1
|
Kilambi V, Barah M, Formica RN, Friedewald JJ, Mehrotra S. Evaluation of Opening Offers Early for Deceased Donor Kidneys at Risk of Nonutilization. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 19:233-240. [PMID: 37943856 PMCID: PMC10861110 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing nonutilization of kidneys recovered from deceased donors is a current policy concern for kidney allocation in the United States. The likelihood of nonutilization is greater with a higher kidney donor risk index (KDRI) offer. We examine how opening offers for organs with KDRI >1.75 to the broader waitlist at varying points of time affects usage rates. METHODS We simulate kidney allocation using data for January 2018 to June 2019 from Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. For the simulation experiment, allocation policy is modified so that KDRI >1.75 organs are offered to all local candidates (same donation service area) after a set amount of cold time simultaneously. Open offers to candidates nationally are similarly examined. RESULTS Simulation results ( n =50 replications) estimate that opening offers locally for KDRI >1.75 after 10 hours yields a nonutilization rate of 38% (range: 35%-42%), less than the prevailing rate of 55% of KDRI >1.75 kidneys. Opening offers after 5 hours yields 30% (range: 26%-34%), reducing the prevailing nonutilization rate by 45%. Opening offers nationally after 10 and 5 hours yields nonutilization rates of 11% (range: 8%-15%) and 6% (range: 4%-9%) for KDRI >1.75 kidneys, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Simulation findings indicate that opening offers and adjusting their timing can significantly reduce nonutilization of high-KDRI kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Kilambi
- Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia
- RAND Health Care, Access and Delivery Program, RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Masoud Barah
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Richard N. Formica
- Department of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - John J. Friedewald
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Engineering and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sanjay Mehrotra
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Engineering and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors: Review and perspective. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14566. [PMID: 34936135 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The practice of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from adult marginal deceased donors (MDDs) dates back to the mid-1990s with initial pioneering experiences reported by the Stanford and Maryland groups, at which time the primary indication was estimated insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects of DKT: Identifying appropriate selection criteria and developing scoring systems based on pre- and post-donation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing mid-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. Deceased donors with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or non-recovery. However, DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. In an attempt to promote utilization of MDD kidneys, the United Network for Organ Sharing introduced new allocation guidelines pursuant to DKT in 2019. The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of DKT and identify opportunities to improve utilization of MDD kidneys through DKT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - David Harriman
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Komal Gurung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Price MB, Yan G, Joshi M, Zhang T, Hickner BT, O'Mahony C, Goss J, Galván TN, Cotton RT, Rana A. Prediction of Kidney Allograft Discard Before Procurement: The Kidney Discard Risk Index. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2021; 19:204-211. [PMID: 33605206 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2020.0340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is an 18.9% discard rate among kidney allografts. Here, we aimed to determine predictors of kidney discard and construct an index to identify high-probability discard kidney allografts prior to procurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 102 246 potential kidney allograft donors from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database were used in this analysis. The cohort was randomized into 2 groups. The training set included 67% of the cohort and was used to derive a predictive index for discard that comprised 21 factors identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The validation set included 33% and was used to internally validate the kidney discard risk index. RESULTS In 77.3% of donors, at least 1 kidney was used for transplant, whereas in 22.7% of donors, both kidneys were discarded. The kidney discard risk index was highly predictive of discard with a C statistic of 0.89 (0.88-0.89). The bottom 10th percentile had a discard rate of 0.73%, whereas the top 10th percentile had a discard rate of 83.65%. The 3 most predictive factors for discard were age, creatinine level, and hepatitis C antibody status. CONCLUSIONS We identified 21 factors predictive of discard prior to donor procurement and used these to develop a kidney discard risk index with a C statistic of 0.89.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Brent Price
- From the Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ibrahim M, Vece G, Mehew J, Johnson R, Forsythe J, Klassen D, Callaghan C, Stewart D. An international comparison of deceased donor kidney utilization: What can the United States and the United Kingdom learn from each other? Am J Transplant 2020; 20:1309-1322. [PMID: 31758833 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In transplant, meaningful international comparisons in organ utilization are needed. This collaborative study between the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US) aimed to develop a kidney utilization metric allowing for legitimate intercountry comparisons. Data from the UK and US transplant registries, including all deceased donor kidneys recovered from 2006 to 2017, were analyzed. To identify a potentially comparable kidney utilization rate (UR), several denominators were assessed. We discovered that the proportion of transplanted kidneys from elderly donors in the UK (10.7%) was 18 times greater than that in the US (0.6%). Conversely, en bloc pediatric kidney transplant was more common in the US. Donation after circulatory death utilization has risen in both countries but is twice as prevalent in the UK (39% of transplants) vs the US (20%). In addition, US and UK URs are not directly comparable due to fundamental system differences. However, using a suite of URs revealed practice areas likely to yield the most benefit if improved, such as efforts to increase kidney offer acceptance in the US and to reduce postacceptance discard in the UK. Methods used in this study, including novel intracountry risk-adjusted UR trend logistic regression analyses, can be translated to other international transplant registries in pursuit of further global learning opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Gabe Vece
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Jenny Mehew
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel Johnson
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - John Forsythe
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - David Klassen
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Chris Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hobeika MJ, Miller CM, Pruett TL, Gifford KA, Locke JE, Cameron AM, Englesbe MJ, Kuhr CS, Magliocca JF, McCune KR, Mekeel KL, Pelletier SJ, Singer AL, Segev DL. PROviding Better ACcess To ORgans: A comprehensive overview of organ-access initiatives from the ASTS PROACTOR Task Force. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:2546-2558. [PMID: 28742951 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 06/25/2017] [Accepted: 07/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) PROviding better Access To Organs (PROACTOR) Task Force was created to inform ongoing ASTS organ access efforts. Task force members were charged with comprehensively cataloguing current organ access activities and organizing them according to stakeholder type. This white paper summarizes the task force findings and makes recommendations for future ASTS organ access initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Hobeika
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C M Miller
- Liver Transplantation Program, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - T L Pruett
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - K A Gifford
- American Society of Transplant Surgeons, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - J E Locke
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Transplant Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - A M Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - M J Englesbe
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - C S Kuhr
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - J F Magliocca
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - K R McCune
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - K L Mekeel
- Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - S J Pelletier
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - A L Singer
- Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - D L Segev
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dual Kidney Transplantation: A Review of Past and Prospect for Future. INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARLY RESEARCH NOTICES 2017; 2017:2693681. [PMID: 28752128 PMCID: PMC5511653 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2693681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2016] [Revised: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation (KT) is one of the treatment options for patients with chronic kidney disease. The number of patients waiting for kidney transplantation is growing day by day. Various strategies have been put in place to expand the donor pool. Extended criteria donors are now accepted more frequently. Increasing number of elderly donors with age > 60 years, history of diabetes or hypertension, and clinical proteinuria are accepted as donor. Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) is also more frequently done and experience with this technique is slowly building up. DKT not only helps to reduce the number of patients on waiting list but also limits unnecessary discard of viable organs. Surgical complications of DKT are comparable to single kidney transplantation (SKT). Patient and graft survivals are also promising. This review article provides a summary of evidence available in the literature.
Collapse
|