Treatment of Long Femoropopliteal Lesions With Self-Expanding Interwoven Nitinol Stent: 24 Month Outcomes of the STELLA-SUPERA Trial

Navigating complexity: The Supera's triumph in femoropopliteal lesions

INTRODUCTION

The femoropopliteal sector endovascular treatment is particularly challenging due to its high tortuosity and torsional forces. Better results are still needed to ensure the long-term patency of stenting in this area. The Supera stent appears to change this paradigm.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of femoropopliteal stenting with Supera in a real-world population. Seventy-nine patients were treated between January 2015 and December 2020, and the results are reported with a median follow-up of 28 months.

RESULTS

Indications for revascularization were chronic limb-threatening ischemia with tissue loss (73.6%) or ischemic rest pain (17.7%) and claudication (7.6%). Thirty-six patients (45.6%) were classified as GLASS stage III according to the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System, with 65.8% and 30.4% in grades 3 and 4 of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal sectors, respectively. The 36-month primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 68.6%, 72.0%, and 79.0%, respectively, with an amputation-free survival rate of 86.6%. There was no significant difference between primary patency rates in GLASS stages I-II compared with GLASS stage III (36-month primary patency rates of 72% vs 63% respectively, p = 0.342) nor in amputation-free survival (88% vs 84%, p = 0.877). After adjusting for potential confounders, only the stent conformation significantly affected the primary patency rates, with a higher hazard of reintervention for the elongated (HR = 3.179; p = 0.36; CI 1.081-9.347) and the compressed (HR = 3.014; p = 0.42; CI 1.039-8.746) forms.

CONCLUSIONS

The 36-month patency of the Supera stents in our real-world cohort was similar to other reported series. The GLASS stage did not interfere with the stent patency, proving it is a good choice even in the most adverse anatomy patients. Only the non-nominal stent conformation affected the primary patency rates in our patients.

Biomimetic Stents for Infrainguinal Peripheral Arterial Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Biomimetic stents are peripheral infrainguinal self expanding stents that mimic the anatomy of the vasculature and artery movement. They are indicated for use in infrainguinal arteries. This research aimed to synthesise all current evidence on the use of biomimetic stents as adjuncts for endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD), helping to guide clinical decision making.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Random effects meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42022385256). Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools checklist, and certainty assessment through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Endpoints included primary patency, target lesion revascularisation, stent fracture, secondary patency, and Death at one year.

RESULTS

In total, 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis (33 cohort studies, two case series, and two randomised controlled trials [RCTs]), representing 4 480 participants. Of these, 34 studies included data on the Supera (81.5% of participants) and three studies reported data on the BioMimics 3D (18.5% of participants) stents. The pooled primary patency rate of 33 studies at one year follow up was 81.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.7 - 83.9%), and the pooled target lesion revascularisation rate of 18 studies at one year was 12.2% (95% CI 9.6 - 15.0%). The certainty of evidence outcome rating as qualified by GRADE was very low for both. Only one study reported a positive stent fracture rate at one year follow up of 0.4% with a certainty of evidence outcome of low.

CONCLUSION

Using biomimetic stents for infrainguinal PAD may be associated with acceptable one year primary patency and target lesion revascularisation rates, with a near negligible one year stent fracture rate. Their use should be considered in those presenting with infrainguinal PAD undergoing endovascular revascularisation. A RCT is necessary to determine their clinical and cost effectiveness.

Endovascular treatment with interwoven nitinol stent for common femoral artery lesions: 2-year outcomes of a single center experience

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed was to report 2-year outcomes of endovascular treatment with interwoven nitinol (Supera™) stent for common femoral artery (CFA) lesions.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data of 20 patients who presented with CFA stenosis or occlusion and underwent balloon angioplasty followed by Supera™ stenting in CFA between February 2016 and January 2022. The outcomes were evaluated in these patients in terms of technical success, post-intervention complications, reintervention, and cumulative patency (1 year, and 2 years).

RESULTS

The study included 20 patients (22 lesions) who presented with isolated CFA lesions (3), iliac lesions involving CFA (6), superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions involving CFA (8), and extensive lesions from the iliac artery to SFA (5). There were 16 men (80%) with a mean age of 69.7 years (range, 34-83). Hypertension, smoking, and diabetes were found in 15 (75%), 7 (35%), and 7 patients (35%), respectively. Clinical presentations were Rutherford stage 5 (9, 45%), Rutherford stage 4 (5, 25%), Rutherford stage 6 (4, 20%), and Rutherford stage 3 (2, 10%). Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). The procedures for treatment were isolated CFA Supera™ stenting (1, 4.5%), CFA plus DFA Supera™ stenting (jailed SFA) (2, 9.1%), CFA plus SFA Supera™ stenting (jailed DFA) (8, 36.4%), CFA Supera™ stenting plus bare iliac stenting (Astron) (6, 27.3%), CFA plus SFA Supera™ stenting (jailed DFA) plus bare iliac stenting (Astron) (5, 22.7%), and additional DFA angioplasty (7, 31.8%). The rate of in-hospital mortality and morbidity were 0% and 10%, respectively. Distal embolization after pre-dilatation occurred in 1 patient, and cerebral infarction occurred 12 h after the procedure in 1 patient. The mean follow-up time was 23 months (range, 2-64). During the follow-up period, in-stent occlusion occurred in 2 patients at 9 and 46 months. Re-intervention was performed in 1 patient due to recurrent symptom of claudication. The cumulative primary patency at 1 year and 2 years were 93.3% and 93.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment with interwoven nitinol (Supera™) stent for CFA lesions was associated with acceptable outcomes at 2 years.

Self-expanding interwoven nitinol stent in severe femoropopliteal arterial disease. Real life results of the Supera Peripheral Stent System®

PURPOSE

The excellent performance of the Supera Peripheral Stent System® by Abbott Vascular in femoropopliteal interventions has already been proven through several trials. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the durability and long-term patency of the Supera stent for the treatment of severe femoropopliteal lesions in a real-world population.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 136 consecutive limbs from 128 patients with atherosclerotic disease in the femoropopliteal region, treated with Supera stents between September 2010 and September 2017. As primary endpoints patency rates and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) were calculated and presented using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-five percent were treated for claudication (IC), 45% for chronical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). The mean treated lesion length was 143 mm (±77.8). The majority of lesions (63%) were Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Criteria II (TASC II) C/D lesions. The overall primary patency rates at 12 and 24 months of follow-up were 72.6% and 60.8% respectively. The primary patency at 12 and 24 months for TASC II A/B lesions was respectively 86% and 75.4%. For TASC II C/D lesions primary patency at 12 and 24 months was 64% and 51.1% respectively (p = 0.001). Overall freedom from TLR after 12 and 24 months was 73.8% and 62.8% respectively. No significant patency differences were observed based on calcification rate.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease with Supera Stent is safe, even in extensive, highly calcified lesions. Patency rates and freedom from TLR are acceptable in a real-life population.

Three-Year Real-World Outcomes of Interwoven Nitinol Supera Stent Implantation in Long and Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions

BACKGROUND

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains a major issue in modern societies and affects more than 200 million people around the world. Endovascular methods have been evaluated to be safe and effective in limb salvage. The Supera is able to withstand increased compression, biomechanical stress and to have higher radial force. The objective of this study is to evaluate performance, durability and 3-year patency of Supera stent implantation in severe femoropopliteal disease.

METHODS

A retrospective real-world analysis was performed with consideration of 77 patients that had a Supera stent implanted with femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease at a single center. Among the 77 individuals, 92 Supera stents were implanted. Analysis of patients' demographics, lesions characteristics, reintervention rates and patency rates was performed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 33 months and ranged from 0 to 84 months. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia was observed among 43 patients. Mean lesion length was 152.8 ± 94.6 mm. Chronic total occlusions were observed in a majority of lesions. Overall, primary patency rates at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months were 85.0%, 73.6%, 59.2% and 53.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Supera stent is effective in the management of long and complex lesions. The results of patency rates were evaluated to be worse among lesions extending to the popliteal artery.

Treatment of Long Femoropopliteal Occlusive Lesions With Self-expanding Interwoven Nitinol Stent: 24 Month Outcomes of the STELLA-SUPERA-SIBERIA Register Trial

PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of the Supera stent in superficial femoral artery (SFA) have been reported mostly in shorter lesions with relatively low proportion of occlusions. There are little data on the effectiveness of the Supera stent in long lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical safety and efficiency of the Supera stent in the treatment of long femoropopliteal occlusive lesions (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus [TASC] C/D) in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The STELLA-SUPERA-SIBERIA is a prospective, single-center, single-arm study. Patients with symptomatic (Rutherford stages 3-6) de novo and TASC C/D occlusive lesions of the femoropopliteal segment were treated with Supera stent. The primary endpoint was the 12 month rate of primary sustained clinical improvement (upward shift on the Rutherford classification to a one level without the need for repeated target lesion revascularization (TLR) in surviving patients without the need for unplanned amputation). Secondary endpoints were the 24 month of primary sustained clinical improvement, MALE, limb salvage, the primary patency, the secondary patency, 24 month MACE. Follow-up included clinical examination, duplex scan, and biplane x-ray up to 24 months.

RESULTS

Between April 2019 and January 2020, 52 symptomatic patients with 55 long femoropopliteal occlusive lesions (52.7% TASC D lesions and 47.3% TASC C lesions) were treated. The mean target lesion length was 205±72 mm. All patients had total occlusions. The mean lesion length of the implanted Supera stents was 198±82 mm. At 12 and 24 months, the primary sustained clinical improvement rate was 80.2% and 63.6%, respectively. The Rutherford category assessment was significantly improved at 24 months compared with baseline (p=0.02). The primary patency rate at 12 and 24 months was 78.1% and 60.0%, respectively. At 12 and 24 months, freedom from TLR was 83.5% and 81.8%, respectively. There were no stent fractures at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Supera Stent implantation for TASC C/D femoropopliteal lesions revascularization appears to be a safe and efficient implant given the complexity of the treated lesions. Head-to-head studies are mandatory to establish Supera Stent as an alternative tool to open surgery for long femoropopliteal lesions.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Our study indicated, that using self-expanding interwoven nitinol stent for TASC C/D femoropopliteal lesions revascularization appears to be a safe and efficient implant given the complexity of the treated lesions. Although bypass grafting is recommended for prolonged femoropopliteal lesions, open surgery is more traumatic and is associated with greater risks than endovascular procedures. Our findings suggest that the use of interwoven nitinol stents can overcome the disadvantages of traditional stents in such cases, which may help to improve patients' outcomes and reduce the risk of adverse events.

What should we expect from intravascular ultrasound use for complex femoropopliteal lesions?

In this review article, we summarize the clinical benefit of intravascular ultrasounds (IVUS) in the endovascular therapy (EVT) of complex femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. Due to the development of novel FP-dedicated devices, outcomes of FP-EVT have been improved. As a result, revascularization methods for the FP lesions have shifted to EVT. However, the long-term durability in complex FP lesions has not yet reached that of bypass surgery using autogenous vein. Strategies for EVT of complex FP lesions are still inconsistent and have room for improvement. Long-term results generally depend on the patient and lesion backgrounds but are also affected by the quality of the procedure. Previous reports have shown IVUS evaluation can better assess vessel size compared to conventional angiographic evaluation. In contrast to angio-guided EVT, which evaluates vessel size by inner diameter, IVUS can be evaluated it with an external elastic membrane, which leads to the selection of a more appropriate (basically, larger) size device. Conversely, angiographic evaluation underestimates the vessel size, suggesting that it may lead to insufficient result. Furthermore, IVUS can also assess the adequate guidewire route, presence of severe dissection etc. As the evidence so far shows, the use of IVUS may improve the quality of EVT procedure, resulting in improved long-term outcomes. In conclusion, despite the widespread use of IVUS in FP-EVT practice, it still conditionally applied. The purpose of IVUS in the EVT of complex FP lesions should be clarified. More evidence regarding the IVUS in complex FP lesions is needed.

Bare metal stent in the area of drug eluting devices for long femoropopliteal lesions

The advancement in the endovascular treatment and the introduction of novel techniques allowed treatment of more complex and longer femoropopliteal lesions. However, the optimal treatment modality is still a source of controversy. The use of bare metal stents (BMS) showed good results for long femoropopliteal lesions. In this review, we summarized all available data on the different treatment strategies of long femoro-popliteal lesions using BMS. Nevertheless, RCTs with head-to-head comparison between BMS strategies are still needed to have more clarification on the best strategy for the endovascular treatment of long femoropopliteal occlusive lesions.

Is open surgery still the first line of treatment for long femoropopliteal lesions?

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions remains a challenge for vascular physicians as patients often present with multilevel complex pathologies and consequently face a high amputation risk and associated mortality. This review aimed to assess the current state of optimal revascularizations for the treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An online literature research of medical databases for original articles and review articles on open and endovascular revascularization of femoropopliteal lesions was conducted using mesh terms.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

There has been an accumulation of evidence over the last years that endovascular treatment is a feasible and enduring alternative to open surgery for treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions if the lesions are restricted to the superficial femoral artery. But when disease extends to the infragenual level venous bypass remains superior with regards to long-term patency, clinical improvement and limb-salvage.

CONCLUSIONS

While the role of venous bypass as a first-line treatment might be declining, especially in frail patients or claudicants, the superior clinical improvement and amputation-free survival highlighted in several trials, demonstrate the relevance of bypass surgery. More randomized clinical trials are needed to verify the non-inferiority of endovascular treatment options to open surgery, especially when arterial disease extends below the knee.

Long-Term Results of Endovascular Treatment with Nitinol Stents for Femoropopliteal TASC II C and D Lesions

Background and Objectives: The feasibility of endovascular treatment (EVT) for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II C and D femoropopliteal artery lesions has been described, but no prospective study has performed a long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to report the long-term results of nitinol stents (NS) for the treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions. Materials and Methods: A single-center prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing EVT with NS and vein bypass surgery was previously performed. The EVT group’s follow-up was extended and separately analyzed with primary patency as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were technical success, secondary patency, reinterventions, limb salvage, survival, complications, and clinical improvement. Results: Between 2016 and 2020, 109 limbs in 103 patients were included. A total of 48 TASC II C and 61 TASC II D lesions with a mean lesion length of 264 mm were reported. In 53% of limbs, the indication for treatment was chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The median follow-up was 45 months. Technical success was achieved in 88% of cases, despite 23% of the lesions being longer than 30 cm (retrograde popliteal access in 22%). At four-year follow-up, primary patency, secondary patency, and freedom from target lesion revascularizations were 35%, 48%, and 58%, respectively. Limb salvage and survival were 90% and 80% at 4 years. Clinical improvement of at least one Rutherford category at the end of follow-up was achieved in 83% of limbs. Conclusions: This study reports the longest follow-up of endovascular treatment with nitinol stents in femoropopliteal TASC II C and D lesions. The results emphasize the feasibility of an endovascular-first strategy, even in lesions beyond 30 cm in length, and clarify its acceptable long-term durability and good clinical outcomes. Large multicenter RCTs with mid- and long-term follow-up are needed to investigate the role of different endovascular techniques in long femoropopliteal lesions.