Quality of life before and after endovascular and open repair of asymptomatic AAAs: a prospective study

Patients' body image after open abdominal surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysm - Perceptions and experiences

AIMS

To explore and gain an understanding of patients' perceptions and experiences of their body and bodily function in connection with open surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND

After the operation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) it may be difficult for the patients to understand what the procedure means.

DESIGN

The design was descriptive and based on an analysis of 13 audio-taped consultations with patients undergoing open surgery for AAA at a Swedish university hospital. The patients' age varied from 57-79 and the mean age was 71 (70.5 female).

METHODS

A hermeneutic approach was used whereby patients were interviewed and draw a picture of their thoughts and experiences of the surgery and what had been done in their bodies. Once patients had finished their drawings, the interviewer asked what thoughts and experiences they had of the AAA.

RESULTS

Patients described experiences as a process of "going from broken to whole again."

Towards Patient Centred Outcomes for Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Scoping Review of Quality of Life Scales

OBJECTIVE

In order to better incorporate the patient's perspective in medical decision making, core outcome sets (COS) are being defined. In the field of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), efforts to capture the patient's perspective focus on generic quantitative quality of life (QoL) scales. The question arises whether these quantitative scales adequately reflect the patient's perspective on QoL, and whether they can be included in the QoL aspect of COS. A scoping review of QoL assessment in the context of elective AAA repair was undertaken.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHODS

A scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Articles reporting QoL assessment in the context of elective AAA repair were identified. Quantitative studies (i.e., traditional QoL scales) were aligned (triangulation approach) with qualitative studies (i.e., patient perspective) to identify parallels and discrepancies. Mean Short Form 36 item survey (SF-36) scores were pooled using a random effects model to evaluate sensitivity to change.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were identified, of which 29 (88%) were quantitative and four (12%) qualitative. The 33 studies reported a total of 54 quantitative QoL scales; the most frequently used were the generic SF-36 (16 studies) and five dimension EuroQol (EQ-5D; eight studies). Aneurysm specific scales were reported by one study. The generic quantitative scales showed poor alignment with the patient's perspective. The aneurysm specific scales better aligned but missed "concerns regarding symptoms" and "the impact of possible outcomes/complications". "Self control and decision making", which was brought forward by patients in qualitative studies, was not captured in any of the current scales.

CONCLUSION

There is no established tool that fully captures all aspects of the patient's perspective appropriate for a COS for elective AAA repair. In order to fulfil the need for a COS for the management of^, AAA disease, a more comprehensive overview of the patient's perspective is required.

Life is about so much more: Patients' experiences of health, well-being, and recovery after operation of abdominal aortic aneurysm with open and endovascular treatment-A prospective study

Different surgical treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysm can lead to different perceptions of health and well-being. The aim of this study was to describe patients' well-being, sense of coherence (SOC), and experiences of surgery after open and endovascular treatment one month and one and 2 years after the procedure. Seventy six patients participated (40 open repair; 36 endovascular aneurysm repair). The study was conducted using the SOC questionnaire, and specific questions about patients' experiences of the surgical treatment and well-being. After 2 years, no patient regretted the operation or considered it to be the most difficult experience they had ever had. Twenty percent of the patients were worried about complications one month after the operation. Both groups experienced difficulty in returning to normal activity after surgery at one month. At one and 2 years after the surgery, patients in both groups stated that it was other things in life that affected their well-being. The endovascular aneurysm repair group reported a significant decrease in SOC from baseline until one year (P = .012) and 2 years (P = .033). The open repair group reported a significant decrease after one year (0.033). The operation did not affect patients' way of thinking about the disease. Patients in both groups stated that it was other circumstances in life that affected their well-being one and 2 years after the treatment, which could indicate that long-term follow-up would not be necessary from a patient perspective. The operation affects patients' well-being a short time after the operation.

Quality of Life After Open Surgical versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Objective

This study aims to compare open surgical and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms in terms of their effects on quality of life, using Short Form-36 (SF-36).

Methods

A total of 133 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR or open surgical repair for infra-renal abdominal aorta aneurysm between January 2009 and June 2014 were included in the study. Twenty-six (19.5%) patients died during follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. Overall, 107 patients, 39 (36.4%) in the open repair group, and 68 (63.6%) in the EVAR group, completed all follow-up visits and study assessments. Quality of life assessments using SF-36 were performed before surgery and at post-operative months 1, 6, and 12.

Results

The mean duration of follow-up was 29.55±19.95 months. At one month, both physical and mental domains of the quality of life assessments favored EVAR, while the two surgical approaches did not differ significantly at or after six months postoperatively.

Conclusion

Despite anatomical advantages and acceptable mid-phase mortality in patients with high- or medium-risk for open surgery, EVAR did not exhibit a quality of life superiority over open surgery in terms of physical function and patient comfort at or after postoperative six months.

Quality of life from a randomized trial of open and endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background

Long-term survival is similar after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Few data exist on the effect of either procedure on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health status.

Methods

Patients enrolled in a multicentre randomized clinical trial (DREAM trial; 2000–2003) in Europe of open repair versus endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm were asked to complete questionnaires on health status and HRQoL. HRQoL scores were assessed at baseline and at 13 time points thereafter, using generic tools, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36®) and EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D™). Physical (PCS) and mental component summary scores were also calculated. Follow-up was 5 years.

Results

Some 332 of 351 patients enrolled in the trial returned questionnaires. More than 70 per cent of questionnaires were returned at each time point. Both surgical interventions had a short-term negative effect on HRQoL and health status. This was less severe in the EVAR group than in the open repair group. In the longer term the physical domains of SF-36® favoured open repair: mean difference in PCS score between open repair and EVAR −1·98 (95 per cent c.i. −3·56 to −0·41). EQ-5D™ descriptive and EQ-5D™ visual analogue scale scores for open repair were also superior to those for EVAR after the initial 6-week interval: mean difference −0·06 (−0·10 to −0·02) and −4·09 (−6·91 to −1·27) respectively.

Conclusion

In this study EVAR appeared to be associated with less severe disruption to HRQoL and health status in the short term. However, during longer-term follow-up to 5 years, patients receiving open repair appeared to have improved quality of life and health status.

Patient-reported outcome measures in vascular surgery

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after vascular surgery are becoming increasingly important in the current era of health care reform. Although a number of general quality of life instruments exist, vascular disease-specific instruments may provide more targeted data on how patients feel after specific interventions. Here we provide a review of both generic and disease-specific instruments focused on arterial conditions, including peripheral arterial disease, carotid arterial disease, and aortic disease, which have been described in the literature. While many different tools currently exist, there is a paucity of well-validated, specific instruments that accurately reflect functional and objective measures of patients' arterial disease burden. A full understanding of the existing tools available to assess patients' perceived lifestyle impact of their disease and its treatments is essential for both research and clinical purposes, and to highlight the need for additional work on this topic.

Impairment of erectile function after elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

The purpose of the present study was to compare the functional change of erectile dysfunction after endovascular repair (EVAR) and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Between April 2009 and December 2011, male patients admitted for elective treatment of an asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were included. The erectile function was evaluated by using a validated KEED questionnaire. All patients filled out the questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively after one year.

The number of patients with an increase of erectile dysfunction was 8 (26.6%) to 16 (53.3%) in open repair group vs. 30 (42.6%) to 40 (58.8%) in endovascular aneurysm repair. There was no statistically significant difference between open repair and endovascular aneurysm repair groups in order of new incidence of erectile dysfunction ( p = 0.412). The study showed an increase in the mean value of Erectile Dysfunction -Score postoperatively in both the groups as well.

The present study showed an increase of erectile dysfunction postoperatively, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.

Meta-analysis of prospective trials determining the short- and mid-term effect of elective open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms on quality of life

Background

Repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is undertaken to prevent rupture. Intervention is by either open repair (OR) or a more minimally invasive endovascular repair (EVAR). Quality-of-life (QoL) analysis is an important health outcome and a number of single studies have assessed QoL following OR and EVAR. This was a meta-analysis of published studies to assess the effect of an intervention on QoL in patients with an AAA.

Methods

A systematic literature search was undertaken for studies prospectively reporting QoL analysis in patients with an AAA undergoing elective intervention. A multivariable meta-analysis model was developed in which the outcomes were mean changes in QoL scores over time, both for all AAA repairs (OR and EVAR) and comparing OR with EVAR.

Results

Data were collated from 16 studies (14 OR, 12 EVAR). The results suggested that treating an AAA had an effect on patient-reported QoL, evident from the statistically significant changes predominantly in domains assessing physical ability and pain. QoL was affected most within the first 3 months after any form of intervention, and was more pronounced following OR. Furthermore, a deterioration in the Physical Component Summary score following an AAA repair (either OR or EVAR) was evident at 12 months after intervention.

Conclusion

Treating an AAA deleteriously affects patient-reported QoL over the first year following intervention.

Questions remain about quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

INTRODUCTION

Morbidity and mortality have traditionally been used as key markers of surgical outcome. However, as complication rates associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair decrease, subjective measures, such as quality of life (QOL), are increasingly recognized as important indicators of treatment efficacy and quality of care. This review presents the existing evidence relating to QOL changes in patients undergoing AAA repair by open repair (OR) and endovascular techniques (EVAR) and challenges current misconceptions about the relative effect of these two procedures.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies relating to QOL or health status in AAA repair. Quality of included studies was assessed according to Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Preoperative QOL in AAA patients has been previously suggested as being worse than that of the general population, that OR patients have a worse QOL in the early postoperative period, and that EVAR patients have a worse QOL in the longer term. None of these assertions is uniformly supported in the literature. From the existing evidence, no clear conclusions can be drawn about the relative QOL benefits of OR vs EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a paucity of good-quality data relating to health status and QOL in patients undergoing AAA repair. Little is known about the prevalence of preoperative or postoperative symptoms and the degree to which these influence patient well-being. Further investigation is needed to clarify health status and QOL changes in these patients and allow clinicians to make targeted improvements in practice.

Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSR

Purpose:

To investigate if study design factors such as randomization, multi-center versus single center evidence, institutional surgical volume, and patient selection affect the outcomes for endovascular repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR). Finally, we investigate trends over time in EVAR versus OSR outcomes.

Methods:

Search strategies for comparative studies were performed individually for: OVID’s MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HAPI, and Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) Reviews (including Cochrane DSR, ACP Journal Club, DARE and CCTR), limited to 1990 and November 2006.

Results:

Identified literature: 84 comparative studies pertaining to 57,645 patients. These include 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), plus 2 RCTs with long-term follow-up. The other 78 comparative studies were nonrandomized with 75 reporting perioperative outcomes, of which 16 were multi-center, and 59 single-center studies. Of the single-center studies 31 were low-volume and 28 were high-volume centers. In addition, 5 studies had all patients anatomically eligible for EVAR, and 8 studies included high-risk patients only. Finally, 25 long term observational studies reported outcomes up to 3 years.

Outcomes:

Lower perioperative mortality and rates of complications for EVAR versus OSR varied across study designs and patient populations. EVAR adverse outcomes have decreased in recent times.

Conclusion:

EVAR highlights the problem of performing meta-analysis when the experience evolves over time.

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm--areas where information is still inadequate

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) fulfils the criteria for a disease suitable for screening. However, important aspects need to be further analysed; the optimal age of the male population considered for screening has not yet been established, and whether women or specific high risk groups would benefit from screening has not been sufficiently evaluated. The impact of the current shift toward a high proportion of AAA repair done with endovascular technique and the long-term effect on QoL are additional issues that have not been adequately studied. Furthermore, therapeutic options for small AAA as well as secondary prevention programmes have to be developed.

The Durability of Evar — What are the Evidence and Implications on Follow-Up?

Background and Aims:

To investigate the durability of EVAR and to explore the evidence for follow-up investigations. Furthermore, to study the patients' impressions of follow-up investigations, and how complications and secondary procedures influence cost-effectiveness.

Material and Methods:

263 patients were treated by EVAR from february 1995-february 2007. The series is divided into two groups with the year 2000 as a cut-off point since a new generation of stent grafts was then introduced. Early and late complications and secondary procedures were recorded. A questionnaire study was performed to investigate the patients' views on the follow-up program.

Results:

There was a significant reduction of complications from period I to period II, which was also reflected in the reduction of secondary procedures. Freedom from secondary procedures were 47% and 93% at 5 years follow-up in the two periods, respectively. In phase II, 7.5% of the patients needed a secondary procedure. Limb extension and femoro-femoral bypass were the most common procedures. Since late complications still occur, and can be unpredictable, a follow-up program is necessary. The vast majority of the patients tolerated the follow-up program well.

Conclusions:

Although the number of complications following EVAR has decreased significantly over the years, a thorough follow-up program is still necessary. This follow-up regime is well tolerated by the patients. Reduction of secondary procedures is important to improve the cost-effectiveness of EVAR.

Patient-reported quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: A prospective comparison of endovascular and open repair

PURPOSE

This study evaluated and compared changes over time in health-related quality of life reported by patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) undergoing elective endovascular (EVAR) and open aneurysm (OR) repair.

METHODS

A prospective, nonrandomized cohort of 76 patients (62 men, 14 women; age range, 42 to 89 years) undergoing elective, infrarenal AAA repair (EVAR, n = 43; OR, n = 33) at two university teaching hospitals during a 15-month period were administered the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item (SF-36) health survey preoperatively and then 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, procedural details, postoperative follow-up data, and SF-36 scores were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Both groups had total SF-36 scores that were significantly lower than preoperative scores at 1 week and 1 month after surgery but were not significantly different from the preoperative scores at 6 months (OR 66.2 +/- 21.1 to 72.3 +/- 19.8, P > .1; and EVAR 61.0 +/- 17.7 to 58.7 +/- 19.4, P > .1). Six-month total SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the OR group compared with the EVAR group (mean 72.3 +/- 19.8 OR vs 58.7 +/- 19.4 EVAR; P = .009). In the postoperative period, a significant drop occurred in mean scores in six of the eight domains of the SF-36 in the OR patients (physical function, PF; role physical, RP; bodily pain, BP; vitality, VT; social function, SF; role emotional, RE) and five domains for EVAR patients (PF, RP, BP, SF, RE). In two domains, RE and PF, scores returned to baseline values significantly sooner in EVAR patients than in OR patients (RE, EVAR 1 month vs OR 6 months; and PF, EVAR 1 month vs OR 6 months). In the VT domain, no significant postoperative drop occurred in the EVAR group, but in the OR group, mean scores were significantly lower at 1 week and 1 month compared with preoperative values. In the domains of general health and mental health, no significant drop occurred in SF-36 score postoperatively in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient reported health-related quality of life after infrarenal AAA repair is significantly impaired in the early postoperative period but returns to baseline by 6 months in patients treated with EVAR and OR. Patients having EVAR had significantly more rapid return to preoperative scores in selected domains of the SF-36. Even though EVAR is associated with shorter and less invasive perioperative hospital course and fewer postoperative complications, EVAR patients had lower quality of life scores 6 months after surgery than OR patients.

Pilot study of sexual dysfunction following abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

INTRODUCTION

The complication of sexual dysfunction as a quality of life (QoL) component after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery in men is poorly studied.

AIMS

To investigate the prevalence of sexual dysfunction and to highlight the importance of discussing this issue with patients undergoing AAA repair.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The self-reported sexual dysfunction prevalence pre- and postoperatively, the effects on sexual QoL, and the postoperative Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores.

METHODS

Between April 1999 and July 2002, a questionnaire-based study, including the SHIM, was conducted on male patients 1-2 years after their elective open (EO) and rupture open (RO) or endovascular repair (EVAR) AAA repair. Demographics, risk factors for sexual dysfunction, sexual history, and postoperative sexual QoL data were obtained.

RESULTS

Out of 142 alive male patients surveyed, 56 (40%) patients responded (26 EO, 21 EVAR, and 9 RO repair). The mean age was 69, 73, and 70 years, respectively, and 65%, 66%, and 66%, respectively, admitted to be sexually active postoperatively. The self-reported sexual dysfunction prevalence preoperatively was 27% (EO), 63% (EVAR), and 45% (RO); and postoperatively was 58%, 76%, and 67%, respectively. Detection using SHIM was higher at 70%, 95%, and 78%, respectively. There was a significantly greater increase in the postoperative prevalence of sexual dysfunction in the EO group than in the EVAR group (P < 0.05, chi(2)). The sexual QoL was worsened postoperatively in all groups: 53% (EO), 75% (EVAR), and 50% (RO); but only one-third of EO and EVAR patients, and none in RO patients, would seek treatment for their sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

There was a negative impact on the sexual QoL in all groups after surgery, and a significantly higher proportion of patients experienced deterioration in sexual QoL following EO surgical repair. Our results demonstrate the need for a prospective study.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians: an analysis based on EUROSTAR data

PURPOSE

To investigate the early and late outcome after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) in octogenarians compared with patients aged < 80 years.

METHODS

Patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with endovascular repair during the period 1996 to 2004 were collated in the EUROSTAR registry. This study group consisted of 697 patients aged > or = 80 years. Comparison was made with 4198 patients aged < 80 years with regard to the incidence of preoperative characteristics and outcomes of the procedure.

RESULTS

The proportion of octogenarians treated by EVAR increased during the study period, from 11% in the first year to 18% in the last year. Octogenarians more frequently had cardiac disease, impaired renal function, and pulmonary disease (P = .03, P < .0001 and P = .0001). Thirty-two percent of the octogenarians were recorded unfit for open surgery as opposed to 22% in younger patients (P < .0001); they also had a larger aneurysm diameter (62 vs 58 mm, respectively; P < .0001). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality in octogenarians was 5% vs 2% in the younger group (P < .0001). More device-related complications and systemic complications, including cardiac disease, were noted in octogenarians (7% vs 5% and 19% vs 11%, P = .03 and P < .0001, respectively). This group of patients also had a higher incidence of postoperative hemorrhagic complications, including hematoma (7% vs 3%, P < .0001, respectively). No differences in conversion to open repair and post-EVAR rupture rate were observed. Aneurysm-related mortality and late all-cause mortality was 7% vs 3% and 10% vs 7%, both P < .0001.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports that EVAR might be considered when treating elderly patients, provided their aneurysms are anatomically suited for the endovascular technique. The risk for late complications compared with open repair may be outweighed by a lower early mortality as well as a shorter time for physical recovery.

Decision-analytical model with lifetime estimation of costs and health outcomes for one-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men

Background

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) causes about 2 per cent of all deaths in men over the age of 65 years. A major improvement in operative mortality would have little impact on total mortality, so screening for AAA has been recommended as a solution. The cost-effectiveness of a programme that invited 65-year-old men for ultrasonographic screening was compared with current clinical practice in a decision-analytical model.

Methods

In a probabilistic Markov model, costs and health outcomes of a screening programme and current clinical practice were simulated over a lifetime perspective. To populate the model with the best available evidence, data from published papers, vascular databases and primary research were used.

Results

The results of the base-case analysis showed that the incremental cost per gained life-year for a screening programme compared with current practice was €7760, and that for a quality-adjusted life-year was €9700. The probability of screening being cost-effective was high.

Conclusion

A financially and practically feasible screening programme for AAA, in which men are invited for ultrasonography in the year in which they turn 65, appears to yield positive health outcomes at a reasonable cost.

Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes Following Elective Open or Endovascular AAA Repair:A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To assess health-related quality of life outcomes after endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive either endovascular or open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery according to a rate of 3 endovascular patients to 1 with open repair. Data on patient characteristics, operative aspects, and procedural and device-related complications were compiled at a single center. Health-related quality of life was assessed before treatment and 1 and 3 months following operation using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) and the EuroQol questionnaire.

RESULTS

Between 1996 and 1999, 57 patients (54 men; mean age 69 years, range 52-82) underwent endovascular and 19 patients (16 men; mean age 68 years, range 52-81) underwent open AAA repairs. Preoperatively, comparable scores were recorded in both treatment groups. One month after operation, patients of both groups scored significantly lower on the SF-36 domains of Role Limitations due to physical problems and Pain compared to preoperative scores. Three months after operation, both groups had scores in all domains comparable to preoperative levels of functioning. There was a significant benefit for the endovascular group 1 month after operation in the SF-36 domains of Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to physical problems, Vitality, and Pain; their score on the EuroQol Usual Activities item was also significantly better. After 3 months, there were no longer differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term health-related quality of life benefits were found after endovascular repair compared with standard open surgery.

Quality of life before and after endovascular and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to evaluate changes in quality of life and to compare conventional outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular and open retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS

Between October 2000 and May 2003, 129 patients underwent elective AAA repair, endovascular repair in 22 patients and open retroperitoneal repair in 107 patients. The Short-Form Health Survey, 12 items (SF-12) was administered preoperatively and at 3 weeks, 4 months, and 1 year after discharge. Quality of life, hospital and intensive care unit stay, perioperative complications, discharge disposition, readmission, and hospital cost were statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

For the total group, significant differences were observed for both Physical Component Summary scores (P<.001) and Mental Component Summary scores (P=.001) between time points. There were no significant differences for either Component Summary score between open and endovascular procedures for any time period. Number of weeks required to return to baseline functional status was similar after either open or endovascular repair (7.22 vs 5.47 weeks, respectively; P=.09). Mean hospital and intensive care unit stay was 4.4 and 1 days, respectively, for open repair versus 1.9 and 0 days, respectively, for endovascular repair (P<.0001). No significant difference between groups was observed in terms of perioperative complications, discharge disposition, or hospital readmission (P> or =.54). Mean total hospital cost for endovascular repair was 1.60 times that for open repair (mean difference, $11,662; P<.0001; 95% confidence interval, $17,799-$5525).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital stay is significantly shorter after endovascular AAA repair. However, hospital cost is almost twice that for open retroperitoneal repair. Perioperative complications, discharge disposition, and hospital readmission are not statistically different between the two groups. Effect on health-related quality of life is similar after either open retroperitoneal or endovascular AAA repair.

Quality of Life after Endovascular and Open AAA Repair. Results of a Randomised Triala

AIM

To compare the quality of life (QoL) in the first postoperative year after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open repair (OR) in a randomised study.

METHODS

In the Dutch Randomised Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) trial, patients are randomly allocated to EVAR or OR. QoL questionnaires (SF-36 and EuroQoL-5D) were sent to all patients preoperatively (PREOP) and at five time points in the first postoperative year (3W, 6W, 3M, 6M and 12M). Between November 1999 and August 2002, 153 patients (141 male; 12 female) were randomised (78 EVAR and 75 OR; one crossover from OR to EVAR). The EuroQoL-5D scores and the eight domains of the SF-36 for the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Changes over time were analysed using the Wilcoxon sign test.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, gender and SVS risk factors). The preoperative QoL scores of the study group were similar to the QoL scores of the general population of the same age. After 3W the OR group showed a significant decrease on the EuroQol-5D (p=0.022) and in six of the eight SF-36 domains. The EVAR group also showed a significant decrease on the EuroQol-5D (p=0.004) and in 5 of the 8 domains of the SF-36. At 6W the EuroQol-5D had recovered to baseline in the OR group and the decreased domains of the SF-36 had partially recovered. In the EVAR group the EuroQol-5D and three of the five decreased SF-36 domains, had returned to baseline. From 6M on, the OR group reported a significantly higher score on the EuroQoL-5D than the EVAR group (p=0.045 (6M) and p=0.001 (12M)).

CONCLUSION

In the early postoperative period there is a small, yet significant QoL advantage for EVAR compared to OR. At 6 months and beyond, patients reported better QoL after OR than after EVAR.

Early and late functional outcome assessments following endovascular and open aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

To compare early and late functional outcomes, as well as survival and recovery, following endovascular or open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2000, 294 patients underwent AAA repair (141 open and 153 endovascular); 57 patients from each group had 12-month follow-up for functional outcome assessment. Recovery was measured as hospital length of stay, skilled nursing requirement, and hospital readmission within 1 year to determine cumulative hospital utilization. Early (<6 months) functional outcomes were measured by activity level and convalescence days following surgery. Late (>6 months) functional outcomes were measured as ambulation, independent living, and employment status pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Operative mortality for open repair was 5 (3.5%) compared to 1 (0.6%) after an endovascular procedure (p<0.05). The endovascular group had a shorter hospital stay (2.8+/-2.8 versus 8.3+/-4.5 days) and fewer skilled nursing requirements (0% versus 26%; p<0.001). Cumulative hospital utilization over 12 months was 3.8 days for endovascular patients and 13.8 days for open repair (p<0.001). Recovery time was 99.3+/-84.1 days (range 14-365) in conventionally treated patients and 32.1+/-43.5 days (range 7-180) in the stent-graft group (p<0.001). At 6 months, 43 (75%) open and 54 (95%) endovascular patients had full recovery (p<0.01). Activity levels decreased in 13 (23%) open and 3 (5%) endovascular patients after surgery (p<0.01). There were no differences in ambulation, independent living, or employment status before and after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Periprocedural survival following aneurysm repair is improved with endovascular grafting compared to open surgery, and recovery is more rapid, with a 78% reduction in total hospital days. Early functional outcomes are markedly improved with endovascular repair, while there is no difference in late functional outcomes between the procedures.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the veteran population

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to audit the outcome of elective open aortic aneurysm repair in a veteran hospital to determine whether age > or =80 years influenced the morbidity or mortality.

METHODS

All elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repaired at Greenslopes Private (Repatriation) Hospital between January 1995 and July 2000 were reviewed. Operative details, premorbid condition, postoperative outcomes as well as length of admission were recorded. Patients were grouped according to age as > or =80 years or <80 years.

RESULTS

There were 251 open elective AAA (including infrarenal and suprarenal, as well as recurrent AAA) repairs carried out during this period, 64 of which were patients of age > or =80 years. Cardiovascular risks factors did not differ between groups nor did complication rates for patients > or =80 and <80 years of age (19.1 and 19.8%, respectively). Mortality rates were not significantly different between groups (> or =80 years: 6.25%; <80 years: 4.8%; P > 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Age > or =80 years should not be an exclusion criteria when contemplating open elective AAA repair.

Durability of benefits of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is reported to result in less initial patient morbidity and a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) when compared with conventional AAA repair. We sought to examine the durability of this result during the intermediate follow-up interval.

METHODS

The records of all admissions for all patients who underwent AAA repair during a 26-month interval were reviewed.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-seven (337) patients underwent procedures to repair AAAs (163 open and 174 endovascular). Endovascular procedures were performed with a variety of devices (Talent, 108; Ancure, 36; AneuRx, 26; Zenith, 2; and Cordis, 2) and configurations (141 bifurcated and 33 aortomonoiliac). The mean follow-up period was 10.6 months (endovascular repair) and 12.3 months (open repair). LOS did not significantly vary by device (P =.24 to P =.92) or configuration (P =.24). The initial median LOS for procedures was significantly shorter (P =.009) for endovascular repairs (5 days) than for open procedures (8 days). However, the patients who underwent endovascular repair were more likely to be readmitted during the follow-up interval when compared with patients who underwent open procedure. The readmission-free survival rate after AAA repair at 12 months was 95% for patients for open AAA repair versus 71% for patients for endovascular repair (P <.001). If the total hospital days were compared, including the initial and all subsequent AAA-related admissions, there was no significant difference for mean LOS for patients who underwent endovascular versus open AAA procedures (11 days versus 13.6 days; P =.21). The patients for endovascular AAA repair most commonly needed readmission for treatment of endoleak (n = 31), wound infection (n = 12), and graft limb thrombosis (n = 9). Although women had similar LOS to men for endovascular repair (P =.44), they had longer initial LOS for open AAA repair (15 versus 10 days; P =.03). After endovascular repair, women were more likely than men to be readmitted by 12 months (51% versus 71% readmission-free survival rate; P =.03) and they had longer LOS on readmission (13.2 versus 5.2 days; P =.006). No gender differences were identified for patients after open AAA repair regarding readmission-free survival rate (P =.09) or LOS on readmission (P =.98).

CONCLUSION

Although initial LOS was shorter for the patients who underwent endovascular as compared with conventional AAA repair, this advantage was lost during the follow-up interval because of frequent readmission for the treatment of procedure-related complications, chiefly endoleak. These readmissions frequently involved the performance of additional invasive procedures. Gender differences existed regarding LOS and the likelihood of complications after open and endovascular AAA repair.

Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing endovascular or conventional AAA repair

PURPOSE

To compare health-related quality of life outcomes in a cohort of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients treated concurrently with either a conventional or endoluminal intervention.

METHODS

Between December 1997 and April 1999, 51 AAA patients treated by either open or endovascular techniques were enrolled in this prospective study. Conventional therapy was performed in 26 patients (19 men; mean age 70.4 +/- 6.0 years) with anatomical features unsuitable for the endovascular approach. Twenty-five patients (23 men; mean age 70.7 +/- 7.2 years) underwent endoluminal AAA exclusion using either the Ancure or bifurcated Enduring stent-grafts. The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item health survey was administered preoperatively and at 1, 4, 8, and > or = 52 weeks after discharge.

RESULTS

At 1 week, both groups showed significant reductions (p < 0.001) in mean scores compared to baseline in 4 dimensions (physical function, social function, role-physical, and vitality), but the decline was more pronounced in patients having open repair. Endoluminal patients returned to their baseline scores by the 4th postoperative week, whereas complete recovery to baseline in the conventional patients was delayed to the 8th week.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated endoluminally exhibit better physical and functional scores as early as 1 week after discharge; they also return to baseline status significantly earlier than the conventional group. These findings document the perceived advantage of endovascular therapy over conventional AAA treatment.