Conservative Surgery for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis is not Associated With Longer Survival Time Without Recurrence of Foot Ulcer When Compared With Amputation

Comparative Efficacy of Conservative Surgery vs Minor Amputation for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical intervention for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Conservative surgery-amputation-free resection of infected bone and soft tissues-is gaining traction as an alternative to minor amputation. Our primary objective was to explore the comparative effectiveness of conservative surgery and minor amputations in clinical failure risk 1 year after index intervention. We also aimed to explore microbiological recurrence at 1 year, and revision surgery risk over a 10-year study period.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center chart review of DFO patients undergoing either conservative surgery or minor amputation. We used multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates to explore the effect of surgical intervention on clinical failure (recurrent diabetic foot infection at surgical site within 1 year after index operation), microbiological recurrence at 1 year, and revision surgery risk over a 10-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

651 patients were included (conservative surgery, n = 121; minor amputation, n = 530). Clinical failure occurred in 34 (28%) patients in the conservative surgery group, and in 111 (21%) of the minor amputation group at 1 year (P = .09). After controlling for potential confounders, we found no association between conservative surgery and clinical failure at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.1). We found no between-group differences in microbiological recurrence at 1 year (conservative surgery: 8 [6.6%]; minor amputation: 33 [6.2%]; P = .25; adjusted HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5-2.6). Over the 10-year period, the conservative group underwent significantly more revision surgeries (conservative surgery: 85 [70.2%]; minor amputation: 252 [47.5%]; P < .01; adjusted HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8).

CONCLUSION

We found that with comorbidity-based patient selection, conservative surgery in the treatment of DFO was associated with the same rates of clinical failure and microbiological recurrence at 1 year, but with significantly more revision surgeries during follow-up, compared with minor amputations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative effectiveness study.

Clinical Features, Inflammatory Markers, and Limb Salvage in Older Adults with Diabetes-Related Foot Infections

Little information exists about diabetic foot infections (DFIs) in older patients. We hypothesize that older patients with DFIs have different clinical features and worse outcomes than younger patients. We conducted a prospective observational study consisting of a cohort of patients with diabetes and moderate to severe DFIs. Patients included in the cohort were dichotomized into two groups using percentile 75 (P75) of age as the cut-off value. Patients aged > P75 presented with more comorbidities and foot-related complications, a higher rate of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), worse renal function (higher values of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, and lower values of estimated glomerular filtration rate), and lower values of HbA1c compared with younger patients. Infection severity, microbiological features, and inflammatory markers were similar in both groups. In the multivariate analysis, minor amputations were associated with age > P75 (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-5.9, p <0.01), necrosis (OR = 4.2, 95% CI 1.8-10.1, p < 0.01), and CRP values (OR = 1.045, 95% CI 1.018-1.073, p < 0.01). Major amputations were associated with a history of amputation (OR = 4.7, 95% CI 1.3-16.7, p = 0.01), PAD (OR = 4.3, 95% CI 1.2-14.6, p = 0.01), and albumin values (OR = 0.344, 95% CI 0.130-0.913, p = 0.03). In conclusion, limb salvage can be achieved in older patients with diabetes-related foot infections at the same rate as in younger patients, despite the fact that they have more comorbidities and foot-related complications, a higher rate of PAD, and worse renal function.

Conservative surgical treatment for metatarsal osteomyelitis in diabetic foot: experience of two French centres

AIMS

Conservative surgery (CS) for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) consists in removing all or part of the infected bone tissues without amputation, in complement with antibiotic therapy. Data on CS for DFO therapy are scarce.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all DFO episodes treated with CS between 06/2007 and 12/2017. Remission was defined by the absence of soft-tissue infection, complete sustained (i.e. > 1 month) healing of the foot ulcer, favourable (i.e., stabilisation or improvement) radiological outcome, and no need for additional surgery during a 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

During the study period, 47 episodes (in 41 patients) were analysed. Excluding deaths (all unrelated to the DFO; n = 3) or loss to follow-up before 1 year (n = 5), the remission rate was 64.2%. Most failures occurred during the first 6 months (79%, 11/14). Patients who experienced failure had a higher rate of peripheral arterial disease with arterial stenosis than patients in remission (57% vs. 24%, P = 0.03), a higher C-reactive protein rate at admission (116 ± 112 mg/L vs. 48 ± 46 mg/L, P = 0.02), and a trend for a higher rate of abscesses (29% vs. 4%, P = 0.06). At 1-year follow-up, foot ulcers related to transfer lesion were identified in 25.5% of the cases. At the last follow-up (mean 3 ± 2 years), the remission rate was 23/25 (92%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that CS is a therapeutic option in patients with localised but severe DFO. Clinicians should, however, consider the necessity of revascularisation, and higher risk of failure if surgery is performed in patients presenting with acute foot infections.

Surgical Treatment of Diabetic Foot and Ankle Osteomyelitis

A review of the literature regarding the evaluation and management of osteomyelitis and discussion on clinical, radiographic, laboratory, and pathologic findings with both acute and chronic cases is presented. Cases illustrate the complexities that can typically present at an academic setting, which often require a stepwise approach and interdisciplinary collaboration. Surgical pearls and ancillary treatment of osteomyelitis highlight the technical challenges and surgeons' preferences.