1
|
Niklas N, Królikowska K, Zdrodowska K, Gutowski P, Kazimierczak A, Rynio P. The Rate of Postoperative Complications in Complicated Acute, and Subacute Type B Aortic Dissections after TEVAR vs. PETTICOAT Procedures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:2150. [PMID: 38138253 PMCID: PMC10744781 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59122150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) is suggested as being associated with a lower incidence of aorta-related events and fewer reinterventions compared to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with complicated acute, and subacute type B aortic dissections. Materials and Methods: This article is a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines. The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched, starting on 21 February 2022 and ending on 22 June 2022, to identify studies that investigated the rate of postoperative complications in patients treated with the PETTICOAT compared to the TEVAR. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. Of 2350 studies, 5 studies involving 360 patients were included: 143 patients after the PETTICOAT procedure and 217 after the TEVAR. Results: The meta-analysis of all studies showed that the rate of secondary endovascular reinterventions was smaller in patients treated with the PETTICOAT (n = 3 studies; OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.94; p = 0.04). The results of other postoperative complications (30-day mortality, mortality during follow-up, paraplegia, stroke, and occurrence of endoleak) were lower in the PETTICOAT group but were not statistically significant. The rate of postoperative renal failure was lower in patients treated with the TEVAR (n = 4; OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.46 to 2.51; p = 0.86). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that the PETTICOAT procedure is related to the lower rate of secondary endovascular reinterventions for complicated acute, and subacute type B aortic dissections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Paweł Rynio
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (N.N.); (K.K.); (K.Z.); (P.G.); (A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lombardi JV, Gleason TG, Panneton JM, Starnes BW, Dake MD, Haulon S, Mossop PJ, Segbefia E, Bharadwaj P. Five-year results of the STABLE II study for the endovascular treatment of complicated, acute type B aortic dissection with a composite device design. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1189-1197.e3. [PMID: 35809819 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide the five-year outcomes of the use of a composite device (proximal covered stent-graft + distal bare stent) for endovascular repair of patients with acute, type B aortic dissection complicated by aortic rupture and/or malperfusion. METHODS STABLE II was a prospective, multicenter study of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System (William Cook Europe, Denmark). Patients were enrolled between August 2012 and January 2015 at sites in the United States and Japan. Five-year follow-up was completed by January 2020. RESULTS In total, 73 patients (mean age 60.7±10.9 years; 65.8% male) with acute type B dissection complicated by malperfusion (72.6%), rupture (21.9%), or both (5.5%) were enrolled. Patients were treated with either a composite device (79.5%) or the proximal stent-graft alone (no distal bare stent, 20.5%). Dissections were more extensive in patients who received the composite device (408.9±121.3 mm) than in patients who did not receive a bare stent (315.9±100.1 mm). Mean follow-up was 1209.4±754.6 days. Freedom from all-cause mortality was 80.3%±4.7% at one year and 68.9%± 7.3% at five years. Freedom from dissection-related mortality remained at 97.1%±2.1% from one-year through five-year follow-up. Within the stent-graft region, the rate of either complete thrombosis or elimination of the false lumen increased over time (82.1% of all patients at five years vs. 55.7% at first post-procedure CT), with a higher rate at five years in patients who received the composite device (90.5%) compared with patients without the bare stent (57.1%). Throughout follow-up, overall true lumen diameter increased within the stent-graft region, and overall false lumen diameter decreased. At five years, 20.7% of patients experienced a decrease in maximum transaortic diameter within the stent-graft region, 17.2% experienced an increase, and 62.1% experienced no change. Distal to the treated segment (but within the dissected aorta), 23.1% of patients experience no change in transaortic diameter at five years; a bare stent was deployed in all these patients at the procedure. Five-year freedom from all secondary intervention was 70.7%±7.2%. CONCLUSIONS These five-year outcomes indicate a low rate of dissection-related mortality for the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System in the treatment of patients with acute, complicated type B aortic dissection. Further, these data suggest a positive influence of composite device use on false lumen thrombosis. Continuous monitoring for distal aortic growth is necessary in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph V Lombardi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ.
| | - Thomas G Gleason
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jean M Panneton
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Benjamin W Starnes
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Stephan Haulon
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Aortic Centre, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Peter J Mossop
- Division of Interventional Radiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Edem Segbefia
- Research Division, Cook Research Incorporated, West Lafayette, IN
| | - Priya Bharadwaj
- Research Division, Cook Research Incorporated, West Lafayette, IN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang R, Kan Y, Yang M, Zhang H, Zhang X, Dai X, Zhai S, Hu H, Zhang X, Chen B, Huang J, Qin X, Xiao Z, Lu X, Guo W, Si Y, Fu W. Clinical Results and Aortic Remodeling After Endovascular Treatment for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection With the “Fabulous” Stent System. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:817675. [PMID: 35237674 PMCID: PMC8882966 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.817675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To report the clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling after the implantation of a self-developed, biomechanically optimized, two-stage thoracic stent system named Fabulous. Background Given the efficacy of the PETTICOAT concept, the benefits of Fabulous and the behavior of remodeling in different segments need further investigation. Methods This is a prospective and multicenter study. From 2017 to 2019, 145 patients (mean age, 56.6 years; 88.3% male) from 14 centers were included in this cohort. The clinical results and core laboratory results were from a central electronic data capture system. Computed tomographic angiography was performed preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months and yearly thereafter and was used for volumetric analysis by 3mensio (Bilthoven, The Netherlands). After the 1-year follow-up, 97.2 and 87.6% of the clinical and imaging results of the eligible patients were available. Results Both stent grafts and bare stents were successfully delivered in place in 100% of the patients. The 30-day mortality and 1-year freedom from all-cause mortality were 2.1 and 96.6%, respectively. The incidence of entry flow was 11.7% at 30 days and 6.2% at 365 days. No cases of stent-induced new entry (SINE) or reintervention were observed. After the 1-year follow-up, the true lumen/overall volume ratio reached 88%. The following subdivided segment volume changes were recorded: stent graft segment TL +56%; FL −92%, bare stent segment TL +32%; FL −75%, and there were no significant changes in the visceral segment. Conclusions These outcomes indicated that there were favorable clinical benefits of Fabulous stent system. This device achieved a low short-term mortality and a low incidence of reintervention. In addition, patients undergoing Fabulous stent system implantation showed remodeling both on descending aorta and on the distal aorta. The volume changes in the TL and FL varied in the different segments. The long-term follow-up is still ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruihan Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuanqing Kan
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mou Yang
- Vascular Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated With Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Hongkun Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoming Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangchen Dai
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Shuiting Zhai
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hejie Hu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, China
| | - Xiwei Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Bing Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianhua Huang
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiao Qin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Zhanxiang Xiao
- Department of General Surgery, Hainan Province People's Hospital, Haikou, China
| | - Xinwu Lu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Si
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Yi Si
| | - Weiguo Fu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Weiguo Fu
| |
Collapse
|