Alloantigen system L affects the outcome of rous sarcomas

Immune effects of chicken non-MHC alloantigens

Alloantigen systems are a broad group of molecules found on various cell types, including erythrocytes and lymphocytes. These alloantigens, identified via specific polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies or molecular methods, have demonstrated effects on immune responses. Erythrocyte alloantigens include the A, B, C, D, E, H, I, J, K, L, N, P, and R systems. Highly polymorphic alloantigen B has been identified as the chicken major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The other twelve systems have a variable degree of polymorphism as well as impact on immune measurements or responses against pathogens. Selection for immune characters altered allele frequencies for particular alloantigen systems. Three lymphocyte alloantigens, Bu-1, Ly-4 and Th-1 have more limited polymorphism but still influence responses against viral pathogens, Rous sarcoma virus and Marek's disease. Together, these erythrocyte and lymphocyte systems contribute to the overall immunity. Identification of the specific alloantigen proteins remains crucial to understanding their immune contribution.

Nutritional modulation of immune function in broilers

Collaborative research efforts across disciplines typically result in more insight toward the hypothesis being tested due to the omnibus nature of the projects. For example, nutritional experiments evaluating a nutrient response will benefit greatly by incorporating biochemical, physiological, and immunological endpoints for measurement. Clearly, commercial poultry producers do not have the luxury of focusing on specific disciplines when field problems occur. Hence, in practice interplay exists among nutrition, genetics, management, and diseases. Dietary composition impacts immune function of the chicken. As research in the area of nutritional immunology has increased, it is becoming apparent that nutrient needs for immunity do not coincide with those for growth or skeletal tissue accretion. This review is not a comprehensive assessment of nutrient needs for immunity in the chicken. Rather, this review is concerned with nutritional modulation of immunity in broilers that offers insight for nutritionists and researchers to implement nutritional regimens to reduce the severity of disease and to test or validate nutritional regimens that heighten immunity. Nutritional modulation of the hen diet and in ovo nutrient modulation to improve chick immunity and disease resistance are discussed.

Resistance, susceptibility, and immunity to cecal coccidiosis: effects of B complex and alloantigen system L

This study examined alloantigen system L effects on resistance to initial infection and acquired immunity to Eimeria tenella infection in three B complex genotypes. Experimental progeny segregating for B and L genotypes were produced from pedigree matings of B2B5 L1L2 sires and dams. Chicks were weighed and inoculated with 30,000 E. tenella oocysts at 6 wk of age to evaluate resistance in four trials (n = 262). Immunity was studied in four additional trials (n = 244) by immunizing progeny with 500 E. tenella oocysts per day for 5 d beginning at 5 wk of age. Two weeks after the last immunization dose, the birds were weighed and challenged with 30,000 E. tenella oocysts. All birds were weighed again and scored for cecal lesion 6 d after the 30,000 oocyst dose challenge. Weight gain and cecal lesion scores were evaluated by ANOVA. Major histocompatibility (B) complex genotypes B2B2 and B5B5 did not affect resistance to initial challenge with E. tenella based on lesion score and weight gain. However, after immunization, the B5B5 and B2B5 genotypes had significantly lower cecal scores than the B2B2 genotype when the birds were rechallenged. Weight gain was not affected among immunized birds. No significant L system effects with or without immunization were detected. These results are consistent with previous research demonstrating B complex effects on immunity to cecal coccidiosis.