Commentary: new-generation devices and adjunctive procedures are the key elements to expanding the indications for endovascular aneurysm repair

Is Evar Feasible in Challenging Aortic Neck Anatomies? A Technical Review and Ethical Discussion

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become an accepted alternative to open repair (OR) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) despite “hostile” anatomies that may reduce its effectiveness. Guidelines suggest refraining from EVAR in such circumstances, but in clinical practice, up to 44% of EVAR procedures are performed using stent grafts outside their instruction for use (IFU), with acceptable outcomes. Starting from this “inconsistency” between clinical practice and guidelines, the aim of this contribution is to report the technical results of the use of EVAR in challenging anatomies as well as the ethical aspects to identify the criteria by which the “best interest” of the patient can be set. Materials and Methods: A literature review on currently available evidence on standard EVAR using commercially available endografts in patients with hostile aortic neck anatomies was conducted. Medline using the PubMed interface and The Cochrane Library databases were searched from 1 January 2000 to 6 May 2021, considering the following outcomes: technical success; need for additional procedures; conversion to OR; reintervention; migration; the presence of type I endoleaks; AAA-related mortality rate. Results: A total of 52 publications were selected by the investigators for a detailed review. All studies were either prospective or retrospective observational studies reporting the immediate, 30-day, and/or follow-up outcomes of standard EVAR procedures in patients with challenging neck anatomies. No randomized trials were identified. Fourteen different endo-grafts systems were used in the selected studies. A total of 45 studies reported a technical success rate ranging from 93 to 100%, and 42 the need for additional procedures (mean value of 9.04%). Results at 30 days: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 37 studies with a mean value of 2.65%; 31 studies reported a null migration rate and 32 a null conversion rate to OR; in 31 of the 35 studies that reported AAA-related mortality, the incidence was null. Mid-term follow-up: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 48 studies with a mean value of 6.65%; 30 studies reported a null migration rate, 33 a null conversion rate to OR, and 28 of the 45 studies reported that the AAA-related mortality incidence was null. Conclusions: Based on the present analysis, EVAR appears to be a safe and effective procedure—and therefore recommendable—even in the presence of hostile anatomies, in patients deemed unfit for OR. However, in order to identify and pursue the patient’s best interest, particular attention must be paid to the management of the patient’s informed consent process, which—in addition to being an essential ethical-legal requirement to legitimize the medical act—ensures that clinical data can be integrated with the patient’s personal preferences and background, beyond the therapeutic potential of the proposed procedures and what is generically stated in the guidelines.

Limb graft occlusion following endovascular aortic repair: Incidence, causes, treatment and prevention in a study cohort

The present study investigated the incidence, causes, treatment and prevention of limb graft occlusion following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). A total of 66 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm receiving EVAR at our department from January 2005 to December 2013 were enrolled. After EVAR, patients received routine antiplatelet therapy of 75 mg PLAVIX for 6 months and then 100 mg Aspirin for another 6 months by oral administration. According to previous clinical experiences, antiplatelet therapy is able to effectively reduce the incidence of iliac occlusion after EVAR. A total of 61 bifurcated grafts and 5 aortauniilac grafts (127 limbs in total) were used. Physical examination, ankle-brachial-index and computer tomographic angiography were performed at 10 days, at 3, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. It was found that 7 limbs in 7 patients (10.6% of patients, 5.5% of limbs) were occluded between 20 days and 12 months (average, 7.8±5.3 months) after EVAR. Acute and severe ischemia was found in 2 cases, claudication was in found 3 cases, asthenia in both legs was found in 1 case and 1 case was asymptomatic. Femoral-femoral bypass, femoral-femoral bypass and stenting, aorto-iliac/femoral bypass, thrombectomy and conservative treatment were performed in 1 patient each and thrombectomy together with stenting was performed in 2 cases. Limb graft occlusion was not rare after EVAR. Treatment of this complication included surgery and endovascular therapy such as bypass, thrombectomy and thrombolysis. In conclusion, aggressive pre-emptive treatment including angioplasty and stenting prevented occlusion in certain cases.

Preliminary experience with the Endurant II short form stent-graft system

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate our preliminary experience with the use of the Endurant II short form (IIs) stent-graft in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

METHODS

Between November 2014 and November 2015, 79 patients were consecutively treated with the Endurant IIs stent-graft at three European vascular centers. Early (30-day) results in terms of technical success, limb occlusion, major morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Estimated 1-year outcomes in terms of survival, freedom from type I endoleak, freedom from limb occlusion, and freedom from any device-related reinterventions were assessed with Kaplan-Meyer method. Factors affecting 1-year freedom from type I endoleak were analyzed by log-rank test and by Cox regression test for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Intraoperative technical success was achieved in all cases. Thirty-day mortality was 1.3% (one death due to cardiac failure). Early type I endoleak was detected in three patients (3.8%). During the follow-up (mean duration 6.7 months; range 1-14), two type I endoleaks resolved spontaneously. No limb occlusions or aneurysm-related reinterventions were recorded. Estimated survival, freedom from type I endoleak, freedom from limb occlusions, and freedom from any device-related reinterventions rates at 1 year were 96%, 96.6%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Adoption of chimney technique significantly affected 1-year freedom from type I endoleak (P≤0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary use of the new Endurant IIs stent-graft is safe and effective in endovascular repair of AAAs (EVAR) without early limb occlusions. Further studies with larger population sizes and longer follow-up are needed to evaluate mid- and long-term results.