Do pre-transplant cultural factors predict health-related quality of life after kidney transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is associated with health outcomes for kidney transplant (KT) recipients. However, pretransplant predictors of improvements in post-transplant HRQOL remain incompletely understood. Namely, important pretransplant cultural factors, such as experience of discrimination, perceived racism in healthcare, or mistrust of the healthcare system, have not been examined as potential HRQOL predictors. Also, few have examined predictors of decline in HRQOL post-transplant.

METHODS

Using data from a prospective cohort study, we examined HRQOL change pre- to post-transplant, and novel cultural predictors of the change. We measured physical, mental, and kidney-specific HRQOL as outcomes, and used cultural factors as predictors, controlling for demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and transplant knowledge covariates.

RESULTS

Among 166 KT recipients (57% male; mean age 50.6 years; 61.4% > high school graduates; 80% non-Hispanic White), we found mental and physical, but not kidney-specific, HRQOL significantly improved post-transplant. No culturally related factors outside of medical mistrust significantly predicted change in any HRQOL outcome. Instead, demographic, knowledge, and clinical factors significantly predicted decline in each HRQOL domain: physical HRQOL-older age, more post-KT complications, higher pre-KT physical HRQOL; mental HRQOL-having less information pre-KT, greater pre-KT mental HRQOL; and, kidney-specific HRQOL-poorer kidney functioning post-KT, lower expectations for physical condition to improve, and higher pre-KT kidney-specific HRQOL.

CONCLUSIONS

Instead of cultural factors, predictors of HRQOL decline included demographic, knowledge, and clinical factors. These findings are useful for identifying patient groups that may be at greater risk of poorer post-transplant outcomes, in order to target individualized support to patients.

Epigenetic clocks indicate that kidney transplantation and not dialysis mitigate the effects of renal ageing

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an age-related disease that displays multiple features of accelerated ageing. It is currently unclear whether the two treatment options for end-stage kidney disease (dialysis and kidney transplantation [KT]) ameliorate the accelerated uremic ageing process.

METHODS

Data on clinical variables and blood DNA methylation (DNAm) from CKD stage G3-G5 patients were used to estimate biological age based on blood biomarkers (phenotypic age [PA], n = 333), skin autofluorescence (SAF age, n = 199) and DNAm (Horvath, Hannum and PhenoAge clocks, n = 47). In the DNAm cohort, we also measured the change in biological age 1 year after the KT or initiation of dialysis. Healthy subjects recruited from the general population were included as controls.

RESULTS

All three DNAm clocks indicated an increased biological age in CKD G5. However, PA and SAF age tended to produce implausibly large estimates of biological age in CKD G5. By contrast, DNAm age was 4.9 years (p = 0.005) higher in the transplantation group and 5.9 years (p = 0.001) higher in the dialysis group compared to controls. This age acceleration was significantly reduced 1 year after KT, but not after 1 year of dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney failure patients displayed an increased biological age as estimated by DNAm clocks compared to population-based controls. Our results suggest that KT, but not dialysis, partially reduces the age acceleration.

Kidney organ allocation: reducing discards

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The donation and kidney transplant system in the United States is challenged with reducing the number of kidneys that are procured for transplant but ultimately discarded. That number can reach 20% of donated kidneys each year.

RECENT FINDINGS

The reasons for these discards, in the face of overwhelming demand, are multiple.

SUMMARY

The authors review the data supporting a number of potential causes for high discard rates as well as provide potential solutions to the problem.

Psychosocial treatment on psychological symptoms, adherence, and physiological function on transplanted patients: A systematic review and metanalysis

OBJECTIVE

Transplantation represents an important source of hope for the candidates and produces an intense emotional effect. Psychosocial interventions can be helpful in all transplantation stages to better manage this extraordinarily stressful situation. Aim of the work is to verify the effects of the psychosocial interventions on recipients on psychological symptoms, medical adherence and transplanted solid organ functioning.

METHODS

This work adhered to PRISMA, STROBE, Cochrane and New Castle Ottawa bias scales and it is registered in PROSPERO. Inserting "Transplant" and "Psychological intervention" as key words in PubMed, Psycinfo, Cochrane database resulted 977 studies from 2001 to 2021. A systematic review and metanalyses were processed on nineteen randomized controlled trials and observative prospective cohort studies. The difference between pre- and post- psychosocial intervention assessment on the psychological variables, medical adherence, and organ functioning outcome was processed.

RESULTS

Main findings showed that the psychosocial interventions were effective on depression (0.62; CI: 0.32-0.92) and anxiety on kidney recipients (0.49; CI: 0.17-0.81), and on anxiety on heart recipients, mainly when administrated after the surgery (0.68; CI: 0.30-1.06). Moreover, the findings showed a lack of studies on the effectiveness of the psychosocial intervention on organ functioning.

CONCLUSION

The work highlighted the effectiveness of the psychosocial interventions on psychological outcome, particularly after the surgery and the need to address the research on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the psychosocial interventions on the organ functioning. The findings suggest to integrate the transplantation procedures with psychosocial interventions considering the different needs of recipients in relation to the specific transplanted organ.

Patient and Clinician Perceptions of Informed Consent and Decision Making About Accepting KDPI > 85 Kidneys

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Although the impact of the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) on kidney discard is well researched, less is known about how patients make decisions about whether to give consent for KDPI > 85 kidney offers.

Methods.

We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with 16 transplant recipients, 15 transplant candidates, and 23 clinicians (transplant surgeons, nephrologists, and nurse coordinators) to assess and compare perceptions of transplant education, informed consent for KDPI > 85 kidneys‚ and the decision-making process for accepting kidney offers. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data.

Results.

Four themes emerged: (1) patients reported uncertainty about the meaning of KDPI or could not recall information about KDPI; (2) patients reported uncertainty about their KDPI > 85 consent status and a limited role in KDPI > 85 consent decision making; (3) patients’ reported willingness to consider KDPI > 85 kidneys depended on their age, health status, and experiences with dialysis, and thus it changed over time; (4) patients’ underestimated the survival benefit of transplantation compared with dialysis, which could affect their KDPI > 85 consent decision making.

Conclusions.

To better support patients’ informed decision making about accepting KDPI > 85 kidneys, centers must ensure that all patients receive education about the trade-offs between accepting a KDPI > 85 kidney and remaining on dialysis. Additionally, education about KDPI and discussions about informed consent for KDPI > 85 kidneys must be repeated at multiple time points while patients are on the waiting list.

Determinants of kidney transplant candidates' decision to accept organ donor intervention transplants and participate in post-transplant research: A conjoint analysis

Deceased organ donor intervention research aims to increase organ quality and quantity for transplantation. We assessed the proportion of kidney transplant candidates who would accept "intervention organs," participate in organ intervention research, and factors influencing acceptance. Kidney transplant candidates were presented 12 hypothetical scenarios, which varied three attributes, donor age, predicted waiting time to receive another organ offer, and research risk to the organ. Candidates were also randomly assigned to one of two conditions varying recipient risk. For each scenario, candidates agreed to accept the intervention organ or remain waitlisted. We fit a multivariable logit model to determine the association between scenario attributes and the acceptance decision. Of 249 participants, most (96%) accepted intervention organs under some or all conditions. Factors independently associated with candidates' greater likelihood of accepting an intervention organ included: low risk to the kidney from the intervention (OR 20.53 [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 13.91-30.29]); younger donor age (OR 3.72 [95% CI, 2.83-4.89]), longer time until the next organ offer (OR 3.48 [95% CI, 2.65-4.57]), and greater trust in their transplant physician (OR 1.03 [95% CI, 1.00-1.06]). Candidates with a lower likelihood of acceptance had been waitlisted longer (OR 0.97 per month [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]) and were Black (OR 0.21 [95% CI, 0.08-0.55]). Most candidates would accept an intervention organ, which should encourage transplant leaders to conduct deceased donor organ intervention trials.

Educational Animations to Inform Transplant Candidates About Deceased Donor Kidney Options: An Efficacy Randomized Trial

Background

Transplant candidates struggle making decisions about accepting kidneys with variable kidney donor profile index (KDPI) and increased risk donor (IRD) status.

Methods

This single site, pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of 2 animations to improve KDPI/IRD knowledge, decisional self-efficacy, and willingness. Kidney candidates were randomly assigned to animation viewing plus standard nurse discussion (intervention) or standard nurse discussion alone (control). Linear regression was used to test the significance of animation exposure after controlling for covariates (α < 0.1).

Results

Mean age was 60 years, and 27% were African American. Both intervention (n = 42) and control (n = 38) groups received similar education at similar duration (12.8 versus 11.8 min, respectively), usually by the same dedicated nurse educator (85% versus 75%, respectively). On multivariate analysis, the intervention group (versus control) exhibited significantly increased knowledge (β = 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.77) and IRD willingness (β = 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.86). There were no between-group differences in KDPI >85% willingness or distribution of KDPI/IRD decisional self-efficacy. Over 90% of participants provided positive ratings on each of 11 acceptability items.

Conclusions

Supporting conventional IRD and KDPI education with educational animations can improve knowledge and IRD willingness compared with standard methods.

Development and preliminary evaluation of an animation (simplifyKDPI) to improve kidney transplant candidate understanding of the Kidney Donor Profile Index

BACKGROUND

Transplant candidates are reluctant to accept kidneys from high Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) donors. Incomplete understanding can lead to transplant delays for older transplant candidates. Patients need access to understandable information to make more informed decisions about KDPI.

METHODS

We developed a KDPI-specific animation with input from six stakeholder groups and conducted a one-group pre-post study with 60 kidney transplant candidates for feasibility and acceptability to improve participant KDPI knowledge, understanding, decisional self-efficacy, and willingness to accept a KDPI > 85% kidney. Data were compared using McNemar's test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Compared with pre-animation scores, post-animation scores were significantly higher for KDPI knowledge for the entire cohort (4.6 vs 6.1, P < .001) and across different levels of age, educational attainment, health literacy, vintage, and technology access. The frequency of positive responses increased pre-post animation for KDPI understanding (55% vs 83%, P < .001) and decisional self-efficacy (47% vs 75%, P < .001). However, willingness to accept KDPI > 85% kidneys (32% vs 36%, P = .83) increased by 2%. After viewing simplifyKDPI, >90% indicated positive ratings on ease of watching, understanding, and engaging.

CONCLUSION

In collaboration with stakeholders, an educational animation about KDPI was developed that was well-received and is promising to impact knowledge.