1
|
Luan S, Ding Y, Wei C, Huang Y, Yuan Z, Quan H, Ma C, Zhu B, Xue X, Wei W, Wang X. PRT-Net: a progressive refinement transformer for dose prediction to guide ovarian transposition. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1372424. [PMID: 38884079 PMCID: PMC11177340 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1372424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Young cervical cancer patients who require ovarian transposition usually have their ovaries moved away from the pelvic radiotherapy (RT) field before radiotherapy. The dose of ovaries during radiotherapy is closely related to the location of the ovaries. To protect ovarian function and avoid ovarian dose exceeding the limits, a safe location of transposed ovary must be determined prior to surgery. Methods For this purpose, we input the patient's preoperative CT into a neural network model to predict the dose distribution. Surgeons were able to quickly locate low-dose regions based on the dose distribution before surgery, thus determining the safe location of the transposed ovary. In this work, we proposed a new progressive refinement transformer model PRT-Net that can generate dose prediction at multiple scale resolutions in one forward propagation, and refine the dose prediction using prediction details from low to high resolution based on a deep supervision strategy. A multi-loss function fusion algorithm was also built to fit the prediction results under different loss dimensions. The clinical feasibility of the method was verified through an actual cases. Results and discussion Therefore, using PRT-Net to predict the dose distribution by preoperative CT in cervical cancer patients can assist clinicians to perform ovarian transposition surgery and prevent patients' ovaries from exceeding the prescribed dose limit in postoperative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunyao Luan
- The Institute of School of Integrated Circuits, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yi Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Changchao Wei
- Key Laboratory of Artificial Micro and Nano-structures of Ministry of Education, Center for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yi Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zilong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hong Quan
- Key Laboratory of Artificial Micro and Nano-structures of Ministry of Education, Center for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Chi Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Benpeng Zhu
- The Institute of School of Integrated Circuits, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xudong Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen Y, Tang X, Lin S, Jin X, Ding J, Shao M. Automatic dose prediction using deep learning and plan optimization with finite-element control for intensity modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:545-555. [PMID: 37748133 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Automatic solutions for generating radiotherapy treatment plans using deep learning (DL) have been investigated by mimicking the voxel's dose. However, plan optimization using voxel-dose features has not been extensively studied. PURPOSE This study aims to investigate the efficiency of a direct optimization strategy with finite elements (FEs) after DL dose prediction for automatic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning. METHODS A double-UNet DL model was adapted for 220 cervical cancer patients (200 for training and 20 for testing), who underwent IMRT between 2016 and 2020 at our clinic. The model inputs were computed tomography (CT) slices, organs at risk (OARs), and planning target volumes (PTVs), and the outputs were dose distributions of uniformly generated high-dose region-controlled plans. The FEs were discretized into equal intervals of the dose prediction value within the [OARs avoid PTV(O-P)] and [body avoids OARs & PTV(B-OP)] regions in the test cohort and used to define the objectives for IMRT plan optimization. The plans were optimized using a two-step process. In the beginning, the plans of two extra cases with and without low-dose region control were compared to pursue robust and optimal dose adjustment degree pattern of FEs. In the first step, the mean dose of O-P FEs were constrained to differing degrees according to the pattern. The further the FEs from the PTV, the tighter the constraints. In the second step, the mean dose of O-P FEs from first step were constrained again but weakly and the dose of the B-OP FEs from dose prediction and PTV were tightly regulated. The dosimetric parameters of the OARs and PTV were evaluated and compared using an interstep approach. In another 10 cases, the plans optimized via the aforementioned steps (method 1) were compared with those directly generated by the double-UNet dose prediction model trained by low and high region-controlled plans (method 2). RESULTS The mean differences in dose metrics between the UNet-predicted dose and the clinical plans were: 0.47 Gy for bladder D50% ; 0.62 Gy for rectum D50% ; 0% for small intestine V30Gy ; 1% for small intestine V40Gy ; 4% for left femoral head V30Gy ; and 6% for right femoral head V30Gy . The reductions in mean dose (p < 0.001) after FE-based optimization were: 4.0, 1.9, 2.8, 5.9, and 5.7 Gy for the bladder, rectum, small intestine, left femoral head, and right femoral head, respectively, with flat PTV homogeneity and conformity. Method 1 plans produced lower mean doses than those of method 2 for the bladder (0.7 Gy), rectum (1.0 Gy), and small intestine (0.6 Gy), while maintaining PTV homogeneity and conformity. CONCLUSION FE-based direct optimization produced lower OAR doses and adequate PTV doses after DL prediction. This solution offers rapid and automatic plan optimization without manual adjustment, particularly in low-dose regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yichao Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Xingni Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Sara Lin
- Petrone associates, Staten Island, New York, USA
| | - Xiance Jin
- Radiotherapy Center Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiapei Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Minghai Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Funderud M, Hoem IS, Guleng MAD, Eidem M, Almberg SS, Alsaker MD, Ståhl-Kornerup J, Frengen J, Marthinsen ABL. Script-based automatic radiotherapy planning for cervical cancer. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1798-1807. [PMID: 37881003 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2267171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to develop fully automated script-based radiotherapy treatment plans for cervical cancer patients, and evaluate them against clinically accepted plans, as validation before clinical implementation. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective planning study, treatment plans for 25 locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients with up to three dose levels were included. Fully automated plans were created using an in-house developed Python script in RayStation, and compared to clinically accepted manually made plans. Quantitatively, relevant dose statistics were compared, and average dose volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed. Qualitatively, a blinded plan comparison was conducted between the clinical and automatic plans. The accuracy of treatment plan delivery was verified with the Delta4 Phantom+. RESULTS The quantitative evaluation showed that target coverage was acceptable for all the automatic and clinical plans. The automatic plans were significantly more conformal than the clinical plans; median of 1.03 vs. 1.12. Mean doses to almost all organs at risk (OARs) were reduced in the automatic plans, with a median reduction of between 0.6 Gy and 1.9 Gy. In the blinded plan comparison, the automatic plans were the preferred plans or of equal quality as the clinical plans in 99% of the cases. In addition, plan delivery was excellent, with a mean gamma passing rate of 99.8%. Complete script-based plans were generated in 30-45 min; about four to ten times faster than manually made plans. CONCLUSION The automatic plans had acceptable target coverage, lower doses to almost all OARs, more conformal dose distributions, and were predominantly preferred by the clinicians. Based on these results, our institution has implemented the script for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Funderud
- Department of Radiotherapy, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ingvild Straumsheim Hoem
- Department of Radiotherapy, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Monika Eidem
- Department of Radiotherapy, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Jomar Frengen
- Department of Radiotherapy, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anne Beate Langeland Marthinsen
- Department of Radiotherapy, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Qiu Z, Olberg S, den Hertog D, Ajdari A, Bortfeld T, Pursley J. Online adaptive planning methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:10.1088/1361-6560/accdb2. [PMID: 37068488 PMCID: PMC10637515 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/accdb2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
Online adaptive radiation therapy aims at adapting a patient's treatment plan to their current anatomy to account for inter-fraction variations before daily treatment delivery. As this process needs to be accomplished while the patient is immobilized on the treatment couch, it requires time-efficient adaptive planning methods to generate a quality daily treatment plan rapidly. The conventional planning methods do not meet the time requirement of online adaptive radiation therapy because they often involve excessive human intervention, significantly prolonging the planning phase. This article reviews the planning strategies employed by current commercial online adaptive radiation therapy systems, research on online adaptive planning, and artificial intelligence's potential application to online adaptive planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihang Qiu
- Department of Business Analytics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Sven Olberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Dick den Hertog
- Department of Business Analytics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ali Ajdari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Thomas Bortfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Pursley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12061489. [PMID: 35741298 PMCID: PMC9222056 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision oncology, which ensures optimized cancer treatment tailored to the unique biology of a patient’s disease, has rapidly developed and is of great clinical importance. Deep learning has become the main method for precision oncology. This paper summarizes the recent deep-learning approaches relevant to precision oncology and reviews over 150 articles within the last six years. First, we survey the deep-learning approaches categorized by various precision oncology tasks, including the estimation of dose distribution for treatment planning, survival analysis and risk estimation after treatment, prediction of treatment response, and patient selection for treatment planning. Secondly, we provide an overview of the studies per anatomical area, including the brain, bladder, breast, bone, cervix, esophagus, gastric, head and neck, kidneys, liver, lung, pancreas, pelvis, prostate, and rectum. Finally, we highlight the challenges and discuss potential solutions for future research directions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Meyer P, Biston MC, Khamphan C, Marghani T, Mazurier J, Bodez V, Fezzani L, Rigaud PA, Sidorski G, Simon L, Robert C. Automation in radiotherapy treatment planning: Examples of use in clinical practice and future trends for a complete automated workflow. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:617-622. [PMID: 34175222 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Modern radiotherapy treatment planning is a complex and time-consuming process that requires the skills of experienced users to obtain quality plans. Since the early 2000s, the automation of this planning process has become an important research topic in radiotherapy. Today, the first commercial automated treatment planning solutions are available and implemented in a growing number of clinical radiotherapy departments. It should be noted that these various commercial solutions are based on very different methods, implying a daily practice that varies from one center to another. It is likely that this change in planning practices is still in its infancy. Indeed, the rise of artificial intelligence methods, based in particular on deep learning, has recently revived research interest in this subject. The numerous articles currently being published announce a lasting and profound transformation of radiotherapy planning practices in the years to come. From this perspective, an evolution of initial training for clinical teams and the drafting of new quality assurance recommendations is desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Meyer
- Department of radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France; ICUBE, CNRS UMR 7357, team IMAGES, Strasbourg, France.
| | - M-C Biston
- Department of radiotherapy, Centre Léon Bérard (CLB), Lyon, France; CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
| | - C Khamphan
- Department of medical physics, Institut du Cancer Avignon-Provence, Avignon, France
| | - T Marghani
- Institut de radiothérapie Amethyst du Sud de l'Oise, Creil, France
| | - J Mazurier
- Centre de radiothérapie Oncorad Garonne, Toulouse, France
| | - V Bodez
- Department of medical physics, Institut du Cancer Avignon-Provence, Avignon, France
| | - L Fezzani
- Institut de radiothérapie Amethyst du Sud de l'Oise, Creil, France
| | - P A Rigaud
- Institut de radiothérapie Amethyst du Sud de l'Oise, Creil, France
| | - G Sidorski
- Centre de radiothérapie Oncorad Garonne, Toulouse, France
| | - L Simon
- Institut Claudius Regaud (ICR), Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole (IUCT-O), Toulouse, France; Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), Université de Toulouse, INSERM U1037, Toulouse, France
| | - C Robert
- Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, INSERM, Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|