Subintimal Angioplasty of Infrainguinal Arterial Occlusions for Critical Limb Ischemia: Long-Term Patency and Clinical Efficacy

Amputation-Free Survival in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Arterial Disease With Heel Ulcer: Open Versus Endovascular Surgery

Background:

Heel ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are hard to heal. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the difference in amputation-free survival (AFS) between open and endovascular revascularization in patients with DM, PAD, and heel ulcers.

Methods:

Retrospective comparative study of results of open versus endovascular surgery in patients with DM, PAD, and heel ulcer presented at the multidisciplinary diabetes foot clinic between 1983 and 2013.

Results:

Patients with heel ulcers were treated with endovascular intervention (n = 97) and open vascular surgery (n = 30). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the AFS was higher in patients undergoing open vascular surgery compared to the endovascular group ( P = .009). Multivariate analysis showed that open vascular surgery versus endovascular therapy (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.9; P = .025) was an independent factor associated with higher AFS. The proportion of patients undergoing endovascular therapy in the former (1983-2000) time period was 47% compared to 89% in the latter (2001-2013) time period ( P < .001).

Conclusion:

The AFS was higher after open than endovascular surgery among patients with DM and PAD with heel ulcer. These results suggest that open vascular surgery should be offered more often as opposed to current practice.

Retrograde subintimal recanalization of a radial artery occlusion after coronary angiography using the palmar loop technique

We report interventional management of critical hand ischemia after transradial coronary angiography. The radial artery occlusion was confirmed by Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography. The radial artery was opened using retrograde recanalization technics through the palmar arch. After guidewire passage the proximal occlusion site was stented with balloon expandable drug eluting stent, and the distal segment underwent balloon angioplasty. The report discusses the potential risks and advantages of angioplasty in the treatment of a symptomatic radial artery occlusion and the retrograde recanalization technique via the palmar arch.

Primary nitinol stenting for femoropopliteal disease

The 1- to 2-year primary patency rates associated with self-expanding nitinol stents for the treatment of symptomatic femoropopliteal disease are superior to those for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and the first-generation stainless steel balloon-expandable stents. The advantages of nitinol stents include improved radial strength and flexibility, the ability to recover from being crushed, reduced foreshortening, and (importantly) deployability without balloon dilation of the stent edge (which may decrease the incidence of the edge stenosis, or "candy-wrap" effect, often observed with balloon-expandable stents). The technical success rate associated with primary deployment of nitinol stents is very high, and acute to 6-month patency results are predictably excellent. Prior to the introduction of nitinol stents, the original guidelines (2000) of the multidisciplinary TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC I) recommended only an adjunctive role for femoropopliteal stents following suboptimal PTA. The abbreviated 2007 TASC II report essentially extended this recommendation to nitinol stents. Here, current trials of nitinol stenting in the femoropopliteal segment are discussed, with emphasis on the advantages of primary (and often direct) deployment in selected circumstances dependent on factors including lesion length, lesion location, indication for treatment (critical limb ischemia or claudication, in-stent restenosis, stent-graft restenosis), and the relative appropriateness of other modalities (e.g., covered stents). Technical considerations in primary nitinol stenting are briefly reviewed. Open questions regarding the factors involved in nitinol stent fracture and the possible association of fracture and restenosis are examined in the context of current clinical trials. A new generation of femoropopliteal nitinol stents combining superior durability and flexibility is expected soon. Development and implementation of uniform reporting and surveillance standards is important for optimizing current and future research.

Medical and endovascular management of critical limb ischemia

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the term used to designate the condition in which peripheral artery disease has resulted in resting leg or foot pain or in a breakdown of the skin of the leg or foot, causing ulcers or tissue loss. If not revascularized, CLI patients are at risk for limb loss and for potentially fatal complications from the progression of gangrene and the development of sepsis. The management of CLI requires a multidisciplinary team of experts in different areas of vascular disease, from atherosclerotic risk factor management to imaging, from intervention to wound care and physical therapy. In the past decade, the most significant change in the treatment of CLI has been the increasing tendency to shift from bypass surgery to less invasive endovascular procedures as first-choice revascularization techniques, with bypass surgery then reserved as backup if appropriate. The goals of intervention for CLI include the restoration of pulsatile, inline flow to the foot to assist wound healing, the relief of rest pain, the avoidance of major amputation, preservation of mobility, and improvement of patient function and quality of life. The evaluating physician should be fully aware of all revascularization options in order to select the most appropriate intervention or combination of interventions, while taking into consideration the goals of therapy, risk-benefit ratios, patient comorbidities, and life expectancy. We discuss the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of CLI and the clinical presentation, diagnosis, available imaging modalities, and medical management (including pain and ulcer care, pharmaceutical options, and molecular therapies targeting angiogenesis). The endovascular approaches that we review include percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (with or without adjunctive stenting); subintimal angioplasty; primary femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal deployment of bare nitinol, covered, drug-eluting, or bioabsorbable stents; cryoplasty; excimer laser-assisted angioplasty; excisional atherectomy; and cutting balloon angioplasty.

Subintimal angioplasty: meta-analytical evidence of clinical utility

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine accurate estimates of the success rate of subintimal angioplasty in terms of ability to recanalise occluded vessels, patency over time and limb salvage rates.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis of published literature.

MATERIALS

All studies reporting unique patient data published in English language between 1989 and 2008.

METHODS

Separate meta-analyses were performed for immediate technical success, 12-month patency rates and 12-month limb salvage rates. Longer-term outcomes were analyzed in separate meta-analyses. Meta-regression was applied to determine whether any of these outcomes had improved over time.

RESULTS

Pooled estimates for technical success, primary patency at 12 months and limb salvage at 12 months were 85.7% (95% confidence interval: 83.3%-87.7%, 2810 limbs), 55.8% (95% confidence interval: 47.9%-63.4%, 1342 limbs), and 89.3% (95% confidence interval: 85.5%-92.2%, 2810 limbs), respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated no significant change in outcomes over time. There was some evidence of publication bias, however, after adjusting for this there was little change in the pooled outcome estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the outcomes for subintimal angioplasty are good and that this method should be considered as an alternative to surgical bypass.