A Review on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening by Artificial Intelligence Methods

PURPOSE

With the increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), the importance of early screening and diagnosis has been subject to considerable discussion. Given the subtle differences between ASD children and typically developing children during the early stages of development, it is imperative to investigate the utilization of automatic recognition methods powered by artificial intelligence. We aim to summarize the research work on this topic and sort out the markers that can be used for identification.

METHODS

We searched the papers published in the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Medline, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Library, and EBSCO databases from 1st January 2013 to 13th November 2023, and 43 articles were included.

RESULTS

These articles mainly divided recognition markers into five categories: gaze behaviors, facial expressions, motor movements, voice features, and task performance. Based on the above markers, the accuracy of artificial intelligence screening ranged from 62.13 to 100%, the sensitivity ranged from 69.67 to 100%, the specificity ranged from 54 to 100%.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, artificial intelligence recognition holds promise as a tool for identifying children with ASD. However, it still needs to continually enhance the screening model and improve accuracy through multimodal screening, thereby facilitating timely intervention and treatment.

Quantifying Voice Characteristics for Detecting Autism

The presence of prosodic anomalies in autistic is recognized by experienced clinicians but their quantitative analysis is a cumbersome task beyond the scope of typical pen and pencil assessment. This paper proposes an automatic approach allowing to tease apart various aspects of prosodic abnormalities and to translate them into fine-grained, automated, and quantifiable measurements. Using a harmonic model (HM) of voiced signal, we isolated the harmonic content of speech and computed a set of quantities related to harmonic content. Employing these measures, along with standard speech measures such as loudness, we successfully trained machine learning models for distinguishing individuals with autism from those with typical development (TD). We evaluated our models empirically on a task of detecting autism on a sample of 118 youth (90 diagnosed with autism and 28 controls; mean age: 10.9 years) and demonstrated that these models perform significantly better than a chance model. Voice and speech analyses could be incorporated as novel outcome measures for treatment research and used for early detection of autism in preverbal infants or toddlers at risk of autism.