Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for femoropopliteal total occlusions: intraluminal versus subintimal approaches

Because there is a lack of comparative studies assessing drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) outcomes with respect to intraluminal (IL) and subintimal (SI) approaches in femoropopliteal (FP) total occlusive lesions, we compared the outcomes between DCB (including bailout stenting) and DES treatments for this lesion. A total of 487 limbs (434 patients) were divided into the IL (n = 344, DCB: n = 268, DES: n = 76) and SI (n = 143, DCB: n = 83, DES: n = 60) approach groups. The primary outcome was a major adverse limb event (MALE), defined as above-ankle amputation or repeat revascularization of the index limb. Secondary outcomes included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), loss of clinical patency, and all-cause death. After adjustment, in each IL and SI approach, the 2-year rates of MALE (p = 0.180 and p = 0.236, respectively), TLR, loss of clinical patency, and all-cause death were similar between the DCB and DES groups. In the DCB and DES groups, both primary and secondary outcomes were similar between the IL and SI approaches. DCB and DES strategies for patients presenting with FP total occlusive lesions demonstrated similar outcomes regardless of the IL or SI approach.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02748226.

Biomimetic Stents for Infrainguinal Peripheral Arterial Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Biomimetic stents are peripheral infrainguinal self expanding stents that mimic the anatomy of the vasculature and artery movement. They are indicated for use in infrainguinal arteries. This research aimed to synthesise all current evidence on the use of biomimetic stents as adjuncts for endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD), helping to guide clinical decision making.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Random effects meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42022385256). Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools checklist, and certainty assessment through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Endpoints included primary patency, target lesion revascularisation, stent fracture, secondary patency, and Death at one year.

RESULTS

In total, 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis (33 cohort studies, two case series, and two randomised controlled trials [RCTs]), representing 4 480 participants. Of these, 34 studies included data on the Supera (81.5% of participants) and three studies reported data on the BioMimics 3D (18.5% of participants) stents. The pooled primary patency rate of 33 studies at one year follow up was 81.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.7 - 83.9%), and the pooled target lesion revascularisation rate of 18 studies at one year was 12.2% (95% CI 9.6 - 15.0%). The certainty of evidence outcome rating as qualified by GRADE was very low for both. Only one study reported a positive stent fracture rate at one year follow up of 0.4% with a certainty of evidence outcome of low.

CONCLUSION

Using biomimetic stents for infrainguinal PAD may be associated with acceptable one year primary patency and target lesion revascularisation rates, with a near negligible one year stent fracture rate. Their use should be considered in those presenting with infrainguinal PAD undergoing endovascular revascularisation. A RCT is necessary to determine their clinical and cost effectiveness.

Endovascular Therapy with Interwoven Nitinol Stent Placement after Predilation for Heavily Calcified Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: Results of the BURDOCK Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the 1-year and 2-year clinical outcomes of interwoven stent (IWS) implantation for symptomatic femoropopliteal arterial disease with calcification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective multicenter study evaluated 308 limbs (63% with the peripheral arterial calcium scoring system 3 and 4 severe calcification and 87% with ≥180° calcification on intravascular ultrasound) of 299 patients (diabetes in 66.9%, chronic renal failure in 52.8%, and dialysis in 49.2%) who underwent IWS (Supera; Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois) implantation after sufficient predilation (residual stenosis < 30%) for calcified femoropopliteal lesions. The primary outcome measure was primary patency (freedom from restenosis) at 1 and 2 years, whereas the secondary outcome measure included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). Clinical parameters associated with loss of patency were explored.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that primary patency was 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.5%-92.1%) at 1 year and 80.8% (95% CI, 76.1%-85.8%) at 2 years. The CD-TLR-free rate was 96.5% and 94.8% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The characteristics associated with loss of patency were restenotic lesion with and without stent implantation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.96 and 2.40; P = .047 and .041, respectively), chronic total occlusion (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88; P = .022), and popliteal involvement (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.60; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of IWS after sufficient predilation for calcified femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease demonstrated clinically acceptable primary patency.

Multicenter, retrospective registry of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal arteries treated with endovascular revascularization

Isolated atherosclerotic popliteal lesions (IAPLs) have been considered challenging. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) using the newer devices for IAPLs. This retrospective multicenter registry analyzed patients with lower extremity artery disease having IAPLs who underwent EVT using the newer devices between 2018 and 2021. The primary outcome was primary patency 1 year after EVT. A total of 392 consecutive patients undergoing EVT for IAPLs were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the primary patency and the freedom from target lesion revascularization were 80.9% and 87.8% 1 year after EVT, respectively. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the clinical features that were independently associated with restenosis risk were drug-coated balloon (DCB) use for younger age (< 75 years old; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.08 [95% confidence interval 1.08-8.74]; P = 0.035), non-ambulatory status (2.74 [95% confidence interval 1.56-4.81]; P < 0.001), cilostazol use (0.51 [95% confidence interval 0.29-0.88]; P = 0.015), severe calcification (1.86 [95% confidence interval 1.18-2.94]; P = 0.007), and small external elastic membrane (EEM) area measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (< 30 mm²) (2.07 [95% confidence interval 1.19-3.60]; P = 0.010). From the univariate analysis, among patients treated with DCB, younger patients (n = 141) were associated with more comorbidities including smoking (P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), end-stage renal disease (P < 0.001), history of revascularization (P = 0.046) and small EEM area (P = 0.036), compared to older patients (n = 140). Moreover, smaller post-procedural minimum lumen area measured by IVUS after DCB dilatation was observed in younger patients (12 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 4 mm², P = 0.033). This retrospective study demonstrated that the current EVT provided an acceptable 1-year primary patency rate in patients with IAPLs. The primary patency was lower following DCB in younger patients, likely due to the higher rates of comorbidities in this patient population.

Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloons vs Bare-Metal Stents in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease has shifted toward drug-coated balloons (DCB). However, limited data are available regarding the safety and efficacy of DCB vs bare-metal stents (BMS).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare DCB vs BMS outcomes in a propensity-adjusted, pooled analysis of 4 prospective, multicenter trials.

METHODS

Patient-level data were pooled from 4 prospective, multicenter studies: the IN.PACT SFA I/II and IN.PACT SFA Japan randomized controlled DCB trials and the Complete SE and DURABILITY II single-arm BMS studies. Outcomes were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Clinical endpoints were 12-month primary patency, freedom from 36-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and cumulative 36-month major adverse events (MAE).

RESULTS

The primary analysis included 771 patients (288 DCB, 483 BMS). IPTW-adjusted demographic, baseline lesion, and procedural characteristics were matched between groups. The adjusted mean lesion length was 8.1 ± 4.7 cm DCB and 7.9 ± 4.5 cm BMS. The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12-month primary patency (90.4% DCB, 80.9% BMS, P = 0.007), freedom from 36-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization (85.6% DCB, 73.7% BMS, P = 0.001), and cumulative incidence of 36-month MAE (25.3% DCB, 38.8% BMS, P < 0.001) favored DCB. There were no statistically significant differences observed in all-cause mortality, target limb major amputation, or thrombosis through 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In a patient-level, IPTW-adjusted pooled analysis of prospective, multicenter pivotal studies, DCB demonstrated significantly higher patency, lower revascularization and MAE rates, and no statistically significant differences in mortality, amputation, or thrombosis vs BMS. This analysis supports DCB use vs BMS in moderately complex femoropopliteal lesions amenable to both treatments.

A Single-Center Study on the Outcomes of Target Limb Revascularization in Femoropopliteal Lesions Treated With Drug Coated Balloons and Bare Metal Stents

Purpose:

Multiple randomized controlled trials have shown that both drug coated balloons (DCBs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) significantly reduce restenosis in femoropopliteal lesions compared with plain balloon angioplasty. However, few studies have directly compared DCB and BMS treatments. Therefore, the goal of our study was to determine if the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) differs between DCB and BMS treatment at our center.

Materials and methods:

We performed a retrospective chart review of femoropopliteal interventions at a single center from 2009 to 2017. The intervention, patient and lesion characteristics, and TLR events were recorded. Exclusion criteria were loss of follow-up, death, bail-out stenting, and amputation within 60 days of treatment. Freedom from TLR was analyzed over a 3 year period with Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Cox hazard ratios were calculated to account for patient and lesion characteristics.

Results:

A total of 322 lesions (234 patients) treated with DCBs and 225 lesions (194 patients) treated with BMSs were included in this study. There were significant differences in baseline patient and lesion characteristics between groups—a greater proportion of women, patients with dyslipidemia, and lesions with popliteal involvement were treated with DCBs. There was no difference in the freedom from TLR between DCBs and BMSs. Accounting for patient and lesion characteristics, there was still no difference between DCBs and BMSs on the hazard of TLR. While our analysis did not detect a difference in the rate of TLR, there was a significant difference in the type of TLR. Compared with DCBs, a greater proportion of lesions initially treated with BMSs were retreated via surgical bypass rather than endovascular intervention, suggesting that lesions treated with DCBs may be more amenable to future endovascular intervention.

Conclusion:

Our retrospective analysis showed no difference in the rate of TLR between lesions treated with DCBs and BMSs. However, DCBs were more often used in complicated lesions involving popliteal arteries and may also allow for easier endovascular reintervention.

Bailout stenting in femoropopliteal arterial segment

Background: Disabling peripheral arterial disease (PAD) of femoropopliteal segment is usually treated with percutaneous balloon dilatation, and when this is not successful, stent is placed. Long-term patency of stent is often compromised due to in-stent restenosis (ISR). We aimed to identify factors associated with bailout stenting, and to recognise risk factors for ISR in procedures without paclitaxel application. Patients and methods: We analysed 592 consecutive successful femoropopliteal interventions performed in patients with either disabling intermittent claudication or chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI). In patients with stent implantation, clinical and ultrasound (US) examination were performed one year after the intervention to establish the presence of ISR, defined as >50% stenosis on US imaging. Results: Bailout stenting was required in 133 (22.5%) procedures. Patients with stent placement were younger (70±10 vs 72±11 years, p=0.007) and less often presented with CLI (29.3% vs 40.5%, p=0.019). They more often reported smoking (63.2% vs 49.2%, p=0.005), less often had diabetes mellitus (35.3% vs 47.5%, p=0.013) and arterial hypertension (82.0% vs 90.8%; p=0.004). Stenting was also dependent on lesion complexity (TASC II C>B>A; p<0.001). Subgroup analysis of 110 procedures with bare metal stent (BMS) placement performed in 107 patients revealed ISR in 46.4% of stents, in half of cases it was symptomatic. Neither clinical nor lesion characteristics proved to differ between the group of procedures with ISR and group of procedures without ISR. Conclusions: Factors associated with bailout stenting were age, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, smoking, clinical picture of PAD and complexity of treated lesions. We did not find any risk factors influencing development of ISR in BMS.

Clinical implications of the invagination of an interwoven nitinol stent: a single-center retrospective analysis

Stent invagination (SIV) sometimes occurs during interwoven nitinol stent (IWS) placement due to its complex deployment system. It may cause stent malapposition and reduce the minimum stent area. However, the clinical implications of SIV remain unclear. This retrospective single-center study sought to assess the clinical implications of IWS invagination in the femoropopliteal lesions in patients with peripheral arterial diseases. Thirty-two consecutive patients (23 men, mean age of 74 years, 34 limbs) with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions who had received IWS implantation from January to July 2019 were enrolled. The study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution. The 12-month primary patency rate after the initial IWS placement was evaluated as the primary outcome, which was compared between lesions with SIV (SIV cohort) and without SIV (non-SIV cohort). All IWSs were deployed successfully, but nine cases (26.4%) of SIV occurred during placement. The mean lesion length was 22.3 cm, and critical limb threatening ischemia was observed in 40.6% of the limbs. The overall 12-month primary patency rate was 78.2%. The non-SIV cohort (25 cases) showed a significantly higher primary patency rate than the SIV cohort (9 cases, 91.7% vs. 41.7%, P = 0.0149). IWS implantation showed acceptable durability in Japanese patients in a real-world setting, however, SIV during IWS placement possibly led to a lower 12-month primary patency rate.

Real-World Results of Supera Stent Implantation for Popliteal Artery Atherosclerotic Lesions: 3-Year Outcome

BACKGROUND

Reports our experience for the first 50 cases of use of Supera stent for popliteal atherosclerotic lesions treatment.

METHODS

This prospective single-arm trial enrolled the first 50 limbs (46 patients) treated in our center with a Supera stent for symptomatic atherosclerotic disease of the popliteal artery. Also, a follow-up of 36 months is reported.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative ankle-brachial index increased from 0.38 ± 0.37 before intervention to 0.63 ± 0.46 postoperatively at 12 months (P = 0.014), 0.66 ± 0.39 at 24 months (P = 0.023), and 0.74 ± 0.46 at 36 months (P = 0.029). Primary patency at 12, 24, and 36 months were 89.6%, 72.3%, and 70.2%, and primary assisted patency was 93.8%, 87.2%, and 85.1%, respectively, by Kaplan-Meier estimates. After 3 years of follow-up, age <75 years (P = 0.034) and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC)-II D lesions (P = 0.041) constituted risk factors for stent occlusion. During the follow-up of the patients, none of them developed stent fracture as evidenced on plain radiographs during follow-up. Implantation defects did not constitute a risk factor for stent restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this study, Supera stent has shown an excellent 3-year patency in this difficult-to-treat anatomic segment. In our experience, younger patients and complex lesions (TASC-II type D) were positive significant predictors for restenosis. In our cohort, post deployment stent conformation did not influence patency. Nevertheless, further investigations, including randomized studies comparing the Supera stent with other stent platforms, drug eluting angioplasty, or atherectomy devices, are mandatory.

Demystifying the Use of Self-Expandable Interwoven Nitinol Stents in Femoropopliteal Peripheral Arterial Disease

Femoropopliteal atherosclerosis affects a significant percentage of the world population, leading to intermittent claudication and critical limb ischemia. The femoropopliteal segment has a unique set of biomechanical challenges that must be considered and overcome for treatment. The use of stents is a reality and a necessity in peripheral interventions. The success of first-generation femoropopliteal stents was limited by their rigidity and deformability. The standard nitinol stents overcame certain biomechanical challenges because of their superelasticity and thermal shape memory, although stent fracture is still an issue. Therefore, interwoven nitinol stents with helical structure have been developed, borrowing the concept from biliary stents, aiming to provide good flexibility while still maintaining a uniform cell size and significant radial strength. This unique interwoven structure gains it advantage in the femoropopliteal region. The purpose of this review article is to investigate the current published evidence of the use of self-expandable interwoven nitinol stents in femoropopliteal arterial disease and compare them with other endovascular treatment options.

Adjunctive stent use during endovascular intervention to the femoropopliteal artery with drug coated balloons: Insights from the XLPAD registry

With growing use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for femoropopliteal (FP) artery interventions, there is limited information on rates of real-world adjunctive stent use and its association with short and long-term outcomes. We report on 225 DCB treated FP lesions in 224 patients from the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry (NCT01904851) between 2014 and 2016. Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel and Wilcoxon rank sum statistics were used to compare stented (planned or ‘bail-out’) versus non-stented DCB treated lesions. Stents were implanted in 31% of FP DCB interventions. Among the 70 stents implanted, 46% were for ‘bail-out’ indications and 54% were planned. Lesions treated with stents were longer (mean 150 mm vs 100 mm; p < 0.001) and less likely to be in-stent restenosis lesions (10% vs 28%; p=0.003). Stenting was significantly more frequent in complex FP lesions, including chronic total occlusions (66% vs 34%; p < 0.001). For bail-out stenting, interwoven nitinol stents were the most common type (50%) followed by drug-eluting stents (34%) and bare-metal stents (22%). There were no differences in peri-procedural complication rates or 12-month target limb revascularization rates (18.6% vs 11.6%; p=0.162) or 12-month amputation rates (11.4% vs 11%; p=0.92) between lesions where adjunctive stenting was used versus lesions without adjunctive stenting, respectively. In conclusion, in a contemporary ‘real-world’ adjudicated multicenter US registry, adjunctive stenting was necessary in nearly a third of the lesions, primarily for the treatment of more complex FP lesions, with similar short and intermediate-term clinical outcomes compared with non-stented lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01904851

Use of the Gore Tigris Vascular Stent in Advanced Femoropopliteal Peripheral Arterial Disease

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of using the Tigris vascular stent (Gore, Flagstaff, Arizona) alone or in combination with the Viabahn stent (Gore) for revascularizing femoropopliteal Trans-Atlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) type B-D lesions with varying degrees of calcification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with Rutherford stage ≥ 3 and TASC type ≥ B were included in the study. From January 2015 to April 2017, 31 segments in 31 patients (21 men, ovarall mean age 73.3 ± 9.2 years) were treated. The breakdown by TASC type and Rutherford stage were TASC B (n = 12), C (n = 6), and D (n = 13), and Rutherford 3 (n = 28) and 4 (n = 3). The lesions were located in the common femoral artery (n = 1), superficial femoral artery (SFA; n = 20), distal SFA to P1 (n = 3), popliteal P1 (n = 1), popliteal P1-3 (n = 3), popliteal P2-3 (n = 2), and 1 femoropopliteal bypass. There were 18 occlusions (58.1%) and 13 stenoses (41.9%). The mean diseased segment length was 15.5 ± 9.9 cm with 80.6% of moderate/severe calcification. The follow-up consisted of color Doppler ultrasound and clinical assessment at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months.

RESULTS

Technical success was 100%. There were no periprocedural or postprocedural complications. The mean stented lesion length was 17.2 ± 10.5 cm with a mean follow-up of 13.1 ± 6.9 months. Primary patency rates at 6, 9, 12, and 15 months were, respectively, 100% (24/31 patients), 90.5% (21/31 patients), 88.9% (20/31 patients), and 80% (15/31 patients). The median postprocedural Rutherford stage was 1. Three occlusions occurred at 7, 9, and 14 months, leading to a target lesion revascularization of 9.7% and a secondary patency of 100% at 15 months. Logistic analysis results demonstrated that lesion length (P = .003) was associated with reocclusion. Amputation-free survival at 15 months was 100%. Intrastent restenosis was observed in four cases (12.9%) but none were associated with worsening of symptoms. No stent fractures were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The Tigris stent used alone or in combination with a Viabahn stent for femoropopliteal TASC B-D lesions demonstrated acceptable 12-month primary patency with a low reintervention rate.

A Pilot Study of Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularisation with a Low Dose Paclitaxel Coated Balloon: Is Predilatation Necessary?

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

The objective was to compare 2 year outcomes in patients treated with or without predilatation prior to drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions.

METHODS

This prospective multicentre pilot study was conducted at three sites in Germany. It compared claudicants undergoing predilatation with a bare percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon before DCB (predilatation group) with patients undergoing direct DCB (direct DCB group). Patients were followed for 2 years. Outcomes included late lumen loss at 6 months, and ankle brachial index (ABI), major adverse events, and primary patency at 2 years. A Clinical Events Committee and core laboratories analysed adverse events and angiographic/duplex images, respectively.

RESULTS

Between December 2011 and November 2012, 50 patients were enrolled to the predilatation group (12% total occlusions) and 28 to the direct DCB group (5% total occlusions). Follow-up compliance at the 2 year visit was 88% (n = 44) and 86% (n = 24), respectively. Late lumen loss at 6 months was lower in the direct DCB group (0.03 ± 0.68 mm vs. 0.54 ± 0.97 mm; p = .01). Major adverse events over 2 years occurred in seven (15%) patients who underwent predilatation and in five (19%) after direct DCB. Mean ABI at 2 years was 0.94 ± 0.15 after predilatation and 1.0 ± 0.12 after direct DCB. Over 2 years, primary patency (80.3% vs. 78.2%; p = .55) was not statistically different between the groups. After propensity score adjustments, 2 year findings remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel coated PTA, with or without bare predilatation, is effective over 2 years in symptomatic patients with femoropopliteal stenotic lesions. Adequately powered randomised controlled comparisons are required to confirm these preliminary results.

First-in-man experience of self-expanding nitinol stents combined with drug-coated balloon in the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease

Purpose

The present study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of a drug-coated balloon inflated within a thin-strut self-expanding bare-metal stent in patients with severe and complex femoropopliteal occlusive disease.

Methods

This prospective study used the Pulsar-self-expanding stent and Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon in patients with severe and complex femoropopliteal occlusive disease. The primary endpoint was the 12-month primary patency, and the secondary endpoints included 24-month primary patency, assisted primary patency, secondary patency, and clinically associated target lesion revascularisation.

Results

The study included 44 patients (51 limbs). The mean age of the patients was 67.6 ± 10.2 years, with 73% men. Chronic limb severity was classified as Rutherford Category III in 41% of the patients, stage IV in 31%, and stage V in 27%. Lesions were predominantly Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC 2007) D (51%) and C (45%), with 32 (63%) chronic total occlusions. Procedural success was obtained in all cases. The mean lesion length was 200 ± 74.55 mm (95% CI = 167.09–208.01) with a mean number of stents per limb used of 1.57 ± 0.70 (95% CI = 1.37–1.76). Distal embolisation occurred in two patients. The primary patency rates at the 12- and 24-month follow-up were 94% (95% CI = 82.9–98.1) and 88% (95% CI = 75.7–94.5), respectively. The assisted primary was 94% (95% CI = 82.9–98.1) and secondary patency was 96% (95% CI = 85.2–99.0) at 24-month follow-up. The cumulative stent fracture rate at the 24-month follow-up was 10%. Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation was 94% (95% CI = 83–98%) at 12-month follow-up and 88% (95% CI = 76–94%) at 24-month follow-up, with two patients requiring a bypass graft.

Conclusion

Our novel approach involving the combination of a thin-strut bare-metal stent and a drug-coated balloon may be safe and effective, with sustainable and promising clinical outcomes up to 24 months after treatment.