptomatic or ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysm having a frequency of 3-6%. Patients typically present with clinical signs of diffuse abdominal pain associated with increasing venous congestion and tachycardia, rapid cardiopulmonary decompensation with acute dyspnea, and an audible machinerylike bruit. Perioperative mortality is high, ranging from 20% to 60%. We report a case of an endovascular aortic repair in a patient with a symptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysm and an aorto-caval fistula. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound seems to be a promising new diagnostic option for the diagnosis and preoperative treatment planning for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms with rupture into the inferior vena cava. It is in addition to computed tomography angiography. It might allow a more rapid and noninvasive diagnosis, especially for patients in intensive care because of its bedside availability. Because the examination is dynamic, additional information about blood flow between the aorta and inferior cava vein can be evaluated.

Aneurisma ilíaco associado a fístula arteriovenosa

A ruptura dos aneurismas aorto-ilíacos para a veia ilíaca ou veia cava é uma complicação pouco comum. A hipertensão venosa leva a vários sinais e sintomas, o que dificulta o diagnóstico pré-operatório, tais como edema do membro inferior, dispnéia, hematúria, sinais de insuficiência renal ou cardíaca. Sopro abdominal é a chave do diagnóstico clínico, associado à massa pulsátil e dor abdominal. O reconhecimento da fístula arteriovenosa no pré-operatório é importante para o planejamento cirúrgico. Relatamos um caso de aneurisma da artéria ilíaca comum e interna direita associado a fístula para veia ilíaca comum, cursando, inicialmente, com edema do membro inferior direito e dispnéia, o que levou ao diagnóstico incorreto de trombose venosa profunda.

Immediate Endovascular Treatment of an Aortoiliac Aneurysm Ruptured into the Inferior Vena Cava

An aortocaval fistula is a severe complication of an aortoiliac aneurysm, usually associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality during open operative repair. We describe the successful endovascular treatment of a symptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysm ruptured into the inferior vena cava with secondary interventional coiling of a persistent type II endoleak because of retrograde perfusion of the inferior mesenteric artery. Endovascular exclusion of ruptured abdominal aneurysms seems to be a valuable treatment option for selected patients even with complicated vascular conditions like an aortocaval fistula.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with aortocaval fistula

OBJECTIVES

To examine the risk of high-flow type II endoleak following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with aortocaval fistula.

DESIGN

Case reports.

SUBJECTS

Two patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms with aortocaval fistula.

METHODS

Both patients had an endovascular repair of their aortic aneurysms.

RESULTS

The aneurysms were successfully treated in both patients, without any endoleak on completion angiography. Apart from a transient type II lumbar endoleak in one of the patients, no endoleak was found after 3 and 12 month follow-up. Seven other cases have been published, reporting one type II and one type Ic endoleak.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence that endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with aortocaval fistula is associated with a higher incidence of persistent endoleak.

Endovascular Repair of an Aorto–Left Renal Vein Fistula Due to a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After EVAR

PURPOSE

To report an unusual late complication of endovascular aneurysm repair: an arteriovenous fistula between the aneurysm sac and a retro-aortic left renal vein following sac expansion due to a type III endoleak.

CASE REPORT

A 79-year-old man developed an arteriovenous fistula between the aneurysm sac and a retro-aortic left renal vein 67 months after endovascular aneurysm exclusion (EVAR). Aneurysm rupture was due to disconnection between the right iliac limb and an extender cuff. The problem was repaired percutaneously with another endograft bridging the two prostheses. At 16 months, the aneurysm sac diameter was decreased; there was no evidence of the AV fistula, and the patient was free from any complication related to the EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

This case emphasizes the need of close surveillance even in the late postoperative course of these patients. Moreover, this rare event confirmed that endovascular techniques can play an important role in treating emergent complications.

Endovascular Stent Graft Treatment of a Traumatic Aortocaval Fistula

Aortocaval fistula (ACF) is an infrequently reported sequela of trauma. Most ACF have been repaired via an open approach. During the past 10 years, there has been one reported case of spontaneous ACF and two cases of traumatic ACF repaired using an endovascular technique. We present a third case of traumatic ACF repaired with an endovascular stent graft. A 40-year-old male sustained two gunshot wounds to the right chest and one to the right upper abdomen. He was taken from the emergency department directly to the operating room, where an exploratory laparotomy was performed. Through-and-through injuries to the stomach and transverse colon were repaired primarily. Subsequently, the patient developed abdominal compartment syndrome. An urgent exploratory laparotomy was performed, revealing a nonbleeding hematoma on the posterior lateral surface of the right lobe of the liver, which was left undisturbed. Open abdominal management was instituted with vacuum pack closure. On the nineteenth hospital day, the patient again had a significant decrease in hematocrit. An aortogram was performed in order to evaluate the patient for intrahepatic arterial bleeding amenable to transcatheter embolization. There was no evidence of hepatic arterial bleeding. However, a supraceliac ACF was identified. The patient was taken to the operating room, and an AneuRx aortic extension cuff was advanced under fluoroscopy and deployed to cover the fistula. Completion angiography revealed total obliteration of the ACF and appropriate placement of the stent graft. Postoperatively, the patient was returned to the intensive care unit, where his hospital course was complicated by ventilator-associated pneumonia and sepsis. Repeat computed tomographic scanning 6 months and 1 year following this repair demonstrated patency of the graft without evidence of graft migration or aortocaval communication. Further research and experience are necessary with this technique regarding long-term outcome and technical aspects. In particular, the sizing problems associated with repair of acute traumatic ACF in emergency situations should be addressed. The endovascular approach provides an attractive and exciting alternative to traditional methods for repair of ACF.

The endovascular management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a controversial technique, which remains the subject of a number of prospective randomised trials. Although questions remain regarding its long-term durability objective evidence exists which demonstrates its reduced physiological impact compared with conventional open repair. If this technique could be used in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) it may reduce the high peri-operative mortality. A review of the literature identified a limited experience with EVAR of ruptured AAA. Only a small number of case series with selected patients exist. The majority of patients were haemodynamically stable. However, the selective use of aortic occlusion balloons allowed successful endovascular management in a small number of unstable cases. All investigators had access to an "off the shelf" endovascular stent-graft (EVG). Per-operative mortality ranged from 9 to 45% and may reflect increasing experience and patient selection. A number of patients who underwent successful EVAR were turned down for open repair. A number of important lessons have been learned from these studies but questions remain regarding patient suitability and staffing issues. If these difficulties can be surmounted then the technique may offer an alternative to open repair.

Emergency endograft placement for recurrent aortocaval fistula after conventional AAA repair

PURPOSE

To report a novel case in which a stent-graft was used to emergently treat an aortocaval fistula that recurred after conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

CASE REPORT

A 67-year-old man was treated urgently for ruptured AAA with surgical placement of a 16-mm Dacron interposition graft. During the procedure, an aortocaval fistula was repaired primarily. The patient was discharged in satisfactory condition but returned 20 days later with dyspnea, bilateral perimalleolar edema, and a bruit in the mesogastric region. The high flow fistula was again present just above the aortic bifurcation at the distal anastomosis of the existing graft. The patient's condition deteriorated rapidly, so a bifurcated Vanguard stent-graft was deployed in an emergency procedure. Subsequent imaging confirmed satisfactory closure of the fistula. The patient was discharged 8 days after endograft placement, and he continues to be without signs of fistula recurrence at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Endograft treatment of vascular lesions in the acute setting is becoming more common as our experience with the devices grows. Endovascular repair of primary aortocaval fistulas appears to be an efficacious and minimally invasive means of dealing with these lesions in AAA patients.

Endovascular repair of aortic rupture due to trauma and aneurysm

OBJECTIVES

to report a single centre experience with endovascular repair of the ruptured descending thoracic and abdominal aorta.

DESIGN

prospective non-randomised study in a university hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

between 1995 and 2000, endovascular treatment was utilised for 231 aortic repairs; in 37 cases (16%) endografting was conducted on an emergency basis for 21 ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms, 15 ruptured descending thoracic aortic lesions, and 1 ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The feasibility of endovascular treatment and the prostheses' size were determined, based on preoperative spiral CT and intraoperative angiography, both obtained in each patient.

RESULTS

endografting was successfully completed in 35 patients (95%). Primary conversion to open repair was necessary in 2 patients (5%). Postoperative 30-day mortality rate was 11% (4 deaths). No patient developed postoperative temporary or permanent paraplegia. In 2 patients (5%) primary endoleaks required overstenting and in 6 patients (16%) secondary surgical interventions were required. Mean follow-up was 19 months (1-70 months); three deaths occurred within three months postoperatively (1-year survival rate 81+/-6%). In one case, secondary conversion to open repair was necessary 14 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

the feasibility of endoluminal repair of the ruptured aorta has been demonstrated. Endoluminal treatment may reduce morbidity and mortality, and may in time become the procedure of choice in certain centres. However, further follow-up is required to determine the long-term efficacy.

Abdominal pain and hemoperitoneum: sole presenting symptoms for "leaking AAA" after endovascular repair

PURPOSE

To describe an unusual presentation of impending aortic endograft rupture and successful endovascular rescue.

CASE REPORT

A 77-year-old man with an enlarging aortic aneurysm was treated with a Talent bifurcated endoprosthesis; a moderate endoleak that appeared to be related to either proximal or distal fixation sites was noted in the body of the aneurysm. The patient was observed for 1 month, and repeat imaging demonstrated persistent endoleak without major increase in the aneurysm diameter. Another examination was scheduled for 3 months hence, but, 2 months later, the patient presented with abdominal pain and a hemoperitoneum. A proximal extension cuff resolved the leak and led to resolution of the hemoperitoneum.

CONCLUSIONS

A leaking aneurysm can be repaired using endovascular techniques in patients with an existing endograft. The need for frequent imaging surveillance of patients with endoleak is underscored.

Endovascular stent-graft repair of primary aortocaval fistula with an abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm

A primary aortocaval fistula is present in less than 1% of all abdominal aortic aneurysms. Until recently, surgical repair was the only method of treatment and was associated with a high incidence of morbidity and mortality. With the rapid development of aortic stent-graft technique, endovascular stent-graft repair may offer an alternative to the management of this often fatal condition. We report a case of an aortoiliac aneurysm with an aortocaval fistula successfully treated with endovascular stent-grafting. The unique hemodynamic changes, technical problems, and complications associated with this case are discussed, and the literature is reviewed.