A Systematic Review of tRNA-Derived Small non-Coding RNAs as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Cancer

miR-29 as diagnostic biomarkers for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The timely diagnosis of tuberculosis through innovative biomarkers that do not rely on sputum samples is a primary focus for strategies aimed at eradicating tuberculosis. miR-29 is an important regulator of tuberculosis pathogenesis. Its differential expression pattern in healthy, latent, and active people who develop tuberculosis has revealed its potential as a biomarker in recent studies. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed for the role of miR-29 in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Methods

EMBASE, PubMed, CNKI, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched utilizing predefined keywords for literature published from 2000 to February 2024.Included in the analysis were studies reporting on the accuracy of miR-29 in the diagnosis of tuberculosis, while articles assessing other small RNAs were not considered. All types of study designs, including case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies, were included, whether prospectively or retrospectively sampled, and the quality of included studies was determined utilizing the QUADAS-2 tool. Publication bias was analyzed via the construction of funnel plots. Heterogeneity among studies and summary results for specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) are depicted in forest plots.

Results

A total of 227 studies were acquired from the various databases, and 18 articles were selected for quantitative analysis. These articles encompassed a total of 2,825 subjects, primarily sourced from the Asian region. Patient specimens, including sputum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, cerebrospinal fluid and serum/plasma samples, were collected upon admission and during hospitalization for tuberculosis testing. miR-29a had an overall sensitivity of 82% (95% CI 77, 85%) and an overall specificity of 82% (95% CI 78, 86%) for detecting tuberculosis. DOR was 21 (95% CI 16-28), and the area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86, 0.91). miR-29a had slightly different diagnostic efficacy in different specimens. miR-29a showed good performance in both the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. miR-29b and miR-29c also had a good performance in diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Conclusion

As can be seen from the diagnostic performance of miR-29, miR-29 can be used as a potential biomarker for the rapid detection of tuberculosis.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=461107.

Quantitative and qualitative detection of tRNAs, tRNA halves and tRFs in human cancer samples: Molecular grounds for biomarker development and clinical perspectives

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs playing a central role during protein synthesis. Besides translation, growing evidence suggests that in many contexts, precursor or mature tRNAs can also be processed into smaller fragments playing many non-canonical regulatory roles in different biological pathways with oncogenic relevance. Depending on the source, these molecules can be classified as tRNA halves (also known as tiRNAs) or tRNA-derived fragments (tRFs), and furtherly divided into 5'-tRNA and 3'-tRNA halves, or tRF-1, tRF-2, tRF-3, tRF-5, and i-tRF, respectively. Unlike DNA and mRNA, high-throughput sequencing of tRNAs is challenging, because of technical limitations of currently developed sequencing methods. In recent years, different sequencing approaches have been proposed allowing the quantification and identification of an increasing number of tRNA fragments with critical functions in distinct physiological and pathophysiological processes. In the present review, we discussed pros and cons of recent advances in different sequencing methods, also introducing the expanding repertoire of bioinformatics tool and resources specifically focused on tRNA research and discussing current issues in the study of these small RNA molecules. Furthermore, we discussed the potential value of tRNA fragments as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for different types of cancers.

An old friend with a new face: tRNA-derived small RNAs with big regulatory potential in cancer biology

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) essential for protein translation. Emerging evidence suggests that tRNAs can also be processed into smaller fragments, tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs), a novel class of sncRNAs with powerful applications and high biological relevance to cancer. tsRNAs biogenesis is heterogeneous and involves different ribonucleases, such as Angiogenin and Dicer. For many years, tsRNAs were thought to be just degradation products. However, accumulating evidence shows their roles in gene expression: either directly via destabilising the mRNA or the ribosomal machinery, or indirectly via regulating the expression of ribosomal components. Furthermore, tsRNAs participate in various biological processes linked to cancer, including apoptosis, cell cycle, immune response, and retroviral insertion into the human genome. It is emerging that tsRNAs have significant therapeutic potential. Endogenous tsRNAs can be used as cancer biomarkers, while synthetic tsRNAs and antisense oligonucleotides can be employed to regulate gene expression. In this review, we are recapitulating the regulatory roles of tsRNAs, with a focus on cancer biology.