Tumor Mutational Burden as a Biomarker for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Newer Biomarkers in Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Scoping Review

Biomarkers have the potential to play a crucial role in managing gallbladder cancer post-surgery. They can identify patients more likely to experience a recurrence, allowing oncologists to tailor a more intensive surveillance plan and consider additional therapies. Some biomarkers can even predict how well a patient will respond to specific chemotherapy or targeted treatments. By monitoring these biomarkers, clinicians can track how effective the ongoing treatment is and detect any signs of early recurrence. Various biomarkers, like tumor markers, genetic markers, and genomic and epigenetic markers, are being investigated. The goal is to find the most reliable and accurate biomarkers to enhance patient care and outcomes. Integrating biomarker data into treatment plans can help personalize therapy and make better informed decisions. By identifying which patients are likely to benefit from specific treatments, biomarkers have the potential to improve long-term survival rates significantly. This scoping review discusses newer biomarkers in gallbladder carcinoma; some of them are in clinical use, while most of them are used in research settings. This provides a broad insight to practicing clinicians about the present biomarkers and the futuristic biomarkers.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR alterations: A series of Chinese cases with an emphasis on their clinicopathologic and genetic features

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) with FGFR alterations is relatively rare, and its identification is important in the era of targeted therapy. We collected a large series of FGFR-altered cases in the Chinese population and characterized their clinicopathological and genetic features. Among the 18 FGFR-altered cases out of 260 iCCAs, 10 were males and 8 were females, ranging in age from 35 to 74 years (mean, 57.3 years; median, 58 years). Pathologically, they include 9 cases of large duct (LD, 50 %) and small duct (SD, 50 %) types each. All of them (100 %, 18/18) showed microsatellite stable (MSS) and low tumor mutation burden (TMB). Genetically, FGFR alterations involved FGFR1 (20 %), FGFR2 (70 %), and FGFR3 (10 %), with FGFR2 rearrangement accounting for the most (11/18). The most frequently altered genes/biological processes were development/proliferation-related pathways (44 %), chromatin organization (20 %), and tumor suppressors (32 %). Our study further revealed the clinicopathological and genetic features of FGFR-altered iCCA and demonstrated that its occurrence may show regional or ethnic variability and is less common in the Chinese population. A significant number of LD-type iCCA cases also have FGFR alterations rather than the SD type.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC), published in late 2022 were adapted in December 2023, according to established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with BTC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with BTC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Taiwan Oncology Society (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different regions of Asia. Drug access and reimbursement in the different regions of Asia are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with BTC across the different countries and regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices and molecular profiling, as well as age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different countries.

Options in Targeted Therapy for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A 2024 Update

Bile duct carcinomas have a different prognosis and genetic profile depending on their location; intrahepatic/extrahepatic or at the level of the gallbladder. Although in recent years there have been important advances in first-line therapy, second-line therapy in cholangiocarcinoma does not currently have a standard. Therefore at this level, there is an acute need for personalized treatment. The present article is a narrative review that aims to list the newest targeted therapeutic options for this type of cancer, based on identified genetic alterations. The literature selected for analysis includes phase 2 or 3 studies with targeted therapy in this disease and original articles no older than three years that describe the prevalence of the most common gene alterations in this type of cancer. PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Clarivate-Web of Science databases were searched and keywords such as "cholangiocarcinoma," "biliary cancer," "targeted therapy," "gene amplifications," and "mutations" were used. This narrative review was designed taking into account the SANRA (Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles) criteria. The conclusions lead to the fact that next-generation sequencing testing is of particular usefulness in cholangiocarcinoma. Bile duct cancers are rich in targetable genetic alterations, and their treatment is in constant change, although much of the current data comes from phase II studies. There is a great need for the current options to be analyzed in phase III studies. Hence, the need of the oncological community to stay informed about targeted treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma is supported by the present article.

Targeted Therapies in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma

Primary tumor resection and liver transplantation are the only curative treatment options for the management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). However, for patients with advanced or metastatic disease, palliative systemic therapy remains the only treatment option. The development of targeted therapeutics has begun to shift the treatment paradigm in CCA. Targets of interest in CCA include mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (mIDH-1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression/amplification, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion, in addition to less frequently observed targets such as BRAF V600E, deficient mismatch repair/high microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H), and high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H). These targets are observed in varying frequency among patients with intrahepatic CCA and extrahepatic CCA. Multiple novel therapies have been developed to exploit each of these targets, with some having received United States Food and Drug Administration approval for use in the second-line setting. In the current review, we discuss targets of interest in CCA and summarize current evidence evaluating available therapies directed at these targets.

Third-Line Palliative Systemic Therapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Multicentre Review of Patterns of Care and Outcomes

Phase 3 trials have established standard first-line (1L) and 2L systemic therapy options for patients with advanced biliary cancer (ABC). However, a standard 3L treatment remains undefined. Clinical practice and outcomes for 3L systemic therapy in patients with ABC were therefore evaluated from three academic centres. Included patients were identified using institutional registries; demographics, staging, treatment history, and clinical outcomes were collected. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Ninety-seven patients, treated between 2006 and 2022, were included; 61.9% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. At the time of analysis, there had been 91 deaths. Median PFS from initiating 3L palliative systemic therapy (mPFS3) was 3.1 months (95%CI 2.0-4.1), while mOS3 was 6.4 months (95%CI 5.5-7.3); mOS1 was 26.9 months (95%CI 23.6-30.2). Among patients with a therapy-targeted molecular aberration (10.3%; n = 10; all received in 3L), mOS3 was significantly improved versus all other included patients (12.5 vs. 5.9 months; p = 0.02). No differences in OS1 were demonstrated between anatomical subtypes. Fourth-line systemic therapy was received by 19.6% of patients (n = 19). This international multicentre analysis documents systemic therapy use in this select patient group, and provides a benchmark of outcomes for future trial design.

Immunology and immunotherapy of cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver cancer. Its incidence is low in the Western world but is rising globally. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy have been the only treatment options for decades. Progress in our molecular understanding of the disease and the identification of druggable targets, such as IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions, has provided new treatment options. Immunotherapy has emerged as a potent strategy for many different types of cancer and has shown efficacy in combination with chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma. In this Review, we discuss findings related to key immunological aspects of cholangiocarcinoma, including the heterogeneous landscape of immune cells within the tumour microenvironment, the immunomodulatory effect of the microbiota and IDH1 mutations, and the association of immune-related signatures and patient outcomes. We introduce findings from preclinical immunotherapy studies, discuss future immune-mediated treatment options, and provide a summary of results from clinical trials testing immune-based approaches in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. This Review provides a thorough survey of our knowledge on immune signatures and immunotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma.

Evolution of the Targeted Therapy Landscape for Cholangiocarcinoma: Is Cholangiocarcinoma the 'NSCLC' of GI Oncology?

In the past two decades, molecular targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of several malignancies. Lethal malignancies such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have become a model for precision-matched immune- and gene-targeted therapies. Multiple small subgroups of NSCLC defined by their genomic aberrations are now recognized; remarkably, taken together, almost 70% of NSCLCs now have a druggable anomaly. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Novel molecular alterations have been recently identified in patients with CCA, and the potential for targeted therapy is being realized. In 2019, a fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) inhibitor, pemigatinib, was the first approved targeted therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic intrahepatic CCA who had FGFR2 gene fusions or rearrangement. More regulatory approvals for matched targeted therapies as second-line or subsequent treatments in advanced CCA followed, including additional drugs that target FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement. Recent tumor-agnostic approvals include (but are not limited to) drugs that target mutations/rearrangements in the following genes and are hence applicable to CCA: isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1); neurotrophic tropomyosin-receptor kinase (NTRK); the V600E mutation of the BRAF gene (BRAFV600E); and high tumor mutational burden, high microsatellite instability, and gene mismatch repair-deficient (TMB-H/MSI-H/dMMR) tumors. Ongoing trials investigate HER2, RET, and non-BRAFV600E mutations in CCA and improvements in the efficacy and safety of new targeted treatments. This review aims to present the current status of molecularly matched targeted therapy for advanced CCA.

Elevated PTTG1 predicts poor prognosis in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma and correlates with immunity

Background

PTTG1 has been reported to be linked with the prognosis and progression of various cancers, including kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC). In this article, we mainly investigated the associations between prognosis, immunity, and PTTG1 in KIRC patients.

Method

We downloaded transcriptome data from the TCGA-KIRC database. PCR and immunohistochemistry were used, respectively, to validate the expression of PTTG1 in KIRC at the cell line and the protein levels. Survival analyses as well as univariate or multivariate Cox hazard regression analyses were used to prove whether PTTG1 alone could affect the prognosis of KIRC. The most important point was to study the relationship between PTTG1 and immunity.

Results

The results of the paper revealed that the expression levels of PTTG1 were elevated in KIRC compared with para-cancerous normal tissues, validated by PCR and immunohistochemistry at the cell line and the protein levels (P < 0.05). High PTTG1 expression was related to shorter overall survival (OS) in patients with KIRC (P < 0.05). Through univariate or multivariate regression analysis, PTTG1 was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor for OS of KIRC (P < 0.05), and its related seven pathways were obtained through gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; P < 0.05). Moreover, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and immunity were found to be significantly connected with PTTG1 in KIRC (P < 0.05). Correlations between PTTG1 and immunotherapy responses implied that the low-PTTG1 group was more sensitive to immunotherapy (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

PTTG1 was closely associated with TMB or immunity, and it had a superior ability to forecast the prognosis of KIRC patients.

Current and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches for biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) comprise a heterogeneous group of aggressive malignancies with unfavorable prognoses. The benefit of chemotherapy seems to have reached a bottleneck and, therefore, new effective therapeutic strategies for advanced BTCs are needed. Molecularly targeted therapies in selected patients are rapidly changing the situation. However, the low frequency of specific driver alterations in BTCs limits their wide application. Recently, immunotherapeutic approaches are also under active investigation in BTCs, but the role of immunotherapy in BTCs remains controversial.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and meeting resources were searched for relevant articles published from January 2017 to May 2022. The search aimed to identify current and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches for BTCs. Information on clinical trials was obtained from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ and http://www.chictr.org.cn/.

RESULTS

Immunotherapy in BTC patients is currently under investigation, and most of the investigations focused on the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, only a subgroup of BTCs with microsatellite-instability high (MSI-H)/DNA mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) benefit from monotherapy of ICIs, and limited activity was observed in the second or subsequent settings. Nevertheless, promising results come from studies of ICIs in combination with other therapeutic approaches, including chemotherapy, in advanced BTCs, with a moderate toxicity profile. Recent studies demonstrated that compared to GEMCIS alone, durvalumab plus GEMCIS significantly improved patient survival (TOPAZ-1 trial) and that ICIs-combined chemoimmunotherapy is poised to become a new frontline therapy option, regardless of TMB and MMR/MSI status. Adoptive cell therapy and peptide- or dendritic-based cancer vaccines are other immunotherapeutic options that are being studied in BTCs. Numerous biomarkers have been investigated to define their predictive role in response to ICIs, but no predictive biomarker has been validated, except MSI-H/dMMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of immunotherapy in BTCs is currently under investigation and the results of ongoing studies are eagerly anticipated. Several studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ICIs in combination with chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients, such as the phase III TOPAZ-1 trial, which will change the standard care of first-line chemotherapy for advanced BTCs. However, further research is needed to understand the best combination with immunotherapy and to discover more predictive biomarkers to guide clinical practice.

Comprehensive germline and somatic genomic profiles of Chinese patients with biliary tract cancer

Background

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is an uncommon but highly lethal malignancy with poor clinical outcomes. To promote the development of precision medicine for BTC, uncovering its genomic profile becomes particularly important. However, studies on the genomic feature of Chinese BTC patients remain insufficient.

Methods

A total of 382 Chinese patients with BTC were enrolled in this study, including 71 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), 194 with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), and 117 with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Genetic testing was performed by utilizing the next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 499 cancer-related genes and the results were compared to those of Western BTC patients (MSKCC cohorts).

Results

The most prevalent genes were TP53 (51.6%), ARID1A (25.9%), KMT2C (24.6%), NCOR1 (17%), SMAD4 (15.2%), KRAS (14.9%), KMT2D (14.9%), ATM (14.1%), and APC (13.9%) in Chinese BTC patients. TP53, SMAD4, and APC were more prevalent in GBC, ECC, and ICC, respectively. In addition, 10.5% of Chinese BTC patients harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline alterations in 41 genes, which were mainly related to DNA damage repair (DDR). Additionally, the genomic features of Chinese and Western BTC tumors were similar, with the exception of the notable difference in the prevalence of TP53, KRAS, IDH1, KMT2C, and SMAD4. Notably, Chinese BTC patients had high prevalence (57.1%) of actionable alterations, especially for those with ECC, and half (192/382) of them had somatic DDR alterations, with the prevalence of deleterious ones being significantly higher than their Western counterparts. Twenty-three percent of patients had a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB-H, over 10 mutations/MB), and TMB was significantly higher in those with deleterious DDR alterations and/or microsatellite instability-high. The most common mutational signature in BTC patients was Signature 1, and interestingly, Signatures 1, 4, and 26 were significantly associated with higher TMB level, but not with the survival of patients who had received immunotherapy in pan-cancer.

Conclusion

Our study elaborated the distinct germline and somatic genomic characteristics of Chinese BTC patients and identified clinically actionable alterations, highlighting the possibility for the development and application of precision medicine.

Expression of PD-L1 as a predictive marker of sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

Expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been reported to correlate with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in various tumor types. However, there are few data on the role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive and prognostic biomarker of sensitivity to ICIs in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive and prognostic biomarker of response to ICIs in patients with advanced BTC.

DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed data from 83 advanced BTC patients who received ICIs as second- or third-line treatment between February 2018 and April 2021.

METHODS

All patient data analysis included evaluation of PD-L1 expression by the combined positive score (CPS).

RESULTS

Among 83 patients, 56 (67.5%) had PD-L1 positivity (CPS ⩾ 1). The objective response rate (ORR) to ICIs was significantly higher in advanced BTC patients with PD-L1 expression compared to those without PD-L1 expression (17.8% versus 0%, p = 0.026). However, there were no significant differences in median progression-free survival (PFS; 2.9 versus 2.6 months, p = 0.330) and median overall survival (OS; 8.1 versus 6.3 months, p = 0.289) as a response to ICIs between patients with and without PD-L1 expression. Also, there were no significant differences in ORR, PFS, and OS as a response to ICIs in conjunction with a response to a prior gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen (p = 0.654, p = 0.278, and p = 0.302, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that the expression of PD-L1 alone was not sufficient as a novel marker to select advanced BTC patients who might benefit from ICIs. Additional comprehensive studies of biomarkers that can assist in predicting BTC patient responses to pembrolizumab and/or nivolumab therapy are required.

Tumor Mutational Burden Is a Potential Predictive Biomarker for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have a dismal prognosis. This multisite, single-institution study analyzed the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced BTC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospectively maintained institutional database was searched for patients with advanced BTC. Electronic medical records of the patients with advanced BTC treated with an ICI that included programmed death-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 blockers were retrospectively reviewed to obtain data on patient characteristics, tumor characteristics including molecular biomarkers, detailed treatment, response characteristics, survival, and toxicities. The analysis included overall response rate, survival, and correlation between survival and molecular biomarkers.

RESULTS

The institutional database query identified 47 patients with advanced BTC who received at least one dose of an ICI; 11 (24%) patients in the first-line setting and the rest of the patients had refractory disease. The median age of the cohort was 62 years, and 51% were female. The overall response rate was 10.6%, with a disease control rate of 53.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 3.6 months and 6.9 months, respectively. Biomarker analysis revealed improved PFS in patients with tumor mutational burden > 5 mutations per megabase (median PFS: 6.4 v 2.2 months; P = .0027). No unexpected adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

ICIs are well tolerated and have modest antitumor activity in patients with advanced BTC. The study result supports the exploration of tumor mutational burden as a potential predictive biomarker for response to ICIs in patients with advanced BTC.