1
|
Dutta SK, Girotra M, Singla M, Dutta A, Otis Stephen F, Nair PP, Merchant NB. Serum HSP70: a novel biomarker for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2012; 41:530-4. [PMID: 22158074 PMCID: PMC4193547 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e3182374ace] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) is overexpressed in human pancreatic cancer cell lines. To determine if serum HSP70 levels are elevated in patients with pancreatic cancer and can function as a biomarker for early detection of pancreatic cancer. METHODS Study subjects were divided into 3 groups: histologically proven pancreatic cancer (PC; n = 23), chronic pancreatitis (CP; n = 12), and matched normal control subjects (C; n = 10). Serum HSP70 levels were determined using a novel immunoelectrophoresis method developed and validated by the authors. Significance of difference between the groups was analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to discriminate patients with pancreatic cancer from normal controls. RESULTS The mean ± SE serum HSP70 levels in the PC, CP, and C groups were 1.68 ± 0.083 ng/mL, 0.40 ± 0.057 ng/mL, and 0.04 ng/mL, respectively. Serum HSP70 levels in the PC group were significantly higher compared with either the CP or C groups (P < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of elevated serum HSP70 in the PC group was 74% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Serum HSP70 levels are significantly increased in patients with pancreatic cancer and may be useful as an additional biomarker for the detection of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudhir K Dutta
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang G, Schetter A, He P, Funamizu N, Gaedcke J, Ghadimi BM, Ried T, Hassan R, Yfantis HG, Lee DH, Lacy C, Maitra A, Hanna N, Alexander HR, Hussain SP. DPEP1 inhibits tumor cell invasiveness, enhances chemosensitivity and predicts clinical outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 2012; 7:e31507. [PMID: 22363658 PMCID: PMC3282755 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2011] [Accepted: 01/12/2012] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide. To identify biologically relevant genes with prognostic and therapeutic significance in PDAC, we first performed the microarray gene-expression profiling in 45 matching pairs of tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues from resected PDAC cases. We identified 36 genes that were associated with patient outcome and also differentially expressed in tumors as compared with adjacent non-tumor tissues in microarray analysis. Further evaluation in an independent validation cohort (N = 27) confirmed that DPEP1 (dipeptidase 1) expression was decreased (T:N ratio ∼0.1, P<0.01) in tumors as compared with non-tumor tissues. DPEP1 gene expression was negatively correlated with histological grade (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.35, P = 0.004). Lower expression of DPEP1 in tumors was associated with poor survival (Kaplan Meier log rank) in both test cohort (P = 0.035) and validation cohort (P = 0.016). DPEP1 expression was independently associated with cancer-specific mortality when adjusted for tumor stage and resection margin status in both univariate (hazard ratio = 0.43, 95%CI = 0.24-0.76, P = 0.004) and multivariate analyses (hazard ratio = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.27-0.94, P = 0.032). We further demonstrated that overexpression of DPEP1 suppressed tumor cells invasiveness and increased sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agent Gemcitabine. Our data also showed that growth factor EGF treatment decreased DPEP1 expression and MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 increased DPEP1 expression in vitro, indicating a potential mechanism for DPEP1 gene regulation. Therefore, we provide evidence that DPEP1 plays a role in pancreatic cancer aggressiveness and predicts outcome in patients with resected PDAC. In view of these findings, we propose that DPEP1 may be a candidate target in PDAC for designing improved treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geng Zhang
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Aaron Schetter
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Peijun He
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Naotake Funamizu
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jochen Gaedcke
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
| | - B. Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Ried
- Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Harris G. Yfantis
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Dong H. Lee
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Curtis Lacy
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Anirban Maitra
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nader Hanna
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Department of Surgery and the Marlene, School of Medicine, Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - H. Richard Alexander
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Department of Surgery and the Marlene, School of Medicine, Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - S. Perwez Hussain
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Screening technologies for target identification in pancreatic cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2010; 3:79-90. [PMID: 24212607 PMCID: PMC3756350 DOI: 10.3390/cancers3010079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2010] [Revised: 12/21/2010] [Accepted: 12/23/2010] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer exhibits an extraordinarily high level of resistance to almost any kind of systemic therapy evaluated in clinical trials so far. Therefore, the identification of novel therapeutic targets is urgently required. High-throughput screens have emerged as an important tool to identify putative targets for diagnosis and therapy in an unbiased manner. More than a decade ago, microarray technology was introduced to identify differentially expressed genes in pancreatic cancer as compared to normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis and other cancer types located in close proximity to the pancreas. In addition, proteomic screens have facilitated the identification of differentially secreted proteins in body fluids of pancreatic cancer patients, serving as possible biomarkers. Recently, RNA interference-based loss-of-function screens have been used to identify functionally relevant genes, whose knock-down has impact on pancreatic cancer cell viability, thereby representing potential new targets for therapeutic intervention. This review summarizes recent results of transcriptional, proteomic and functional screens in pancreatic cancer and discusses potentials and limitations of the respective technologies as well as their impact on future therapeutic developments.
Collapse
|
4
|
Stratford JK, Bentrem DJ, Anderson JM, Fan C, Volmar KA, Marron JS, Routh ED, Caskey LS, Samuel JC, Der CJ, Thorne LB, Calvo BF, Kim HJ, Talamonti MS, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Hollingsworth MA, Perou CM, Yeh JJ. A six-gene signature predicts survival of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PLoS Med 2010; 7:e1000307. [PMID: 20644708 PMCID: PMC2903589 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2010] [Accepted: 06/03/2010] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a lethal disease. For patients with localized PDAC, surgery is the best option, but with a median survival of less than 2 years and a difficult and prolonged postoperative course for most, there is an urgent need to better identify patients who have the most aggressive disease. METHODS AND FINDINGS We analyzed the gene expression profiles of primary tumors from patients with localized compared to metastatic disease and identified a six-gene signature associated with metastatic disease. We evaluated the prognostic potential of this signature in a training set of 34 patients with localized and resected PDAC and selected a cut-point associated with outcome using X-tile. We then applied this cut-point to an independent test set of 67 patients with localized and resected PDAC and found that our signature was independently predictive of survival and superior to established clinical prognostic factors such as grade, tumor size, and nodal status, with a hazard ratio of 4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-10.0). Patients defined to be high-risk patients by the six-gene signature had a 1-year survival rate of 55% compared to 91% in the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS Our six-gene signature may be used to better stage PDAC patients and assist in the difficult treatment decisions of surgery and to select patients whose tumor biology may benefit most from neoadjuvant therapy. The use of this six-gene signature should be investigated in prospective patient cohorts, and if confirmed, in future PDAC clinical trials, its potential as a biomarker should be investigated. Genes in this signature, or the pathways that they fall into, may represent new therapeutic targets. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeran K. Stratford
- Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - David J. Bentrem
- Department of Surgery and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Judy M. Anderson
- The Eppley Cancer Institute, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Cheng Fan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Keith A. Volmar
- Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - J. S. Marron
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth D. Routh
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Laura S. Caskey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jonathan C. Samuel
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Channing J. Der
- Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Leigh B. Thorne
- Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Benjamin F. Calvo
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Hong Jin Kim
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Mark S. Talamonti
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | | | - Charles M. Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jen Jen Yeh
- Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Duffy MJ, Sturgeon C, Lamerz R, Haglund C, Holubec VL, Klapdor R, Nicolini A, Topolcan O, Heinemann V. Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM) status report. Ann Oncol 2009; 21:441-447. [PMID: 19690057 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 246] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the most difficult malignancies to diagnose and treat. The aim of this article is to review how tumor markers can aid the diagnosis and management of patients with this malignancy. The most widely used and best validated marker for pancreatic cancer is CA 19-9. Inadequate sensitivity and specificity limit the use of CA 19-9 in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In non-jaundiced patients, however, CA 19-9 may complement other diagnostic procedures. In patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, presurgical and postresection CA 19-9 levels correlate with overall survival. In advanced disease, elevated pretreatment levels of CA 19-9 are associated with adverse patient outcome and thus may be combined with other factors for risk stratification. Most, but not all, reports indicate that serial levels of CA 19-9 correlate with response to systemic therapy. Use of CA 19-9 kinetics in conjunction with imaging is therefore recommended in monitoring therapy. Although several potential serum and tissue markers for pancreatic cancer are currently undergoing evaluation, none are sufficiently validated for routine clinical use. CA 19-9 thus remains the serum pancreatic cancer marker against which new markers for this malignancy should be judged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Duffy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin; UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - C Sturgeon
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - R Lamerz
- Medical Klinik II, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | - C Haglund
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - V L Holubec
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - R Klapdor
- Centre for Clinical and Experimental Tumour Diagnosis and Therapy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Nicolini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - O Topolcan
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - V Heinemann
- Medical Clinic III, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a deadly disease with an annual incidence rate nearly equal to its mortality rate. Incremental improvement in outcome has been seen in the last 25 years, illustrating the critical need for novel approaches and intensive research investment. Expression profiling of pancreatic cancers has led to an explosion of informative gene-expression changes and the identification of new diagnostic and prognostic markers. However, the search for genes that are of functional significance in these large datasets continues to be much more challenging. One approach to focusing on genes or pathways that are likely to be more biologically relevant is to study those that are of prognostic significance. This review will therefore focus on the advantages of a prognostic gene signature for pancreatic cancer, the advances that have been made thus far, the approaches used and the challenges that remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen Jen Yeh
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Surgical Oncology, Campus Box 7213, 1150 POB, 170 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|