The effect of a web-based self-care instruction on symptom experience and quality of life in living liver donors: A randomized controlled trial

Objective

Living liver donors need help to manage symptom distress and improve their quality of life. This study aims to test the effectiveness of a web-based symptom self-care instruction on symptom experience and health-related quality of life of living liver donors.

Methods

This study was a randomized controlled trial. Participants were recruited from January 2019 to August 2020. Participants in the experimental group had access to a web-based symptom self-care instruction, which included text and video. The control group received routine care. The primary outcomes were symptom distress and quality of life.

Results

A total of 90 living liver donors recruited in this study were assigned randomly to the web group (n = 46) and control group (n = 44). The symptom distress was significantly negatively correlated with quality of life at each data collection time. There was an interaction effect with the participants in the web group experiencing more symptom distress at three months after surgery than the control group (B = 3.616, 95% CI: 7.163-3.990, p = 0.046). There was no significant effect on the quality of life.

Conclusion

Patients in the web-based self-care group had higher symptom distress than those in the control group three months after surgery, but there was no difference in quality of life. Future studies could add some interactive elements to the website and include a larger sample size.

Registration

This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900020518).

The Meaning of Being a Living Kidney, Liver, or Stem Cell Donor-A Meta-Ethnography

BACKGROUND

Studies on living donors from the donors' perspective show that the donation process involves both positive and negative feelings involving vulnerability. Qualitative studies of living kidney, liver, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donors have not previously been merged in the same analysis. Therefore, our aim was to synthesize current knowledge of these donors' experiences to deepen understanding of the meaning of being a living donor for the purpose of saving or extending someone's life.

METHODS

The meta-ethnography steps presented by Noblit and Hare in 1988 were used.

RESULTS

Forty-one qualitative studies from 1968 to 2016 that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The studies comprised experiences of over 670 donors. The time since donation varied from 2 days to 29 years. A majority of the studies, 25 of 41, were on living kidney donors. The synthesis revealed that the essential meaning of being a donor is doing what one feels one has to do, involving 6 themes; A sense of responsibility, loneliness and abandonment, suffering, pride and gratitude, a sense of togetherness, and a life changing event.

CONCLUSIONS

The main issue is that one donates irrespective of what one donates. The relationship to the recipient determines the motives for donation. The deeper insight into the donors' experiences provides implications for their psychological care.

Increasing Donation Opportunities for Vascularized Composite Allografts

There are 40 vascularized composite allotransplant programs across 5 continents served by 31 organ procurement organizations (or equivalent). The organizations’ websites inform about organ and tissue donation. This research explored worldwide educational efforts on vascularized composite allograft (VCAG) donation via their corporate websites as well as options within donor registries and donor card systems to indicate a VCAG donation preference. Of these, 13 (41.9%) of 31 had VCAG content and 7 (22.6%) of 31 offered a mechanism for individuals to voice a preference about VCAG donation through an opt in donor registry or card or an opt out registry. In North America, the only donor registration/card system that facilitated VCAG donation is in Mexico. The resistance to consent for VACG donation is likely due to poor public education and the personal nature of face, hand, uterus, and penile allografts. Efforts to reduce this resistance can begin with the assistance of website content, registries, and donor cards.

Perceptions of transplant surgery among living liver donors in Japan

CONTEXT

To minimize impaired psychosocial outcomes among living liver donors, it may be useful to obtain their views about being a donor with respect to their specific backgrounds.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the perceptions of living liver donors with respect to transplant surgery and to determine whether any differences in perceptions were related to the recipient's age or prognosis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

In total, 240 living liver donors (mean age, 44.4 years) openly and freely described their views on transplant.

RESULTS

Content analysis of the descriptions revealed 4 categories: grateful for the benefits of living donor liver transplant (n = 143, 59.6%), facing the limitations of living liver transplant (n = 125, 52.1%), donor stress (n = 105, 43.8%), and crucial preoperative period (n = 75, 31.2%). The frequency of descriptions of gratitude for the benefits of transplant differed significantly between adult-to-adult and adult-to-child transplants: donors to children (ie, recipients <18 years old) were more grateful than were donors to adults (ie, recipients ≥18 years old). In addition, descriptions of gratitude differed significantly depending on the recipient's prognosis: donors with recipients who survived were more grateful and experienced fewer difficulties than did donors with recipients who died.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, living liver donors were satisfied with transplant surgery but experienced living donor liver transplant as a burden, which was affected by the transplant outcome and the age of the recipient.

Parental Live Liver Donation: A Transformational Experience

Background

Parental live liver donation is an attractive alternative to deceased donation for pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), yet very little has been published about the long-term emotional consequences of live liver donations on donors and their families.

Objectives

To better understand the impact that a parental live liver donation has on the everyday life of the donor.

Method

Thirteen living parental donors from 2 West Coast transplant centers participated. Data included semistructured interviews, observations, and field notes about the donors and their physical, emotional, and familial lives since their donation. The perceived impact of donation on parental donors and their intrafamilial relationships are reviewed and the social and emotional context of parental liver donation, including impacts on the predonation decisions and life after donation are analyzed.

Results

Thematic analysis was used to analyze this set of interviews, and after open coding, 3 major categories emerged: a self-awareness process, a clarification of familial relationships, and a change in perspectives on community. The overarching theme that was constructed from the interviews suggested that the impact the donation had on the donors' lives was one of transformation.

Quality Improvement in the Care of Live Liver Donors: Implementation of the Designated Donor Nurse Program

Publications on living donor liver transplant have focused on the medical aspects of donor selection, postoperative management, surgical procedures, and outcomes, but little attention has been given to the nursing implications for care of live liver donors during their inpatient stay. Donor advocates from various disciplines are involved during the initial education and evaluation, but most care after surgery is delivered by an inpatient medical team and bedside nursing staff who are not as familiar with the donor and concepts related to donor advocacy. In an effort to improve the overall donor experience and provide safe, high-quality care to patients undergoing elective partial hepatectomy, our academic medical center began a quality improvement project focused on improving the inpatient stay. Inpatient nursing standards and policies and procedures were developed to ensure that consistent care is delivered. However, the infrequency of living donor liver transplantation makes it nearly impossible to have all transplant program staff on a nursing unit be “experts” on donor care. Therefore, our center determined that, similar to the Independent Donor Advocacy Team, a transplant program needs live donor champions on the nursing unit to mirror the goals of the team. To that end, we developed the concept of the Designated Donor Nurse to care for and advocate for live liver donors during the inpatient stay and also to serve as a resource to their colleagues.