1
|
Ndjembidouma BCM, James LG, Meye PO, Loembamouandza SY, Belembaogo E, Ben-Bolie GH. Assessment of rectal toxicities after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: experience of the Akanda Cancer Institute in Gabon. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:636-645. [PMID: 38179290 PMCID: PMC10764052 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.97507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose was to evaluate the incidence of acute and late rectal toxicities and their correlation with the clinical and dosimetric parameters of patients who underwent curative radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer at the Akanda Cancer Institute, Gabon. Materials and methods Between 2013 and 2021, a cohort of 46 patients with clinically localized stage cT1c-T4 prostate cancer was treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) at the national cancer institute with doses ranging from 66 to 80 Gy. Post-radiation gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were classified and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CTCAE v4.0. Results In our study, 17.4% (8/46) developed acute GI. Grades 1 and 3 acute GI complications were seen in 13.0% (6/46) and 4.3% (2/46), respectively. No patient developed acute grade 2 or grade higher than 3 complications. Late GI side effects were limited. The median time to the development of late GI Grade ≥ 1 toxicities was 12 months (range: 9-19 months). 10.9% (5/46) had experience late GI. Among them, grade 1 and 2 were seen in 6.5% (3/46), and 4.3% (2/46), respectively. There was no grade 3 or higher complications. Statistically, we did not find any correlation between the presence of rectal toxicity and clinical factors or the presence of comorbidity. On the dosimetric level, the Mann-Whitney statistical test found a correlation between the presence of late GI toxicity and rectal volume irradiated at the prescribed dose (p = 0.02). Conclusion Despite the high radiation doses involved, our results showed an acceptable complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beaud Conrad Mabika Ndjembidouma
- Departement of Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Akanda Cancer Institute, Libreville, Gabon
- Laboratory of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroun
| | | | - Phillippe Ondo Meye
- General Directorate for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety, Ministery of Energy and Hydraulic Resources, Libreville Gabon
- Laboratory of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroun
| | | | - Ernest Belembaogo
- Departement of Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Akanda Cancer Institute, Libreville, Gabon
| | - Germain Hubert Ben-Bolie
- Laboratory of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroun
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rectal Dose Is the Other Dosimetric Factor in Addition to Small Bowel for Prediction of Acute Diarrhea during Postoperative Whole-Pelvic Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Gynecologic Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030497. [PMID: 33525461 PMCID: PMC7865679 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although the small bowel volume effect for acute diarrhea during radiotherapy has been investigated, no study has reported the influence of rectal dose. We analyzed 108 patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy after hysterectomy. Acute diarrhea was defined as onset during radiotherapy based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3. Both small bowel and rectum dosimetric parameters affected Grade 2 to 3 diarrhea. The high-dose volume effects on the small bowel still play an important role in postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy. This is the first large cohort study to demonstrate the role of both IMRT dosimetric factors of the rectum and the small bowel in acute diarrhea in gynecological patients with a previous hysterectomy. A small bowel volume of 39.6 Gy < 60 mL and a mean rectal dose of <32.75 Gy are suggested as constraints to treatment planning. Abstract We studied the association of rectal dose with acute diarrhea in patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing whole-pelvic (WP) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). From June 2006 to April 2019, 108 patients with previous hysterectomy who underwent WP IMRT were enrolled in this cohort study. WP irradiation of 39.6–45 Gy/22–25 fractions was initially delivered to the patients. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3 was used to evaluate acute diarrhea during radiotherapy. Small bowel volume at different levels of isodose curves (Vn%) and mean rectal dose (MRD) were measured for statistical analysis. The multivariate analysis showed that the MRD ≥ 32.75 Gy (p = 0.005) and small bowel volume of 100% prescribed (V100%) ≥ 60 mL (p = 0.008) were independent factors of Grade 2 or higher diarrhea. The cumulative incidence of Grade 2 or higher diarrhea at 39.6 Gy were 70.5%, 42.2%, and 15.0% (p < 0.001) in patients with both high (V100% ≥ 60 mL and MRD ≥ 32.75 Gy), either high, and both low volume-dose factors, respectively. Strict constraints for the rectum/small bowel or image-guided radiotherapy to reduce these doses are suggested.
Collapse
|
3
|
Haekal M, Arimura H, Hirose TA, Shibayama Y, Ohga S, Fukunaga J, Umezu Y, Honda H, Sasaki T. Computational analysis of interfractional anisotropic shape variations of the rectum in prostate cancer radiation therapy. Phys Med 2018. [PMID: 29519405 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the uncertainties of the rectum due to anisotropic shape variations by using a statistical point distribution model (PDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS The PDM was applied to the rectum contours that were delineated on planning computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) at 80 fractions of 11 patients. The standard deviations (SDs) of systematic and random errors of the shape variations of the whole rectum and the region in which the rectum overlapped with the PTV (ROP regions) were derived from the PDMs at all fractions of each patient. The systematic error was derived by using the PDMs of planning and average rectum surface determined from rectum surfaces at all fractions, while the random error was derived by using a PDM-based covariance matrix at all fractions of each patient. RESULTS Regarding whole rectum, the population SDs were larger than 1.0 mm along all directions for random error, and along the anterior, superior, and inferior directions for systematic error. The deviation is largest along the superior and inferior directions for systematic and random errors, respectively. For ROP regions, the population SDs of systematic error were larger than 1.0 mm along the superior and inferior directions. The population SDs of random error for the ROP regions were larger than 1.0 mm except along the right and posterior directions. CONCLUSIONS The anisotropic shape variations of the rectum, especially in the ROP regions, should be considered when determining a planning risk volume (PRV) margins for the rectum associated with the acute toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Haekal
- Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Arimura
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
| | - Taka-Aki Hirose
- Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yusuke Shibayama
- Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Saiji Ohga
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Junichi Fukunaga
- Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Umezu
- Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Honda
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Tomonari Sasaki
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prabhakar R, Oates R, Jones D, Kron T, Cramb J, Foroudi F, Geso M, Gill S. A study on planning organ at risk volume for the rectum using cone beam computed tomography in the treatment of prostate cancer. Med Dosim 2014; 39:38-43. [PMID: 24412028 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2012] [Revised: 09/18/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we analyzed planning organ at risk volume (PRV) for the rectum using a series of cone beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) acquired during the treatment of prostate cancer and evaluated the dosimetric effect of different PRV definitions. Overall, 21 patients with prostate cancer were treated radically with 78Gy in 39 fractions had in total 418 CBCTs, each acquired at the end of the first 5 fractions and then every alternate fraction. The PRV was generated from the Boolean sum volume of the rectum obtained from first 5 fractions (PRV-CBCT-5) and from all CBCTs (PRV-CBCT-All). The PRV margin was compared at the superior, middle, and inferior slices of the contoured rectum to compare PRV-CBCT-5 and PRV-CBCT-All. We also compared the dose received by the planned rectum (Rectum-computed tomography [CT]), PRV-CBCT-5, PRV-CBCT-All, and average rectum (CBCT-AV-dose-volume histogram [DVH]) at critical dose levels. The average measured rectal volume for all 21 patients for Rectum-CT, PRV-CBCT-5, and PRV-CBCT-All was 44.3 ± 15.0, 92.8 ± 40.40, and 121.5 ± 36.7cm(3), respectively. For PRV-CBCT-All, the mean ± standard deviation displacement in the anterior, posterior, right, and left lateral directions in centimeters was 2.1 ± 1.1, 0.9 ± 0.5, 0.9 ± 0.8, and 1.1 ± 0.7 for the superior rectum; 0.8 ± 0.5, 1.1 ± 0.5, 1.0 ± 0.5, and 1.0 ± 0.5 for the middle rectum; and 0.3 ± 0.3; 0.9 ± 0.5; 0.4 ± 0.2, and 0.5 ± 0.3 for the inferior rectum, respectively. The first 5 CBCTs did not predict the PRV for individual patients. Our study shows that the PRV margin is different for superior, middle, and the inferior parts of the rectum, it is wider superiorly and narrower inferiorly. A uniform PRV margin does not represent the actual rectal variations during treatment for all treatment fractions. The large variation in interpatient rectal size implies a potential role for adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramachandran Prabhakar
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Richard Oates
- Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daryl Jones
- Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jim Cramb
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Suki Gill
- Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gray PJ, Paly JJ, Yeap BY, Sanda MG, Sandler HM, Michalski JM, Talcott JA, Coen JJ, Hamstra DA, Shipley WU, Hahn SM, Zietman AL, Bekelman JE, Efstathiou JA. Patient-reported outcomes after 3-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, or proton beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 2013; 119:1729-35. [PMID: 23436283 PMCID: PMC3759976 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2012] [Revised: 12/08/2012] [Accepted: 12/11/2012] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have suggested differing toxicity patterns for patients with prostate cancer who receive treatment with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), or proton beam therapy (PBT). METHODS The authors reviewed patient-reported outcomes data collected prospectively using validated instruments that assessed bowel and urinary quality of life (QOL) for patients with localized prostate cancer who received 3DCRT (n = 123), IMRT (n = 153) or PBT (n = 95). Clinically meaningful differences in mean QOL scores were defined as those exceeding half the standard deviation of the baseline mean value. Changes from baseline were compared within groups at the first post-treatment follow-up (2-3 months from the start of treatment) and at 12 months and 24 months. RESULTS At the first post-treatment follow-up, patients who received 3DCRT and IMRT, but not those who received PBT, reported a clinically meaningful decrement in bowel QOL. At 12 months and 24 months, all 3 cohorts reported clinically meaningful decrements in bowel QOL. Patients who received IMRT reported clinically meaningful decrements in the domains of urinary irritation/obstruction and incontinence at the first post-treatment follow-up. At 12 months, patients who received PBT, but not those who received IMRT or 3DCRT, reported a clinically meaningful decrement in the urinary irritation/obstruction domain. At 24 months, none of the 3 cohorts reported clinically meaningful changes in urinary QOL. CONCLUSIONS Patients who received 3DCRT, IMRT, or PBT reported distinct patterns of treatment-related QOL. Although the timing of toxicity varied between the cohorts, patients reported similar modest QOL decrements in the bowel domain and minimal QOL decrements in the urinary domains at 24 months. Prospective randomized trials are needed to further examine these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan J. Paly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beow Y. Yeap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Martin G. Sanda
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Howard. M. Sandler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeff M. Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - John J. Coen
- Hartford Radiation Oncology Associates, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Daniel A. Hamstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - William U. Shipley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen M. Hahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anthony L. Zietman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Justin E. Bekelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason A. Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|