1
|
Zerwes S, Ciura AM, Eckstein HH, Heiser O, Kalder J, Keschenau P, Lescan M, Rylski B, Kondov S, Teßarek J, Bruijnen HK, Hyhlik-Dürr A. Real world experience with the TREO device in standard EVAR: Mid-term results of 150 cases from a German Multicenter study. VASA 2024. [PMID: 39252587 DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
Background: The objective of the study was to analyze mid-term results of unselected patients treated with the TREO (Terumo Aortic, Florida, USA) device at six German hospital sites. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients treated within and outside instructions for use (IFU) from January 2017 to November 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality and endograft related complications according to IFU status. Secondary outcomes were aneurysm/procedure related re-interventions. Results: 150 patients (92% male, mean age 73 ±8 years) were treated (within IFU 84% vs. outside IFU 16%) with the TREO device for abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=127 intact, n=17 symptomatic and n=6 ruptured; p=0.30). Technical success was achieved in 147/150 (within IFU 99% vs. outside IFU 92%, p=0.08). 30-day mortality was 2%, one year and overall mortality was 3% and 5%. During a mean follow-up of 28.4 months (range: 1-67.4 months), 35 (25%; within IFU 23% vs. outside IFU 35%, p=0.23) patients suffered from endoleaks. The majority were endoleaks type II (n=33), the remaining type Ia (n=5) and type Ib (n=3). No endoleaks type III-V, migrations or aneurysm ruptures occurred. Overall, 19 patients (13%; within IFU 13% vs. 15% outside IFU, p=0.70) received a secondary intervention: nine endoleak related endovascular procedures, three open conversions, two endograft limb related interventions, four surgical revisions of the femoral access sites and two bowl ischemia related procedures, respectively. Conclusions: This non industry-sponsored, multicenter trial indicates that using the TREO device in a real-world setting (both within and outside IFU) seems feasible in the treatment of patients suffering from AAA. While the rate of complications and secondary interventions is in line with previously published data, the findings highlight the fact that standard EVAR is associated with serious adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zerwes
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ana-Maria Ciura
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Henning Eckstein
- Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Clinic, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Oksana Heiser
- Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Clinic, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Kalder
- Department of Adult and Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Gießen, Germany
| | - Paula Keschenau
- Department of Adult and Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Gießen, Germany
| | - Mario Lescan
- Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Clinic Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bartosz Rylski
- Clinic for Heart and Vascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krotzingen, Germany
| | - Stoyan Kondov
- Clinic for Heart and Vascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krotzingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Teßarek
- Department for Vascular Surgery, Bonifatius Hospital Lingen, Germany
| | - Hans-Kees Bruijnen
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Esposito D, Rawashdeh M, Onida S, Turner B, Machin M, Pulli R, Davies AH. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Elective Open Conversion versus Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Repair for Previous Non-Infected Failed Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:393-405. [PMID: 37748552 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate outcomes of patients electively undergoing fenestrated and branched endovascular repair (F/B-EVAR) or open conversion for failed previous non-infected endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). DATA SOURCES Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHOD The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023404091). The review followed the PRISMA guidelines; certainty was assessed through the GRADE and quality through MINORS tools. Outcomes data were pooled separately for F/B-EVAR and open conversion. A random effects meta-analysis of proportions was conducted; heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. RESULTS Thirty eight studies were included, for a total of 1 645 patients of whom 1 001 (60.9%) underwent an open conversion and 644 (39.1%) a F/B-EVAR. The quality of evidence was generally limited. GRADE certainty was judged low for 30 day death (in both groups) and F/B-EVAR technical success, and very low for the other outcomes. Pooled 30 day death was 2.3% (I2 33%) in the open conversion group and 2.4% (I2 0%) in the F/B-EVAR conversion group (p = .36). Technical success for F/B-EVAR was 94.1% (I2 23%). The pooled 30 day major systemic complications rate was higher in the open conversion (21.3%; I2 74%) than in the F/B-EVAR (15.7%; I2 78%) group (p = .52). At 18 months follow up, the pooled re-intervention rate was 4.5% (I2 58%) in the open conversion and 26% (I2 0%) in the F/B-EVAR group (p < .001), and overall survival was 92.5% (I2 59%) and 81.6% (I2 68%), respectively (p = .005). CONCLUSION In the elective setting, and excluding infections, the early results of both open conversion and F/B-EVAR after failed EVAR appear satisfactory. Although open conversion presented with higher complication rates in the first 30 days after surgery, at follow up it seemed to be associated with fewer re-interventions and better survival compared with F/B-EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Esposito
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy; Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Majd Rawashdeh
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Onida
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Benedict Turner
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Machin
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Raffaele Pulli
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alun H Davies
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knappich C, Kirchhoff F, Fritsche MK, Egert-Schwender S, Wendorff H, Kallmayer M, Haller B, Hyhlik-Duerr A, Reeps C, Eckstein HH, Trenner M. Endovascular aortic repair with sac embolization for the prevention of type II endoleaks (the EVAR-SE study): study protocol for a randomized controlled multicentre study in Germany. Trials 2024; 25:17. [PMID: 38167068 PMCID: PMC10759747 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07888-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beyond a certain threshold diameter, abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are to be treated by open surgical or endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). In a quarter of patients who undergo EVAR, inversion of blood flow in the inferior mesenteric artery or lumbar arteries may lead to type II endoleak (T2EL), which is associated with complications (e.g. AAA growth, secondary type I endoleak, rupture). As secondary interventions to treat T2EL often fail and may be highly invasive, prevention of T2EL is desirable. The present study aims to assess the efficacy of sac embolization (SE) with metal coils during EVAR to prevent T2EL in patients at high risk. METHODS Over a 24-month recruitment period, a total of 100 patients undergoing EVAR in four vascular centres (i.e. Klinikum rechts der Isar of the Technical University of Munich, University Hospital Augsburg, University Hospital Dresden, St. Joseph's Hospital Wiesbaden) are to be included in the present study. Patients at high risk for T2EL (i.e. ≥ 5 efferent vessels covered by endograft or aneurysmal thrombus volume <40%) are randomized to one group receiving standard EVAR and another group receiving EVAR with SE. Follow-up assessments postoperatively, after 30 days, and 6 months involve contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans (CEUS) and after 12 months an additional computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan. The presence of T2EL detected by CEUS or CTA after 12 months is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints comprise quality of life (quantified by the SF-36 questionnaire), reintervention rate, occurrence of type I/III endoleak, aortic rupture, death, alteration of aneurysm volume, or diameter. Standardized evaluation of CTA scans happens through a core lab. The study will be terminated after the final follow-up visit of the ultimate patient. DISCUSSION Although preexisting studies repeatedly indicated a beneficial effect of SE on T2EL rates after EVAR, patient relevant outcomes have not been assessed until now. The present study is the first randomized controlled multicentre study to assess the impact of SE on quality of life. Further unique features include employment of easily assessable high-risk criteria, a contemporary follow-up protocol, and approval to use any commercially available coil material. Overcoming limitations of previous studies might help SE to be implemented in daily practice and to enhance patient safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05665101. Registered on 23 December 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Knappich
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany.
| | - Felix Kirchhoff
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany
| | - Marie-Kristin Fritsche
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany
| | - Silvia Egert-Schwender
- Münchner Studienzentrum, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Heiko Wendorff
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany
| | - Michael Kallmayer
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Institute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christian Reeps
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus and University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hans-Henning Eckstein
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany
| | - Matthias Trenner
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany
- Division of Vascular Medicine, St. Josefs Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lopez-Espada C, Linares-Palomino J, Guerra Requena M, Serrano Hernando FJ, Iborra Ortega E, Fernández-Samos R, Zanabili Al-Sibbai A, González Cañas E, Rodriguez Sánchez JM, Zaragozá García JM, García León A, Manzano Grossi S, de Benito L, Gil Sala D, Revuelta Mariño L. Multicenter Comparative Analysis of Late Open Conversion in Patients With Adherence and Nonadherence to Instructions for Use Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. J Endovasc Ther 2023; 30:867-876. [PMID: 35735201 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221102658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The widespread adoption of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) as preferred treatment modality for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has enlarged the number of patients needing open surgical conversion (OSC). The relationship between adherence to Instructions For Use (IFU) and EVAR long-term outcomes remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare preoperative differences and postoperative outcomes between EVAR patients not adjusted to IFU and adjusted to IFU who underwent OSC. METHODS This multicenter retrospective study reviewed 33 explanted EVARs between January 2003 and December 2019 at 14 Vascular Units. Patients were included if OSC occurred >30 days after implantation and excluded if explantation was performed to treat an endograft infection, aortic dissection, or traumatic transections. Variables analyzed included baseline characteristics, adherence to IFU, implant and explant procedural details, secondary reinterventions, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS Fifteen explanted patients (15/33, 45.5%) were identified not accomplished to IFU (out-IFU) at initial EVAR vs 18 explanted patients adjusted (in-IFU). During follow-up, a mean of 1.73±1.2 secondary reinterventions were performed, with more type I endoleaks treated in the subgroup out-IFU: 16.7% vs 6.3% in-IFU patients and more type III endoleaks (8.3% vs 0%). Patients out-IFU had shorter mean interval from implant to explant: 47.60±28.8 months vs 71.17±48. Type II endoleak was the most frequent indication for explantation. Low-flow endoleaks (types II, IV, V) account for 44% of indications for OSC in subgroup of patients in-IFU, compared with 13.3% in patients out-IFU and high-flow endoleaks (types I and III) were the main indication for patients out-IFU (33.3% vs 16.7% in-IFU). Total endograft explantation was performed in 57.5% of cases (19/33) and more suprarenal clamping was required in the subgroup out-IFU. Overall, 30-day mortality rate was 12.1% (4/33): 20% for patients out-IFU and 5.6% in-IFU. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, type II endoleak is the most common indication for conversion and differences have been found between patients treated outside IFU with explantation taking place earlier during follow-up, mainly due to high-flow endoleaks and with higher mortality in comparison with patients adjusted to IFU. Ongoing research is required to delve into these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose Linares-Palomino
- Vascular Surgery Unit, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
- Department of Surgery, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Elena González Cañas
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Corporació Sanitaria Parc Tauli de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
| | | | | | - Andrés García León
- Vascular Surgery Unit, University Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Luis de Benito
- Vascular Surgery Unit, University Hospital Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Gil Sala
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nasif A, Ren G, Ahmed AM, Mahmoud A, Nazzal M, Osman M, Ahmed A. Risk factors for readmission after open abdominal aortic aneurysms repair and its outcome in chronic kidney disease patients. Vascular 2023; 31:841-849. [PMID: 35531927 DOI: 10.1177/17085381221097301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Readmission after vascular procedures is a burden to hospitals and the Medicare system. Therefore, identifying risk factors leading to readmission is vital. We examined the frequency of and risk factors for 30-day readmission after open aneurysm repair (OAR) and explored post-operative outcomes with special attention for those with preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS Patients who underwent OAR were identified in the National Readmission Database (2016-2018). Demographic information and comorbidities were collected. Patients readmitted within 30 days after their index hospitalization were identified and compared to patients without readmission records. RESULTS A total of 5090 patients underwent OAR during the study timeframe with 488 patients (9.6%) were readmitted within 30 days. Females were more readmitted than males (F = 11.1% vs M = 9.0%, P < 0.001). Readmitted patients had more comorbidities (median ECI 12, P < 0.05), were on Medicare (73.7%, P < 0.001), had higher surgery admission cost ($146,844, P < 0.001), longer length of stay (8 days, P < 0.001), and were discharged to a lower level care facility (62.7%, P < 0.001). Comorbidities that predisposed patients for readmission include: peripheral arterial disease (OR 2.15, P < 0.01), asthma (OR 1.87, P < 0.01), chronic heart failure (OR 1.74, P < 0.05). On readmission visit, acute renal failure (23.8%) was the most common diagnosis, while intestinal surgery (13.7%) was the most common procedure. Patients with CKD (n = 968, 18.9% of total population) had double the mortality rate compared to non-CKD patients on surgery admission (10.4%, P < 0.001) and readmission (10.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Certain factors were noted to increase readmission rate, special attention need to be paid when dealing with such group of patients requiring OAR. Vascular surgeons should meticulously weigh benefits and risks when considering OAR in patients with CKD who are not a candidate for endovascular repair, and optimize their kidney function before considering such approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Nasif
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Gang Ren
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Amin Mohamed Ahmed
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ali Mahmoud
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Munier Nazzal
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Mohamed Osman
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Ayman Ahmed
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zerwes S, Kiessling J, Schaefer A, Liebetrau D, Gosslau Y, Bruijnen HK, Hyhlik-Duerr A. Combining Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing with Chimney Grafts - 5 Year Follow-Up after 47 Procedures. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 96:195-206. [PMID: 37075835 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.03.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate longer-term results of a cohort treated with primary chimney endovascular aneurysm sealing (ChEVAS) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms or secondary ChEVAS after failed endovascular aneurysm repair/endovascular aneurysm sealing. METHODS A single-center study was conducted of 47 consecutive patients (mean age 72 ± 8 years, range 50-91; 38 men) treated with ChEVAS from February 2014 to November 2016 and followed through December 2021. The main outcome measures were all-cause mortality (ACM), aneurysm-related mortality, occurrence of secondary complications and conversion to open surgery. Data are presented as the median (interquartile range [IQR]) and absolute range. RESULTS 35 patients received a primary ChEVAS (=group I) and 12 patients a secondary ChEVAS (=group II). Technical success was 97% (group I) and 92% (group II); 30-day mortality was 3% and 8%, respectively. The median proximal sealing zone length was 20.5 mm (IQR 16, 24; range 10-48) in group I and 26 mm (IQR 17.5, 30; range 8-45) in group II, respectively. During a median time of follow-up of 62 months (range 0-88), ACM amounted to 60% (group I) and 58% (group II); aneurysm mortality was 29% and 8%, respectively. An endoleak was seen in 57% (group I: 15 type Ia endoleaks, four isolated type Ib, and 1 endoleak type V) and 25% (group II: 1 endoleak type Ia, one type II, and 2 type V), aneurysm growth in 40% and 17%, migration in 40% and 17%, resulting in 20% and 25% conversions in group I and II, respectively. Overall a secondary intervention was performed in 51% (group I) and 25% (group II), respectively. The occurrence of complications did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Neither the number of chimney grafts, nor the thrombus ratio significantly affected the occurrence of abovementioned complications. CONCLUSIONS While initially delivering a high technical success rate, ChEVAS fails to provide acceptable longer-term results both in primary and secondary ChEVAS, resulting in high rates of complications, secondary interventions and open conversions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zerwes
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Augsburg.
| | - Johanna Kiessling
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Sankt Gertrauden Krankenhaus, Berlin
| | - Alexander Schaefer
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Augsburg
| | - Dominik Liebetrau
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Augsburg
| | - Yvonne Gosslau
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Augsburg
| | - Hans-Kees Bruijnen
- formerly Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, retired vascular surgeon, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Augsburg
| | - Alexander Hyhlik-Duerr
- Clinic for vascular and endovascular surgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität of Augsburg, Augsburg
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boyle JR, Tsilimparis N, Van Herzeele I, Wanhainen A. Editor's Choice - Focused Update on Patients Treated with the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System from the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Practice Guidelines. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:320-322. [PMID: 36623763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE After alerts on EndoVascular Aneurysm Seal (EVAS) failure were raised, the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Clinical Practice Guidelines Writing Committee (WC) initiated a task force with the aim to provide guidance on surveillance and management of patients with implanted EVAS devices. METHODS Based on a scoping review of risk for late serious aortic-related adverse events in patients treated with EVAS for AAA, the ESVS AAA Guidelines WC agreed on recommendations graded according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) grading system. RESULTS EVAS has a very high incidence of late endograft migration resulting in proximal type 1 endoleak with risk of rupture, requiring open conversion with device explantation. The reported mortality rate for elective explantation varies between 0% and 14%, while acute conversion for rupture has a very dismal prognosis with a 67 - 75% mortality rate. CONCLUSION It is recommended that all patients in whom a Nellix device has been implanted should be identified, properly informed, and enrolled in enhanced surveillance. If device failure is detected, early elective device explantation should be considered in surgically fit patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan R Boyle
- Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust & Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabelle Van Herzeele
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden and Department of Surgical and Peri-operative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zoethout AC, Ketting S, Zeebregts CJ, Apostolou D, Mees BME, Berg P, Beyrouti HE, De Vries JPPM, Torella F, Migliari M, Silingardi R, Reijnen MMPJ. An International, Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study to Assess Technical Success and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated with an Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Device for Type III Endoleak. J Endovasc Ther 2021; 29:57-65. [PMID: 34342235 PMCID: PMC8750149 DOI: 10.1177/15266028211031933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Type III endoleaks post-endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) warrant treatment because they increase pressure within the aneurysm sac leading to increased rupture risk. The treatment may be difficult with regular endovascular devices. Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) might provide a treatment option for type III endoleaks, especially if located near the flow divider. This study aims to analyze clinical outcomes of EVAS for type III endoleaks after EVAR. METHODS This is an international, retrospective, observational cohort study including data from 8 European institutions. RESULTS A total of 20 patients were identified of which 80% had a type IIIb endoleak and the remainder (20%) a type IIIa endoleak. The median time between EVAR and EVAS was 49.5 months (28.5-89). Mean AAA diameter prior to EVAS revision was 76.6±19.9 mm. Technical success was achieved in 95%, 1 patient had technical failure due to a postoperative myocardial infarction resulting in death. Mean follow-up was 22.8±15.2 months. During follow-up 1 patient had a type Ia endoleak, and 1 patient had a new type IIIa endoleak at an untreated location. There were 5 patients with aneurysm growth. Five patients underwent AAA-related reinterventions indications being: growth with type II endoleak (n=3), type Ia endoleak (n=1), and iliac aneurysm (n=1). At 1-year follow-up, the freedom from clinical failure was 77.5%, freedom from all-cause mortality 94.7%, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality 95%, and freedom from aneurysm-related reinterventions 93.8%. CONCLUSION The EVAS relining can be safely performed to treat type III endoleaks with an acceptable technical success rate, a low 30-day mortality rate and no secondary ruptures at short-term follow-up. The relatively low clinical success rates, related to reinterventions and AAA enlargement, highlight the need for prolonged follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra C Zoethout
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Shirley Ketting
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center and CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Clark J Zeebregts
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitri Apostolou
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle General Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Barend M E Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center and CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Berg
- Department of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Katholisches Karl-Leisner-Klinikum, Marienhospital Kevelaer, Kevelaer, Germany
| | - Hazem El Beyrouti
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jean-Paul P M De Vries
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Vascular Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Torella
- Liverpool Vascular and Endovascular Service, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mattia Migliari
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Silingardi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Michel M P J Reijnen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands.,Multimodality-Medical Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lin JX, Taylor S, Hidajat C, Hill A. Difficult diagnosis and management of a complicated Nellix graft infection. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY CASES INNOVATIONS AND TECHNIQUES 2021; 7:417-420. [PMID: 34278074 PMCID: PMC8261550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
An 81-year-old man, with a complex vascular surgical history, presents with sepsis from an infected Nellix stent-graft. He required an urgent laparotomy, explantation of the graft, and extra-anatomical repair. Although now widely used for this indication, the preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was nondiagnostic for his stent-graft infection. We describe our management of a complicated Nellix graft infection and discuss the utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography for stent-graft infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Xin Lin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sam Taylor
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Cassandra Hidajat
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrew Hill
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|