1
|
Sakai T, Ko JS, Crouch CE, Kumar S, Little MB, Chae MS, Ganoza A, Gómez-Salinas L, Humar A, Kim SH, Koo BN, Rodriguez G, Sirianni J, Smith NK, Song JG, Ullah A, Hendrickse A. Perioperative management of adult living donor liver transplantation: Part 1 - recipients. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14667. [PMID: 35435293 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation option has become an established and widely practiced transplantation method for adult patients suffering from end-stage liver disease. It has successfully addressed the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplant Anesthesia jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of live donor liver transplant recipients. The review aims to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live liver transplantation recipients. We feature the status, outcomes, surgical procedure, portal venous decompression, anesthetic management, prevention of acute kidney injury, avoidance of blood transfusion, monitoring and therapeutic strategies of hemodynamic derangements, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for liver transplant recipients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuro Sakai
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Justin Sangwook Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cara E Crouch
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sathish Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael B Little
- Department of Anesthesiology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Min Suk Chae
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Armando Ganoza
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Luis Gómez-Salinas
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Abhi Humar
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sang Hyun Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Bon-Nyeo Koo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gonzalo Rodriguez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Joel Sirianni
- Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Natalie K Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jun-Gol Song
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Aisha Ullah
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adrian Hendrickse
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luchsinger W, Zimbrean P. Systematic Review: Treatment for Addictive Disorder in Transplant Patients. Am J Addict 2020; 29:445-462. [PMID: 32410396 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.13054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The number of patients with substance use disorders in need for organ transplantation is expected to increase. Patients with addictive disorders are considered a higher risk of negative outcomes after organ transplantation due to the impact of substance use upon medical status and adherence with treatment. The goal of this systematic review was to assess the current literature on treatment for addiction transplant candidates and recipients. METHODS We conducted a literature search within four databases PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for publications dated 1/1/1988 to 12/31/2018. RESULTS Out of 3108 articles identified through database screening, 39 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Sixteen studies described addiction treatment in groups over five patients. All the articles included liver transplant patients, with only two studies including patients who needed a kidney or a heart transplant. Nine articles described treatment of alcohol use disorder exclusively, five focused on treatment of opioid use disorders. Although 9 of 16 studies were prospective, the variability of the treatment intervention, outcome measures, and control group when applicable prohibited a meaningful meta-analysis of the results. Eight articles that described the case reports are analyzed separately. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Promising treatment options for alcohol use disorder have been reported but more studies are needed to confirm their effectiveness and their feasibility. Methadone appears effective for opioid disorder in transplant patients. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the treatment of addictive disorders in transplant patients. (Am J Addict 2020;29:445-462).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula Zimbrean
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yıldız E, Kılınç G. The relationship between anxiety-depression status and psychosocial adjustments in the patients undergoing liver transplantation. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2018; 54:221-229. [PMID: 28556990 DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Erman Yıldız
- Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Gülsen Kılınç
- Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Delair S, Feeley TH, Kim H, Del Rio Martin J, Kim-Schluger L, Lapointe Rudow D, Orloff M, Sheiner PA, Teperman L. A peer-based intervention to educate liver transplant candidates about living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2010; 16:42-8. [PMID: 20035520 DOI: 10.1002/lt.21937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The number of liver donors has not measurably increased since 2004 and has begun to decrease. Although many waitlisted patients may be suitable candidates to receive a living donor graft, they are often reticent to discuss living donation with close friends and family, partly because of a lack of knowledge about donor health and quality of life outcomes after donation. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of an educational intervention that uses testimonials and self-report data from living donors in New York State. The study had an independent sample pretest (n = 437) and posttest (n = 338) design with posttest, between-subjects comparison for intervention exposure. All waitlisted patients at 5 liver transplant centers in New York were provided a peer-based educational brochure and DVD either by mail or at the clinic. The outcome measures were liver candidates' knowledge and self-efficacy to discuss living donation with family and friends. The number and proportion of individuals who presented to centers for living liver donation evaluation were also measured. Liver transplant candidates' self-efficacy to discuss living donation and their knowledge increased from the pretest period to the posttest period. Those exposed to the peer-based intervention reported significantly greater knowledge, a greater likelihood of discussing donation, and increased self-efficacy in comparison with those not exposed to the intervention. The results did not differ by age, length of time on the waiting list, education, or ethnicity. In comparison with the preintervention period, living donation increased 42%, and the number of individuals who presented for donation evaluation increased by 74%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Delair
- New York Center for Liver Transplantation, Inc., East Greenbush, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|