Treatment Modalities for Small Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Endovenous Microwave Ablation Versus Laser Ablation for Small Saphenous Vein Varicosis

INTRODUCTION

Laser and radiofrequency ablation are two thermal ablation methods currently widely used to treat lower limb venous insufficiency. However, very few studies have been conducted on the use of microwaves, a form of thermal ablation, for the treatment of small saphenous vein (SSV) insufficiency. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) for the treatment of SSV insufficiency.

METHODS

The clinical data of 126 patients (126 lower limbs) with SSV insufficiency (SSV trunk reflux time ≥ 500 ms on lower limb color Doppler ultrasound) treated at the Surgery Department of The Sixth People's Hospital of Zhuji from January 2020 to June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively; 64 patients underwent EMA and 62 underwent endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). The perioperative marker data [duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, length of thermal ablation, duration of thermal ablation, number of incisions, and numerical pain rating scale (NPRS)], complication data [skin ecchymosis, skin burns, surgical site infection, paresthesia, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT)], venous clinical severity score (VCSS), chronic venous disease quality of life questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) before and 1, 3, 12 months after surgery, and SSV trunk occlusion rate at 12 months after surgery were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the surgery or hospitalization durations were observed between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the length of the SSV that required thermal ablation between the two groups; however, the thermal ablation time was shorter in the EMA group than that in the EVLA group (6.14 ± 1.47 min vs 7.05 ± 1.16 min, P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in the number of incisions, volume of tumescent solution used, or quantity of sclerosing foam used. The NPRS scores of the EMA group at 24 h and 72 h after surgery were significantly greater than those of the EVLA group (4.03 ± 0.98 vs 3.52 ± 1.28, P = 0.013; 3.78 ± 1.06 vs 3.15 ± 1.03, P = 0.001). Moreover, the two groups showed no significant difference in the NPRS score at 1 month (1.14 ± 0.84 vs 1.07 ± 0.75, P = 0.623). The EMA and EVLA group patients experienced similar postoperative complications. The VCSS and CIVIQ-20 score significantly improved at 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery. The VCSS and CIVIQ-20 scores were compared between the two groups at 12 months after surgery, and there were no significant differences (1.44 ± 0.63 vs 1.56 ± 0.56, P = 0.261; 24.24 ± 4.96 vs 25.19 ± 5.36, P = 0.304). There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSV trunk occlusion at 12 months after surgery between the two groups (95.31% vs 96.77%, OR 1.475; 95% CI 0.238-9.146, P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

EMA and EVLA are equally effective treatment methods for SSV insufficiency. EMA is associated with higher NPRS scores in the early postoperative period.

Efficacy and safety of mechanochemical ablation versus laser ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein reflux: A randomized, open, parallel controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a new mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) device versus endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for primary great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospectively analyze the demographics, treatment detail and outcomes data of 57 primary GSV reflux patients. Patients were randomly assigned to MOCA or EVLA group with random envelope method. Primary endpoint was 6-month closure rate of GSV. Secondary endpoint including technical success rate, the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain.

RESULTS

The procedures were well tolerated according to the VAS score. The 6-month closure rate was 85.71% in MOCA and 96.55% in EVLA group (p = .194). Significant changes were observed in regard of VCSS and CIVIQ-20 score at 6-month follow-up. Skin paresthesia occurred in 0 in MOCA and 5 in EVLA group.

CONCLUSION

The new MOCA device is safe and effective in treating primary great saphenous vein reflux. The 6-month closure rate is non-inferior compared with EVLA. However, the long-term results need further follow-up.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Lower Extremity Chronic Venous Disease

Lower extremity venous insufficiency is a chronic medical condition resulting from primary valvular incompetence or, less commonly, prior deep venous thrombosis or extrinsic venous obstruction. Lower extremity chronic venous disease has a high prevalence with a related socioeconomic burden. In the United States, over 11 million males and 22 million females 40 to 80 years of age have varicose veins, with over 2 million adults having advanced chronic venous disease. The high cost to the health care system is related to the recurrent nature of venous ulcerative disease, with total treatment costs estimated >$2.5 billion per year in the United States, with at least 20,556 individuals with newly diagnosed venous ulcers yearly. Various diagnostic and treatment strategies are in place for lower extremity chronic venous disease and are discussed in this document. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

One Year Follow-Up of Endovascular Microwave Ablation and Concomitant Foam Sclerotherapy in the Treatment of Primary Small Saphenous Vein Insufficiency

BACKGROUND

In the last decade, the microwave ablation catheter specifically for treating lower extremity varicose veins has become popular. However, imited data is available on the efficacy, analysis, and evaluation of endovenous microwave ablation (EMWA) in treating SSV insufficiency. Our objective is to evaluated the feasibility, safety, and 1-year outcomes of EMWA and concomitant foam sclerotherapy of primary small saphenous vein (SSV) insufficiency.

METHODS

Our team carried out a single-center, retrospective analysis of 24 patients treated with EMWAand concomitant foam sclerotherapy for primary SSV insufficiency. All operations were performed using a MWA catheter and polidocanol for the trunk and branches of the SSV, respectively. The SSV occlusion rate was assessed at the 6- and 12-month follow-up examinations using duplex ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological (CEAP) clinical class; Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS); Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ); periprocedural pain; and complications.

RESULTS

100% of the cases have been technically successful. At the 6-month follow-up, all treated SSVs were occluded. The 12-month assessment duplex doppler showed anatomical success in patients with 95.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.756-0.994). The CEAP clinical class, VCSS, and the AVVQ had decreased significantly at the 6- and 12-month follow-up, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EMWA and concomitant foam sclerotherapy is a feasible and effective technique for treating SSV insufficiency.

The 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I. Duplex Scanning and Treatment of Superficial Truncal Reflux: Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine and the International Union of Phlebology

The Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society collaborated to update the 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery/American Venous Forum clinical practice guidelines and provide new evidence-based recommendations on critical issues affecting the care of patients with varicose veins. Each recommendation is based on a recent, independent systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic tests and treatments options for patients with lower extremity varicose veins. Part I of the guidelines includes evidence-based recommendations for the evaluation of patients with CEAP (Clinical Class, Etiology, Anatomy, Pathology) class 2 varicose vein using duplex ultrasound scanning and other diagnostic tests, open surgical treatment (ligation and stripping) vs endovenous ablation techniques, thermal vs nonthermal ablation of the superficial truncal veins, and management of incompetent perforating veins in CEAP class 2 disease. We have also made recommendations on the concomitant vs staged treatment of varicose tributaries using phlebectomy or liquid or foam sclerotherapy (with physician-compounded foam or commercially prepared polidocanol endovenous microfoam) for patients undergoing ablation of incompetent superficial truncal veins.

FOVELASS: A Randomised Trial of Endovenous Laser Ablation Versus Polidocanol Foam for Small Saphenous Vein Incompetence

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) to treat isolated small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence in a multicentre randomised controlled study (RCT; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05468450).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing isolated SSV treatment (reflux > 0.5 seconds) were randomised to UGFS or EVLA. Patients treated with UGFS were allowed one additional truncal treatment at six weeks. Tributary treatments (phlebectomy or sclerotherapy) were permitted after six months. Participants were assessed at eight days, six months, and one, two, and three years. The primary endpoint was the absence of SSV reflux (> 0.5 seconds). Secondary outcomes included clinical scores and quality of life (QoL) scores. All analyses were done by intention to treat.

RESULTS

Of 1 522 screened patients, 161 were randomised to UGFS (n = 82) and EVLA (n = 79). Only 3% of patients who received UGFS had the second (allowed) treatment and 86% of patients completed the three year study. Forty-one and 19 tributary treatments (by sclerotherapy) were performed in 27 UGFS patients (33%) and 15 EVLA patients (19%), respectively. The complete absence of reflux at three years was significantly better after EVLA (86%) than after UGFS (56%) (odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.31 - 12.44; risk ratio 1.59, 95% CI 1.26 - 2.01). Two deep vein thromboses (DVTs; one femoropopliteal and one gastrocnemius) and one endovenous heat induced thrombosis occurred in the EVLA group. Seven DVTs were seen in the UGFS group, including two partial popliteal DVTs and five gastrocnemius vein thromboses (four asymptomatic and incidental on day 8 screening). At three years, there was no difference between groups for the following: rate of visible varices (p = .87), revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (p = .28), and QoL (p = .59). Patient satisfaction scores were high in both groups (median score: EVLA 97/100 and UGFS 93/100; p = .080). Symptoms were significantly improved in both groups. (p < .001) CONCLUSION: Technical success was better for EVLA than for UGFS three years after SSV treatment. This agrees with studies that have reported on these treatments in the great saphenous vein. However, improvements in clinical outcome were similar for both groups.

Partial tibial nerve transfer for iatrogenic peroneal nerve palsy after endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins of the lower extremity: A case report

Postprocedural peroneal nerve palsy after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins is rare and is associated with poor functional recovery. There have been no reports using tibial nerve transfer for iatrogenic peroneal nerve palsy after EVLA. Herein, we present a case with peroneal nerve injury after EVLA, which was successfully treated by partial tibial nerve transfer for the first time. A 75-year-old female presented with a right foot drop immediately after EVLA of the lesser saphenous vein. The ankle and toe dorsiflexion had a muscle grade of M0 on the British Medical Research Council muscle scale, without voluntary motor unit action potentials (MUAP) in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle on the needle electromyography. Three months after the injury, surgical nerve exploration revealed a damaged common peroneal nerve with discoloration and scarring at the fibular head. Intraoperative deep peroneal nerve stimulation confirmed the absence of compound muscle action potentials in the TA. The best functioning motor fascicles of the tibial nerve were transferred to the deep peroneal main trunk involving motor branches of the TA, extensor digitorum longus, and extensor hallucis longus (EHL) through the interosseous membrane. The postoperative course was uneventful, with no complications. After 3 months of surgery, nascent MUAP appeared in the TA. After 24 months, the patient regained the TA and EHL muscle function and ambulation without an ankle-foot orthosis and tibial nerve deficits. Thus, our procedure may serve as an alternative to nerve grafting, tendon transfer, and orthoses for better management of the major neural complications associated with EVLA.

Popliteal vein reflux is associated with increased rates of thrombotic complications after small saphenous vein closure procedures

BACKGROUND

Venous insufficiency in the small saphenous vein (SSV) is significantly less common than venous insufficiency in the great saphenous vein; the impact of popliteal vein reflux on SSV closure procedural outcomes has yet to be studied.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 150 SSV closure procedures from 2015 to 2019. Preoperative demographic analysis was performed, after which univariate analyses were performed for postoperative occlusion rates and combined rates of endothermal heat-induced thrombus (EHIT) and endovenous foam-induced thrombus (EFIT).

RESULTS

The cohort had a mean age of 58 years, and 116 (77%) were female. Fifty-four patients had C2 disease, 76 had C3 disease, 15 had C4 disease, 1 had C5 disease, and 4 had C6 disease. Twenty-three patients (15.3%) were noted to have popliteal vein reflux on their initial venous insufficiency ultrasound study, compared with 127 (84.6%) who did not. Treatment modalities included 84 radiofrequency ablations (56.0%), 37 polidocanol endovenous microfoam (24.6%), and 29 laser ablations (19.3%). When comparing patients with popliteal vein reflux with those without, there was no significant difference in the occlusion rates at their immediate postoperative visit (99.2% vs 95.6%) or at their 6-month postoperative visit (92.1% vs 91.3%). EHIT/EFIT was noted in 4 of the 23 patients with popliteal vein reflux compared with 4 of the 127 patients without popliteal vein reflux (17.3% vs 3.1%; P = .01). All eight instances of EHIT/EFIT were classified as either arteriovenous fistula class I or II EHIT or EFIT, and all were successfully treated without progression to deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of popliteal vein reflux has no impact on postoperative occlusion rates at 6 months; however, it is associated with a significantly increased rate in EHIT and EFIT. Patients should be counseled on this increased risk should they undergo SSV treatment with known popliteal vein reflux.

Choosing Wisely in France, for the Treatment of Saphenous Vein Insufficiency and Recurrences

Choosing wisely is an idea originally created in North America. It was designed to help maintaining a dialogue with patients to allow taking best decisions in the care and treatment of patients. As a consequence, despite guidelines outlining evidence of different treatments, choosing wisely takes the patient’s point of view into the focus and helps priorising therapeutic strategies in the context of specialisation, country, reimbursement and culture.

In France this dialogue was performed under the auspices of the National Professional Council of Vascular Medicine (CNPMV- Conseil National Professionnel de Médecine Vasculaire), which brings together all the societies of vascular medicine in France (representing, more than 2,000 vascular doctors).

They have elaborated 10 recommendations to choose wisely regarding the treatment of saphenous veins insufficiency and recurrences. The history, discussion and results are presented in this article.

Radiofrequency Ablation of Incompetent Short Saphenous Vein: a Case Series

Short saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence proved to be an obstacle in chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) treatment in the endovascular era. In our study, we used to prove that radiofrequency ablation could be done safely with low incidence of side effects. In this prospective case series study, 34 patients suffered from leg varicosity (either primary or recurrent) attended to outpatient clinic and were referred for duplex scan to ensure SSV incompetency. SSV ablation was done using radiofrequency catheter. Operative findings were recorded, and patients were followed for up to 12 months post-surgical procedure to look for complications or recurrences. Successful obliteration of short saphenous vein was done in 52 legs with mean diameter 4.9 SD 1.0 mm and operative time 37.5 SD 13.7 min, the incidence of sural nerve paresthesia was 9%, and no reported cases with DVT. On 12-month follow-up, VCSS reduced significantly from 13 (IQR 12) to 3 (IQR 6) and AVVQ reduced significantly from 27.1 (IQR 18.8) to 5.6 (IQR 7.2); the rate of short saphenous vein obliteration was 98.1% at 6 months and 94.2% at 12 months. Radiofrequency ablation can be recommended for patients with incompetent SSV.

Success rate and factors predictive of redo endothermal ablation of Small Saphenous veins

OBJECTIVE

Endothermal ablation as endothermal laser ablation (EVLA) or Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is being progressively more employed for small saphenous vein (SSV) insufficiency treatment. Prior studies have shown recurrence rates of 0% to 10% in incompetent small saphenous veins (ISSVs). The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of redo venous ablations for symptomatic recanalized SSVs and to predict factors related with recanalization.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 2,566 procedures in 1,752 patients with CVI due to ISSVs from 2012 to 2018 was performed, using individual chart review for data extraction. All 2,566 procedures were performed using endothermal ablation in patients who failed initial conservative management. Postoperative duplex ultrasound scans were performed within 3 to 7 days. We defined a successful obliteration as a lack of color flow by postoperative duplex scan. We defined recanalization as the presence of reflux on duplex ultrasound in the target vessel at follow-up. We conducted follow-ups every 3 months in the first year, followed by every 6 months subsequently.

RESULTS

Among the 2,566 procedures, redo ablation was performed in 91 ISSVs (86 patients), including 58 women and 28 men. 54 procedures were performed on the left lower extremity, 37 were performed on the right lower extremity. The average Body Mass Index (BMI) was 32.2 ± 7.66. The mean age was 62.4 ± 15.10 years. Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) classes of the patients were: C1, 0; C2, 0; C3, 29; C4, 43; C5, 1; and C6, 18. The mean maximum diameter of the targeted veins, for the redo procedures, was 4.51± 1.33 mm. Forty procedures were performed using EVLA, 51 were performed using RFA. Initial technical success was 98.9%. Redo procedures had an early closure of 96.7%. At follow up after a mean duration of 24.9 ± 14.9 months, closure was 96.5%. No correlation was found between successful obliteration in the redo procedure and age, gender, CEAP, laterality, EVLA vs. RFA, BMI, or vein diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of successful closure for ISSVs on initial and redo procedures are comparable. The data validate the potential usefulness of performing redo SSV ablations.

Evaluation of endolaser thermoablation of the small saphenous vein under local anesthesia

Background

The small saphenous vein (SSV) is affected in 15% of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) cases. Conventional surgery is the standard technique for treatment of SSV insufficiency, but sural nerve injury is a complication of great concern. Endovenous laser ablation is a surgical technique for treatment of CVI that is considered likely to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Objectives

To evaluate patients with CVI undergoing endovenous laser ablation of the SSV at least 30 days after the procedure.

Methods

We analyzed 54 lower extremities in 46 patients scheduled for 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation under local anesthesia to treat CVI in a tertiary hospital. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively over 30 days with clinical examination, physical examination, and ultrasound.

Results

In the 54 lower extremities treated, there was a significant difference (p < 0.003) in terms of reduction in the diameter of treated veins (6.37 mm preoperatively and 5.15 mm on the 30th postoperative day) and improvement in the venous clinical severity score (VCSS) (means of 8.02 preoperative and 6.11 on the 30th postoperative day) (95%CI, 5.01-7.21) (p < 0.02). Postoperative complications such as paresthesia and phlebitis were present and diagnosed in 5 and 3 patients, respectively, but did not affect their quality of life or routine activities.

Conclusions

Intravenous laser ablation of the SSV proved to be safe and effective for reducing clinical symptoms and improving quality of life.

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is safe and effective in the management of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremity

BACKGROUND

Superficial venous disease of the lower extremity has a significant impact on quality of life. Both truncal and tributary vein reflux contribute to this disease process. Endovenous foam sclerotherapy is a widely used technique throughout the world for the management of superficial venous reflux and ultrasound guidance improves its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

A PubMed search for ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) was conducted and all abstracts were reviewed to identify clinical trials and systematic reviews for a full-text analysis. Additional articles were also identified through searching the references of the selected studies.

RESULTS

The production of foam for sclerotherapy in a 1:3 or 1:4 ratio of air to sclerosant is optimal in a low silicone, low-volume syringe system. Physiologic gas may decrease any side effects, with the trade-off of decreased foam stability. Proper technique with appropriate sterility and cleansing protocols are paramount for safe and effective treatment. The technical success of UGFS for great saphenous vein disease is inferior to endothermal and surgical modalities and retreatment is more common. However, the clinical improvement in patient-reported quality of life is similar between these three modalities. When used for tributary veins in combination with endothermal approaches of the truncal veins, UGFS has high rates of success with excellent patient satisfaction. UGFS has demonstrated an excellent safety profile comparable with or superior to other modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

With proper technique, UGFS is safe and effective for the management of superficial venous disease.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of mechanochemical endovenous ablation using Flebogrif for varicose veins: A summary of evidence

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we reviewed and analyzed the currently available data on the Flebogrif device (Balton, Warsaw, Poland) to define its role in the global varicose vein treatment devices market.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were eligible if they had included patients treated using the Flebogrif for saphenous vein incompetence, had been reported in English, and had the full text available. The methodologic quality of the studies was assessed using the methodologic index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS) score. A random effects model was used to estimate the primary outcome of anatomic success, defined as the occlusion rate of the treated vein. The estimates are reported with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The secondary outcomes were clinical success, complication rate, pain during and after the procedure, and time to return to work.

RESULTS

A total of 392 patients are reported in the included studies. A total of 348 legs were treated with Flebogrif (in 6 patients both legs). A total of 50 patients/legs were treated with EVLA (Ammollo et al.). In conclusion, 348 Flebogrif procedures are performed in 392 patients. Four studies reported the 3-month anatomic success, and three studies reported the 12-month anatomic success. The pooled 3-month anatomic success rate was 95.6% (95% CI, 93.2%-98.0%). The 12-month anatomic success rate was 93.2% (95% CI, 90.3%-96.1%). The only major complication reported within 3 months was deep vein thrombosis, which developed in 0.3% of the patients. The minor complications of thrombophlebitis and hyperpigmentation had occurred in 13.3% to 14.5% and 3.3% to 10.0% of patients, respectively, within 3 months. The methodologic quality of the included studies was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanochemical ablation using the Flebogrif device is a safe and well-tolerated procedure for the treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency. However, well-designed studies of sufficient sample size and follow-up are required to compare the effectiveness with other endovenous treatment modalities and define the definitive role of the Flebogrif device.

Risk factors for saphenous vein recanalization after endovenous radiofrequency ablation

Target vein recanalization is defined as the postoperative detection of blood flow in a venous segment previously ablated. It can be occurred after thermal-tumescent procedures, as radiofrequency (RFA) and endovenous laser (EVLA) ablation techniques. Despite several papers described and analyzed incidence and consequences of recanalization, limited data are published on risk factors for this condition. The aim of this general review is to investigate clinical and instrumental risk factors for great and small saphenous veins recanalization after RFA, indicating their impact in the follow-up period.

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for primary small saphenous vein insufficiency

BACKGROUND

We performed this single-centre prospective study, aimed to analyse the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for primary isolated small saphenous vein (SSV) insufficiency.

METHODS

From June 2017 to June 2019, patients with primary SSV insufficiency and receiving ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy were included in this study. The collected data included demographics of patients, clinical treatment results, occlusion rate and the patient's venous clinical severity score (VCSS) before and after surgery at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients (14 women and 12 men) underwent ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy in 26 lower limbs, and were followed up at 1 week, 1 month and 6 months after surgery. Short-term complications included two severe pain during injection, one with vasovagal syncope, four with hyperpigmentation and two phlebitis. During 6-month follow-up, 22 were found to have complete thrombosis, and four showed partial thrombosis. There was a clear inverse relationship between SSV occlusion and SSV diameter (r = -0.502, P < 0.05), and pre-operative VCSS evaluation (r = -0.598, P < 0.05). At the same time, there was a weak inverse relationship between SSV occlusion and the volume of foam used (r = -0.357, P < 0.05). The pre-procedural VCSS score was 8.42 ± 3.25 and the post-procedural VCSS score was 7.16 ± 3.14. Deep vein thrombosis, nerve injury and other important complications did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is a safe and effective method for symptomatic SSV insufficiency, with less adverse reactions and better effects.

Thromboprophylaxis practice after outpatient endovenous thermal ablation

OBJECTIVE

The use of endovenous thermal ablation (ETA) for the treatment of truncal varicose veins has been increasing worldwide; however, uncertainty remains regarding the need for thromboprophylaxis and follow-up of patients undergoing this minimally invasive procedure. A nationwide survey of among physicians performing ETA was conducted to assess the thromboprophylaxis practice and follow-up protocols after ETA in Switzerland.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all ETA-certified physicians (n = 193) in Switzerland. The survey covered procedure type, thromboprophylaxis (including pharmacologic and compression therapy), duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations, and the management of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT).

RESULTS

Overall, 121 responses were received, for a response rate of 62.7%. Of the 121 respondents, 71 were vascular medicine specialists (58.7%) and 46 were general or vascular surgeons (38.0%), representing the two largest groups of specialists, followed by 2 dermatologists (1.7%) and 2 interventional radiologists (1.7%). Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after ETA was always used by 86 physicians (71.1%), nearly always by 8 (6.6%), frequently used by 5 (4.1%), rarely used by 21 (17.4%), and never by 1 physician (0.8%). A direct oral anticoagulant drug was the preferred type of thromboprophylaxis used by 92 physicians (77.3%). The first dose of thromboprophylaxis was mostly administered immediately after intervention by 53 physicians (53.7%). The duration of postablation thromboprophylaxis ranged from 1 to 21 days, with 7 to 10 days used by 57 physicians. Compression therapy was used by all physicians, with large variation in duration ranging from 1 to 42 days after a single ETA session and after ETA with concomitant phlebectomy. Postablation duplex ultrasonography was performed routinely by 120 respondents (99.2%), and 84 respondents (69.4%) performed two to three duplex ultrasound scans. Management of EHIT depended on the EHIT class and differed widely among the physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Our nationwide survey on thromboprophylaxis practices after ETA of truncal varicose veins in Switzerland showed that most physicians use pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, with a direct oral anticoagulant drug the preferred agent. However, the timing of the first dose and the duration of thromboprophylaxis varied widely among the respondents, reflecting the uncertainty in this domain owing to the absence of high-quality evidence-based guidelines.

Early results of mechanochemical ablation for small saphenous vein incompetency using 2% polidocanol

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the early results of mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) for the treatment of small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of 60 patients treated with MOCA for single-axis SSV incompetence. All procedures were performed with the patient under local anesthesia using the ClariVein catheter (Merit Medical, South Jordan, Utah) combined with 2% polidocanol and, where appropriate, additional microphlebectomy. The primary study endpoint was to assess the SSV occlusion rate at the 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up examinations. The secondary endpoints included the Venous Clinical Severity Score, quality of life (QoL) assessment, periprocedural pain, and further complications after the intervention and during the follow-up period. Patient QoL was assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire. Pain was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 100% of the cases. The mean visual analog scale score on the first postoperative day was 15 mm. No major events were recorded. No neurological complications or deep vein thrombosis were observed. Minor complications included ecchymosis in 3.3% of cases (2 of 60), transient phlebitis of the SSV in 5% of cases (3 of 60), and itching in 3.3% of cases (2 of 60). At the 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up examinations, the occlusion rate was 100% (60 of 60), 98.3% (57 of 58), and 92.6% (50 of 54). The median Venous Clinical Severity Score had significantly decreased from 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-6) at baseline to 2 (IQR, 1-4) at the 1-month follow-up (P < .001), 1 (IQR, 1-2) at the 6-month follow-up (P < .001) and 1 (IQR, 0-1) at the 12-month follow-up (P < .001). The mean Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score had improved from the baseline score of 25 ± 14.61 to 15.81 ± 13.76 at the 1-month follow-up (P < .001), to 9.81 ± 7.42 at the 6-month follow-up (P < .001) and 4.73 ± 3.32 at the 12-month follow-up (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study have shown that MOCA is a feasible, safe, and painless procedure for the treatment of SSV incompetence with an occlusion rate of 92.6% at the 12-month examination. No sural nerve injuries or other major complications were observed. The procedure also provided good clinical results and positive effects on patient QoL.

Long-term results of endovenous laser ablation of saphenous vein reflux: Up to nine years of follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) has become the gold standard for the treatment of saphenous vein reflux. We report the long-term clinical and ultrasound results of EVLA.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent EVLA of saphenous vein over four years. Clinical results were assessed using venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and ultrasound results were classified according to Bush classification.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up time of 4.4 years, 168 EVLA-treated patients showed a drop in VCSS from 4.38 to 1.39. Ultrasound results of 140 treated great saphenous veins showed that 64% had one or more cause of recurrence. The presence of neovascularization correlated well with the lack of improvement of VCSS.

CONCLUSION

EVLA resulted in drop in VCSS from 4.38 to 1.39. Among 140 treated great saphenous veins, reflux in the anterior accessory saphenous vein was the primary cause (23.5%) of recurrence.

Update of the SFMV (French society of vascular medicine) guidelines on the conditions and safety measures necessary for thermal ablation of the saphenous veins and proposals for unresolved issues

Venous insufficiency is a very common disease affecting about 25% of the French population (if we combine all stages of its progression). It is a complex disease and its aetiology has not yet been fully elucidated. Some of its causes are well known, such as valvular dysfunction, vein wall defect, and the suctioning effect common to all varicose veins. These factors are generally associated and together lead to dysfunction of one or more of the saphenous veins. Saphenous vein dysfunction is revealed by ultrasound scan, a reflux lasting more than 0.5 seconds indicating venous incompetence. The potential consequences of saphenous vein dysfunction over time include: symptoms (heaviness, swellings, restlessness, cramps, itching of the lower limbs), acute complications (superficial venous thrombosis, varicose bleeding), chronic complications (changes in skin texture and colour, stasis dermatitis, eczema, vein atresia, leg ulcer), and appearance of unaesthetic varicose veins. It is not possible to repair an incompetent saphenous vein. The only therapeutic options at present are ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, physical removal of the vein (saphenous stripping), or its thermal ablation (by laser or radiofrequency treatment), the latter strategy having now become the gold standard as recommended by international guidelines. Recommendations concerning thermal ablation of saphenous veins were published in 2014 by the Société française de médecine vasculaire. Our society has now decided to update these recommendations, taking this opportunity to discuss unresolved issues and issues not addressed in the original guidelines. Thermal ablation of an incompetent saphenous vein consists in destroying this by means of a heating element introduced via ultrasound-guided venous puncture. The heating element comprises either a laser fibre or a radiofrequency catheter. The practitioner must provide the patient with full information about the procedure and obtain his/her consent prior to its implementation. The checklist concerning the interventional procedure issued by the HAS should be validated for each patient (see the appended document).

Antigen removal process preserves function of small diameter venous valved conduits, whereas SDS-decellularization results in significant valvular insufficiency

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is the most common reported chronic condition in the United States, affecting more than 25 million Americans. Regardless of its high occurrence, current therapeutic options are far from ideal due to their palliative nature. For best treatment outcomes, challenging cases of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) are treated by repair or replacement of venous valves. Regrettably, the success of venous valve transplant is dependent on the availability of autologous venous valves and hindered by the possibility of donor site complications and increased patient morbidity. Therefore, the use of alternative tissue sources to provide off-the-shelf venous valve replacements has potential to be extremely beneficial to the field of CVI. This manuscript demonstrates the capability of producing off-the-shelf fully functional venous valved extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold conduits from bovine saphenous vein (SV), using an antigen removal (AR) method. AR ECM scaffolds maintained native SV structure-function relationships and associated venous valves function. Conversely, SDS decellularization caused significant changes to the collagen and elastin macromolecular structures, resulting in collagen fibril merging, elimination of fibril crimp, amalgaming collagen fibers and fragmentation of the inner elastic lamina. ECM changes induced by SDS decellularization resulted in significant venous valve dysfunction. Venous valved conduits generated using the AR approach have potential to serve as off-the-shelf venous valve replacements for CVI. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Retention of the structure and composition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins within xenogeneic scaffolds for tissue engineering is of crucial importance, due to the undeniable effect ECM proteins can impose on repopulating cells and function of the resultant biomaterial. This manuscript demonstrates that alteration or elimination of ECM proteins via commonly utilized decellularization approach results in complete disruption of venous valve function. Conversely, retention of the delicate ECM structure and composition of native venous tissue, using an antigen removal tissue processing method, results in preservation of native venous valve function.

The 2020 appropriate use criteria for chronic lower extremity venous disease of the American Venous Forum, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, and the Society of Interventional Radiology

BACKGROUND

Stimulated by published reports of potentially inappropriate application of venous procedures, the American Venous Forum and its Ethics Task Force in collaboration with multiple other professional societies including the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS), American Vein and Lymphatic Society (AVLS), and the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) developed the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for chronic lower extremity venous disease to provide clarity to the application of venous procedures, duplex ultrasound imaging, timing, and reimbursements.

METHODS

The AUC were developed using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, a validated method of developing appropriateness criteria in health care. By conducting a modified Delphi exercise and incorporating best available evidence and expert opinion, AUC were developed and scored.

RESULTS

There were 119 scenarios rated on a scale of 1 to 9 by an expert panel, with 1 being never appropriate and 9 being appropriate. The majority of scenarios consisted of symptomatic indications were deemed appropriate for venous intervention. For scenarios with anatomically short segments of reflux and/or no symptoms, the indications were rated less appropriate. For the indication of edema, a wide dispersion of ratings was observed especially for short segments of saphenous reflux or stenting for iliac/ inferior vena cava disease, noting that there are multifactorial causes of edema, some of which could coexist with venous disease and possibly impact effectiveness of treatment. Several scenarios were considered never appropriate, including treatment of saphenous veins with no reflux, iliac vein or inferior vena cava stenting for iliac vein compression as an incidental finding by imaging with minimal or no symptoms or signs, and incentivizing sonographers to find reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

The AUC statements are intended to serve as a guide to patient care, particularly in areas where high-quality evidence is lacking to aid clinicians in making day-to-day decisions for common venous interventions. This may also prove useful when applied on a population level, such as practice patterns, and not necessarily to dictate decision making for individual cases. As a product of a collaborative effort, it is hoped that this could be utilized by physicians and multiple stakeholders committed toward improving patient care and to identify and stimulate future research priorities.

Comparison of different approaches to small saphenous vein reflux treatment: a retrospective study in two centers

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis and treatment of small saphenous vein (SSV) insufficiency is of utmost importance for relieving chronic venous insufficiency symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of five different treatment approaches among patients with SSV insufficiency.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Two-center retrospective clinical study, conducted at cardiovascular surgery clinics in a local training and research hospital and a state hospital.

METHODS

A total of 282 extremities of 268 patients with SSV insufficiency alone who were treated for symptomatic varicose veins between January 2012 and January 2017 were included in the study. All extremities included in the study were divided into five groups as follows: high ligation + stripping; radiofrequency ablation (RFA); cyanoacrylate closure (CAC); and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) at the wavelengths 980 nm and 1,470 nm.

RESULTS

Although the recurrence rate at six months was similar among the treatment groups, we found significant differences in recurrence rates at one year, with lower rates in the CAC, RFA and 1,470 nm EVLA groups, compared with the other treatments (P = 0.005). No sural neuritis was observed in the CAC group. The pigmentation rate was higher in the two EVLA groups (980 nm and 1,470 nm).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results showed that although CAC, RFA and EVLA at 1,470 nm seemed to be effective methods for treating SSV insufficiency alone, CAC and RFA had better aesthetic results than EVLA at 1,470 nm. We consider that endovenous non-thermal techniques for treating SSV insufficiency may be preferable because of relatively low risk of nerve injury.

Mechanical Occlusion Chemically Assisted Ablation (MOCA) for Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: A Meta-Analysis of a Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

A previous meta-analysis has conducted nonrandomized trials for mechanochemical ablation (MOCA). Since medium-term follow-up data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are becoming available, we chose to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs to assess the efficacy and safety of MOCA for saphenous vein insufficiency.

METHODS

A systematic search of all RCTs comparing the anatomical success of MOCA for saphenous vein insufficiency to thermal ablation was performed using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. We employed the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis of outcomes using RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

Four studies (615 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The MOCA group had 93.4% and 84.5%, whereas the thermal ablation group had 95.8% and 94.8% of anatomical success rate at 1 month (short-term) and a period of more than 6 months but less than 1-year follow-up (mid-term), respectively. According to intention-to-treat analysis, there were similar anatomical successes in MOCA and thermal ablation groups at the short-term follow-up (low-quality evidence; relative risk (RR) = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.03); P = 0.44; I 2 = 53%). The estimated effect of MOCA on anatomical success showed a statistically significant reduction at the mid-term follow-up (moderate-quality evidence; RR = 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95); P = 0.0002; I 2 = 0%). MOCA had fewer incidence of nerve injury, deep vein thrombosis, and skin burns compared to the thermal ablation procedure (low-quality evidence; RR = 0.33 (95% CI, 0.09-1.28); P = 0.11; I 2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

MOCA offered fewer major complications but lesser anatomical success at the period of more than 6 months but less than 1-year follow-up than thermal ablation. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN ID 000036727).

Risk Factors of Saphenous Vein Insufficiency in Female Patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Venous reflux most frequently occurs in the great saphenous vein (GSV), which is the most commonly diseased vein and is associated with venous insufficiency and varicose veins.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed, in this study, to determine risk factors for saphenous vein insufficiency in female patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from the medical records of adult female patients who developed saphenous vein insufficiency at King Abdulaziz Medical City, between 2015 and 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 97 subjects participated in the study, 53 patients had saphenous vein reflux while 44 patients did not have reflux. Leg swelling was the only symptom that showed a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.001); patients with reflux had significantly higher rates of endovenous laser therapy (p=0.021). While the same patient group showed significantly lower rates of sclerotherapy compared to patients without reflux (p=0.006). The proportion of hypertension patients without reflux (22.7%) was significantly larger than that of hypertension patients with reflux (1.9%) (p= 0.001).

CONCLUSION

More research is encouraged to provide better understanding and management of saphenous vein insufficiency in the Saudi population, especially in females who are at high risk.

European College of Phlebology guideline for truncal ablation

Background

The purpose of the guideline was to achieve consensus in the care and treatment of patients with chronic venous disease, based on current evidence.

Method

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, and the Cochrane library up until 1 February 2019. Additional relevant literature were added through checking of references. Level of evidence was graded through the GRADE scale and recommendations were concluded.

Results

For the treatment of great and small saphenous vein reflux, endovenous ablation with laser or radiofrequency was recommended in preference to surgery or foam sclerotherapy. If tributaries are to be treated it should be done in the same procedure. Treatment with mecanicochemical ablation and glue can be used but we still need long term follow up results.

Conclusion

For the treatment of truncal varicosities, endovenous ablation with laser or radiofrequency combined with phlebectomies is recommended before surgery or foam.

Mini-invasive foam sclerotherapy-assisted ligation versus surgical flush ligation for incompetent sapheno-popliteal junction treatment

Objectives

Comparison of a flush sapheno-popliteal junction ligation versus a mini-invasive foam sclerotherapy-assisted ligation.

Methods

Forty-eight chronic venous disease patients underwent sapheno-popliteal junction flush ligation (group A). Forty-one patients underwent small saphenous vein ligation by means of mini-invasive incision with foam sclerotherapy of the popliteal stump (group B).

Results

At 4.1 ± 3.3 years mean follow-up, sapheno-popliteal junction recurrence was detected in four patients of group A (4/48; 8.3%) and in two cases of group B (3/41; 7.3%) ( P= ns). Mean procedural time was 36 ± 11 minutes versus 21 ± 6 minutes ( p<0.0001). A mild post-operative paresthesia lasting more than 24 h was reported in 6.3% (3/48) of group A versus 2.4% (1/41) ( p<0.009) of group B. At one-year check-up, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire significantly improved in both groups with no significant difference between group A and B.

Conclusions

Foam-assisted mini-invasive sapheno-popliteal ligation represents a time and clinical-effective option, associated with a decrease in post-operative paresthesia risk.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasound on Venous and Arterial Ulcers: A Focused Review

GENERAL PURPOSE

To provide information about the use of ultrasound for diagnostic and therapeutic treatment of venous and arterial ulcers.

TARGET AUDIENCE

This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES

After completing this continuing education activity, you should be able to: ABSTRACT: To review the diagnostic and therapeutic use of ultrasound on venous and arterial ulcers.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for peer-reviewed articles using the search terms "ultrasound for venous ulcers" and "ultrasound for arterial ulcers." The search yielded 282 articles on ultrasound for venous ulcers and 455 articles for ultrasound on arterial ulcers. Data from 36 articles were selected and included after abstract review.

RESULTS

Ultrasound is an established diagnostic modality for venous and arterial disease and is indicated for wound debridement. Recent evidence continues to support its superiority over standard of care in healing venous ulcers, but findings conflict in terms of the effectiveness of low-frequency ultrasound over high-frequency ultrasound. There are currently no standardized treatment protocols for ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic ultrasound is used to assess venous and arterial disease and guide appropriate treatment for ulcers. Therapeutic low-frequency ultrasound is used to debride the wound bed, as an adjunctive topical wound treatment with standard of care, and to guide the application of other advanced therapies to chronic wounds. Better trial designs and consistent data are needed to support the effectiveness of ultrasound therapy on venous and arterial ulcers.

Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Varicose veins affect nearly 30% of the world's population. This condition is a social problem and needs interventions to improve quality of life and reduce risks. Recently, new and less invasive methods for varicose vein treatment have emerged. There is a need to define the best treatment options and to reduce the risks and costs. Since there are cosmetic implications, treatments for which effectiveness remains unproven present risks to consumers and higher costs for stakeholders. These risks and costs justify conducting an overview of systematic reviews to summarize the evidence.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Overview of systematic reviews within the Discipline of Evidence-Based Health, at Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).

METHODS

Systematic reviews on clinical or surgical treatments for varicose veins were included, with no restrictions on language or publication date.

RESULTS

51 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Outcomes and comparators were described, and a narrative review was conducted. Overall, there was no evidence that compression stockings should be recommended for patients as the initial treatment or after surgical interventions. There was low to moderate evidence that minimally invasive therapies (endovenous laser therapy, radiofrequency ablation or foam sclerotherapy) are as safe and effective as conventional surgery (ligation and stripping). Among these systematic reviews, only 18 were judged to present high quality.

CONCLUSIONS

There was evidence of low to moderate quality that minimally invasive treatments, including foam sclerotherapy, laser and radiofrequency therapy are comparable to conventional surgery, regarding effectiveness and safety for treatment of varicose veins.

Expert review on the VenaSeal® system for endovenous cyano-acrylate adhesive ablation of incompetent saphenous trunks in patients with varicose veins

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of incompetent truncal veins has been innovated by the introduction of minimally invasive non-thermal non-tumescent (NTNT) techniques. One of these consists of the use of cyanoacrylate glue to occlude the vein lumen by means of the VenaSeal device. Areas covered: This expert-review aims to evaluate NTNT ablation of incompetent saphenous trunks using the VenaSeal device. Expert commentary: Cyanoacrylate adhesive embolization of incompetent truncal veins using the VenaSeal device is a safe and efficacious innovative technique. Further studies are needed to evaluate anatomical and clinical outcomes at long term.

A review of endothermal laser ablative treatment of incompetent saphenous veins

Endovenous treatment of incompetent great and small saphenous veins has become firmly established as an alternative to cross-ectomy and stripping operations. Among other thermal and non-thermal procedures, endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is one of the most frequently used methods. Development of the procedure has continued since its introduction in 1998: the low wavelengths used at first (810 nm) resulted in a high rate of complications (ecchymosis, pain), and over the years systems using longer wavelengths have been developed with increasingly fewer side effects. The effectiveness of the wavelength most frequently used today (1470 nm) has been reported in numerous studies. The most frequent side effects include endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT), nerve damage and ecchymosis; major complications like lung embolism are reported very rarely.

Factors influencing the choice of treatment modality for individual patients with varicose veins

INTRODUCTION There is evidence of effectiveness for a range of different treatment modalities for varicose veins but limited information about factors that influence treatment choice for individual patients. METHODS A postal survey was sent to 438 UK members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. RESULTS Overall, 251 responses were received (response rate 57%). A total of 222 respondents treated varicose veins using conventional surgery (84%), endothermal ablation (82%) and foam sclerotherapy (68%). The clinical pattern of veins appeared to have the greatest influence on treatment choice. This was followed by guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, patient expectations, facilities, cost and whether treatment was carried out in the public or private sector. Respondents were asked to indicate whether each of 13 clinical 'scenarios' (eg very extensive varicose veins in both legs) would influence them towards or against using specified treatment modalities. 'Consensus' was defined as ≥80% of responses either towards or against any treatment modality; and disagreement as 41-59% both towards and against any modality (i.e. ∼50:50 split). There was consensus towards using endothermal ablation for truncal reflux, towards UGFS for localised varicose veins and towards conventional surgery for large, extensive, bilateral veins. There was consensus against UGFS for large truncal veins, and against surgery for obese patients and those with a history of venous thromboembolism. There were important disagreements about the influence of large or extensive veins, about whether patients were obese or slim and about a prior history of venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS Conventional surgery is still widely available in the UK. Disagreements about treatment choice in different clinical scenarios suggest substantial variation in the treatments patients are offered. Attention to identifying subgroups in trials would help to guide treatment choice for individual patients.

Mechanochemical Ablation for Treatment of Truncal Venous Insufficiency: A Review of the Current Literature

Mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) is a nonthermal nontumescent technique used in the treatment of superficial venous disease. This review analyzed the available data on the efficacy and safety of MOCA. A systematic literature search was performed. Of 101 studies identified, 14 were suitable for inclusion. The studies were found to be heterogeneous in design, and the quality of evidence was found to be low or very low. MOCA was demonstrated to be effective in the short-term with minimal complications. Consensus guidelines and definitions of reporting outcome measures must be standardized to allow comparison with other techniques.

Mid-calf level as a puncture site is not safe enough for thermal ablation of the small saphenous vein

Background:

Endovenous thermal ablation of the small saphenous vein carries a risk for sural nerve injury. Ablation above mid-calf level is recommended to avoid it. However, this strategy could not eradicate this complication. We present our results of consecutive 30 small saphenous vein thermal ablations which are performed after ultrasonographic identification of the sural nerve.

Methods:

We studied 26 consecutive subjects with a total of 30 limbs. Ablation was performed proximal to the risk point by a 1470-nm diode laser. Patients were asked to attend follow-up outpatient controls at 7 days, 30 days, and 180 days postoperatively. Rate of identification of the sural nerve by ultrasonography, safety of the mid-calf level as a puncture site and postoperative sural nerve damage were assessed.

Results:

The sural nerve identification was achieved by ultrasonography in all patients except for one. Mid-calf level as a puncture site was not safe in three (10%) extremities. None of the patients showed any evidence suggesting postoperative sural nerve damage.

Conclusion:

Choosing the puncture site according to the risk point may be more reasonable than general mid-calf level which is being used.

[Endovenous ablation versus open surgery for varicose veins : An attempt at an evaluation]

Open and endovenous surgery of varicose veins provides an excellent way to treat varicose veins. However, there are great differences in the how the techniques are performed. No matter which procedure is carried out, there are standards that should be observed. The state of the art of open venous surgery with radical crossectomy is well-known, but unfortunately is still not always performed correctly nowadays. The state of the art of endovenous surgery has unfortunately not yet been sufficiently documented, but should be based on open-surgical techniques. How the standard of both methods today is (or should be) is described in detail in this work. A recurrence definition which applies to both techniques, is set up.

Mechanochemical endovenous ablation of saphenous veins using the ClariVein: A systematic review

Objective To systematically review all available English literature on mechanochemical endovenous ablation and to report on the anatomical, technical, and clinical success. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library on mechanochemical endovenous ablation for the treatment of insufficient great and/or small saphenous vein. Methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the MINORS score. The primary outcome measure was anatomical success, defined as closure of the treated vein on follow-up duplex ultrasound imaging. Secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, and major complications defined as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms or paresthesia. Results The literature search identified 759 records, of which 13 were included, describing 10 unique cohorts. A total of 1521 veins (1267 great saphenous vein and 254 small saphenous vein) were included, with cohort sizes ranging from 30 to 570 veins. The pooled anatomical success rate after short-term follow up was 92% (95% CI 90-94%) ( n = 1314 veins). After 6 and 12 months these numbers were 92% (95% CI 88-95%) ( n = 284) and 91% (95% CI 86-94%) ( n = 228), respectively. The long-term anatomical success rates at 2 and 3 years were 91% (95% CI 85-95%) ( n = 136) and 87% (95% CI 75-94%) ( n = 48), respectively. Major complications and especially nerve injury were very rare (≤ 0.2%). All studies were of moderate or good quality using the MINORS scoring scale. Conclusions Mechanochemical endovenous ablation using the ClariVein in combination with liquid sclerosant is associated with an anatomical success rate ranging from 87% to 92% and good clinical success. To date, no randomized controlled trials are available studying the anatomical success after mechanochemical ablation, compared to the endothermal ablation. The risk of major complications is very low after the procedure.

Prophylactic GSV surgery in elderly candidates for hip or knee arthroplasty

Aging is one of the major risk factors for varicose veins. The same is for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis. Most of the patients undergoing to Hip (THA) or Knee (TKA) arthroplasty are over sixteen. Varicose veins, excluding thrombophilia, are the most significant risk factors for VTE after THA and TKA. This study investigates on the usefulness of prophylactic treatment of GSV insufficiency in elderly patients undergoing to orthopedic surgery. A retrospective study enrolling 44 over-sixty five patients, undergoing to TKA or THA. 24 patients underwent to traditional surgery and 20 to EVLA. The presence of evident varicosities and/or a saphenic reflux lasting > 500 ms has been considered as operability criterion. Both in surgery and EVLA group has been performed the ablation of visible varicosities and only saphenic refluxing traits.

RESULTS

1 case of symptomatic DVT was recorded after arthroplasty. A statistically significant difference (p = 0.006) of recovery time between surgery and EVLA groups has been detected. There is not a statistically significant difference in long-term recurrence rate between surgery and EVLA.

CONCLUSIONS

It is useful to program GSV surgery, before treat hip or knee. This study showed a 50% decrease in the incidence of postoperative DVT.

Proof-of-Concept Evaluation of the SailValve Self-Expanding Deep Venous Valve System in a Porcine Model

Purpose: To evaluate the SailValve, a new self-expanding deep venous valve concept based on a single polytetrafluoroethylene cusp floating up and down in the bloodstream like a sail, acting as a flow regulator and allowing minimal reflux to reduce thrombogenicity. Methods: Both iliac veins of 5 pigs were implanted with SailValve devices; the first animal was an acute pilot experiment to show the feasibility of accurately positioning the SailValve via a femoral access. The other 4 animals were followed for 2 weeks (n=2) or 4 weeks (n=2) under a chronic implantation protocol. Patency and valve function were evaluated directly in all animals using ascending and descending phlebography after device placement and at termination in the chronic implant animals. For reasons of clinical relevance, a regimen of clopidogrel and calcium carbasalate was administered. Histological analysis was performed according to a predefined protocol by an independent pathologist. Results: Deployment was technically feasible in all 10 iliac veins, and all were patent directly after placement. No perioperative or postoperative complications occurred. Ascending phlebograms in the follow-up animals confirmed the patency of all valves after 2 or 4 weeks. Descending phlebograms showed full function in 5 of 8 valves. Limited reflux was seen in 1 valve (4-week group), and the function in the remaining 2 valves (2-week group) was insufficient because of malpositioning. No macroscopic thrombosis was noted on histology. Histology in the follow-up groups revealed a progressive inflammatory reaction to the valves. Conclusion: This animal study shows the potential of the SailValve concept with sufficient valve function after adequate positioning and no (thrombogenic) occlusions after short-term follow-up. Future research is essential to optimize valve material and long-term patency.

Endovenous Laser Ablation of Varicose Veins Preserves Biological Properties of Vascular Endothelium and Modulates Proinflammatory Agent Profile More Favorably Than Classic Vein Stripping

Here we compared effect of serum from varicose patients undergoing endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and classic vein stripping (CVS) on biological properties of endothelial cells and on the local and systemic profiles of proinflammatory agents. Results showed that serum from EVLA patients improved proliferation and reduced senescence and oxidative stress in the endothelial cells, as compared with the serum from CVS patients. These effects were related to a suppressed activity of TGF-β1, the level of which in the serum from the EVLA patients was decreased. Medium generated by the cells subjected to EVLA serum contained decreased amounts of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin and increased amount of uPA, whereas the serum itself contained decreased concentrations of ICAM-1, E-selectin, and P-selectin and increased concentrations of uPA, PAI-1, and TFPI. Both EVLA and CVS resulted in diversified patients' reaction with respect to a direction of postprocedure changes in proinflammatory factors' serum level. Analysis of proportions showed that the groups differed remarkably in case of ICAM-1 and ET-1, the level of which declined in a higher fraction of patients treated endovenously. Our findings indicate that EVLA preserves better than CVS the functionality of vascular endothelium and modulates better both local and systemic profile of proinflammatory mediators.