Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurrent Head and Neck Carcinoma

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Recurrent and Oligometastatic Head and Neck Tumours

The treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs) encompasses a complex paradigm involving a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment. Locoregional recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure, and few patients are suitable for salvage surgery. Reirradiation with conventional radiation techniques is challenging due to normal tissue tolerance limits and the risk of significant toxicities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a highly conformal modality that offers the potential for cure while limiting the dose to surrounding tissue. There is also growing research that shows that those with oligometastatic disease can benefit from curative intent local ablative therapies such as SBRT. This review will look at published evidence regarding the use of SBRT in locoregional recurrent and oligometastatic HNCs.

Two novel stereotactic radiotherapy methods for locally advanced, previously irradiated head and neck cancers patients

To determine the feasibility and utility of conebeam CT-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for locally recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer (HNC) patients on the Halcyon, a ring delivery system (RDS). This research aims to quantify plan quality, treatment delivery accuracy, and overall efficacy by comparing against novel clinical TrueBeam HyperArc method. Ten recurrent HNC patients who were treated at our institution on TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) for 30 to 40 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions with noncoplanar HyperArc plans were re-planned on Halcyon (6MV-FFF). These plans were re-planned with the same Acuros-based dose engine. Additionally, we used site-specific full/partial coplanar VMAT arcs. PTV coverage, mean dose to GTV, maximum dose to organs-at-risk (OAR), beam-on time (BOT), and quality assurance (QA) results were investigated and compared. Halcyon provided highly conformal HNC SRT plans with slightly superior mean PTVD99 coverage (96.7% vs 95.5%, p = 0.071), and slightly lower mean GTV dose (37.8 Gy vs 38.2 Gy, p = 0.241) when compared to the HyperArc plans. Differences in plan conformality and maximum dose to OARs were statistically insignificant. Due to Halcyon's coplanar geometry, D2cm was significantly higher (p = 0.001) but Halcyon did result in a reduced normal brain dose by 1 Gy on average and up to 5.2 Gy in some cases. Halcyon provided similar patient-specific QA pass rates with a 2%/2mm gamma criteria (98.2% vs 98.5%) and independent in-house Monte Carlo second check results (97.7% vs 98.2%), suggesting identical treatment delivery accuracy. Halcyon plans resulted in slightly longer beam-on time (3.16 vs 2.30 minutes, p = 0.010), however door-to-door patient time is expected to be <10 minutes. Compared to clinical TrueBeam HyperArc, Halcyon SRT plans provided similar plan quality and treatment delivery accuracy with a potentially faster overall treatment using fully automated patient setup and verification. Rapid delivery of recurrent HNC SRT may reduce intrafraction motion errors while also improving patient compliance and comfort. To provide high-quality of HNC SRT similar to HyperArc, we recommend Halcyon users consider commissioning this novel method. This method will be useful for remote and underserved patient cohorts including Halcyon-only clinics as well.

HyperArc VMAT stereotactic radiotherapy for locally recurrent previously‐irradiated head and neck cancers: Plan quality, treatment delivery accuracy, and efficiency

Purpose

Materials/Methods

Results

Conclusion

Cyberknife Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review

Cyberknife radiosurgery is a frameless stereotactic robotic radiosurgery which has shown to deliver better treatment outcomes in the treatment of advanced head and neck (H&N) carcinomas, especially in previously irradiated and recurrent cases. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review of the available data on the outcomes of Cyberknife radiosurgery for treatment of head and neck cancer and to evaluate its collective outcomes. This systematic review was registered with the university with the registration no. FRP/2019/63 and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (RC/IRB/2019/132). Literature search was performed in the following: PubMed, Science direct, SciELO, MyScienceWork, Microsoft Academ EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Cochrane databases with the keywords “Cyberknife,” “oral cancer,” “oropharyngeal cancer,” and “head and neck cancer” and data was extracted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The records identified were 147 manuscripts. Excluded articles included 5 duplicate articles, 33 abstracts, 101 full text articles due to being off-topic, case reports, review, non-English, 1 survey, and 2 other articles containing data extracted from a main study which was already included. A total of 5 articles were evaluated for qualitative synthesis. The mean dose of Cyberknife radiosurgery delivered for previously irradiated recurrent H&N carcinoma patients was 34.57 Gy, with a mean sample size of 5 studied during the period of 2000 to 2016. The available evidence from the systematic review indicates that Cyberknife can be an efficacious treatment option for recurrent previously irradiated H&N carcinoma, especially for nonresectable tumors. There is paucity of homogenous data and studies in this arena; hence, meta-analysis could not be performed. Further standardized studies are essential, especially where the treatment of H&N carcinoma is considered.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessing the Impact of Palliative Radiotherapy on Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

Incurable head and neck cancer has a poor prognosis and impairs a patient's health-related quality of life. Palliative radiotherapy may improve or stabilize health-related quality of life and symptoms, best measured by patient-reported outcomes. There is no systematic analysis if palliative radiotherapy for head and neck cancer improves or stabilizes health-related quality of life or symptoms as validly measured by patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, the primary objective of this systematic review (PROSPERO-ID: CRD42020166434) was to assess the effect of palliative radiotherapy for head and neck cancer on patient-reported outcomes. The secondary objective was to assess the rate and quality of use of patient-reported outcomes in relevant studies claiming a "palliative effect" of radiotherapy. The databases MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, "ClinicalTrials.gov" were searched. Concerning the primary objective, four studies were eligible to assess the effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy as measured by patient-reported outcomes. A narrative synthesis suggests a favorable impact of palliative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and symptom burden. The risk of bias, however, is considerable and the overall quality of evidence low. Concerning the secondary objective, over 90% of studies claiming a "palliative effect" of palliative radiotherapy did either not use patient-reported outcomes or did so by limited quality. In conclusion, implementation of patient-reported outcomes in studies assessing palliative radiotherapy for head and neck cancer should be fostered. Palliative radiotherapy remains an option for head and neck cancer patients, although more studies focusing on patient-reported outcomes are needed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020166434.

Initial Data Pooling for Radiation Dose-Volume Tolerance for Carotid Artery Blowout and Other Bleeding Events in Hypofractionated Head and Neck Retreatments

PURPOSE

Dose-volume data for injury to carotid artery and other major vessels in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)/SABR head and neck reirradiation were reviewed, modeled, and summarized.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A PubMed search of the English-language literature (stereotactic and carotid and radiation) in April 2018 found 238 major vessel maximum point doses in 6 articles that were pooled for logistic modeling. Two subsequent studies with dose-volume major vessel data were modeled separately for comparison. Attempts were made to separate carotid blowout syndrome from other bleeding events (BE) in the analysis, but we acknowledge that all except 1 data set has some element of BE interspersed.

RESULTS

Prior radiation therapy (RT) dose was not uniformly reported per patient in the studies included, but a course on the order of conventionally fractionated 70 Gy was considered for the purposes of the analysis (with an approximately ≥6-month estimated interval between prior and subsequent treatment in most cases). Factors likely associated with reduced risk of BE include nonconsecutive daily treatment, lower extent of circumferential tumor involvement around the vessel, and no surgical manipulation before or after SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial data pooling for reirradiation involving the carotid artery resulted in 3 preliminary models compared in this Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) report. More recent experiences with alternating fractionation schedules and additional risk-reduction strategies are also presented. Complications data for the most critical structures such as spinal cord and carotid artery are so limited that they cannot be viewed as strong conclusions of probability of risk, but rather, as a general guideline for consideration. There is a great need for better reporting standards as noted in the High Dose per Fraction, Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic introductory paper.

Comparison of Intrafractional Motion in Head and Neck Cancer Between Two Immobilization Methods During Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy by CyberKnife

Purpose

Maintaining immobilization to minimize spine motion is very important during salvage stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for recurrent head and neck cancer. This study aimed to compare the intrafractional motion between two immobilization methods.

Patients and Methods

With a spine tracking system for image guiding, 9094 records from 41 patients receiving SABR by CyberKnife were obtained for retrospective comparison. Twenty-one patients were immobilized with a thermoplastic mask and headrest (Group A), and another 20 patients used a thermoplastic mask and headrest together with a vacuum bag to support the head and neck area (Group B). The intrafractional motion in the X (superior-inferior), Y (right-left), Z (anterior-posterior) axes, 3D (three-dimensional) vector, Roll, Pitch and Yaw in the two groups was compared. The margins of the planning target volume (PTV) to cover 95% intrafractional motion were evaluated.

Results

The translational movements in the X-axis, Y-axis, and 3D vector in Group A were significantly smaller than in Group B. The rotational errors in the Roll and Yaw in Group A were also significantly smaller than those in Group B; conversely, those in the Pitch in Group A were larger. To cover 95% intrafractional motion, margins of 0.96, 1.55, and 1.51 mm in the X, Y and Z axes, respectively were needed in Group A, and 1.06, 2.86, and 1.34 mm, respectively were required in Group B.

Conclusion

The immobilization method of thermoplastic mask and head rest with vacuum bag did not provide better immobilization than that without vacuum bag in most axes. The clinical use of 2 mm as a margin of PTV to cover 95% intrafractional motion was adequate in Group A but not in Group B.

A systematic review and practical considerations of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining popularity although its use in head and neck cancer (HNC) is not well defined. The primary objective was to review the published evidence regarding the use of stereotactic radiotherapy in HNC.

METHODS

A literature search was performed by using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for eligible studies from 2000 to 2019 and 26 relevant studies were identified.

RESULTS

Literature demonstrates a heterogeneous use of this technique with regards to patient population, primary or salvage treatment, dose fractionation regimens, outcomes and follow-up protocols. Carotid blow out syndrome is a risk as with other forms of reirradiation but alternative treatment regimens may reduce this risk.

CONCLUSION

At present there is a lack of evidence regarding SBRT as a primary treatment option for HNC and definitive answers regarding efficacy and tolerability cannot be provided but there is growing evidence that SBRT reirradiation regimens are safe and effective. In lieu of evidence from large Phase III trials, we define appropriate organ at risk constraints and prescription doses, with accurate plan summation approaches. Prospective randomised trials are warranted to validate improved treatment outcomes and acceptable treatment morbidity.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This article provides a comprehensive review of evidence of use of stereotactic radiotherapy in HNC site (either as a primary treatment or as reirradiation). We also provide an evidence-based approach to the implementation and practical consideration of stereotactic radiotherapy in HNC.

Evolving multidisciplinary treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in India✰

In this article, we highlight the evolution of a multimodal approach in the overall management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in India; present advances in technology (newer surgical techniques), novel medical and radiotherapy (RT) approaches; review their roles for an integrated approach for treating SCCHN and discuss the current role of immunotherapy in SCCHN. For locally advanced (LA) SCCHN, the multidisciplinary approach includes surgery followed by RT, with or without chemotherapy (CT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Improved surgical techniques of reconstruction and voice-preservation are being implemented. Advanced forms of high-precision conformal techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy are used to deliver highly conformal doses to tumors, sparing the surrounding normal tissue. Compared with RT alone, novel CT regimens and targeted therapeutic agents have the potential to improve locoregional control and survival and reduce treatment-induced toxicities. Several clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy, safety, and quality of life benefits of adding cetuximab to RT regimens in LASCCHN. Studies have also suggested a cetuximab-related laryngeal preservation benefit. At progression, platinum-based CT combined with cetuximab (a monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody) is the only validated option available as the first-line therapy. Thus, an integrated multidisciplinary approach plays a key role in maximizing patient outcomes, reduction in treatment related morbidities that consequently impact quality of life of survivors.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for De Novo Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for de novo (previously untreated) head and neck cancers (HNCs) is increasingly being used in medically unfit patients. A systematic review of SBRT was conducted for previously untreated HNCs.

Methods and Materials

Medline (PubMed), excerpta medica database, and Cochrane Library databases were queried from inception until July 2020. Comparative outcome data were extracted where available up to 5 years. Results from random-effect models were presented in forest plots, with between-study heterogeneity evaluated by I² statistics and Q-tests.

Results

Nine studies met inclusion criteria, representing 157 patients. Local control rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were as follows: 90.7% (95% confidence interval, 80.6%-95.6%), 81.8% (67.2%-90.7%), and 73.5% (40.4%-90.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 75.9% (75.1%-76.6%), 61.1% (60.3%-61.9%), and 50.0% (48.8%-51.4%), respectively. Late grade 3 to 4 toxicity rate was 3.3% (0.2%-10.2%), and late grade 5 toxicity rate was 0.1% (0.0%-1.0%).

Conclusions

SBRT for de novo HNC is safe and effective in providing locoregional control, with acceptable toxicities in most subsites. This finding warrants broader validation to guide its scope.

Radical external beam re-irradiation in the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer: Critical review

Management of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer remains a challenge for the surgeon as well as the treating radiation oncologist. Even in the era of modern radiotherapy, the rate of severe toxicity remains high with unsatisfactory treatment results. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and heavy-ion irradiation have all emerged as highly conformal and precise techniques that offer many radiobiological advantages in various clinical situations. Although re-irradiation is now widespread in clinical practice, little is known about the differences in treatment response and toxicity using diverse re-irradiation techniques. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the role of radiation therapy in recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer including patient selection, therapeutic outcome, and risk using different re-irradiation techniques. Critical review of published evidence on IMRT, SBRT, and heavy-ion full-dose re-irradiation is presented including data on locoregional control, overall survival, and toxicity.

Boron neutron capture therapy for locally recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of dose response and survival

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) that recurs locally is a therapeutic challenge. We investigated the efficacy of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) in the treatment of such patients and the factors associated with treatment response and survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventy-nine patients with inoperable, locally recurred HNSCC were treated with l-boronophenylalanine-mediated BNCT in Espoo, Finland, between February, 2003 and January, 2012. Prior treatments consisted of surgery and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to a median cumulative dose of 66 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 59-70 Gy) administered with or without concomitant chemotherapy. Tumor response was assessed using the RECISTv.1.0 criteria.

RESULTS

Forty patients received BNCT once (on 1 day), and 39 twice. The median time between the 2 treatments was 6 weeks. Forty-seven (68%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 57-79%) of the 69 evaluable patients responded; 25 (36%) had a complete response, 22 (32%) a partial response, 17 (25%) a stable disease lasting for a median of 4.2 months, and 5 (7%) progressed. The patients treated with BNCT twice responded more often than those treated once. The median follow-up time after BNCT was 7.8 years. The 2-year locoregional progression-free survival rate was 38% and the overall survival rate 21%. A high minimum tumor dose and a small volume were independently associated with long survival in a multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients responded to BNCT. A high minimum tumor dose from BNCT was predictive for response and survival.

The Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of CT-Guided Radioactive I-125 Seed Implantation for the Treatment of Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer After External Beam Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

To analyze the efficacy and safety of radioactive I-125 seed implantation in the treatment of recurrent head and neck tumors after radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The data of 101 patients with recurrent head and neck cancer after radiation therapy who received computed tomography guided radioactive I-125 seed implantation were analyzed. The median previous cumulative external irradiation dose was 66 Gy, and the median dose to 90% of the target volume (D90) after operation was 117 Gy. The short-term efficacy was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and the adverse event was evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

RESULTS

The 5-year local control rate was 26.6%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 15.5%. Univariate analysis showed that factors related to local control rate included age, pathologic type, implantation site, lesion volume, and D90. The 5-year local control rate was 11.5% (2-year) if D90 was <120 Gy and 44.2% if D90 was ≥120 Gy (P = .001). Multivariate analysis showed that pathologic type, lesion volume, and D90 were independent factors related to local control (P = .002, 0, .014, respectively); Karnofsky performance status and lesion volume were independent factors associated with survival (P = .021 and 0, respectively). For the side effects, there were 26 cases of skin or mucosa ulceration (25.7%), 14 cases of pain (13.9%), and 2 cases of dry mouth (2%). The correlation between toxicity and dose had not been found.

CONCLUSIONS

Radioactive I-125 seed implantation in the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer after radiation therapy showed acceptable efficacy and safety. Nonsquamous carcinoma, small lesion volume, and high dose (D90) were correlated with better local control.

[Technical aspects and indications of extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy]

Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy has developed considerably in recent years and is now an important part of the therapeutic alternatives to be offered to patients with cancer. It offers opportunities that have progressively led physicians to reconsider the therapeutic strategy, for example in the case of local recurrence in irradiated territory or oligometastatic disease. The literature on the subject is rich but, yet, there is no real consensus on therapeutic indications. This is largely due to the lack of prospective, randomized studies that have evaluated this technique with sufficient recoil. We propose a review of the literature on the technical aspects and indications of extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

[Re-irradiation of head and neck cancers: Target volumes, technical evolutions and prospects]

Malignant tumors of the head and neck have a predominantly regional recurrence pattern, with most deaths resulting from this progression. Optimization of re-radiation in recurrence setting is a major objective for these patients. Extensive research has been carried out with the PubMed search engine to find publications dealing with this topic. The first attempts to reirradiate the ORL sphere date back to the 1980s and the first to be performed by intensity modulation conformational radiotherapy (IMRT) date back to the late 1990s. Compared to 3 dimensional conformal radiotherapy, IMRT improves clinical outcomes and reduces toxicity. In IMRT series, associated or not with concomitant chemotherapy, the locoregional control obtained at 2 years was of the order of 45 to 65% and the overall survival of 15 to 60%, depending on predictive factors. Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred on the order of 10 to 30% and late-grade 3 toxicity on the order of 15 to 50%. In a selected population with low volumes tumors, stereotactic re-irradiation at a minimum dose of 35Gy obtained outcome comparable to IMRT. Re-irradiation of head and neck tumors by proton therapy is rare. The toxicity rate appears to be lower than that usually seen after photon therapy. However, we do not have a long follow-up. This technique therefore remains reserved for search protocols and represents a future perspective in these situations.

Head and Neck Tumor Control Probability: Radiation Dose-Volume Effects in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Previously-Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer: Report of the AAPM Working Group

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a viable reirradiation strategy for locally recurrent previously-irradiated head and neck cancer. Doses in the literature have varied, which challenges clinical application of SBRT as well as clinical trial design.

MATERIAL & METHODS

A working group was formed through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to study tumor control probabilities for SBRT in head and neck cancer. We herein present a systematic review of the available literature addressing the dose/volume data for tumor control probability with SBRT in patients with locally recurrent previously-irradiated head and neck cancer. Dose-response models are generated that present tumor control probability as a function of dose.

RESULTS

Data from more than 300 cases in 8 publications suggest that there is a dose-response relationship, with superior local control and possibly improved overall survival for doses of 35 to 45 Gy (in 5 fractions) compared with <30 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy doses equivalent to 5-fraction doses of 40 to 50 Gy are suggested for retreatment.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers a promising opportunity for cure and/or palliation to patients with recurrent head and neck cancer whose comorbidities, performance status, and history of prior treatment may preclude many other salvage options. Stereotactic body radiation therapy appears to have a favorable response and toxicity profile compared with other nonoperative salvage options for recurrent head and neck cancer. However, the risk of severe toxicity remains, with carotid blowout syndrome a unique concern, although the incidence of this complication may be minimized with alternating-day fractionation. The short overall treatment time and low rates of acute toxicity make SBRT an optimal vehicle to integrate with novel systemic therapies, and several phase II studies have used concurrent cetuximab as a radiosensitizer with SBRT with promising results. Ongoing studies aim to evaluate the potential synergistic effect of SBRT with immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent head and neck cancer.

Survey of current practices from the International Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Consortium (ISBRTC) for head and neck cancers

Aim: To provide a multi-institutional description of current practices of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for head and neck cancer. Materials & methods: 15 international institutions with significant experience in head and neck SBRT were asked to complete a questionnaire covering clinical and technical factors. Results: SBRT is used 10–100% of the time for recurrent primary head and neck cancer, and 0–10% of the time in newly diagnosed disease. Five centers use a constraint for primary disease of 3–5 cm and 25–30 cc. Nine institutions apply a clinical target volume expansion of 1–10 mm and 14 use a planning target volume margin of 1–5 mm. Fractionation regimens vary between 15 and 22 Gy in 1 fraction to 30–50 Gy in 5 or 6 fractions. The risk of carotid blowout quoted in the re-irradiation setting ranges from 3 to 20%. Conclusion: There is considerable heterogeneity in patient selection and techniques in head and neck SBRT practice among experienced centers.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer: A critical review

The management of patients with recurrent head and neck cancers remains a challenging clinical dilemma. Concerns over toxicity with re-irradiation have limited its use in the clinical setting. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a highly conformal and precise type of radiotherapy and has the advantage of sparing normal tissue. Although SBRT is an attractive treatment modality, its use in the clinic is limited, given the technically challenging nature of the procedure. In this review, we attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of re-irradiation in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers, with particular attention to the advent of SBRT and its use with systemic therapies such as cetuximab. In the second portion of this review, we present our systematic review of published experiences with SBRT in recurrent head and neck cancers in an attempt to provide data on response rates (RR), overall survival and toxicity. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 595-601, 2017.

High-dose hypofractionated radiotherapy is effective and safe for tumors in the head-and-neck

OBJECTIVES

High-dose, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) is sometimes used to treat malignancy in the head-and-neck (HN), both in the curative and palliative setting. Its safety and efficacy have been reported in small studies and are still controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes and toxicities of HFRT, including ultra-high-dose fractionation schemes (⩾8Gray per fraction), for HN malignancies.

RESULTS

A total of 62 sites of measurable gross disease in 48 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 54.3months among five survivors and 6.0months in the remaining patients. Median RT dose was 30Gray in 5 fractions; 20/62 lesions (32%) received dose-per-fraction of ⩾8Gray. Overall response rate at first follow-up was 79%. One-year local-progression free rate was 50%. On multivariate analysis for locoregional control, dose-per-fraction ⩾6Gray was associated with control (p=0.04) and previous radiation was associated with inferior control (p=0.04). Patients who achieved complete response to RT had longer survival than those who did not (p=0.01). Increased toxicity rates were not observed among patients treated with dose-per-fraction ⩾8Gray; only re-irradiation increased toxicity rates.

CONCLUSION

Despite the poor prognostic features noted in this cohort of patients with HN malignancies, HFRT was associated with high response rates, good local control, and acceptable toxicity. Sites that were treated with 6Gray per fraction or higher and had not been previously irradiated had the best disease control. A prospective trial is warranted to further refine the use and indications of HFRT in this setting.

Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to generate Monte Carlo computed dose distributions with the X-ray voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) algorithm in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and compare to heterogeneity corrected pencil-beam (PB-hete) algorithm. This study includes 10 head and neck cancer patients who underwent SRT re-irradiation using heterogeneity corrected pencil-beam (PB-hete) algorithm for dose calculation. Prescription dose was 24-40 Gy in 3-5 fractions (treated 3-5 fractions per week) with at least 95% of the PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose. A stereotactic head and neck localization box was attached to the base of the thermoplastic mask fixation for target localization. The gross tumor volume (GTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs) were contoured on the 3D CT images. The planning target volume (PTV) was generated from the GTV with 0 to 5 mm uniform expansion; PTV ranged from 10.2 to 64.3 cc (average = 35.0±17.5 cc). OARs were contoured on the 3D planning CT and consisted of spinal cord, brainstem, optic structures, parotids, and skin. In the BrainLab treatment planning system (TPS), clinically optimal SRT plans were generated using hybrid planning technique (combination of 3D conformal nonco-planar arcs and nonopposing static beams) for the Novalis-Tx linear accelerator consisting of high-definition multileaf collimators (HD-MLCs: 2.5 mm leaf width at isocenter) and 6 MV-SRS (1000 MU/min) beam. For the purposes of this study, treatment plans were recomputed using XVMC algorithm utilizing identical beam geometry, multileaf positions, and monitor units and compared to the corresponding clinical PB-hete plans. The Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions show small decreases (< 1.5%) in calculated dose for D99, Dmean, and Dmax of the PTV coverage between the two algorithms. However, the average target volume encompassed by the prescribed percent dose (Vp) was about 2.5% less with XVMC vs. PB-hete and ranged between -0.1 and 7.8%. The averages for D100 and D10 of the GTV were lower by about 2% and ranged between -0.8 and 3.1%. For the spinal cord, both the maximal dose difference and the dose to 0.35 cc of the structure were higher by an average of 4.2% (ranged 1.2 to -13.6%) and 1.4% (ranged 7.5 to -11.3%), respectively, with XVMC calculation. For the brainstem, the maximal dose dif-ferences and the dose to 0.5 cc of the structure were, on average, higher by 2.4% (ranged 6.4 to -8.0%) and 3.6% (ranged 6.4 to -9.0%), respectively. For the parotids, both the mean dose and the dose to 20 cc of parotids were higher by an average of 3% (ranged -0.2 to -5.9%) and 4% (ranged -0.2 to -8%), respectively, with XVMC calculation. For the optic apparatus, results from both algorithms were similar. However, the mean dose to skin was 3% higher (ranged 0 to -6%), on average, with XVMC compared to PB-hete, although the maximum dose to skin was 2% lower (ranged -5% to 15.5%). The results from our XVMC dose calculations for head and neck SRT patients indicate small to moderate underdosing of the tumor volume when compared to PB-hete calculation. However, Vp was up to 7.8% less for the lower-neck patient with XVMC. Critical structures, such as spinal cord, brainstem, or parotids, could potentially receive higher doses when using XVMC algorithm. Given the proximity to critical structures and the smaller volumes treated with SRT in the region of the head and neck, the differences between XVMC and PB-hete calculation methods may be of clinical interest.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: an addition to the armamentarium against head and neck cancer

In the recent years, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a potential therapy for head and neck malignancies. Although early results appear to be promising, serious acute and late effects have been observed, mainly in patients who have had prior external beam radiotherapy. This review will discuss the radiobiology of SBRT, clinical rationale and outcomes for SBRT in head and neck cancers and focus on the benefits and potential limitations in both de novo and re-irradiation settings.

Hyperfractionated stereotactic reirradiation for recurrent head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The goal of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of hyperfractionated stereotactic reirradiation (re-RT) as a treatment for inoperable, recurrent, or second primary head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) that is not suitable for systemic treatment.

PATIENTS AND MATERIALS

Forty patients with recurrent or second primary HNSCC were included in this study. The patients had a median gross tumor volume of 76 ml (range 14-193 ml) and a previous radiotherapy dose greater than 60 Gy. Treatment was designed to cover 95 % of the planning target volume (PTV, defined as gross tumor volume [GTV] + 3 mm to account for microscopic spreading, with no additional set-up margin) with the prescribed dose (48 Gy in 16 fractions b.i.d.). Treatment was administered twice daily with a minimum 6 h gap. Uninvolved lymph nodes were not irradiated.

RESULTS

Treatment was completed as planned for all patients (with median duration of 11 days, range 9-14 days). Acute toxicity was evaluated using the RTOG/EORTC scale. A 37 % incidence of grade 3 mucositis was observed, with recovery time of ≤ 4 weeks for all of these patients. Acute skin toxicity was never observed to be higher than grade 2. Late toxicity was also evaluated according to the RTOG/EORTC scale. Mandible radionecrosis was seen in 4 cases (10 %); however, neither carotid blowout syndrome nor other grade 4 late toxicity occurred. One-year overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (L-PFS) were found to be 33 and 44 %, respectively. Performance status and GTV proved to be significant prognostic factors regarding local control and survival.

CONCLUSION

Hyperfractionated stereotactic re-RT is a reasonable treatment option for patients with recurrent/second primary HNSCC who were previously exposed to high-dose irradiation and who are not candidates for systemic treatment or hypofractionation.

Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy for symptom control in head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE

Our aim was to determine the efficacy and quality of life outcomes of head and neck (HN) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in a palliative population with significant proportions of de novo HN tumors not amenable to surgery or protracted course of curative radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective database identified 21 patients with 24 sites that were treated. Patients were treated with intensity modulated RT (IMRT), usually 7-9 static fields with a 2-3-mm margin from gross tumor volume to planning target volume only with no microscopic margin added. Electronic patient records and treatment plans were reviewed. Basic demographic information was collected. The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire was the tool used to collect QOL data both pre- and on-treatment fraction 5. Univariate analysis was performed for predictors of local control (LC) and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients had 24 sites that were treated. The median age was 87 (range 25-103) and median KPS was 70. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) 19/24 (79 %), basal cell carcinoma (BCC) 3/24 (16 %), and melanoma (4 %). The median maximal diameter was 3.7 cm (range 1-10 cm). The most commonly treated site was lymph nodes in the neck 13/24 (54 %), skin 8/24 (33 %), 4/24 (16 %) other HN mucosal primary sites. Of the 24 lesions, 17 (71 %) were de novo, without prior treatment and 7/24 (29 %) were recurrent. The most commonly used dose/fraction (fx) was 40 Gy/5 (fx) (range 35/5fx-48/6fx). Of the 24 lesions, 6 (25 %) had complete response, 16/24 (67 %) had partial response, and 2/24 (8 %) had no response. Control was defined as no further progression after treatment. For the entire cohort, LC at 3, 6, and 9 months were 66, 50, and 33 %, respectively. In the de novo group, 2/16 (12.5 %) had local failures with the LC rate of 94, 94, and 87 % at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. In the recurrent group, 4/8 (50 %) had failure with LC rates of 87. 5, 62.5, and 50 % at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. Of the 21 patients, 10 died during follow up, with the OS rate at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year of 90, 70, and 60 %, respectively. Being defined "de novo" showed a trend toward statistical significance p = 0.046 for local failure. Overall survival did not show significant difference between de novo and recurrent with a p value of 0.267. No significant prognostic variables for OS were found. Pre-treatment QOL scores for the entire cohort were 53/130 versus 38/130 (lower scores indicating better QOL) scores with a trend toward statistical significance p = 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT is efficacious with improved quality of life within this elderly frail population in the treatment of de novo and recurrent tumors of the head and neck with promising quality of life scores.

Multi institutional phase II study of concomitant stereotactic reirradiation and cetuximab for recurrent head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

Recurrent head and neck cancer is associated to a poor survival prognosis. A high toxicity rate is demonstrated when surgery and/or radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy are combined. Furthermore, the duration of treatment is often not ethically compatible with the expected survival (median survival<1year). Normal tissues tolerance limits the use of reirradiation and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could offer precise irradiation while sparing healthy tissues. After completion of a feasibility study, results of a multicentric study (Lille, Nancy & Nice) using SBRT with cetuximab are reported. The aim of the study was to deliver non toxic short course SBRT (2weeks) in order to get the same local control as the one demonstrated with longer protocols.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with inoperable recurrent, or new primary tumor in a previously irradiated area, were included (WHO<3). Reirradiation (RT) dose was 36Gy in six fractions of 6Gy to the 85% isodose line covering 95% of the PTV with 5 injections of concomitant cetuximab (CT). All patients had previous radiotherapy, 85% had previous surgery and 48% previous chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between 11/2007 and 08/2010, 60 were included (46 men and 14 women), 56 received CT+RT, 3 were not treated and 1 received only CT. Median age was 60 (42-87)) and all 56 patients had squamous carcinoma and received concomitant cetuximab. Mean time between previous radiotherapy and the start of SBRT was 38months. Cutaneous toxicity was observed for 41 patients. There was one toxic death from hemorrhage and denutrition. Median follow-up was 11.4months. At 3months, response rate was 58.4% (95% CI: 43.2-72.4%) and disease control rate was 91.7% (95% CI: 80.0-97.7%). The one-year OS rate was 47.5% (95% CI: 30.8-62.4).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that short SBRT with cetuximab is an effective salvage treatment with good response rate in this poor prognosis population with previously irradiated HNC. Treatment is feasible and, with appropriate care to limiting critical structure, acute toxicities are acceptable. This combination may be the reference treatment is this population.

A simple strategy to decrease fatal carotid blowout syndrome after stereotactic body reirradiaton for recurrent head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes and fatal carotid blow out syndrome (CBOS) incidence rates between two different stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) protocols.

METHODS

The study included 75 patients with inoperable locally recurrent head and neck cancer treated with SBRT in our department between June 2007 and March 2011. The first 43 patients were treated sequentially (group I). Then our SBRT protocol was changed due to the high rate of CBOS, and the following 32 patients were treated every other day in a prospective institutional protocol (group II).

RESULTS

Median overall survival in group I and group II was 11 months and 23 months, respectively (P = 0.006). We observed 11 cases of CBOS. Only 1 of 7 patients (14%) with CBOS survived in group I, whereas 2 of 4 patients (50%) in group II remain alive. CBOS free median overall survivals were 9 months, and 23 months in group I and group II respectively (P = 0.002). The median radiation dose received by the carotid artery in patients with CBOS was 36.5 Gy (range: 34-42.8 Gy), versus 34.7 Gy (range: 0-44 Gy) in the patients that didn't have CBOS (P = 0.15). CBOS did not occur in any of the patients with a maximum carotid artery radiation dose <34 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Every other day SBRT protocol for re-irradiation of recurrent head and neck cancer is promising in terms of decreasing the incidence of fatal CBOS.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in elderly patients

Background

Treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the elderly is often complicated by comorbidities that preclude surgery, chemotherapy and/or conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has thus garnered interest in this setting.

Methods

A retrospective review of 26 patients of age ≥ 80 with pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with definitive SBRT+/-chemotherapy from 2007–2011 was performed. Twenty-seven percent of patients were stage I, 38% were stage II, 27% were stage III and 8% were stage IV. Patients most commonly received 24 Gy/1 fraction or 30-36 Gy/3 fractions. Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), cause specific survival (CSS) and freedom-from-metastatic disease (FFMD).

Results

The median age was 86 (range 80–91), and median follow-up was 11.6 months (3.5-24.6). The median planning target volume was 21.48 cm³ (6.1-85.09). Median OS was 7.6 months with 6/12 month OS rates of 65.4%/34.6%, respectively. Median LC was 11.5 months, 6-month and 12-month actuarial LC rates were 60.1% and 41.2%, respectively. There were no independent predictors for LC, but there was a trend for improved LC with prescription dose greater than 20 Gy (p = 0.063). Median CSS was 6.3 months, and 6-month and 12-month actuarial CSS were 53.8% and 23.1%, respectively. Median FFMD was 8.4 months, and 6-month and 12-month actuarial rates were 62.0% and 41.4%, respectively. Nine patients (47%) had local failures, 11 (58%) had distant metastasis, and 7 (37%) had both. There were no acute or late grade 3+ toxicities.

Conclusions

Definitive SBRT is feasible, safe and effective in elderly patients who have unresectable disease, have comorbidities precluding surgery or decline surgery.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary and recurrent head and neck tumors

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat a variety of head and neck tumors as a result of its highly conformal dose distributions and stereotactic spatial accuracy in delivery. Our experience and other previous reports have shown that SBRT is technically feasible, well-tolerated and compares favorably to other alternatives of salvage therapy in the management of patients with recurrent and/or previously irradiated head and neck cancers. Furthermore, it has the advantage of a shorter treatment schedule, greater compliance, and safe delivery in the outpatient setting. This affords an opportunity to introduce SBRT as a definitive treatment in select patients. This review presents an overview of the use of SBRT for managing head and neck tumors by highlighting the existing indications and the expanding role of SBRT in managing these patients.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation--a review

Although locoregional relapse is frequent after definitive radiotherapy (RT) or multimodal treatments, re-irradiation is only performed in few patients even in palliative settings like e.g. vertebral metastasis. This is most due to concern about potentially severe complications, especially when large volumes are exposed to re-irradiation. With technological advancements in treatment planning the interest in re-irradiation as a local treatment approach has been reinforced. Recently, several studies reported re-irradiation for spinal metastases using SBRT with promising local and symptom control rates and simultaneously low rates of toxicity. These early data consistently indicate that SBRT is a safe and effective treatment modality in this clinical situation, where other treatment alternatives are rare. Similarly, good results have been shown for SBRT in the re-irradiation of head and neck tumors. Despite severe late adverse effects were reported in several studies, especially after single fraction doses >10 Gy, they appear less frequently compared to conventional radiotherapy. Few studies with small patient numbers have been published on SBRT re-irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) is limited by systemic progression and seems to depend particularly on patient selection. SBRT re-irradiation after primary SBRT should not be practiced in centrally located tumors due to high risk of severe toxicity. Only limited data is available for SBRT re-irradiation of pelvic tumors: feasibility and acceptable toxicity has been described, suggesting SBRT as a complementary treatment modality for local symptom control.

A retrospective, deformable registration analysis of the impact of PET-CT planning on patterns of failure in stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has seen increasing use as a salvage strategy for selected patients with recurrent, previously-irradiated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (rSCCHN). PET-CT may be advantageous for tumor delineation and evaluation of treatment failures in SBRT. We analyzed the patterns of failure following SBRT for rSCCHN and assessed the impact of PET-CT treatment planning on these patterns of failure.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 96 patients with rSCCHN treated with SBRT. Seven patients (7%) were treated after surgical resection of rSCCHN and 89 patients (93%) were treated definitively. PET-CT treatment planning was used for 45 patients whereas non-PET-CT planning was used for 51 patients. Categories of failure were assigned by comparing recurrences on post-treatment scans to the planning target volume (PTV) from planning scans using the deformable registration function of VelocityAI™. Failures were defined: In-field (>75% inside PTV), Overlap (20-75% inside PTV), Marginal (<20% inside PTV but closest edge within 1cm of PTV), or Regional/Distant (more than 1cm from PTV).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 7.4 months (range, 2.6-52 months). Of 96 patients, 47 (49%) developed post-SBRT failure. Failure distribution was: In-field-12.3%, Overlap-24.6%, Marginal-36.8%, Regional/Distant-26.3%. There was a significant improvement in overall failure-free survival (log rank p = 0.037) and combined Overlap/Marginal failure-free survival (log rank p = 0.037) for those receiving PET-CT planning vs. non-PET-CT planning in the overall cohort (n = 96). Analysis of the definitive SBRT subgroup (n = 89) increased the significance of these findings (overall failure: p = 0.008, Overlap/Marginal failure: p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in age, gender, time from prior radiation, dose, use of cetuximab with SBRT, tumor differentiation, and tumor volume between the PET-CT and non-PET-CT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Most failures after SBRT treatment for rSCCHN were near misses, i.e. Overlap/Marginal failures (61.4%), suggesting an opportunity to improve outcomes with more sensitive imaging. PET-CT treatment planning showed the lowest rate of overall and near miss failures and is beneficial for SBRT treatment planning.

Malignant melanoma of the head and neck: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of cases in northern Japan

BACKGROUND

Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck is rare and is associated with a poor prognoses because of locoregional failure and distant metastasis. The aim of our study was to review the characteristics of these patients in northern Japan and to analyze their outcomes.

METHODS

The medical records of 94 patients who had been provided initial treatment in 12 institutes from 1998 to 2007 were reviewed.

RESULTS

When the 5-year overall survival rates of patients were evaluated, we found that the survival rates of patients treated by chemotherapy were significantly lower than those of patients treated by surgery or radiation. The survival rates of the single-treatment modality, 2-modality, and ≥3-modality groups were 23.4%, 38.0%, and 33.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that patients who underwent combined treatment had better prognoses. However, we found that chemotherapy had no additional survival benefits.

[Reirradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers]

Recurrences or second primary head and neck cancers meant, for a long time, therapeutic dead ends. Surgery was the standard treatment, but could only be achieved in 25% of the patients. The GETTEC-GORTEC (99-01) randomized trial showed that radiochemotherapy improved disease-free survival for a highly selected population. For inoperable patients, three options can be discussed: supportive care only, chemotherapy or radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. The EXTREME protocol showed that combining platinum, 5FU and cetuximab improved overall survival for recurrent or metastatic forms. This is certainly the best option for advanced forms, which are not accessible to radiotherapy. Concerning radiotherapy, only one randomized trial compared chemoradiotherapy to chemotherapy alone using methotrexate. The overall survival, the main objective in this study, was not improved, however, the enrollment was incomplete and included many advanced stage tumors. Other articles are based on Vokes' initial work of radiochemotherapy delivered in split-course over a period of 11 weeks. All conventional and conformational radiotherapy series showed improved local control and disease-free survival rates, but at the expense of acute and late toxicities demanding a drastic patients selection. New radiotherapy techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have reduced toxicities with a likely oncological results improvement, offering treatments which are spread over six to seven weeks for IMRT and two weeks for SBRT. The better treatment tolerance allows an increasing number of eligible patients. The main future objective will be to define the specific IMRT and SBRT indications.

Salvage stereotactic reirradiation with or without cetuximab for locally recurrent head-and-neck cancer: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

Normal tissues tolerance limits the use of reirradiation for recurrent head-and-neck cancers (HNC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could offer precise irradiation while sparing healthy tissues. Results of a feasibility study using SBRT with or without cetuximab are reported for reirradiation of recurrent primary HNC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with inoperable recurrent, or new primary tumor, in a previously irradiated area were included. Reirradiation dose was 36 Gy in six fractions of 6 Gy to the 85% isodose line covering 95% of the planning target volume. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma received concomitant cetuximab.

RESULTS

Between June 2007 and January 2010, 40 patients were prospectively treated for 43 lesions. Median age was 60 and median tumor size was 29 mm. Fifteen patients received concomitant cetuximab and 1 received concomitant cisplatin. Median follow-up was 25.6 months with 34 patients evaluable for tumor response. Median overall survival was 13.6 months and response rate was 79.4% (15 complete and 12 partial responses). Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 4 patients.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that short SBRT with or without cetuximab is an effective salvage treatment with good response rate in this poor prognosis population with previously irradiated HNC. Treatment is feasible and, with appropriate care to limiting critical structure, acute toxicities are acceptable. A prospective multicenter Phase II trial of SRT and concomitant cetuximab in recurrent HNC squamous cell carcinoma is ongoing.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally recurrent, previously irradiated nonsquamous cell cancers of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising salvage strategy for patients with recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer; however, data are limited predominantly to squamous cell carcinomas. Herein, we report the efficacy of SBRT in recurrent, nonsquamous cell cancers of the head and neck (NSCHNs).

METHODS

In all, 34 patients with pathologically proven NSCHN were re-irradiated with SBRT to a median dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions (interquartile range, 30-44 Gy). Toxicity and quality of life were followed prospectively.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10 months (absolute range, 0-55 months). The 6-month/1-year local control rate was 77/59%, with a 6-month/1-year overall survival of 76/59%. Local control was significantly improved for tumors <25 mL (p = .030). Acute/late grade 3 toxicity was 15/6%, with no grade 4-5 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for previously irradiated, locally recurrent NSCHN provides promising local control, especially for tumors <25 mL, with minimal toxicity. The optimal dose for larger tumors remains to be defined.

The impact of tumor volume and radiotherapy dose on outcome in previously irradiated recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) dose and tumor volume on outcomes in patients with recurrent, previously irradiated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 96 patients with recurrent, previously irradiated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with SBRT using Cyberknife and Trilogy-intensity-modulated radiosurgery. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to estimate locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival rates. Response was evaluated using positron emission tomography/computed tomography or computed tomography and detailed physical examination.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for all patients was 14 months (2-39 months). The median dose of prior radiation was 68.4 Gy (32-170 Gy). Patients were divided into 4 SBRT dose groups: I (15-28 Gy/n = 29), II (30-36 Gy/n = 22), III (40 Gy/n = 18), and IV (44-50 Gy/n = 27). The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 24.3(3) cm (2.5-162 cm). For GTV ≤25 cm(3) (n = 50), complete response rates were 27.8%/30%/45.5%/45.5%, and for GTV >25 cm(3) (n = 46), complete response rates were 20%/25%/42.8%/50% for SBRT groups I-IV, respectively. The 1-/2-/3-year LRC rates for doses 40 to 50 Gy were 69.4%/57.8%/41.1%, respectively, whereas for 15 to 36 Gy, they were 51.9%/31.7%/15.9%, respectively (P = 0.02). The overall 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 58.9% and 28.4%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated with no grade 4/5 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation up to 50 Gy in 5 fractions is feasible with SBRT for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Higher SBRT doses were associated with significantly higher LRC rates. Large tumor volume required higher SBRT doses to achieve optimal response rates compared with smaller tumor volume.

Concurrent cetuximab with stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a single institution matched case-control study

PURPOSE

Locally recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma can be treated with curative intent by surgical salvage or reirradiation with or without chemotherapy. We have previously demonstrated the feasibility and safety of stereotactic body reirradiation at our institution; however, efficacy has been unsatisfactory. Based on the successful combination of cetuximab with radiotherapy in locally-advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, we compared stereotactic body radiotherapy alone with combination therapy, using concomitant cetuximab with stereotactic body radiotherapy, to enhance clinical efficacy while minimizing toxicity.

METHODS

In a retrospective-matched cohort study, we compared 2 groups of patients treated over a 6-year period with stereotactic body radiation therapy alone (n=35) or with weekly cetuximab infusion during stereotactic body radiotherapy (n=35), and evaluated clinical response, local control, overall survival, and toxicity. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-ups for patients alive at last contact were 21.3 months and 24.8 months for stereotactic body radiotherapy only (n=13) and stereotactic body radiotherapy plus cetuximab (n=22), respectively. Our results indicate that cetuximab conferred an overall survival advantage (24.5 vs. 14.8 months) when compared with the stereotactic body radiotherapy alone arm, without a significant increase in grade 3/4 toxicities. This survival advantage was also observed in the subgroup that had received cetuximab therapy during their prior therapeutic regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest an overall survival benefit of concomitant cetuximab with stereotactic body radiotherapy in locally recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and suggest a role in this setting. Concomitant cetuximab with stereotactic body radiotherapy is a reasonable approach for unresectable recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and should be tested in prospective randomized trials to validate its clinical efficacy.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We reviewed outcomes of 71 patients treated with SBRT for pancreatic cancer between July 2004 and January 2009. Forty patients (56%) had locally unresectable disease, 11 patients (16%) had local recurrence following surgical resection, 8 patients (11%) had metastatic disease, and 12 patients (17%) received adjuvant SBRT for positive margins. The median dose was 24 Gy (18-25 Gy), given in a single-fraction SBRT (n = 67) or fractionated SBRT (n = 4). Kaplan-Meyer survival analyses were used to estimate freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival (OS) rates.

RESULTS

The median follow-up among surviving patients was 12.7 months (4-26 months). The median tumor volume was 17 mL (5.1-249 mL). The overall FFLP rates at 6 months/1 year were 71.7%/48.5%, respectively. Among those with macroscopic disease, FFLP was achieved in 77.3% of patients with tumor size <15 mL (n = 22), and 59.5% for ≥15 mL (n = 37) (P = 0.02). FFLP was achieved in 73% following 24 to 25 Gy, and 45% with 18 to 22 Gy (P = 0.004). The median OS was 10.3 months, with 6 month/1 year OS rates of 65.3%/41%, respectively. Grade 1-2 acute and late GI toxicity were seen in 39.5% of patients. Three patients experienced acute grade 3 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT is feasible, with minimal grade ≥3 toxicity. The overall FFLP rate for all patients was 64.8%, comparable to rates with external beam radiotherapy. This shorter treatment course can be delivered without delay in adjuvant systemic therapy.

Carbon ion radiotherapy performed as re-irradiation using active beam delivery in patients with tumors of the brain, skull base and sacral region

INTRODUCTION

To asses carbon ion radiation therapy (RT) performed as re-irradiation in 28 patients with recurrent tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were treated with carbon ion RT as re-irradiation for recurrent chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base (n=16 and n=2), one chordoma and one chondrosarcoma of the os sacrum, high-risk meningioma (n=3), adenoid-cystic carcinoma (n=4) as well as one SCCHN. All patients were treated using active raster scanning, and treatment planning was performed on CT- and MRI-basis. All patients were followed prospectively during follow-up.

RESULTS

In all patients re-irradiation could be applied safely without interruptions. For skull base tumors, local tumor control after re-irradiation was 92% at 24 months and 64% at 36 months. Survival after re-irradiation was 86% at 24 months, and 43% at 60 months. In all three meningiomas treated with C12 for re-irradiation, the tumor recurrence was located within the former RT-field. Two patients developed tumor progression at 6 months, and in one patient the tumor remained stable for 67 months. In patients with head-and-neck tumors, three patients developed local tumor progression at 12, 24 and 29 months after re-irradiation. Median local progression-free survival was 24 months. For sacral tumors, re-irradiation offered palliation with tumor control for 24 and 36 months.

CONCLUSION

Due to the physical characteristics particle therapy offers a new treatment modality in cases with tumor recurrences. With carbon ions, the additional biological benefits may be exploited for long-term tumor control. Further evaluation in a larger patients' cohort will be performed in the future.

Salvage reirradiaton with stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally recurrent head-and-neck tumors

PURPOSE

In this study, we present our results of reirradiation of locally recurrent head-and-neck cancer with image-guided, fractionated, frameless stereotactic body radiotherapy technique.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From July 2007 to February 2009, 46 patients were treated using the CyberKnife (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA) at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. All patients had recurrent, unresectable, and previously irradiated head-and-neck cancer. The most prominent site was the nasopharynx (32.6%), and the most common histopathology was epidermoid carcinoma. The planning target volume was defined as the gross tumor volume identified on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. There were 22 female and 24 male patients. Median age was 53 years (range, 19-87 years). The median tumor dose with stereotactic body radiotherapy was 30 Gy (range, 18-35 Gy) in a median of five (range, one to five) fractions.

RESULTS

Of 37 patients whose response to therapy was evaluated, 10 patients (27%) had complete tumor regression, 11 (29.8%) had partial response, and 10 (27%) had stable disease. Ultimate local disease control was achieved in 31 patients (83.8%). The overall survival was 11.93 months in median (ranged, 11.4-17.4 months), and the median progression free survival was 10.5 months. One-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 41% and 46%, respectively. Grade II or greater long-term complications were observed in 6 (13.3%) patients. On follow-up, 8 (17.3%) patients had carotid blow-out syndrome, and 7 (15.2%) patients died of bleeding from carotid arteries. We discovered that this fatal syndrome occurred only in patients with tumor surrounding carotid arteries and carotid arteries receiving all prescribed dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an appealing treatment option for patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer previously treated with radiation to high doses. Good local control with considerable 1-year survival is achieved with a relatively high rate of morbidity and related mortality.

Fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of previously-irradiated recurrent head and neck carcinoma: updated report of the University of Pittsburgh experience

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with recurrent previously irradiated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (rSCCHN).

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with 85 patients who received SBRT for rSCCHN between January 2003 and May 2008. The mean dose of SBRT was 35 Gy (range: 15-44 Gy). The following end points were evaluated: tumor response, time-to-progression, acute and late toxicities, local control (LC) rates and impact of tumor dose and tumor size on LC, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of all patients was 6 months (range: 1.3-39 months). For those patients who were alive at last follow-up (40%) the median follow-up was 17.6 months. The mean total dose of prior radiation to the primary site was 74 Gy (range: 32-170 Gy). Those patients who received SBRT <35 Gy had significantly lower LC than those with > or =35 Gy at 6 months the median follow-up time (P = 0.014). Tumor responses were 34% complete response, 34% partial response, 20% stable disease, and 12% progressive disease. Among those with an initial tumor response followed by progression (58 patients), there was a median interval of 5.5 months for time-to-progression. The 1-year and 2-year LC and overall survival rates for all patients were 51.2% and 30.7%, and 48.5% and 16.1%, respectively. Overall, the median survival for all patients was 11.5 months (range: 3-51). Treatment was well-tolerated with no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT is feasible and safe with minimal toxicities for treatment of rSCCHN patients with prior radiation therapy deemed to be poor candidates for re-irradiation by conventional means.