A New Preprocedural Score to Predict Bleeding Complications of Endovascular Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease

Two-year outcomes of endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal arterial lesions for patients with high bleeding risk

The Academic Research Consortium (ARC) recently published a definition of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the prevalence of the ARC-HBR criteria in patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal arterial lesions has not been thoroughly investigated. The study population comprised 165 patients undergoing initial EVT for femoropopliteal lesions between June 2018 and June 2020. They were divided into two groups according to the ARC-HBR criteria. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 2 years of EVT. The 165 patients were divided into two groups: 125 (75.8%) patients at HBR (HBR group) and 40 (24.2%) patients at no HBR (non-HBR group). The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in the HBR group than in the non-HBR group (40.6% vs. 0%, log-rank p < 0.001). The HBR group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause death, major bleeding, and TLR than the non-HBR group (25.2% vs. 0%, log-rank p = 0.004, 13.9% vs. 0%, log-rank p = 0.047, 16.8% vs. 0%, log-rank p = 0.035). Most patients with peripheral artery disease were classified as HBR patients, and HBR patients were at higher risk of death, major bleeding, and TLR than non-HBR patients.

External validation of bleeding risk models for the prediction of long-term bleeding risk in patients with established cardiovascular disease

OBJECTIVE

The long-term predictive performance of existing bleeding risk models in patients with various manifestations of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is not well known. This study aims to assess and compare the performance of relevant existing bleeding risk models in estimating the long-term risk of major bleeding in a cohort of patients with established CVD.

METHODS

Seven existing bleeding risk models (PRECISE-DAPT, DAPT, Ducrocq et al, de Vries et al, S₂TOP-BLEED, Intracranial B₂LEED₃S and HAS-BLED) were identified and externally validated in 7,249 patients with established CVD included in the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort-second manifestations of arterial disease study. Predictive performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration, both at 10 years and the original prediction horizon of the models. Major bleeding was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 8.4 years (interquartile range 4.5-12.5), a total of 233 (3.2%) major bleeding events occurred. C-statistics for discrimination at 10 years ranged from 0.53 (95%CI 0.49-0.57) to 0.64 (95%CI 0.60-0.68). Calibration plots after recalibration to 10 years showed best agreement between predicted and observed bleeding risk for De Vries et al, S₂TOP-BLEED, DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of existing bleeding risk models to predict long-term bleeding in patients with CVD varied. Discrimination and calibration were best for the models of de Vries et al, S₂TOP-BLEED, DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT. Of these, recalibrated models requiring the least predictors may be preferred for use to personalize prevention with antithrombotic therapy.

Antithrombotic therapies in aortic and peripheral arterial diseases in 2021: a consensus document from the ESC working group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases, the ESC working group on thrombosis, and the ESC working group on cardiovascular pharmacotherapy

The aim of this collaborative document is to provide an update for clinicians on best antithrombotic strategies in patients with aortic and/or peripheral arterial diseases. Antithrombotic therapy is a pillar of optimal medical treatment for these patients at very high cardiovascular risk. While the number of trials on antithrombotic therapies in patients with aortic or peripheral arterial diseases is substantially smaller than for those with coronary artery disease, recent evidence deserves to be incorporated into clinical practice. In the absence of specific indications for chronic oral anticoagulation due to concomitant cardiovascular disease, a single antiplatelet agent is the basis for long-term antithrombotic treatment in patients with aortic or peripheral arterial diseases. Its association with another antiplatelet agent or low-dose anticoagulants will be discussed, based on patient's ischaemic and bleeding risk as well therapeutic paths (e.g. endovascular therapy). This consensus document aims to provide a guidance for antithrombotic therapy according to arterial disease localizations and clinical presentation. However, it cannot substitute multidisciplinary team discussions, which are particularly important in patients with uncertain ischaemic/bleeding balance. Importantly, since this balance evolves over time in an individual patient, a regular reassessment of the antithrombotic therapy is of paramount importance.

Bleeding events and mid-term mortality in the patients undergoing endovascular interventions for peripheral artery disease of the lower limbs based on the academic research consortium high bleeding risk criteria

This study applied the Academic Research Consortium for HBR (ARC-HBR) criteria to peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients after Endovascular therapy (EVT) and assessed the prevalence of HBR, as well as the association between HBR and clinical outcomes. This is a single-center, non-randomized, controlled, and retrospective study. EVTs for symptomatic PAD are minimally invasive and efficient. Although bleeding can be a serious adverse event, the criteria for HBR and assessment of bleeding events in patients who underwent EVT have been limited. A total of 156 patients with PAD who underwent EVT were divided into two groups according to ARC-HBR criteria. The associations between HBR and bleeding events, which was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Type 3 or Type 5 bleeding within 1 year and all-cause mortality within 1 year, were analyzed. The percentage of patients who were categorized as having HBR was 75.0%. Bleeding events occurred in 12.6% of the patients. All bleeding events occurred in the HBR group, while no bleeding events occurred in the no-HBR group. (16.9% vs. 0.0%, respectively; p = 0.008). During the follow-up period, 11.1% of the patients had died. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the HBR group than in the no-HBR group (14.7% vs. 0.0%, respectively; p = 0.019). Most patients with PAD were classified as having HBR as assessed by ARC-HBR criteria, and patients with HBR were at a higher risk of not only bleeding events but also mid-term mortality compared to those without HBR. ARC-HBR criteria can be a helpful parameter when treating PAD patients after EVT.

Endovascular treatment of arterio-ureteral fistula with new-generation balloon-expandable stent graft using a 7-French system

Arterio-ureteral fistulas are relatively rare, but a potentially life-threatening condition because of the possible massive bleeding. An 82-year-old woman with a history of hysterectomy and irradiation for uterine cancer was treated with ureteric stents for recurrent bilateral ureteral stenosis. During the adjustments of the stent, removing the right ureteric stent immediately resulted in massive hematuria. Computed tomography showed that the right ureter coursed above and seemed to be connected to the right external iliac artery. From the clinical history and computed tomography findings, an arterio-ureteral fistula between the right external iliac artery and right ureter was strongly suspected. The GORE^® VIABAHN^® VBX Stent Graft was deployed from the common iliac artery to the external iliac artery via a 7-French femoral system, followed by post-dilatation. The patient did not develop any complications or recurrence of hematuria after the procedure during the 11-month follow-up. The VBX is a useful device, with a low- profile device and a size-adjustable balloon-expandable stent that depended on the individual vessel size for post-dilatation. However, there are several concerns, such as risk of infection, stent thrombosis/stenosis, and chronic outcome while using stent grafts for treatment. Patients with arterio-ureteral fistulas who were treated using stent grafts should be carefully followed up.