An Analysis of the Long-Term Complications of Intestine Transplant Recipients

Cost-effectiveness of Intestinal Transplantation Compared to Parenteral Nutrition in Adults

BACKGROUND

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the most expensive abdominal organ transplant. Detailed studies about exact costs and cost-effectiveness compared to home parenteral nutrition (HPN) therapy in chronic intestinal failure are lacking. The aim is to provide an in-depth analysis of ITx costs and evaluate cost-effectiveness compared to HPN.

METHODS

To calculate costs before and after ITx, costs were analyzed in 12 adult patients. To calculate the costs of patients with uncomplicated chronic intestinal failure, 28 adults, stable HPN patients were studied. Total costs including surgery, admissions, diagnostics, HPN therapy, medication, and ambulatory care were included. Median (range) costs are given.

RESULTS

Costs before ITx were €69 160 (€60 682-90 891) in year 2, and €104 146 (€83 854-186 412) in year 1. After ITx, costs were €172 133 (€122 483-351 407) in the 1st year, €40 619 (€3905-113 154) in the 2nd year, and dropped to €15 743 (€4408-138 906) in the 3rd year. In stable HPN patients, the costs were €83 402 (€35 364-169 146) in the 1st year, €70 945 (€31 955-117 913) in the 2nd year, and stabilized to €60 242 (€29 161-238 136) in the 3rd year.

CONCLUSIONS

ITx, although initially very expensive, is cost-effective compared to HPN in adults by year 4, and cost-saving by year 5.

Gut microbiota and its implications in small bowel transplantation

The gut microbiota is mainly composed of a diverse population of commensal bacterial species and plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis, immune modulation and metabolism. The influence of the gut microbiota on solid organ transplantation has recently been recognized. In fact, several studies indicated that acute and chronic allograft rejection in small bowel transplantation (SBT) is closely associated with the alterations in microbial patterns in the gut. In this review, we focused on the recent findings regarding alterations in the microbiota following SBTand the potential roles of these alterations in the development of acute and chronic allograft rejection. We also reviewed important advances with respect to the interplays between the microbiota and host immune systems in SBT. Furthermore, we explored the potential of the gut microbiota as a microbial marker and/or therapeutic target for the predication and intervention of allograft rejection and chronic dysfunction. Given that current research on the gut microbiota has become increasingly sophisticated and comprehensive, large cohort studies employing metagenomic analysis and multivariate linkage should be designed for the characterization of host-microbe interaction and causality between microbiota alterations and clinical outcomes in SBT. The findings are expected to provide valuable insights into the role of gut microbiota in the development of allograft rejection and other transplant-related complications and introduce novel therapeutic targets and treatment approaches in clinical practice.

Cost-effectiveness of intestinal transplantation for adult patients with intestinal failure: a simulation study

BACKGROUND

Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) and intestinal transplantation (ITx) are the 2 treatment options for irreversible intestinal failure (IF).

OBJECTIVE

This study simulated the disease course of irreversible IF and both of these treatments--HPN and ITx--to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ITx.

DESIGN

We simulated IF treatment in adults as a discrete event model with variables derived from the Dutch Registry of Intestinal Failure and Intestinal Transplantation, the Intestinal Transplant Registry, hospital records, the literature, and expert opinions. Simulated patients were enrolled at a rate of 40/mo for 10 y. The maximum follow-up was 40 y. Survival was simulated as a probabilistic function. ITx was offered to 10% of patients with <12 mo of remaining life expectancy with HPN if they did not undergo ITx. Costs were calculated according to Dutch guidelines, with discounting. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ITx by comparing models conducted with and without ITx and by calculating the cost difference per life-year gained [incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)].

RESULTS

The average survival was 14.6 y without ITx and 14.9 y with ITx. HPN costs were €13,276 for treatment introduction, followed by €77,652 annually. The costs of ITx were ∼€73,000 during the first year and then €13,000 annually. The ICER was €19,529 per life-year gained.

CONCLUSION

Our simulations show that ITx slightly improves survival of patients with IF in comparison with HPN at an additional cost of €19,529 per life-year gained.

Update on intestinal rehabilitation after intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The past decade has seen improvements in patient selection and a greater range of surgical procedures available to patients with intestinal failure, and this, combined with more effective immunosuppressive regimens, has transformed survival after intestinal transplantation (ITx). Much more is known about optimizing rehabilitation of the engrafted intestine in the first 12 months after transplant, but it is also becoming apparent that there are some long-term health issues to consider.

RECENT FINDINGS

The key issues in rehabilitation of ITx are the immunogenic nature of the intestinal graft, which means a higher risk of rejection and necessitates relatively high levels of immune suppression that promotes infections, including Epstein-Barr virus-driven lymphoma, viral gastroenteritis and renal impairment; and those related to the specifics of an intestinal allograft (nutritional support, chylous ascites, growth, food allergy, fat soluble vitamin deficiencies, metabolic bone disease). In this article, recent publications about approaches for establishing nutrition and methods for monitoring the health of the ITx patient are reviewed.

SUMMARY

ITx appears to be cost-effective compared with parenteral nutrition, but ITx recipients continue to be vulnerable to infections, nutritional deficiencies and rejection over the long-term and, therefore, require support from and involvement of a multidisciplinary team for patients to become safely integrated with their local community.

Treatment of intestinal failure: intestinal transplantation

Over the past 15 years, intestinal transplantation for the treatment of intestinal failure has changed from a desperate last-ditch effort into a standard therapy for which a good outcome is expected. Patient survival after intestinal transplantation has improved in the past 3-5 years and now approaches that of other solid organ allograft recipients, including liver and kidney, and is similar to survival on permanent therapy with parenteral nutrition. Complications are more common and often more severe during the initial hospitalization period after intestinal transplantation than they are after transplantation of other solid organs. After intestinal transplantation the initial hospitalization period is, therefore, usually 3-8 weeks long. Nearly all patients discharged after intestinal transplantation have good allograft function and have been weaned from total parenteral nutrition. The cost of the initial hospitalization period is one to two times the cost of permanent total parenteral nutrition for 1 year, which means that, in most cases, intestinal transplantation is cost-saving within 2 years of transplantation. In addition, quality of life after intestinal transplantation, as determined by standardized quality of life measures, is good or normal.