Validation of Neuropsychological Tests to Screen for Dementia in Chinese Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Influence of cognitive reserve on cognitive and motor function in α-synucleinopathies: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis

Cognitive reserve has shown promise as a justification for neuropathologically unexplainable clinical outcomes in Alzheimer's disease. Recent evidence suggests this effect may be replicated in conditions like Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. However, the relationships between cognitive reserve and different cognitive abilities, as well as motor outcomes, are still poorly understood in these conditions. Additionally, it is unclear whether the reported effects are confounded by medication. This review analysed studies investigating the relationship between cognitive reserve and clinical outcomes in these α-synucleinopathy cohorts, identified from MEDLINE, Scopus, psycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science. 85 records, containing 176 cognition and 31 motor function effect sizes, were pooled using multilevel meta-analysis. There was a significant, positive association between higher cognitive reserve and both better cognition and motor function. Cognition effect sizes differed by disease subtype, cognitive reserve measure, and outcome type; however, no moderators significantly impacted motor function. Review findings highlight the clinical implications of cognitive reserve and importance of engaging in reserve-building behaviours.

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease

Background: Impulse control and related disorders (ICRDs) have gained recognition as a severe complication of Parkinson's disease (PD) and are connected to poor quality of life and devastating financial and social problems. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease (QUIP) and estimate the risk factors for ICRDs in Chinese patients with PD. Methods: 207 PD patients were assessed using the QUIP and evaluated for PD motor and nonmotor symptoms. ICRDs were diagnosed via interviews of patients or their caregivers, and the clinical characteristics of patients with and without ICRDs were compared. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the C-QUIP were 95.0, 83.4, 38.0, 99.4, and 84.5%. The prevalence of each disorder among participants diagnosed via interview was pathological gambling (0.5%), hypersexuality (1.9%), compulsive shopping (1.0%), binge eating (3.9%), hobbyism (1.9%), punding (0.5%), walkabout (0.5%), and dopamine dysregulation syndrome (2.9%). PD patients with ICRDs had longer PD duration, higher Hoehn and Yahr stage, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS), and Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale (HAMD). Also, they received a larger total daily levodopa equivalent dose (LED), levodopa dosage, and dopamine agonist only LED (DA-LED) than did PD patients without ICRDs. Conclusions: Given its psychometric properties, the C-QUIP is a valid and rapid screening instrument for assessing of ICRDs in PD patients. Higher Hoehn and Yahr staging, NMSS and HAMD scores, a larger mean LED and levodopa dosage are risk factors for ICRDs.

A Systematic Review of Neuropsychological Tests for the Assessment of Dementia in Non-Western, Low-Educated or Illiterate Populations

OBJECTIVE

Neuropsychological tests are important instruments to determine a cognitive profile, giving insight into the etiology of dementia; however, these tests cannot readily be used in culturally diverse, low-educated populations, due to their dependence upon (Western) culture, education, and literacy. In this review we aim to give an overview of studies investigating domain-specific cognitive tests used to assess dementia in non-Western, low-educated populations. The second aim was to examine the quality of these studies and of the adaptations for culturally, linguistically, and educationally diverse populations.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed using six databases, without restrictions on the year or language of publication.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies were included, stemming mainly from Brazil, Hong Kong, Korea, and considering Hispanics/Latinos residing in the USA. Most studies focused on Alzheimer's disease (n = 17) or unspecified dementia (n = 16). Memory (n = 18) was studied most often, using 14 different tests. The traditional Western tests in the domains of attention (n = 8) and construction (n = 15), were unsuitable for low-educated patients. There was little variety in instruments measuring executive functioning (two tests, n = 13), and language (n = 12, of which 10 were naming tests). Many studies did not report a thorough adaptation procedure (n = 39) or blinding procedures (n = 29).

CONCLUSIONS

Various formats of memory tests seem suitable for low-educated, non-Western populations. Promising tasks in other cognitive domains are the Stick Design Test, Five Digit Test, and verbal fluency test. Further research is needed regarding cross-cultural instruments measuring executive functioning and language in low-educated people.

Can MoCA and MMSE Be Interchangeable Cognitive Screening Tools? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cognitive disorders may be an early sign of neuropsychiatric disorders; however, it remains unclear whether the screening measures are interchangeable. The aim of this study was to contrast the most commonly used screening tools-Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)-for early detection of neurocognitive disorder (NCD).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study presents a descriptive systematic review and informative literature according to the Cochrane Foundation's guidelines. The keywords "Mini-Mental State Examination" and "Montreal Cognitive Assessment" were searched in the Web of Science, SciELO, and LILACS databases.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were selected including a total sample of 11,870 participants (8,360 clinical patients and 3,510 healthy controls). Most studies were published in the past 5 years using a cross-sectional design, carried out across the world. They were organized by age ranges (18-69 years and 20-89 years), years of schooling, and mental status (with and without mental and behavior disorders). Sixteen of 18 studies had participants aged 18-69 years, and 21 out of 33 studies within the older set suggested that the MoCA is a more sensitive tool for detecting NCD.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Thirty-seven studies suggested that the MoCA is a more sensitive tool for NCD detection because it assesses executive function and visuospatial abilities. Some individuals who demonstrated normal cognitive function on the MMSE had lower performance on the MoCA. However, it seems necessary to establish different cutoffs based on years of schooling to avoid false positives. Future studies should contrast MoCA with other screening tools designed for NCD assessment.