One-Year Outcomes Following Directional Atherectomy of Popliteal Artery Lesions: Subgroup Analysis of the Prospective, Multicenter DEFINITIVE LE Trial

Usage of rotational atherectomy and drug-coated balloon angioplasty for isolated popliteal artery lesions: two-year results of a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

In this study, perioperative properties and early and mid-term clinical outcomes of endovascular revascularization with a combined usage of rotational atherectomy (RA) and drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) angioplasty for isolated popliteal artery lesion were reported.

METHODS

A total of 28 patients with isolated popliteal artery stenosis who underwent combined RA and DCB angioplasty between December 2018 and September 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Temren atherectomy system (Invamed, Ankara, Turkey) and Extender paclitaxel-coated drug-coated balloon catheter (Invamed, Ankara, Turkey) were used in all cases. The main outcome was primary patency; secondary outcomes were technical success, freedom from amputation, and mortality.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 64.2 ± 9.1 years and the majority of the patients were male (n = 20; 71.4%). Types of the lesions were total occlusion in 24 limbs and critical stenosis in 4 limbs. The mean total occlusion length was 65.2 ± 14.2 mm. Flow-limiting dissection was seen in lesions of 2 patients (7.1%) and treated with prolonged balloon dilatation without bail-out stenting requirement. Technical success defined as an adequate vascular lumen (less than 30% stenosis) was achieved in 26 (92.8%) with a mean follow-up of 17.2 ± 8.2 months. The mean primary patency rates at 12 months and 24 months were 92.3% ± 3.2 and 81.2% ± 3.2, respectively. Complications included 1 distal embolization following RA, 2 flow-limiting dissections, and 3 puncture site hematomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular procedures using combined RA and DCB angioplasty seem to be effective alternative treatment modalities for the treatment of popliteal artery lesions with high rates of primary patency and freedom from TLR.

Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Popliteal Artery Disease: K-POP Registry 12-Month Results

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The popliteal artery is generally regarded as a "no-stent zone." Limited data are available on the outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for popliteal artery disease. This study aimed to evaluate the 12-month clinical outcomes among patients who received DCB treatment for atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter registry study enrolled 100 patients from 7 Korean endovascular centers who underwent endovascular therapy using IN.PACT DCB (Medtronic) for symptomatic atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. The primary endpoint was 12-month clinical primary patency and the secondary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free rate.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study cohort was 65.7±10.8 years, and 77% of enrolled patients were men. The mean lesion length was 93.7±53.7 mm, and total occlusions were present in 45% of patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Combined atherectomy was performed in 17% and provisional stenting was required in 11%. Out of the enrolled patients, 91 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. Clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival rates at 12 months were 76.0% and 87.2%, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified female and longer lesion length as the significant independent predictors of loss of patency.

CONCLUSIONS

DCB treatment yielded favorable 12-month clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival outcomes in patients with popliteal artery disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02698345.

Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy Versus PTA/Supera Stenting for Popliteal Artery Lesions: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

PURPOSE

This study examines the use and impact of directional atherectomy with antirestenotic therapy (DAART) versus angioplasty plus Supera stent implantation on the outcomes during endovascular treatment of popliteal lesions in clinical practice.

METHODS

Overall 143 consecutive patients (mean age 75.0±12.2 years, 72% male), with isolated atherosclerotic disease of the popliteal artery who underwent endovascular treatment using DAART therapy or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/Supera stenting of the popliteal artery between January 2016 and December 2021 were identified from a retrospectively database. Patient and plaque characteristics were collected. A propensity-score matched, case-control analysis was conducted to balance covariates between the group of patients who underwent DAART and the one treated by PTA/Supera stenting.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients (35.7%) showed severe claudication and 92 (64.3%) critical limb ischemia. There was a trend toward longer treated lesions (90.4±81 vs 72.5±5.3 mm, p=0.089) and more chronic total occlusions (60.5% vs 46.8%, p=0.058) in the PTA/Supera stenting group, although not reaching statistically significance. Moderate-to-severe calcification was present in most lesions treated (75.8% of DAART group, 80.2% of PTA/Supera stenting group, and 78.3% of total cohort). Among the 53 case-matched pairs of patients treated with DAART or PTA/Supera stenting, there were no significant differences in short-term outcomes, including rate of technical success (96.2% vs 98.1%, p=0.232), procedural success (88.7% vs 90.1%, p=0.251), distal embolization (1.9% vs 1.9%, p=0.178), dissection (5.7% vs 1.9%, p=0.268), perforation (3.8% vs 5.6%, p=0.163), hospital discharge (1.2±0.1 vs 1.0±0.1, p=0.325), 30 day minor (28.3% vs 32.1%, p=0.264) or major amputation rates (7.5% vs 3.8%, p=0.107), and 30 day mortality (1.9% vs 1.9%, p=0.173). At 1 year, there was no difference in primary patency (73.6% vs 77.4%, p=0.233), primary assisted patency (81.3% vs 84.9%, p=0.167), secondary patency (86.8% vs 92.5%, p=0.094), ipsilateral minor (35.8% vs 39.6%, p=0.472) or major amputation (9.4% vs 7.5%, p=0.186), ankle brachial index improvement (0.32±0.12 vs 0.37±0.37, p=0.401), or mortality (5.7% vs 5.7%, p=0.121) rate between patients who underwent DAART or PTA/Supera stenting for popliteal lesions.

CONCLUSION

Twelve-month results following DAART technique or PTA/Supera stenting of atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery are not different, regardless of patient and plaque characteristics.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The DAART technique for the treatment of popliteal artery atherosclerotic disease is presented as a "leave nothing behind" strategy with on-year clinical outcomes similar to ATP/Supera stenting.

Effect of Limb Salvage by Excimer Laser Angioplasty Plus Low-Pressure Balloon Inflation in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients with Infrapopliteal Vessel Disease

Background

Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) often exhibit long, diffuse, totally occluded and heavily calcified infrapopliteal (IP) lesions. This study evaluated limb salvage after peripheral excimer laser atherectomy (PELA) plus low-pressure balloon inflation (LPBI) without stent deployment in CLTI patients with severe IP disease.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 70 consecutive patients with 109 IP vessels who underwent PELA plus LPBI from 2010 to 2013. Technical success was defined as at least one IP straight-line flow being achieved below the malleolus. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with 6-month limb salvage.

Results

Of the 109 IP vessels, 100 (91.7%) were totally occluded, and none of the patients received a stent. Of the 70 patients, 20% were octogenarians, and 85.8% had a Rutherford-Becker class 5 and 6. The technical success rate was 87.1% and 6-month limb salvage rate was 78.6%. Rutherford score was negatively correlated with clinical success (adjusted odds ratio 0.24; p = 0.028). No immediate major cardiovascular events were recorded during admission.

Conclusions

PELA plus LPBI may be a treatment option for complex IP lesions in patients with CLTI. Higher Rutherford class was correlated with a lower 6-month limb salvage rate. However, a large-scale study with a control group is needed to clarify our results.

Periprocedural Outcomes of Rotational Atherectomy-Assisted Balloon Angioplasty in Isolated Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions: The ISO-POP Trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of calcified popliteal artery lesions represents an ongoing challenge for vascular specialists. Biomechanical forces of external compression, torsion and elongation that occur with locomotion in the popliteal segment can lead to stent fractures and occlusions. The aim of our study was to assess the procedural success rate of atherectomy in combination with balloon angioplasty for isolated calcified popliteal artery lesions.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2022, 62 patients with isolated atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery underwent endovascular treatment by use of rotational atherectomy (Phoenix, Philips USA, (subgroup A) or Jetstream, Boston USA, (subgroup B), atherectomy systems) and additional balloon angioplasty in two vascular centers. The primary outcome measures were: 1. periprocedural clinical and technical success (<30% residual stenosis and no need for bailout stenting due to flow-limiting dissection) and 2. postprocedural increase in the ankle brachial index of more than 0.1.

RESULTS

The overall rate of bailout stenting was 4.8%, whereas the procedural success rate was 98.4%. The rate of procedural complications included 3.7% and 5.7% peripheral embolizations in the subgroups A and B, respectively, and no vessel perforations were noted. All embolizations were successfully treated by catheter aspiration or capture in the pre-treatment placed filter system. In addition, 1 (3.7%) pseudoaneurysm in the groin was reported in subgroup A and treated by surgical means. Median ABI of the affected limbs improved from 0.55 (0.2) to 0.70 (0.2) in subgroup A and from 0.50 (0.2) to 0.95 (0.1) in subgroup B (DABI of 0.15 versus 0.45, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of rotational atherectomy and balloon angioplasty in the popliteal artery showed reproducible outcomes in 2 centers, with low incidence of complications and low rates of bail-out stenting. These findings may contribute to more liberal use of such devices especially in segments with high risk for stent factures and occlusions.

Different endovascular modalities of treatment for isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions (EMO-POP) registry

BACKGROUND

The mid-term results after treatment of isolated popliteal lesions have been limited. The aim of the present study was to report the mid-term outcomes after endovascular treatment of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions.

METHODS

A multicenter (15 hospitals in five countries) retrospective cohort study was performed. Between June 2016 and June 2021, 651 consecutive patients who had been treated for isolated popliteal lesions using endovascular methods exclusively were included in the present study. Six techniques were identified, including plain balloon angioplasty (PTA; n = 286; 43.9%), drug-coated balloon angioplasty (n = 98; 15.1%), stenting with low-chronic outward force (COF) stents (n = 84; 12.9%), stenting with high-COF stents (n = 76; 11.7%), atherectomy alone (n = 17; 2.6%), and directional atherectomy with drug-coated balloons (n = 90; 13.8%). The primary outcomes measures were primary and secondary patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (F-CDTLR).

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 74.5 years. Most of the patients (n = 409; 62.9%) had had chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Popliteal occlusion was found in 400 cases (61.4%). High-grade calcification was present in 36.7% of cases. Immediate technical success was 94.8%. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 6-42 months). The actuarial rate for all patients at 26 months (per outcome measure) was as follows: primary patency, 73.9%; secondary patency, 88%; and F-CDTLR, 76.5%. When comparing PTA vs all other treatments in an adjusted regression analysis, the F-CDTLR was 75.2% for PTA vs 76.5% for all other treatment (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.48; P = .46, adjusted regression). The difference in secondary patency also was not statistically significant (85.7% for PTA vs 88%; P = .20). Adjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the estimated primary patency was inferior for PTA in pairwise comparisons vs other treatments (P < .001 vs atherectomy; P = .002 vs directional atherectomy with drug-coated balloons; and P = .002 vs low-COF stenting).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from our study have shown that endovascular treatment of isolated popliteal lesions is safe and associated with acceptable patency and F-CDTLR in the mid-term.

Supera stent implantation for the treatment of isolated popliteal artery disease systematic review and evaluation of current endovascular strategies

&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; The anatomical location of the popliteal artery is one of the greatest challenges for percutaneous interventions. The biomechanical attributes of the vessel lead to higher rates of restenosis, stent fracture, and occlusion. Some surgeons consider the popliteal artery as a no stenting zone. Many specialists favor percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to be the first line of endovascular treatment in the popliteal artery with bail-out stent implantation if the results are suboptimal. The Supera peripheral stent system is a novel stent that has been manufactured with a high degree of flexibility and supposedly might be appropriate for implantation in the popliteal artery. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; Evaluation of the performance of Supera stent in isolated popliteal artery disease in comparison to other methods of treatment. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; As many as 92 articles were found in the databases and after full-text review, 4 studies matched the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Primary patency rates of Supera implantation in an isolated popliteal artery at 12 months ranged from 68% to 90%. In all four studies, no stent fractures were observed. Only one study provided longer follow-up than 12 months and evaluated the performance of the Supera stent 36 months after implantation. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; In conclusion, mentioned studies show promising and superior to other stent patency rates of the Supera stent regarding popliteal artery lesions. What is more, no stent fracture is promising regarding longer follow-up. However, more studies with longer follow-ups and direct comparison to other methods are required to fully evaluate Supera&apos;s performance in the popliteal artery.

Outcomes of directional atherectomy for common femoral artery disease

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy is the first-line strategy for femoropopliteal obstructive disease. However, for lesions involving the common femoral artery (CFA) surgical endarterectomy is still the gold standard.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of directional atherectomy (DA) for the treatment of CFA lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent DA of the CFA between March 2009 and June 2017 was performed. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (cdTLR). Secondary endpoints included the overall procedural complication rate at 30 days, change in ankle-brachial index (ABI), and Rutherford-Becker class (RBC) during follow-up.

RESULTS

This analysis included 250 patients. The mean follow-up period was 31.03±21.56 months (range 1-88, median follow-up period 25 months). The procedural complication rate including access-site complications, target lesion perforation, and outflow embolisation was 10.4% (n=26). All but one complication could be treated conservatively or endovascularly. One surgical revision was necessary. Freedom from major adverse events (death, cdTLR, myocardial infarction and major target limb amputation) at 30 days was 99.6%. The rate of cdTLR during follow-up was 13.6% (n=34). A significant improvement of the mean ABI and the RBC was observed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed residual target lesion stenosis >30% (p=0.005), and heavy calcification of the target lesion (p=0.033) to be independent predictors for cdTLR.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DA for the treatment of CFA lesions leads to promising midterm results with an acceptable complication rate.

Mid-term results and predictors of restenosis in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for isolated popliteal artery steno-occlusive disease

Background and aim

There is only a limited number of major publications on the outcome of interventions for isolated popliteal artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to report our results on mid-term patency and predictors of restenosis.

Patients and methods

This single-center retrospective study included 61 symptomatic patients (males, N = 33; median age, 65.1 years [IQR, 60.7–71.9 years]; Rutherford grade 4–6, N = 14) with at least two patent crural arteries, whose atherosclerotic stenoses/occlusions were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or stenting (using self-expanding bare-metal Astron Pulsar stents) between 2011 and 2018.

Results

Twenty-six patients had PTA, while 35 underwent stenting. The median follow-up was 29 months (IQR, 10–47 months). The primary patency rates were not significantly different (P = 0.629) between PTA and stenting groups. Restenosis developed in nine patients (34.6%) in the PTA group, and in 12 (34.3%) in the stenting group. Restenotic lesions required re-intervention in nine cases (100%) in the PTA group, and in eight (66.7%) in the stenting group. Restenosis developed significantly less frequently (P = 0.010) in patients with a popliteal/P1 stent; the primary patency rates were also significantly better (P = 0.018) in patients with a popliteal/P1 stent when compared to popliteal/P2 plus multi-segment stents. Cox regression analysis identified lesion location as a predictor of in-stent restenosis (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2–5.5; P = 0.019).

Conclusion

Stenting was not superior when compared to PTA (if selective stenting was not considered as loss of patency). Follow-up should be more thorough in patients undergoing popliteal/P2 or multi-segment stenting.

Efficacy and one-year outcomes of Luminor® paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting balloon in the treatment of popliteal artery atherosclerosis lesions

PURPOSE

Reporting outcomes with a new generation paclitaxel eluting balloon (Luminor®; iVascular, Vascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) in the popliteal district. Endovascular treatment of popliteal artery atherosclerotic disease is still debated without definitive evidences.

METHODS

From January to June 2019, patients' data presenting popliteal artery atherosclerotic diseases and treated with the Luminor® (iVascular) drug eluting balloon (DEB) were prospectively collected. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) or severe claudication associated with popliteal artery stenosis >50% were the inclusion criteria. Measured outcomes were technical success, early and late results; including mortality, morbidity, symptoms recurrence, amputation, ankle-brachial index (ABI), survival, primary patency, secondary patency, freedom from restenosis. Median follow-up was 22.43 ± 4 (mean:21.58; IQR:20-24) months.

RESULTS

Of the 33 included patients, 28 (85%) were diagnosed with CLI, with a mean preoperative run-off score of 5.39 (r:0-10; SD:3) and a chronic popliteal occlusion in 21 (64%). Technical success was achieved in all cases. Perioperative mortality was observed in 1 (3%) patient and perioperative complications in 2 (6%). During the follow-up were reported 2 symptoms recurrence; a significant ABI increase (0.57; IQR:0.41-0.47 vs. 0.69; IQR:0.50-0.67; P < 0.01); 1 (3%) major and 2 (6%) minor amputations. Estimated 24 months survival, primary patency, secondary patency, and freedom from restenosis were 97%, 96.9%, 100%, and 93.8% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, the use of the Luminor® (iVascular) was safe and effective in addressing atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions. Larger studies with longer term-outcomes are required to assess the durability of this device in the popliteal artery.

[Atherectomy in Peripheral Artery Disease: Current and Future]

Atherectomy has become a promising treatment option for peripheral artery disease caused by diabetes mellitus or end-stage renal disease. Atherectomy refers to the removal of atheromatous tissue by mechanical method, resulting in an enlarged lumen of the treated blood vessel. Based on this method, the term is limited to the percutaneous minimally invasive approach, and there are currently two types of atherectomy devices available in Korea. The increased prevalence of atherectomy has led to the concept of "vascular preparation" and a new treatment concept of "leave nothing behind." Various studies have proven the safety and effectiveness of atherectomy; however, there are some limitations. We need to remain focused on patient selection and subsequent large-scale research.

Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Isolated Chronic Occlusion of the Popliteal Artery: A Retrospective Single-Institution Study

PURPOSE

To assess the 12-month safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of patients with isolated chronic occlusions in popliteal arteries and evaluate the risk factors of lesion reocclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2018 to December 2019, DCB angioplasty was performed in 54 limbs with isolated chronic popliteal artery occlusion of 48 patients (32 men) with a mean age of 71.5 ± 12.1 (range, 50-97) years, mean occlusive length of 6.3 ± 3.0 (range, 1-15) cm, and mean preoperative ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.42 ± 0.12 (range, 0.19-0.58). A total of 18.5% (10/54) of lesions were long-segment occlusions involving the entire popliteal artery from P1 to P3. Twenty seven of 54 limbs presented with critical limb ischemia (CLI) with a mean ABI of 0.33 ± 0.10 (range, 0.19-0.51). The primary endpoint was primary patency rate at 12 months. The secondary endpoints included technical success rate, 1-year secondary patency rate, limb salvage rate, and improvement in clinical symptoms. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of lesion reocclusion.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 85.2% (46/54), and bailout stenting was performed in 14.8% (8/54) of lesions. The 12-month primary and secondary patency rates by the Kaplan-Meier estimate were 72.6% and 88.3%, respectively. Two thirds of the reocclusions occurred within 6 months after intervention. No 30-day mortality was observed. The limb salvage rate was 100% during a mean follow-up period of 13 months, and all minor amputations occurred in the limbs presented with CLI. The mean ABI increased from 0.42 before the procedure to 0.73 after the procedure. Patients younger than 60 years and the lesions exhibiting long-segment occlusions present as trending risk factors for lesion reocclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel DCB angioplasty is safe and effective in managing isolated chronic occlusion of popliteal arteries. Younger patients and long-segment occlusions of the popliteal artery are associated with a relatively higher reocclusion rate after the procedure.

Safety of day-case endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease in a rural, underserved area

Background:

We aimed to investigate the safety of endovascular procedures undertaken in a single outpatient center located in a rural, underserved area. Endovascular procedures for Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) have become increasingly common in outpatient settings; their safety is yet to be determined in a rural, underserved area with no stand-by vascular surgeon on site.

Methods:

We undertook a retrospective case review of endovascular procedures for the investigation and management of lower extremity PAD between December 2012 and August 2015. Patients were classified by Rutherford score, degree of stenosis and length of lesions. Complications were major (requiring hospitalization) or minor, including perforation, distal embolization, hematoma, and allergic reactions, which could be treated immediately in the catheterization laboratory with no sequelae. Patients were monitored in the facility and followed up using clinical, biochemical and radiological parameters at 24 h and 1 month.

Results:

A total of 692 patients underwent endovascular procedures for the investigation and/or treatment of PAD, of which 608 were interventional. Of these patients, 10.20% experienced procedural complications, of which 0.66% were classified as major, including wire retention and retroperitoneal hemorrhage. In total, 99.34% were discharged safely on the same day as the procedure. No adverse events were reported at follow up.

Conclusion:

Endovascular procedures for PAD can be performed safely in a rural outpatient setting with low complication rates. Most complications are minor and do not require hospitalization. Outpatient procedures for PAD are safe and may widen access to specialist procedures in areas of socio-economic deprivation.

Endarterectomy for Isolated Atherosclerotic Lesions of the Popliteal Artery

BACKGROUND

In the endovascular era, angioplasty has grown a large place in the treatment of peripheral artery disease. Few studies have been focused in short atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery itself, which remain for many surgeons a critical zone for the technical approach decision. We herein describe simple techniques of popliteal endarterectomy for the treatment of short popliteal occlusive disease.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and June 2019, patients with isolated popliteal artery atherosclerotic lesions were included in this retrospective study. Indication for intervention was either disabling lower limb claudication or critical limb ischemia. We performed either endarterectomy by eversion of the popliteal artery or a simple endarterectomy with a patch angioplasty. We then studied the procedural data, the thirty-day outcomes, and the mid-term follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients were included in the study, and 18 limbs were revascularized with the endarterectomy technique. Total duration of the procedure was 100 ± 46 min. Overall technical success was 100%. Median hospital stay was 4 days. Complete clinical success, that is, freedom from claudication or rest pain, was achieved in all cases. No early additional procedure was needed. After a mean follow-up of 34 ± 32 months with no patient lost to follow-up, all patients were alive, and a 100% primary patency and limb salvage was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 years' follow-up, endarterectomy of the popliteal artery appears to be a valid option for isolated and short atherosclerotic lesions.

Peripheral Vascular Disease in Women: Therapeutic Options in 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, there have been advances in the prevention, management, and control of peripheral vascular disease (PVD). There is a trend towards aggressive risk factor modification, noninvasive screening, and endovascular revascularization with surgical approaches reserved only for select cases. This article reviews the different management strategies ranging from pharmacotherapy, revascularization, and rehabilitation with an emphasis on the response of women to these therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Overall, the representation of women in the majority of the published data in this arena remains poor. Studies examining medical therapy and endovascular and surgical revascularization were not designed to address sex disparities. Nevertheless, we dissect these therapies and their relevant randomized trials. The paucity of data investigating the response of women to the different management options makes it difficult to make any evidence-based recommendations. This not only applies to the type of intervention, but also the appropriate timing and risks entailed.

Real-World Results of Supera Stent Implantation for Popliteal Artery Atherosclerotic Lesions: 3-Year Outcome

BACKGROUND

Reports our experience for the first 50 cases of use of Supera stent for popliteal atherosclerotic lesions treatment.

METHODS

This prospective single-arm trial enrolled the first 50 limbs (46 patients) treated in our center with a Supera stent for symptomatic atherosclerotic disease of the popliteal artery. Also, a follow-up of 36 months is reported.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative ankle-brachial index increased from 0.38 ± 0.37 before intervention to 0.63 ± 0.46 postoperatively at 12 months (P = 0.014), 0.66 ± 0.39 at 24 months (P = 0.023), and 0.74 ± 0.46 at 36 months (P = 0.029). Primary patency at 12, 24, and 36 months were 89.6%, 72.3%, and 70.2%, and primary assisted patency was 93.8%, 87.2%, and 85.1%, respectively, by Kaplan-Meier estimates. After 3 years of follow-up, age <75 years (P = 0.034) and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC)-II D lesions (P = 0.041) constituted risk factors for stent occlusion. During the follow-up of the patients, none of them developed stent fracture as evidenced on plain radiographs during follow-up. Implantation defects did not constitute a risk factor for stent restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this study, Supera stent has shown an excellent 3-year patency in this difficult-to-treat anatomic segment. In our experience, younger patients and complex lesions (TASC-II type D) were positive significant predictors for restenosis. In our cohort, post deployment stent conformation did not influence patency. Nevertheless, further investigations, including randomized studies comparing the Supera stent with other stent platforms, drug eluting angioplasty, or atherectomy devices, are mandatory.

The Role of Atherectomy in Peripheral Artery Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

An ageing population and the increasing prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors have aggravated the burden of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Despite advances in the pharmacological treatment of atherosclerosis, many patients with symptomatic PAD require invasive procedures to reduce the symptoms of claudication, salvage tissue and prevent amputation and subsequent disability in those with critical limb ischaemia. After significant advances in endovascular treatment over the past two decades, these techniques are widely accepted as first-choice treatment in the majority of patients with PAD. However, in patients with severely calcified lesions, standard endovascular treatment such as plain or drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty may fail due to vessel recoil or severe dissection in the acute setting, and intimal hyperplasia in the long term. With the use of percutaneous plaque modification and debulking techniques based on atherectomy, such calcified lesions can be tackled more easily after removal or fragmentation of atherosclerotic plaque. More homogeneous balloon expansion at lower pressures can be achieved after atherectomy, which reduces barotrauma while allowing better drug delivery to the vessel wall during DCB angioplasty avoids the need for stent placement. There are four principal methods of direct atherectomy available at the present time: directional atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, orbital atherectomy and hybrid atherectomy. In this article, we provide a short overview of these techniques and the current evidence from clinical trials to support their use.

Directional atherectomy with antirestenotic therapy for the treatment of no-stenting zones

Endovascular treatment for peripheral artery occlusive disease carries unresolved problem of restenosis. Treatment modalities in areas of high mechanical stress like popliteal artery and common femoral artery remains challenging. New-generation devices improved the results of stent therapy in this anatomical territory, but could impact on future surgical options if they are needed. Vessel preparation prior to drug (paclitaxel)-coated balloons (DCB) angioplasty leads to better paclitaxel penetration into the arterial wall and improved drug uptake. The "leave nothing behind" strategies, DCB angioplasty and combined directional atherectomy (DA) and antirestenotic therapy (DAART), can theoretically overcome the problems caused by the mobility of the knee joint. However, calcified and longer lesions remain a challenging subset that is less responsive to DCBs, resulting in higher provisional stent rates. For the treatment of long and calcified femoropopliteal lesions, vessel preparation with DA before DCB angioplasty seems to be safe in mid-term follow-up and might have benefits in more challenging lesion subsets that are at higher risk for acute and chronic technical treatment failure of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, including DCB angioplasty, such as severely calcified lesions. Treatment with DA+DCB resulted in both increased technical success and fewer flow-limiting dissections compared with treatment with DCB alone. In concept of "leave nothing behind" therapies for isolated popliteal artery lesions, DAART was associated with a higher primary patency rate than DCB angioplasty alone.

Incidence and Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Disease: Outcomes from the IPAD Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To report the incidence and long-term outcomes following endovascular treatment of symptomatic, atherosclerotic isolated popliteal artery disease (IPAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included all patients who underwent endovascular treatment of IPAD between January 2010 and December 2016 because of intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI), in three tertiary University Hospitals. In total, 4717 peripheral arterial disease (PAD) procedures were analyzed. The study's primary outcome measures were: IPAD incidence, binary restenosis rate and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary outcome measures included technical success, limb salvage rate and the identification of predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

The incidence of IPAD was 0.98% (46/4717 PAD procedures). In total, 46 patients (38 male; mean age 73 ± 12 years) underwent plain balloon (69.5%) or bail-out stenting (30.5%) procedures. Most patients suffered from CLI (65.2%). Mean lesion length was 52.5 ± 32.0 mm and 45.6% of the cases were occlusions. Severe calcifications were noted in 26.1%. Technical success was 100%. Mean time follow-up was 32.6 ± 25.6 months. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, restenosis was 15.8, 40.9, 45.8% and TLR-free rate was 90.5, 79.0, 74.1%, at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Survival and limb salvage rates were 73.6 and 88.1%, at 5 years, respectively. The major amputation rate for CLI patients was 10.0% (3/29 limbs), while no major amputations occurred in the claudication subgroup. Cox multivariable analysis detected baseline occlusion as an independent predictor of increased restenosis (HR 5.3; 95% CI 0.21-0.66, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated popliteal lesions requiring treatment appear in nearly 1% of patients with PAD. Balloon angioplasty and bail-out stenting resulted in acceptable long-term clinical outcomes. Treatment of occlusions was correlated with increased restenosis rate.

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Atherosclerosis Patients With Popliteal Artery Involvement

Purpose: To investigate outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty in endovascular interventions including or restricted to the popliteal artery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 266 patients [median age 72 years, interquartile range (IQR) 62, 78; 166 men] treated with DCB angioplasty in 281 de novo lesions including the popliteal artery between December 2011 and January 2015 at a single center. The median lesion length was 270 mm (IQR 150, 373). The study outcomes were primary patency and predictors of restenosis [reported as the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI)]. Results: The primary patency was 77.4% at a median 12.2 months (IQR 5.7, 18.8). Independent variables associated with restenosis included baseline Rutherford category (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.77, p=0.02), reference vessel diameter (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.95, p=0.02), dissection (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.022.79, p=0.04), and standard nitinol stent use (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.79, p=0.02). Conclusion: Outcomes after DCB angioplasty in lesions including the popliteal artery were acceptable compared with previous studies. Further investigation with long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these results.