Racial disparities across multiple stages of the deceased organ donation process

Pervasive structural violence causes higher organ failure rates among Black Americans and an excess of Black potential deceased organ donors. Underuse of Black donors would exacerbate organ shortages that disproportionately harm Black transplant candidates. This study investigates racial differences in transit between distinct donation steps among 132 968 potential donors across 557 hospitals and 6 organ procurement organizations (OPOs) from 2015 through 2021. Multilevel multistate modeling with patient covariates and OPO random effects shows adjusted likelihoods (95% confidence interval) of non-Black versus Black patients transitioning from OPO referral to approach of 1.39 (1.35, 1.44), approach to authorization: 1.64 (1.56, 1.72), authorization to procurement: 1.10 (1.04, 1.16), and procurement to transplant: 1.00 (0.95, 1.06). Overall organ utilization rates for Black, Latino, White, and other OPO referrals were 5.89%, 8.18%, 6.79%, and 5.24%, respectively. Adjusting for patient covariates and hospital and OPO random effects, multilevel logistic models estimated that compared with Black patients, Latino, White, and other patients had odds ratios of organ utilization of 1.81 (1.61, 2.03), 3.19 (2.91, 3.50), and 1.24 (1.05, 1.47), respectively. Nationwide in 2022, donor conversion disparities likely lost more than 1700 donors-two-thirds of whom would have been Black. Achieving racial equity for transplant candidates will require reducing racial disparities in organ donation.

The effect of the Iranian family approach-specific course (IrFASC) on obtaining consent from deceased organ donors' families

Background

A family approach and obtaining consent from the families of potential brain-dead donors is the most important step of organ procurement in countries where an opt-in policy applies to organ donation. Health care staff's communication skills and ability to have conversations about donation under circumstances of grief and emotion play a crucial role in families' decision-making process and, consequently, the consent rate.

Methods

A new training course, called the Iranian family approach-specific course (IrFASC), was designed with the aim of improving interviewers' skills and knowledge, sharing experiences, and increasing coordinators' confidence. The IrFASC was administered to three groups of coordinators. The family consent rate of participants in the same intervals (12 months for group 1, 6 months for group 2, and 3 months for group 3) was measured before and after the training course. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to make comparisons.

Results

The family consent rate was significantly different for all participants before and after the training, increasing from 50.0% to 62.5% (P=0.037). Furthermore, sex (P=0.005), previous training (P=0.090), education (P=0.068), and duration of work as a coordinator (P=0.008) had significant effects on the difference in families' consent rates before and after IrFASC.

Conclusions

This study showed that the IrFASC training method could improve the success of coordinators in obtaining family consent.

Predictors of Deceased Organ Donation in the Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND

A shortage of donor organs represents the major barrier to the success of solid organ transplantation. This is especially true in the pediatric population for which the number of organ donors has decreased over time. With this study, we aimed to assess the factors associated with deceased organ donor consent in the pediatric population and determine the variability in consent rates across organ procurement organizations (OPOs).

METHODS

All eligible pediatric deaths were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2008-2019). The rate of organ donor consent was determined, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the factors independently associated with successful donor recruitment. The probability of donor consent was determined for each OPO after adjusting for patient demographics.

RESULTS

A total of 11 829 eligible pediatric deaths were approached to request consent for organ donation. Consent was successful in 8816 (74.5%) subjects. Consent rates are lower in the pediatric population compared with young adults and are directly related to patient age such that eligible infant deaths have the lowest rate of successful donor consent. There is significant variability in donor consent rates across OPOs, independent of population demographic differences.

CONCLUSIONS

OPO is predictive of pediatric deceased organ donor consent independent of demographic differences, with some regions having consistently higher consent rates than others. Sharing best practices for pediatric deceased donor recruitment may be a strategy to increase organ availability in the pediatric population.

Examination of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Deceased Organ Donation Ratio Over Time in the US

Importance

Historically, deceased organ donation was lower among Black compared with White populations, motivating efforts to reduce racial disparities. The overarching effect of these efforts in Black and other racial/ethnic groups remains unclear.

Objective

To examine changes in deceased organ donation over time.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based cohort study used data from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2017, from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to quantify the number of actual deceased organ donors, and from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research Detailed Mortality File to quantify the number of potential donors (individuals who died under conditions consistent with organ donation). Data were analyzed from December 2, 2019, to May 14, 2020.

Exposures

Race and ethnicity of deceased and potential donors.

Main Outcomes and Measures

For each racial/ethnic group and year, a donation ratio was calculated as the number of actual deceased donors divided by the number of potential donors. Direct age and sex standardization was used to allow for group comparisons, and Poisson regression was used to quantify changes in donation ratio over time.

Results

A total of 141 534 deceased donors and 5 268 200 potential donors were included in the analysis. Among Black individuals, the donation ratio increased 2.58-fold from 1999 to 2017 (yearly change in adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.05-1.05; P < .001). This increase was significantly greater than the 1.60-fold increase seen in White individuals. Nevertheless, substantial racial differences remained, with Black individuals still donating at only 69% the rate of White individuals in 2017 (P < .001). Among other racial minority populations, changes were less drastic. Deceased organ donation increased 1.80-fold among American Indian/Alaska Native and 1.40-fold among Asian or Pacific Islander populations, with substantial racial differences remaining in 2017 (American Indian/Alaska Native population donation at 28% and Asian/Pacific Islander population donation at 85% the rate of the White population). Deceased organ donation differences between Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino populations increased over time (4% lower in 2017).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that differences in deceased organ donation between White and some racial minority populations have attenuated over time. The greatest gains were observed among Black individuals, who have been the primary targets of study and intervention. Despite improvements, substantial differences remain, suggesting that novel approaches are needed to understand and address relatively lower rates of deceased organ donation among all racial minorities.

Informed Clustering of Donation Service Areas for Improved Benchmarking

The donation community continuously strives to collaborate and share effective practices to further the mission of saving and healing lives. Donation service areas in which the Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) work are multifaceted in their demographics, inciting the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network to consider a more holistic and objective measure of similarity rather than the size of population alone or locational proximity alone. This would allow OPOs, as a part of their quality improvement efforts, to learn from and mentor other organizations that are dealing with similar challenges. By incorporating multiple informative characteristics together, we can distinguish those likenesses only revealed by taking into account multiple factors simultaneously. We used statistical approaches that take many characteristics of interest describing a donation service area and purposely excluded performance measures that an OPO may be able to influence by their own practices. Unsupervised learning methods combined the original characteristics into a smaller number of new variables, eliminating correlation and overlap in information from the original characteristics, and clustered donation service areas based on the general characteristics and population of the area. This analysis is a first step in providing a different perspective for OPOs to learn from other organizations that may face similar challenges, as well as to share best practices and open new lines of communication.

"Effective" Requesting: A Scoping Review of the Literature on Asking Families to Consent to Organ and Tissue Donation

BACKGROUND

Families are often asked to consent to the donation of their deceased relative's organs or tissues. These end-of-life conversations are important because they affect consent rates as well as the psychological impact of the decision for families. This scoping review of the literature on requesting family consent was prepared to support of the development of leading practice recommendations for end-of-life conversations with families of potential donors. A scoping review maps research activity in a field across a range of commentary and empirical study designs but does not attempt meta-synthesis of empirical data or quality assessment.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature from January 2000 to February 2015 on the questions of what constitutes an "effective" request and the factors that affect consent rates and family satisfaction with their decision and the process. This review includes a final set of 168 articles addressing (a) whether, when, and how to ask families for consent to donation or (b) characteristics of families or decedents that affect families' decisions or family satisfaction with their decisions.

RESULTS

Six main themes were identified: (1) the objectives of requesting and encouraging family consent to donation, (2) the effect of the donation decision on family well-being, (3) the process of requesting family consent, (4) the impact of the quality of the care for the deceased and for the family, (5) the content and manner of the request for family consent, and (6) the characteristics of the family and deceased that affect the request for family consent.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review found that there is a large literature on how to modify the process and manner of the request to increase family consent rates. Another important line of inquiry focuses on the psychological impact of the decision on the family. Although a scoping review does not attempt to synthesize results or draw evidence-based conclusions, the literature generally supports the intuitive expectations that compassionate and respectful care for the deceased and family, listening for and addressing family concerns, and an attitude to donation that is positive (but not solely procurement-focused) and is best for both consent rates and family well-being. Although the presumption is often that the primary objective of asking for family consent is to secure consent and donation, some ethical commentary on requesting consent emphasizes that this objective must be balanced with the parallel obligation to protect the psychological well-being of families. This places some constraints on the approaches used in family consent discussions.

Deep Demographics

This is the first published study to examine in detail the demographic factors associated with willingness to register as an organ donor at a state motor vehicles bureau. It uses registration counts controlling for the size of the general population as the measure of willingness. Local variation in registration levels is modeled as a function of a set of local socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and immigration characteristics; cluster analysis of social areas is used to probe the effects of nonlinear combinations of local social environment factors. Results show that residence in high minority areas, lower-income areas, and immigrant-heavy areas depresses registration levels but also that significant nonlinear combinations of factors are at work. Specifically, minority/immigrant areas tend strongly to have lower registration counts controlling for population regardless of socioeconomic status (SES), whereas registration in less prosperous areas depends largely on the racial, ethnic, and immigrant proportions in those areas. Moreover, the very highest SES neighborhoods in the study area (northern California minus greater Sacramento) have very high levels of donor registration despite high racial, ethnic, and national origin diversity.

Improving organ donation rates by modifying the family approach process

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify steps during family approach for organ donation that may be modified to improve consent rates of potential organ donors.

METHODS

Retrospective study of our local organ procurement organization (OPO) database of potential organ donors. Modifiable variables involved in the family approach of potential organ donors were collected and included race and sex of OPO representative, individual initiating approach discussion with family (RN or MD vs. OPO), length of donation discussion, use of a translator, and time of day of approach.

RESULTS

Of 1137 potential organ donors, 661 (58%) consented and 476 (42%) declined. Consent rates were higher with matched race of donor and OPO representative (66% vs. 52%, p < 0.001), family approach by female OPO representative (67% vs. 56%, p = 0.002), if approach was initiated by OPO representative (69% vs. 49%, p < 0.001), and if consent rate was dependent on time of day the approach occurred: 6:00 am to noon (56%), noon to 6:00 pm (67%), 6:00 pm to midnight (68%), and midnight to 6:00 am (45%), p = 0.04. Family approach that led to consent lasted longer than those declining (67 vs. 43 minutes, p < 0.001). Independent predictors of consent to donation included female OPO representative (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; p = 0.006), approach discussion initiated by OPO representative (OR, 1.9; p = 0.001), and longer approach discussions (OR, 1.02; p < 0.001). The independent predictor of declined donation was the use of a translator (OR, 0.39; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Variables such as race and sex of OPO representative and time of day should be considered before approaching a family for organ donation. Avoiding translators during the approach process may improve donation rates. Education for health care providers should reinforce the importance of allowing OPO representatives to initiate the family approach for organ donation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiologic study, level IV. Therapeutic study, level IV.

The Interpersonal Process in Tissue Donation Requests with “Undecided” Next of Kin

Context

Although recent studies have demonstrated that tissue requesters' behavior during conversations about tissue donation affects consent rates, the link between requesters' behavior and consent rates remains unclear.

Objective

To examine whether positive/collaborative requester behaviors elicit complementary behaviors from next of kin who were initially undecided about their willingness to donate their deceased family member's tissues.

Design

Audio recordings of requests were coded to assess for interpersonal behavior of each interactant.

Setting

Audio recordings were gathered from a national sample of tissue banks.

Participants

One hundred and two requester–next-of-kin dyads, consisting of 102 relatives and 53 requesters.

Main Outcome Measures

Tissue requester and next-of-kin affiliation and interpersonal control were assessed. Tissue requesters' persuasion, confirmation (eg, approval, empathy, reassurance) and disapproval, as well as next-of-kin approval and disapproval, were examined.

Results

Tissue requesters and next of kin tended to match one another on affiliation and complement one another on interpersonal control. “Key topics,” which may affect the next of kin's decision, are discussed in only about one-third of requests. Next of kin were less affiliative and more disapproving when requesters were also more disapproving. Interpersonal behavior of the tissue requester, such as affiliation, statements of disapproval, and persuasion, as well as discussion of key topics, was a significant predictor of the interpersonal behavior of the next of kin.

Conclusions

Positive requester behaviors elicited a positive response from undecided next of kin. Because many next of kin have limited knowledge about tissue donation before the request, the communication process may affect the next of kin's perceptions of donation and thus affect the likelihood of consent. Findings could potentially inform communication skills training for tissue requesters; future research could examine effects of such training on consent rates.