Transseptal guidewire stabilization facilitates stent-graft deployment for persistent proximal ascending aortic dissection

Editor's Choice - Outcomes of Endovascular Repair Confined to the Ascending Thoracic Aorta: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

High risk, inoperable patients with ascending aortic disease are increasingly managed with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The aim of this study was to assess the available literature on TEVAR confined to the ascending aorta (a-TEVAR), describing study and patient characteristics, procedural and stent graft details, and outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched for eligible studies reporting on outcomes after a-TEVAR (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023440826). Eligible studies reported outcomes after a-TEVAR without adjunctive supra-aortic vessel treatment.

REVIEW METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. The ROBINS-I and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist were used as quality assessment tools. A Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence certainty analysis was performed for the main outcomes. The main outcome was death. A proportional meta-analysis was performed with a mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the main outcomes. All articles were included up to 1 January 2024.

RESULTS

Ninety four studies were included (19 cohort studies, 75 case reports or series), reporting on 259 patients (57.8% male). The mean age was 69.1 (95% CI 65.0 - 73.1) years and mean follow up 19.6 (95% CI 14.5 - 24.6) months. The most common comorbidity was prior cardiac or thoracic surgery (n = 191). The most frequent indications for a-TEVAR (52.1% urgent a-TEVAR) were type A aortic dissection (43.6%) and pseudoaneurysm (38.6%). The most commonly deployed stent grafts were Gore (44.5%), Cook (23.5%), and Medtronic (17.0%). The in hospital mortality rate was 7.3% (95% CI 4.7 - 11.2%), 30 day mortality rate 7.7% (95% CI 5.1 - 11.6%), and overall mortality rate 17.0% (95% CI 12.9 - 22.0%) during follow up. GRADE showed very low evidence certainty for all outcomes. Eighty eight complications were reported and there was a re-operation rate of 13.1% (95% CI 9.5 - 17.8%). In hospital and 30 day mortality rates for type A dissection were 12.4% (95% CI 7.5 - 19.7%) (n = 14) and 13.3% (95% CI 8.2 - 20.8%) (n = 15), respectively, and for pseudoaneurysm 4.0% (95% CI 1.6 - 9.8%) (n = 4) and 4.0% (95% CI 1.6 - 9.8) (n = 4), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite heterogeneous literature and very low GRADE evidence certainty, a-TEVAR seems technically feasible in high risk patients. In addition, there is need for a consensus on when and how to use a-TEVAR and a need for a specific endograft for use in the ascending aorta.

From zone 1 to zone 3: Feasibility and safety of complex endovascular aortic repairs in type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

More than 30% of patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection are considered high risk or inoperable. This study aims to investigate the early and midterm outcomes of complex endovascular aortic repair of aortic root, ascending aorta, and aortic arch among patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

From January 2018 to January 2023, 29 patients who were considered high risk for open operation underwent endovascular aortic repair. Patients were considered high risk because of frailty (n = 14), severe malperfusion (n = 5), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and on home oxygen (n = 4), frozen chest (n = 3), metastatic cancer (n = 3), ejection fraction <20% (n = 4), and cirrhosis (n = 2). For an isolated tear in the ascending aorta (zone 0), ascending stent graft placement was performed using commercially available aortic stent grafts. For patients with a tear in the aortic root, Endo-Bentall was performed using a physician-modified modular device composed of a self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve incorporated inside an aortic stent graft. For patients with a tear in the ascending aorta as well as the aortic arch (zone 0, zone 1, 2), ascending stent graft placement and endovascular arch repair was performed. Follow-up electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography was performed to evaluate aortic remodeling.

RESULTS

The mean age for this cohort was 76.3 ± 11.1 years. Endovascular repairs included isolated ascending stent placement in 65.5% (19/29), endo-Bentall in 6.9% (2/29), endo-Bentall plus endo arch in 6.9% (2/29), and ascending thoracic endovascular repair + endo arch in 20.7% (6/29). The operative mortality was 10.3% (3/29). Stroke rate was 10.3% (3/29). During the follow-up time of a median of 6.25 months (range, 0.85-64.6 months), an endoleak was observed in 42.3% (11/26) patients (80% among patients with a tear <2 cm of sinotubular junction). Seven patients had a type 1a endoleak, whereas 4 patients had a type 1b endoleak on follow-up computed tomography angiography. Three patients required reintervention. The Kaplan-Meier 5-year probability of survival for the entire cohort post-intervention was 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

Early outcomes of complex endovascular repair of ascending aortic dissection are promising with acceptable mortality and stroke rate. However, the rate of endoleak after isolated ascending thoracic endovascular repair with a tear within 2 cm of the aortic root is high with poor long-term survival.

Hospital Incidence, Sex Disparities, and Perioperative Mortality in Open Surgically Treated Patients with Aneurysms of the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch in Switzerland

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the epidemiological shifts in the incidence of ascending and arch aortic aneurysms (AA) treated with open surgery in the context of evolving endovascular options on a national basis.

METHODS

Between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018, 4388 cases were admitted to the hospital with either ruptured (r)AA or non-ruptured (nr)AA as the primary or secondary diagnosis. Patients were classified as having AA based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The age-standardized hospital incidence rates for treatment of nrAA were 7.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9 to 8.7) in 100,000 men and 2.9 (2.4 to 3.4) in 100,000 women and were stable over time. The overall raw in-hospital mortality rate was 2.0% and was significantly lower in males compared to women (1.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.015). Higher van Walraven scores (OR: 1.08 per point; 95%CI: 1.06 to 1.11; p = 0.001) and higher age (OR 1.05 per year; (95%CI: 1.02 to 1.07, p = 0.045) were significantly associated with hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular surgery seems to have no influence on hospital incidence in patients treated with conventional surgery for AA in Switzerland. There was a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality in both men and women, with age and the von Walraven score being independent factors for worse outcomes.

Endovascular Treatment of Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Using Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data

OBJECTIVE

The undisputed gold standard of treatment for type A aortic dissections (TAAD) is open surgery. Anecdotal reports have assessed thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as a last resort for highly selected candidates. The present study aims to evaluate endovascular outcomes in TAAD patients who are unsuitable for open surgery whilst having TEVAR-compatible aortic anatomy.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed up to 19 May 2022. Time-to-event data were reconstructed using Kaplan-Meier curves from the source literature.

RESULTS

In 20 eligible studies, 311 patients underwent TEVAR for acute, subacute, or chronic TAAD. Mean age at the time of the operation was 60.70 ± 8.00 years and 75.48% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 60.33-88.46%) of the included patients were males. Mean operative time was 169.40 ± 30.70 min. Overall, 0.44% (95% CI, 0.00-4.83%) of the cases were converted to salvage open surgery. Technical failure, stroke, and endoleaks occurred in 0.22%, 0.1%, and 8.52% of the cohort, respectively. Thirty-day postoperative complication rate was 7.08% (95% CI, 1.52-14.97%), whereas late complications developed in 16.89% (95% CI, 7.75-27.88%) of the patients. One-, three-, and five-year survival rates were estimated at 87.15%, 82.52% and 82.31%, respectively. Reintervention was required in 8.38% of the cohort over a mean follow-up of 32.40 ± 24.40 months.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR seems to be feasible in highly selected patients with TAAD who cannot tolerate open surgery. Overcoming technical limitations and acquiring long-term data are warranted to safely define the place of endovascular treatment in the armamentarium of TAAD repair.

Feasibility and safety of Stanford A aortic dissection complete endovascular repair system in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a catastrophic disease with high morbidity and mortality. Although open surgery is still the gold standard for the treatment of ATAAD, some patients, with advanced age and multiple comorbidities, can only receive medical management alone. Nowadays, thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) provides a potential treatment option for the patient with ATAAD, but traditional stent grafts (SGs), which are not designed for the ATAAD, are inapplicable to the unique anatomy of the aortic arch. Therefore, we innovatively created the BRIDGE system (Chuangxin Medical, Shenzhen, China), a complete endovascular reconstruction system designed to treat ATAAD. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the novel Stanford A aortic dissection complete endovascular reconstruction system in a porcine model.

METHOD

The BRIDGE system consists of the type A stent system and the type C stent system. Between November 2020 and March 2021, three white swine were utilized in the study. The BRIDGE system was deployed via the transcatheter approach under angiographic guidance. The swine(n = 3) treated with our system were evaluated using angiography before sacrifice 1-month after implantation, which was followed by gross specimen evaluation and histological examination of harvested tissues.

RESULT

The acute procedure success rate was 100% (3/3). The immediate post-procedural angiography showed that both type A SGs and type C SGs were deployed in satisfactory locations, with patency of the supra-aortic trunk and no endoleak. The cumulative mortality of 30-day was 0% without any adverse events. No device migration or leakage was observed angiographically, before sacrifice. The gross observation confirmed a type A SG covered part of the entry of anonyma. Favorable endothelialization, no thrombogenesis, and slight inflammatory infiltration of the tissues around the device were confirmed by microscopic examinations in all pigs.

CONCLUSION

It was feasible and secure to use Stanford A aortic dissection complete endovascular reconstruction system to implement a transcatheter endovascular repair in a porcine model. With this novel system, treating acute type A aortic dissection may be more efficient and secure in human.

Endovascular Repair of Zone 0 Ascending Aortic Pseudoaneurysm: A Case Report

Although open surgery is standard of care for ascending aortic pathology, endovascular approaches can be viable options. We report the case of a 77-year-old man with a 5.7-cm ascending aorta penetrating ulcer. Given his age and clinical profile, the patient underwent Zone 0 thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Acute aortic dissection: evidence, uncertainties, and future therapies

Remarkable progress has become especially apparent in aortic medicine in the last few decades, leading to essential changes in how thoracic aortic dissection is understood and treated. This state-of-the-art review article addresses the mechanisms of acute aortic dissection, explaining the role of its primary entry location, proximal, and distal dissection extension in their clinical presentation and impact on the decision-making process towards the best treatment approach. The latest evidence on novel treatment methods for acute aortic syndromes is presented, and the diverse dissection classification systems that remain uncertain are discussed, which reveals the need for shared terminology and more clarity. Finally, future aspects are discussed in treating acute aortic dissection, such as the endovascular treatment of aortic dissection Type A and biomarkers for acute aortic syndromes.

Endovascular Intervention for Aortic Dissection Is "Ascending"

Ascending aorta diseases represent an important cause of mortality worldwide. Notably, acute and chronic thoracic aorta pathologies have increased during the last years, but medical therapy does not seem to influence their natural history. Currently, although open surgery is the first choice of treatment, many patients are still rejected or have poor outcomes. In this scenario, endovascular treatment is raised as a valuable option. In this review we describe the limitations of conventional surgery and the state-of-art of endovascular ascending aorta repair.

Aortic Remodeling After Stepwise External Wrapping for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

The optimal repair technique for type A acute aortic dissection is graft replacement; however, the treatment approach in high-risk patients remains controversial or suboptimal.

METHODS

We have retrospectively analyzed a cohort of high-risk patients who were admitted to our center for type A acute aortic dissection and who were treated by a new surgical approach using artificial grafts (stepwise external wrapping) between January 2016 and January 2020. The primary endpoints included inhospital mortality and survival during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included the assessment of aortic remodeling after ascending aorta wrapping.

RESULTS

Among the 134 patients admitted for type A acute aortic dissection, 43 patients underwent stepwise external wrapping. The mean patient age was 79.1 ± 6.8 years. The new standard European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score was 64% ± 12%. There was one hospital death (2.3%). There were two major complications of persistent cerebral disorder (4.6%). Minor complications included temporary neurologic disorder (2.3%) and renal failure (2.3%). The intensive care unit and hospital stays were 2.8 ± 1.0 days and 11.7 ± 2.5 days, respectively. The follow-up survival rate was 95.3% ± 6.2% and 91% ± 10.2% at 1 and 3 years, respectively, after surgery. There was no aortic-related death during follow-up. At 1 year after surgery, complete remodeling of the ascending aorta was obtained in 30 patients (85.7%), and 5 patients (14.3%) showed partial remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

Our stepwise external wrapping technique was associated with excellent outcomes for high-risk patients with type A acute aortic dissection.

ARISE: First-In-Human Evaluation of a Novel Stent Graft to Treat Ascending Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Operative mortality for type A aortic dissection is still 10-20% at centers of excellence. Additionally, 10-20% are not considered as viable candidates for open surgical repair and not offered life-saving emergency surgery. ARISE is a multicenter investigation evaluating the novel GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG; Flagstaff, AZ).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to assess early feasibility of using these investigational devices to treat ascending aortic dissection.

METHODS

This a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study that enrolls patients at high surgical risk with appropriate anatomical requirements based on computed tomography imaging at 7 of 9 US sites. Devices are delivered transfemorally under fluoroscopic guidance. Primary endpoint is all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary endpoints include major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled with a mean age of 75.7 years (range 47-91) and 11 (57.9%) were female. Ten (52.6%) had DeBakey type I disease, and the rest were type II. Sixteen (84.2%) of the patients were acute. Patients were treated with safe access, (7/19 (36.8%) percutaneous, 10/19 (52.6%) transfemoral, 2/19 (10.5%) iliac conduit), delivery, and deployment completed in all cases. Median procedure time was 154 mins (range 52-392) and median contrast used was 111 mL (range 75-200). MACCE at 30 days occurred in 5 patients including mortality 3/19 (15.8%), disabling stroke in 1/19 (5.3%), and myocardial infarction in 1/19 (5.3%).

CONCLUSION

Results from the ARISE early feasibility study of a specific ascending stent graft device to treat ascending aortic dissection are promising.

Endovascular Repair for Ascending Aortic Graft Side Branch Pseudoaneurysm: A Report of Two Cases

Introduction

A pseudoaneurysm arising from the side branch of the prosthesis, following ascending aortic replacement, is extremely rare. Re-intervention usually involves open surgery, replacement of the ascending aorta, or ligation of the side branch. Redo surgery with an additional sternotomy carries the risk of cardiac and vascular injuries, and endovascular treatment can reduce such adverse events.

Report

This study describes the successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of two cases of pseudoaneurysms arising from the side branch after ascending aortic replacement. Case 1 involved a 79 year old man who underwent ascending aortic replacement and omentopexy for a ruptured tuberculous aortic aneurysm 13 years ago. The pseudoaneurysm was mushroom shaped with a 30 mm protrusion. Case 2 involved an 83 year old man who underwent ascending aortic replacement for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection 11 years ago. The pseudoaneurysm was rod shaped with a 27 mm protrusion. In both cases, the pseudoaneurysm arising from the side branch was not noted on computed tomography (CT) until one year earlier and was first identified at a routine follow up examination. The pseudoaneurysms required surgical repair because of the risk of rupture; however, TEVAR was selected considering the risks of redo surgery and the patients' ages. It was performed via a femoral artery approach without adverse events using a commercially available thoracic aortic device. Post-operative CT scan showed complete exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm.

Discussion

Although TEVAR is usually not indicated for ascending aortic pathologies, if there is an anatomical indication and a compatible stent graft, TEVAR for the ascending aorta should be the first choice in patients who are inoperable, at high risk and undergoing redo surgery.

Thoracic endograft placement using a transfemoral snare in a patient with angled aortic arch

OBJECTIVE

In complex anatomical challenges, endovascular endograft implantation to the thoracic aorta may not be performed. Various techniques have been put forward for endograft therapy. In this report, we present the effect of femoral snare support for a patient with an aortic arch angle.

METHOD

Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) was used for treating a 60-year-old male patient who suffered from severe angulation in the arcus aorta and aneurysmal enlargement of the left subclavian artery and descending aorta. The endovascular graft could not be advanced into the aortic arch with the guidewire because of the aortic arch angle. Therefore, the TEVAR graft distal end was caught with the snare advanced from the femoral artery, and the TEVAR graft was advanced into the aortic arch.

CONCLUSION AND RESULT

The femoral snare technique is a simple and successful method for endograft implantation of the aortic arch disease without the risk of heart trauma, especially in cases with aortic arch tortuosity.

Back-Table Modified Stent-Graft for Endovascular Repair of Ascending Aorta

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness of modified stent-grafts (SGs) for the management of ascending aortic pathologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2019, 31 individuals were treated by ascending aortic endovascular repair with a back-table modified SG for acute (n=4) or chronic (n=1) type A aortic dissections, penetrating aortic ulcers (n=18), pseudoaneurysms (n=2), anastomotic fistula (n=1), and endoleaks after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (n=5). The commercially available thoracic aortic SGs were modified with a fenestration or truncation technique on the back-table according to aortography during the operation.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality and aorta-related mortality rates were 12.9% and 6.5%, respectively. There were 2 strokes, 3 respiratory insufficiencies, and 6 endoleaks during hospitalization. During a mean follow-up of 28.8±16.6 months, the overall survival rates at 1 year and 3 years were both 80.6%. Free from adverse event rates at 1 year and 3 years were 88.9% and 84.7%, respectively. There were 2 deaths during follow-up: One patient died of cachexia 1 month after discharge, and the other patient died of acute myocardial infarction 3 months after discharge. One patient with a pseudoaneurysm underwent open ascending aorta replacement 3 months after discharge for a type Ia endoleak. Another patient suffered from cerebellar infarction 17 months after discharge.

CONCLUSION

The modified SG for endovascular repair of the ascending aorta is a practicable alternative and presents acceptable outcomes in high-risk patients.

Endovascular treatment of the dissected proximal aortic arch: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Surgical repair of aortic dissection involving the proximal aortic arch is associated with higher morbidity and mortality, in particular when elderly high-risk patients are concerned. Endovascular treatments for this disease are under evaluation and some reports exist. We investigated the current use of catheter-based treatments for the dissected proximal aortic arch repair.

METHODS

We searched in PubMed and MEDLINE databases up to the end of June 2020 for studies on endovascular treatment of the dissected proximal aortic arch. Data on demographic, procedure and stent graft (SG) details, access route, mortality with cause of death, complications and follow-up were extracted. A systematic review on the employed technology, procedure and outcome was performed.

RESULTS

A total number of 15 articles (13 retrospective reports and 2 case reports) were deemed eligible and were included in the study. In total, 140 patients (mean age: 56.7 years in 106 cases) received endovascular treatments for the dissected proximal aortic arch (unspecific aortic dissection: 14; acute and subacute type A aortic dissection: 88; chronic type A aortic dissection: 23; type B aortic dissection with retrograde type A dissection: 15). The procedure strategy included unspecific thoracic endovascular aorta repair (TEVAR) (n = 8), TEVAR + supra-aortic debranching (n = 2), TEVAR + cervical bypass (n = 8), TEVAR + periscope SG (n = 12), TEVAR + chimney graft (n = 8), TEVAR + branched SG (n = 21) and TEVAR + fenestration (n = 81). Procedural success rate was 95.6% for 116 reported cases. Complications included endoleaks (postoperative: 2; late: 5), stroke (n = 4), late SG-induced new entry (n = 3) and new false lumen formation (n = 1). Hospital mortality was 5% (6 cases) in 13 reports (120 patients). The mean follow-up time was 26.2 ± 29.4 months and 2 patients died during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

As an alternative to surgery for high-risk patients with a dissected proximal aortic arch, the endovascular treatment seems to be promising in highly selected cases. Further studies with long-term results and specifically designed devices are required to standardize this approach.

Hybrid stepwise external wrapping for type a acute aortic dissection with cerebral Malperfusion

Background

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening condition which can lead to coronary, brachiocephalic or branch vessel malperfusion, as well as aortic valve insufficiency, or aortic rupture. Mortality of surgical treatment in high-risk or elderly patients with Type A AAD (TAAAD) still remains high, and treatment for such patients remains controversial. We report a successful treatment of TAAAD with a communicating false lumen in a 60-year-old man with acute hemi-cerebral malperfusion.

Case presentation

The ascending aorta was wrapped with stepwise external wrapping (SEW) procedure, and subsequent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was successfully performed. The patient was discharged in good physical condition without any complications.

Conclusions

Hybrid therapy with SEW and TEVAR with TAAAD associated with major cerebral malperfusion should be considered, especially in patients for whom open surgery is extremely risky.

Acute Aortic Syndrome of Ascending Thoracic Aorta: Transcarotid Percutaneous Exclusion of a Ruptured Pseudoaneurysm

Treatment of ascending aorta disease is surgical; however, some series have evaluated the effectiveness of endovascular treatment. We report the case of a patient with a ruptured pseudoaneurysm who underwent endovascular repair via the left common carotid artery. The clinical and neurological evolution was satisfactory during the in-hospital follow-up. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Catheter-based treatment of the dissected ascending aorta: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

METHODS

A PubMed search was supplemented by searching through bibliographies and key articles. Demographics, risk score, stent graft detail, access route, mortality, cause of death, complications, reinterventions and follow-up data were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one articles (7 retrospective reports; 24 case reports/series) were included in the study. In total, 104 patients (mean age 71 ± 14 years) received endovascular treatment for acute (63) or chronic (41) type A dissection. A history of a major cardiac or aortic operation was present in 29 patients. The mean EuroSCORE II was 30 ± 20 in 4 reports. A total of 114 stent grafts were implanted: ‘off-the-shelf’, 65/114; custom made, 12/114; and modified, 7/114. Hospital complications included intraprocedural conversion to open surgery (2/104), stroke (2/104), coronary stenting (2/104), early endoleak (9/104) and repeat aortic endovascular treatment for endoleak (5/104). Hospital mortality was 10% (intraoperative death 2/104). Mean duration of follow-up time was 21 ± 21 months (range 1–81 months); follow-up data were available for 86 patients: 10 patients died of non-aortic-related causes; reintervention for aortic disease (endovascular repair or open surgery) was performed in 8 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter-based ascending aorta repair for type A aortic dissection with the entry tear in the ascending aorta can be considered in carefully selected high-risk patients. Further analysis and specifically designed devices are required.

Zone 0 Thoracic Endovascular Repair After Aortic Wrapping for Acute Aortic Syndrome

We report a successful treatment of type A acute aortic syndrome (AAS)-associated aortic arch aneurysm in a 71-year-old man with major comorbidities. The ascending aorta was wrapped with artificial graft, and supra-aortic debranching was constructed. Then, Zone 0 thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) with plug occlusion of the left subclavian artery was successfully performed. The patient was discharged in good physical condition without any complications. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case in the literature of successful Zone 0 TEVAR after ascending aorta wrapping and supra-aortic debranching with type A AAS associated with aortic arch aneurysm.

The future of stenting in patients with type A aortic dissection: a systematic review

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) carries high morbidity and mortality rates and is a clinical emergency. The reported mortality rate is 50% to 65% within the first 48 hours without surgical intervention. Open surgery therefore remains the gold standard management for ATAAD. However, in patients who are deemed unfit for surgery and where possible, endovascular repair offers a useful alternative to medical treatment alone or high-risk open surgical repair. Several case reports, case series, and retrospective studies have reported good outcomes following endovascular treatment. The endovascular option also has comparable early and late outcomes, favourable aortic remodelling, and satisfactory overall survival despite having a higher-risk patient cohort. However, stenting in patients with ATAAD undoubtedly still has several limitations and technical challenges.

Endovascular Treatment of the Ascending Aorta: is this the Last Frontier in Aortic Surgery?

Regardless the successful treatment of the descending aorta with endovascular prosthesis, for the ascending aorta segment, because of several anatomic and physiologic issues, this technique has been considered an alternative only for high-risk or inoperable patients. Despite restricted indications, hundreds of treatments have been performed worldwide, demonstrating its safety and reproducibility if it is done in high-quality centers. Therefore, understanding patients' selection criteria and technique limitations are critical to its application.

Endovascular treatment of non-dissected ascending aorta disease: a systematic review

Severe ascending aorta disease includes aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms (ascending aorta pseudoaneurysms), penetrating aortic ulcers and Type A aortic dissections. Surgical replacement of the aortic root, ascending aorta or aortic arch is the common treatment for severe ascending aortic disease involving the root, the ascending aorta and/or the arch. Despite good surgical results, there is still a risk for morbidity and mortality following surgery for ascending aorta replacement when elderly patients or patients at high risk for surgery are concerned. Less invasive endovascular treatments for ascending aorta repair are under evaluation, and some reports appeared in the available literature in the last decade. However, clinical series or randomized studies are not yet available, and the use of these techniques is still questionable. In this study, we analysed the outcomes of reported cases of endovascular treatment for ascending aorta disease, excluding Type A aortic dissection. We reviewed reports published until February 2017, and we evaluated the employed technology, the devices, the procedural steps and the outcomes. A total of 26 articles reported 67 patients (mean age 65 ± 17 years) who received endovascular treatment for ascending aorta disease: aneurysms, ascending aorta pseudoaneurysms, penetrating aortic ulcers, intramural haematoma, thrombosis, iatrogenic coarctation and aortic rupture. Complications included endoleak (9 cases), stroke (3 cases), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (1 case) and splenic infarction (1 case). Three patients required conversion to open surgery, and 1 patient underwent endovascular reintervention. Early mortality was 2.9%. As an alternative treatment for ascending aorta disease in selected high-risk patients, the endovascular repair will gain popularity, but further analysis is required.

Back-table Modified Aortic Endograft Deployed via "Innominate Bounce" Technique for Management of a Zone 0 Ascending Aortic Pseudoaneurysm

Ascending aortic pseudoaneurysms pose a difficult therapeutic dilemma. Surgical repair carries high morbidity and mortality risk and may be challenging in patients with unfavorable anatomy or prior aortic surgery. Endovascular repair is difficult due to short landing zones, need for precise delivery, and the lack of adequately sized commercially available devices. This report describes a case of back-table modification of a thoracic aortic stent graft successfully deployed using an "innominate bounce" technique.

Endovascular repair of ascending aorta pseudoaneurysm

We present a case of a 48-year-old female patient with Marfan syndrome and previous open surgeries for Bentall procedure and arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique, who was admitted at our Department with a diagnosis of ascending aorta pseudoaneurysm at the anastomosis-site between composite valve graft and arch prosthesis treated by endovascular procedure because of she was considered to be at high-risk for a third open surgery and for the patient's favorable anatomy for endovascular closure of the pseudoaneurysm. The patient was successfully treated with the positioning of two abdominal cuffs through the left axillary artery. The postoperative course was uneventful and at 2-month follow-up, the patient was free of complications with CT angiogram showing complete endovascular exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm.

Endovascular treatment of acute Type A aortic dissection-the Endo Bentall approach

Outcome after classical surgical repair of acute Type A aortic dissection has steadily improved over the years and several modifications in cannulation and perfusion added to this achievement. However, subgroups remain where results of classical surgical repair still have room for improvement, particularly patients with severe preoperative malperfusion as well as elderly patients with a limited physiological reserve. So far, only small case series or case reports have been published on the endovascular treatment of dissected ascending aortas. However, a tube alone is not sufficient to fix the entire complex underlying problem in the vast majority of patients with acute Type A aortic dissection. In addition, these published reports are either due to a favorable anatomy or due to very localized disease processes, which are the exception and not the rule. The concept of an endovascular valve-carrying conduit may significantly increase the number of patients suitable for endovascular therapy and it may soon be common practice.

Hybrid and total endovascular repair of the aortic arch

Background

Recent advances in endovascular technology have enabled minimally invasive repair of the aortic arch, with specifically designed stent-grafts. This article reviews hybrid and total endovascular repair in the management of aortic arch pathology.

Methods

Studies relating to aortic arch management were identified using MEDLINE and Embase, focusing on endovascular repair.

Results

Hybrid arch repair is associated with an early mortality rate of some 12 per cent, and carries significant risk of stroke (up to 15 per cent), paraplegia (up to 6 per cent), retrograde dissection (up to 6·5 per cent) and proximal endoleak (6 per cent). Despite patients being of overall higher perioperative risk, hybrid repair has morbidity and early mortality rates comparable to those of open arch replacement. However, rates of freedom from aortic rupture or reintervention are significantly lower in the longer term, owing to the incidence of endoleak. Total endovascular arch repair may be achieved by the use of parallel stents or in situ fenestration in the emergency setting, or use of custom-made devices (scalloped, fenestrated or branched stent-grafts) in the elective setting. Reports of these relatively novel technologies suggest acceptable short-term outcomes, but long-term data are still awaited.

Conclusion

Repair of aortic arch pathology presents a formidable challenge for endovascular technology. Open aortic arch repair remains the standard in younger, fitter patients, but endovascular technology and experience continue to evolve with encouraging early outcomes and expanding indications.

Thoracic endovascular repair for acute type A aortic dissection: operative technique

Acute type A aortic dissection is a potentially lethal condition which requires immediate diagnostic and therapeutic intervention. Open surgical repair remains the standard of care as survival rates continue to improve in the modern surgical era. Unfortunately, up to twenty percent of patients are denied surgical therapy because they are deemed medically unfit to undergo open repair. The application of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has changed the treatment paradigm for aortic disease involving the descending thoracic aorta and may be a viable rescue option for patients with type A dissection who are not eligible for open surgical repair. New endovascular devices and advanced image-guided procedures are continually evolving. This article summarizes the pathology of aortic dissection and focuses on currently available endovascular solutions for transapical and transfemoral stent graft deployment for acute aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta for selected patients who are ineligible for open surgical repair.

Endovascular Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection: Current Experience and Technical Considerations

Dissection of the ascending aorta, type A aortic dissection (TAAD), represents a surgical emergency with high morbidity and mortality. Current open surgical techniques, although state-of-the-art procedures and having improved outcomes for patients with TAAD over the last decades, confer significant risk of complications and death. Recently, endovascular techniques for repair of both the abdominal and thoracic aorta have gained acceptance within the vascular and cardiovascular surgical communities as a useful tool in select pathologies and patient populations. As development of endovascular technology proceeds ever closer to the aortic valve, thoracic endovascular repair for TAAD deserves special investigation. A comprehensive literature search for studies reporting outcomes of endovascular repair in the ascending aorta was performed. In this review, we compile the worldwide experience of thoracic endovascular repair for TAAD as well as imaging studies for patient selection and the use of hybrid (open plus endovascular) techniques. The authors discuss the remaining challenges that preclude its broader adoption in this role, namely patient selection and device specificity.

Balloon-Supported Passage of a Stent-Graft into the Aortic Arch

A 62-year-old man was admitted, and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedure was performed to treat an accidentally detected aortic aneurysm, which was 63 mm in diameter. While performing TEVAR, the passage of the stent-graft introducer system was impossible due to the prolapse of the introducer system into a wide-necked aneurysm; this aneurysm was located at the greater curvature of the proximal descending thoracic aorta. In order to advance the introducer system, a compliant balloon was inflated. Thus, we created an artificial wall in the aneurysm with this inflated balloon. Finally, we were able to advance the introducer system into the target zone.

Endovascular stent-graft treatment for Stanford type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to summarise our experience of endovascular stent grafting for Stanford type A aortic dissection.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis at single centre.

METHODS

From January 2001 to January 2009, we treated 45 cases of Stanford type A aortic dissection with endovascular stent grafting. The entry tear was located at the ascending aorta in 10 cases (DeBakey type I), the aortic arch in 14 cases and the distal aortic arch or proximal descending aorta in 21 cases in which the ascending aorta was also involved by the dissection.

RESULTS

The surgical success rate was 97.8% (44/45) and 30-day mortality rate was 6.7% (3/45). Type I endoleaks occurred in 10 cases: one patient died intra-operatively, four were successfully treated with ballooning, four were sealed with aortic cuffs and one case caused by left subclavian artery (LSA) reflux was sealed with an occluder. Average follow-up time was 35.5 ± 5.4 months. Up to the most recent review or death, 32 patients had complete thrombosis and 10 had partial thrombosis inside the false lumen. Two deaths occurred after 30-days postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular stent-graft treatment is a minimally invasive and effective method to treat Stanford type A aortic dissection.

Stent-grafting of the thoracic aorta: feasibility and early results in acute and chronic lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Conventional surgery of the thoracic aorta is frequently associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Here we present treatment of surgical pathologies of the thoracic aorta using a less invasive endovascular approach.

METHODS

From January 2000 to May 2004, 51 patients (mean age 62.7 +/- 12.8 years, 36 men) underwent endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions in our institution. All patients underwent computed tomography scan at discharge, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Clinical follow-up was carried out by outpatient clinic visit or by telephone contact with the patients or their referring physicians. Mean follow-up was 15.8 months.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate was 3.8%, one death in the group of chronic (1.9%) and one in the group of acute lesion (1.9%). The survival rate in the follow-up period was 92.4% at 6 months. Computed tomography angiography confirmed exclusion of the lesion in 25 out of 27 chronic patients, whereas type I and II endoleaks were detected in two patients treated with a secondary procedure. In addition, two patients with an acute type B aortic dissection presented with early endoleaks. The overall rate of complications was 10%. No other endoleaks or deaths were observed at later follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The early and mid-term results of endovascular stent-grafting for the treatment of chronic and acute thoracic aortic diseases showed a good outcome and low rate of complications. Stent-grafting of the thoracic aorta is still an investigational procedure that needs further validation.

An experimental study of a new pull-through technique for aortic arch aneurysm in a porcine model

A new pull-through technique for placement of the aortic arch stent-graft was developed. Self-expandable curved stents (Matsui-Kitamura stents) were used on 4 pigs. With use of the endoscopic system, the sheath insertion was performed at the ascending aorta. By this pull-through method from the ascending aorta to the femoral artery, the stent was deployed into the aortic arch. All stents were successfully deployed into the correct position, and they fitted into the curvature of the aortic arch wall. By this method, stent-grafting for aortic arch aneurysm is expected to be performed with more accuracy and safety.