Sulodexide as Adjunctive Therapy in Diabetic Foot Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Treated With Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty

Sulodexide for Diabetic-Induced Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes are leading morbidities in the world population. They are responsible not only for increased mortality but also severe disabilities, which jeopardize quality of life (e.g., blindness, walking limitations, and renal failure requiring dialysis). The new antidiabetic agents (e.g., glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors) are increasingly recognized as breakthrough agents in the treatment of diabetes and prevention of diabetic complications. However, drugs effective in preventing and treating diabetic disabilities are still needed and sulodexide could be one of those able to address the unmet clinical needs of the new antidiabetic agents.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal. We also manually searched potentially relevant journals, conference proceedings, and journal supplements. Any study monitoring any effect of sulodexide in subjects with diabetes, in relation to renal, vascular, and ocular complication, was considered. Treatment effects were estimated using standardized mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs), and risk ratios (RRs), as appropriate. We calculated 95% confidence interval (CIs) and heterogeneity (Q, tau, and I²).

RESULTS

The search found 45 studies with 2817 participants (mean age 57 years; 63% male). The 26 randomized controlled studies included 2074 participants (mean age 58.8 years; 66% male). Sulodexide reduced the impact of diabetic retinopathy; increased the pain-free and maximal walking distance in peripheral arterial disease; accelerated the healing of diabetes-associated trophic ulcers; and decreased the rate of albumin excretion in subjects with nephropathy. The risk of adverse events (AEs) was not different between sulodexide and controls.

CONCLUSION

Sulodexide has a beneficial effect on the ocular, peripheral arterial disease, trophic ulcers, and renal complications of diabetes without increasing the risk of AEs.

Reducing hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins is one of the most common medical procedures performed in the Western world, and hyperpigmentation is one of the most frequent, dreaded, minor adverse events. There has recently been some interest in investigating the inflammatory response of the local endothelium after sclerotherapy and the possible benefits of venoactive drugs because of their pleiotropic properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether adding a venoactive drug (sulodexide) to the standard sclerotherapy treatment protocol for patients with varicose veins can reduce the occurrence of postsclerotherapy hyperpigmentation.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design. It included 720 patients with telangiectasia, reticular veins, or varicose veins who were candidates for sclerotherapy. Patients with reflux in deep system or saphenous veins were excluded. Group A consisted of 354 patients who received an oral dose of sulodexide twice a day for 7 days before scheduled sclerotherapy; the treatment then continued for 3 months. Group B consisted of 366 patients who received the standard sclerotherapy protocol. Polidocanol was used as the sclerosing agent, and 20 to 30 mm Hg compression stockings were used in both groups for 7 days. Control photographs were taken, and a follow-up examination took place after 1 month and 3 months. Computer software was used to analyze the treated area for incidence of hyperpigmentation, total area of hyperpigmentation, skin tone increase in the hyperpigmented area, vein disappearance, and incidence of major bleeding. The sample size was calculated to give a statistical power of 80%. Student t-test and the χ² test were used for comparative analyses, as appropriate. The level of significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 609 patients completed the 3-month follow-up: 312 in group A and 297 in group B. After 1 month, the incidence of hyperpigmentation was 8.7% in group A and 14.8% in group B (P = .01). Group A developed an average area of hyperpigmentation of 10.7% compared with 18.2% in group B (P = .01), and the skin tone of the hyperpigmented area was lower in group A than in group B (P = .02). However, the latter difference was not significant after 3 months. The overall vein disappearance rate was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows that by adding a venoactive drug (sulodexide) to the standard sclerotherapy protocol, the occurrence of hyperpigmentation is reduced without affecting the desired therapeutic vein elimination response.

A Review of Antithrombotic Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia After Endovascular Intervention

Endovascular intervention is often used to treat critical limb ischemia (CLI). Post-intervention treatment with antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy has reduced morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular complications. The purpose of this review is to shed light on the various pharmacologic treatment protocols for treating CLI following endovascular procedures. We reviewed the literature comparing outcomes after antithrombotic treatment for patients with CLI. We characterized antithrombotic therapies into three categories: (1) mono-antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) vs. dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), (2) MAPT vs. antiplatelet (AP) + anticoagulant (AC) therapy, and (3) AC vs. AP + AC therapy. Relevant results and statistics were extracted to determine differences in the rates of the following outcomes: (1) re-stenosis, (2) occlusion, (3) target limb revascularization (TLR), (4) major amputation, (5) major adverse cardiac events, (6) all-cause death, and (7) bleeding. Studies suggest that DAPT reduces post-surgical restenosis, TLR, and amputation for diabetic patients, without increasing major bleeding incidences, compared to MAPT. Also, AP + AC therapy provides overall superior efficacy, with no difference in bleeding incidences, compared to antiplatelet alone. Additionally, the effects were significant for restenosis, limb salvage, survival rates, and cumulative rate of above ankle amputation or death. These results suggest that treatment with DAPT and AP + AC might provide better outcomes than MAPT following the endovascular intervention for CLI, and that the ideal treatment may be related to the condition of the individual patient. However, the studies were few and heterogenous with small patient populations. Therefore, further large controlled studies are warranted to confirm these outcomes.

Medical adjunctive therapy for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this article is to systematically review the literature on medical adjunctive therapy for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for studies published between January 1st, 2009, and June 1st, 2019. Articles that studied medical treatment of CLTI patients and reported clinical outcomes were eligible. Main exclusion criteria were case reports <20 patients, incorrect publication type, and CLTI caused by Buerger disease. The primary end point was major amputation (above the ankle) in studies with a follow-up of ≥6 months. Secondary end points were other clinical end points such as death and wound healing. Study quality was assessed according to the Downs and Black checklist.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Included were 42 articles: four focused on antiplatelet therapy, five on antihypertensive medication, 6 on lipid-lowering therapy, 16 on stem cell therapy, three on growth factors, five on prostanoids, and one study each on cilostazol, glucose-lowering therapy, spinal cord stimulation, sulodexide, and hemodilution. Calcium channel blockers, iloprost, cilostazol, and hemodilution showed significant improvement of limb salvage, but data are limited. Stem cell therapy showed no significant improvement of limb salvage but could potentially improve wound healing. Antiplatelets, antihypertensives, and statins showed significantly lower cardiovascular events rates but not evident lower major amputation rates. The quality of the studies was fair to good.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain medical therapies serve to improve limb salvage next to revascularization in CLTI patients, whereas others are important in secondary prevention. Because high quality evidence is limited, further research is needed.