Aortic Aneurysm Morphology for Planning Endovascular Aortic Grafts: Limitations of Conventional Imaging Methods

The Effect of Angulation on Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Observed in Vascular Phantoms

Purpose:

To quantify the error introduced by noncoaxial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging and to evaluate the use of a balloon-tipped catheter in compensating for intraluminal angulation and subsequent dimensional inaccuracy.

Methods:

The effect of noncoaxial IVUS imaging was investigated in both a polyvinyl chloride phantom and an in vitro canine aorta using a calibrated setup to measure angulation off axis. Imaging was performed at increasing angulation (creating an elliptical image) in both phantoms, with the transducer centered and off center. Diameters were compared to the original coaxial diameter, as well as calculated diameters based on specific angles off axis. The percentage change (error) was also calculated at these angles. The measurements were repeated using a balloon-tipped catheter to center the transducer.

Results:

The measured diameters and percentage changes compared closely with their calculated counterpart. Up to 25° off axis, the apparent increase in diameter measurement was nearly 10%. Angulation from 30° to 70° resulted in an increase of 15% to 192%. Use of the centering balloon reduced the amount of error by 70% to 85% but was limited to angles ≤ 25° due to the design of the test apparatus.

Conclusions:

The error introduced by noncoaxial IVUS imaging can be significant and may be partially corrected by the use of a centering balloon. Further studies in the clinical application of a centering device are warranted.

Imaging Modalities for Aortic Endografting

One of the most fundamental and influential differences between conventional surgery and endovascular grafting for aortic aneurysm is the central role of imaging in every aspect of management. This review summarizes five imaging techniques for aortic endografting: intravascular ultrasound, contrast angiography, conventional computed tomography (CT), spiral CT with image processing, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

External ultrasound and intravascular ultrasound have important relevance to endovascular aortic surgery. Artifacts of arteriography include magnification, thrombus effect, foreshortening of tortuosity, loss of luminal detail, parallax error, and projection errors. Conventional CT scans have artifacts and difficulties also. Diameter measurement by CT suffers from methodology errors and observer variability. If conventional CT and angiography are used for endovascular aortic graft planning, both should be obtained since neither alone provides sufficient data.

The use of spiral CT scanning and computerized image processing has clearly aided the preoperative definition of aneurysm morphology both in terms of dimensional accuracy and by adding diagnostic information. MRA is capable of producing three-dimensional images, axial sections, and longitudinal projections in any plane. It can detect blood flow without contrast medium, but gadolinium enhances MRA by avoiding the “signal dropout” artifact.

Technology exists to provide new forms of imaging for endovascular surgery that combines three-dimensional models with on-line image data in a process called “data fusion.” This may offer improved ease and accuracy for conducting endovascular procedures in the future.

Adverse Events at the Aneurysmal Neck Identified at Follow-Up after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneursym Repair: How Do They Correlate?

The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of and the correlation between dilatation of the infrarenal neck and proximal device migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The analysis made use of the EUROSTAR registry.

Between 1994 and 2004, 4,233 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm larger than 4 cm underwent EVAR. Only patients with available follow-up data regarding neck size and device position were included in this assessment. Chi-square and t-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for comparison of discrete and continuous variables, respectively. Time-dependent variables were evaluated by log-rank tests. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed to determine anatomic and operative variables with an independent correlation with neck growth and device migration, respectively. In addition, the association with proximal endoleak was assessed.

Neck dilatation and proximal migration were found in 1,342 (32%) and 192 (4.5%) of the 4,233 patients, respectively. One hundred twelve patients (2.5%) had neck dilatation and migration of the proximal device extremity. The correlation between proximal migration and neck dilatation was statistically significant ( p < .0001). Other independent variables for migration were a wider neck and aneurysmal diameter, shorter necks, proximal endoleak, and absence of suprarenal fixation. Neck dilatation was predicted by narrow necks, use of devices with suprarenal fixation, and larger device diameters. Proximal endoleak occurred in 136 (3.2%) patients and was significantly associated with shorter, angulated necks and proximal migration.

The present study documented that migration may be caused by neck dilatation. However, neck dilatation was not significantly promoted by proximal migration. Other factors, such as dimensions of the neck, the device fixation system, and perhaps progressive wall degeneration, are also likely to play a role in the pathogenesis of neck dilatation. To obtain good results from EVAR, accepted criteria of neck dimensions should be adhered to.

Influence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Size on the Feasibility of Endovascular Repair

Purpose:

To assess the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size on overall aneurysm morphology with special attention to possible relationships among various anatomic variables that determine the feasibility of endovascular repair.

Methods:

One hundred sixty-eight patients were assessed with spiral computed tomographic angiography to measure the length and diameter of the AAA, the proximal neck, and the common iliac arteries. Anatomic variables were correlated with aneurysm size using Spearman's rank order correlation coefficients (rs); comparisons among small, intermediate, and large aneurysms were made using the Chi-square test.

Results:

Correlations between aneurysm size and the anatomic variables above were weak. The strongest association was between aneurysm size and aortic length (rs = 0.41, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in proximal neck length, neck diameter, or overall suitability for endovascular repair between aneurysms greater or smaller than 5.5-cm diameter. However, significantly more short (< 1.5 cm), wide (> 3 cm), and, hence, unsuitable proximal necks were found in patients with aneurysms > 7 cm in diameter (χ2 = 7.8, p < 0.01).

Conclusions:

Shortening and widening of the proximal neck seems to increase with aneurysm size but only after the aneurysm expands beyond 7 cm in diameter. Aneurysms with diameters in the 4.5- to 5.5-cm range are no more suitable for endovascular repair than those between 5.5 and 7 cm. The lack of any significant correlation between anatomic variables emphasizes the need for accurate preoperative assessment of the anatomy of each individual patient before endovascular repair.

Spiral CT Angiography versus Aortography in the Assessment of Aortoiliac Length in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Purpose:

To compare measurements of aortoiliac length obtained with spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and aortography in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair.

Methods:

The distances from the lower-most renal artery to the aortic bifurcation and from the aortic bifurcation to the common iliac artery (CIA) bifurcation were measured using both CTA and aortography in 108 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Results:

The level of agreement between CTA and aortography was high, with 69% of aortic and 76% of iliac measurements within 1 cm and > 90% within 2 cm of each other. Mean differences were −0.35 ± 1.20 cm and 0.25 ± 1.10 cm, respectively, for aortic and iliac lengths. Aortography overestimated renal artery to aortic bifurcation length in comparison to CTA (p = 0.003), particularly in patients with large aneurysms (> 6.5 cm) and lumen diameters > 4.5 cm (p < 0.0001). Measurements of CIA length were shorter by aortography than CTA (p = 0.02).

Conclusions:

There is a high level of agreement between CTA and aortography in the measurement of aortoiliac length, but aortography overestimates renal artery to aortic bifurcation length in patients with large-diameter aneurysms and wide aneurysm lumens. CTA is sufficiently accurate in the majority of cases to be used as the sole basis for the construction of endovascular grafts.

CT artifacts of the proximal aortic neck: an important problem in endograft planning

PURPOSE

To describe the imaging error introduced by noncircular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) necks in axial and reformatted computed tomographic (CT) images and discuss the potential implications for aortic endografting.

METHODS

The records of 120 endograft patients with preoperative CT axial scans and subsequent 3-dimensional (3D) computerized reconstructions were reviewed. Maximum and minimum infrarenal aortic neck diameters were measured from axial CT scans and 3D reformatted slices at the same point on the vessel. Diameter measurements were made at the largest point within the 10-mm segment of vessel below the lowest renal artery. Excluded were aneurysms with proximal neck minimum diameters >30 mm, neck lengths < 15 mm, or angulation > 75 degrees measured on the axial CT slice.

RESULTS

Measuring from reformatted CT slices, 86 (71.6%) cases had < or = 2-mm differences between maximal and minimal neck diameters, comprising the "round neck" group A. In 34 (28.4%) cases, the neck was not round: 26 (21.7%) had diameter differences between 2 and 4 mm (group B) and 8 (6.7%) had a > 4-mm difference (group C; range 4.1-8.1 mm). Although AAA diameter, neck length, and neck angle progressively increased as the difference between neck maximum and minimum diameters grew, i.e., greater eccentricity, these trends did not reach statistical significance. Mean infrarenal neck maximum diameter was significantly larger in group C (30.2 +/- 3.4 mm) compared to groups A (23.0 +/- 2.9 mm, p = 0.0002) and B (23.8 +/- 3.6 mm, p = 0.0003). Hence, 28.4% of AAAs had a noncircular aortic neck of varying degree, and 6.7% had an eccentricity factor that may have clinical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the importance of selecting an endoprosthesis sized 15% to 20% larger than the infrarenal aortic neck diameter. Three-dimensional reconstruction using reformatted CT slices perpendicular to the flow lumen is an important tool that offers enhanced accuracy of infrarenal aortic neck evaluation.

A simple technique to improve the accuracy of proximal AAA endograft deployment

PURPOSE

To report a technique for overcoming the positioning errors caused by angulation and rotation of the proximal aortic neck when anteroposterior fluoroscopic imaging is used during endograft deployment.

TECHNIQUE

Aortic neck angulation and rotation were measured preoperatively using spiral computed tomographic angiography in sagittal and axial projections. Before proximal graft deployment, the proximal end of the endograft was centered in the field of view, and the position of the C-arm was adjusted to the aortic neck angulation. Using this technique, optimal positioning of the endograft relative to the true position of the renal arteries can be achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

C-arm angulation and rotation is helpful in facilitating perfect positioning for an optimal seal between the endograft and the infrarenal aortic neck.

Can preoperative spiral CT scans alone determine the feasibility of endovascular AAA repair? A comparison to angiographic measurements

PURPOSE

To determine whether computed tomography (CT) alone can be used for excluding patients from endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

Among 71 patients evaluated for endovascular AAA repair using spiral CT imaging and angiography, 31 were selected who had both studies performed within 6 months of each other using a graduated measuring catheter or guidewire. Measurements of aneurysm neck diameter, neck length, and infrarenal aortic length were made from the CT and angiographic images using handheld calipers with calibration markers as guides. Infrarenal aortic length and neck length were determined from CT images by multiplying the width of the cuts by the number of slices between the lowest renal artery and the aortic bifurcation or the top of the aneurysm, respectively.

RESULTS

CT neck diameter measurements differed significantly from the angiographic dimensions (6.3 +/- 5.1-mm mean difference, p < 0.001). In the majority of patients (25, 81%), CT neck diameters were larger (mean 7.3 +/- 3.8 mm). The mean difference in neck length measurements was 0.5 +/- 15.9 mm (p = NS). Twenty-two (71%) patients had aortic length measurements that were longer on the angiogram (mean 15.4 +/- 17.2 mm, p = NS). Five patients who would have been excluded as candidates based on overestimated CT neck diameter measurements subsequently underwent successful endovascular aneurysm repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable discrepancies exist between preoperative neck diameter and infrarenal aortic length measurements obtained from CT scans and angiograms used to evaluate candidates for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. CT alone may not be adequate for predicting the feasibility of endovascular AAA repair.

Endograft planning without preoperative arteriography: a clinical feasibility study

PURPOSE

To investigate an alternative method of preprocedural planning for aortic endografting based solely on spiral computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction without preoperative arteriography.

METHODS

From August 1997 to April 1998, 25 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were evaluated for endovascular repair by spiral CT scans (2-mm slice thickness) and computerized 3D model construction. No additional imaging for planning was performed. The aortoiliac dimensions, thrombus load, calcification, and vessel tortuosity were measured and evaluated from the 3D model of the aortoiliac segment. These data were used for selecting the patients; the configuration, diameter, and length of the endograft; and the attachment sites for deployment.

RESULTS

Primary procedural success was 92% (23/25). All endografts were deployed as planned, and there were no conversions to open repair. Six patients required adjunctive procedures for delivery system access or for iliac aneurysm exclusion, as predicted by the 3D model. Mean procedural time was 91 minutes (range 24 to 273). Two (8%) type II (side branch) endoleaks both sealed spontaneously within 1 month. No graft-related complications or death occurred, for a 30-day technical success rate of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

This computerized 3D model provided accurate data for preoperative evaluation of the aortoiliac segment for endovascular AAA repair. Satisfactory technical outcomes for aortic endografts can be achieved without the use of preprocedural invasive imaging.