1
|
Mid-Term Outcomes of Chimney Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 79:359-371. [PMID: 34666145 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To provide an overview of the literature on the mid-term outcomes of chimney EVAR (ChEVAR) for the treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAA). METHODS Different electronic databases were searched for published articles up to January 2020. The eligibility criteria were studies describing mid- or long-term outcomes of chimney EVAR (mean follow-up at least 1 year) for treatment of JAAA, including more than 10 cases, published in English, and with full text available. The outcomes measure were overall survival rate, target vessel patency, and freedom from reintervention at 3 years. Quality of the included studies was analyzed using the MINORS criteria. Pooled effect estimates were analyzed using random-effect models and heterogeneity was tested using I2 statistics. RESULTS Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The included studies described 1,019 patients. According to the quality assessment, methodological quality was moderate to poor. The pooled overall survival, freedom from reintervention, and target vessel patency at 3 year was 81.4 % (95%CI 73.8-87.9), 85.7% (95%CI 75.6-93.5), and 95.1% (95%CI 89.3-98.7) respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review show good to acceptable short and mid-term survival and good mid-term durability, which supports that ChEVAR as a suitable alternative in high-risk JAAA. However, proper patient selection for ChEVAR seems essential to attain good mid-term outcomes, and further large prospective and good quality studies are required to demonstrate its long-term results and enable conclusions on specific determinants for outcome.
Collapse
|
2
|
Menegolo M, Xodo A, Penzo M, Piazza M, Squizzato F, Colacchio EC, Grego F, Antonello M. Open repair versus evar with parallel grafts in patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm excluded from fenestrated endografting. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2021; 62:483-495. [PMID: 34142524 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.21.11833-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the outcomes of open surgical repair (OSR) versus EVAR with parallel graft technique (PG) in patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA) excluded from fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) due to clinical, anatomical, technical or manufacturing time reasons. METHODS A single-center analysis of consecutive patients who underwent elective and urgent (within 24-48 hours) repair of JAAA from January 2010 to January 2019 was performed. Two groups were compared: patients excluded from FEVAR and respectively treated by OSR or by PG for JAAA. Perioperative clinical, anatomic and operative data were collected in a dedicated database. The endpoints were primary technical success, changes in renal function, early and long-term mortality, freedom from aortic related reinterventions (ARRs) and aortic related mortality (ARM). RESULTS 118 consecutive patients were treated for JAAA, 32 of them (27.1%) with FEVAR. 86 patients were enrolled in the study (OSR group=61; PG group= 25). The mean age was 77.4 ± 6.5 years for PG group and 71.1 ± 6.7 years for OSR group (p=.0001); the average comorbidity score of the Society for Vascular Surgery was higher for patients treated by PG (10.2 ± 4.8 vs 5.5 ± 0.4, p=.0001), with no differences for hypertension and renal score. After propensity score matching, 42 patients (OSR=27 ; PG=15) without differences in the preoperative risk factors were selected. Conical shape and neck mural thrombus were respectively more represented in the OSR group (95.1% vs 56.0%; 63.9% vs 36.0%). Aortic clamp site was supraceliac for 12 patients (19.7%), suprarenal for 21 (34.4%) and trans-renal for 28 patients (45.9%). In the PG group, 16 patients (64%) were treated with a single renal chimney. Primary technical success was similar in the two groups (100.0% vs 92.0%, p=.08), with an higher rate of procedure achieved by assisted technical success for the PG group after propensity score matching analysis (20.0% vs 0%, p=.04). Deterioration of renal function occurred for both groups of patients, with a significant creatinine increasing 12 months after surgery in the PG group compared with OSR group (1.72 ± 0.66 vs 1.18 ± 0.40, p=.006). Multiple logistic regression shows no independent predictor of peri-operative medical complication among demographics and pre-operative relevant clinical factors between the two cohorts. No difference in terms of early mortality was observed between the groups (1.6 % vs 0%, p=1.00). At 5 years, overall survival was lower for patients treated by PG (53.5% vs 70.2%, p=.007), such as freedom from ARRs (64.6 vs 90.5%, p=.03). Freedom from ARM at 5 years did not show significant differences among the two groups (100% vs 98.4%, p=1.00). CONCLUSIONS PG represents a feasible procedure for patients excluded from FEVAR due to clinical, anatomical, technical or device manufacturing time reasons, ensuring low rates of ARM. However, ARRs during the follow-up remain the Achilles heel of this technique. OSR is still the most durable procedure in the endovascular era, allowing the treatment of proximal "hostile necks" with low rates of reoperation and a similar impact on the renal function compared to PG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko Menegolo
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science and Public Health, Padua University School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrea Xodo
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science and Public Health, Padua University School of Medicine, Padua, Italy -
| | - Marco Penzo
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science and Public Health, Padua University School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
| | - Michele Piazza
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science and Public Health, Padua University School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Squizzato
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science and Public Health, Padua University School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
| | - Elda C Colacchio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science and Public Health, Padua University School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
| | - Franco Grego
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science and Public Health, Padua University School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
| | - Michele Antonello
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Science and Public Health, Padua University School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Končar IB, Jovanović AL, Dučič SM. The role of fEVAR, chEVAR and open repair in treatment of juxtarenal aneurysms: a systematic review. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2020; 61:24-36. [PMID: 32079378 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.19.11187-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Open repair (OR), fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fEVAR) and endovascular exclusion using parallel graft (chEVAR) are complementary procedures used for treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (jrAAA). The aim of our study was to assess available literature and analyze dispersion of OR, fEVAR and chEVAR procedures among reported papers related to treatment of jrAAA. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The PubMed database was systematically searched using predefined strategy and key words related to treatment of jrAAA on September 28th, 2019. Studies were assessed for eligibility using the inclusion and exclusion criteria with at least five patients treated with at least one of the procedures while systematic reviews, meta-analysis, reviews, comments, editorials and letters were excluded as well as studies without clear classification of the location of the aneurysm, studies not specifying the number of patients treated with each of the techniques or not discriminated between aortic pathologies (juxtarenal, paravisceral and thoracoabdominal), hybrid procedures, endoanchors or with branched stent-graft. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 1533 papers were identified while papers that met inclusion criteria were either representing experience of single institution (87 papers) or from multicenter studies (6 papers), national or international registries (18 papers). In the period between January 1977 and December 2017, treatment of 5664 patients with jrAAA was reported in 87 papers as a single institution report. Out of them 2531 (45%) were treated with OR, 2592 (46%) with fEVAR and 541 (9%) with chEVAR. Out of 29 institutions reporting OR, there were 11 (37.9%) with more than 100 treated patients while 21 (41.1%) out of 51 institutions that reported more than 50 jrAAA treated with fEVAR. Only four institutions reported results of all three treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results reported in the literature, regardless of its complexity and costs, fEVAR for jrAAA has been accepted in substantial number of hospitals worldwide, while number of reported procedures is reaching OR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor B Končar
- Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Serbian Clinical Center, Belgrade, Serbia - .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia -
| | - Aleksa L Jovanović
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.,Institute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Stefan M Dučič
- Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Serbian Clinical Center, Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Donas KP, Taneva GT, Li Y, Tran K, Torsello G. Use of Bare Metal Chimney Stents in the Treatment of Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms: "Do Not Praise the Day Before Evening". J Endovasc Ther 2019; 26:359-360. [PMID: 30935280 DOI: 10.1177/1526602819838870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gergana T Taneva
- 1 Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
- 2 University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yukun Li
- 1 Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Kenneth Tran
- 3 Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Torsello
- 1 Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|